Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104802
題名: | 關於『破戒』中“可能表現”之探討 | 其他題名: | The Exploration of "kanoo" Expression in 『hakai』 | 作者: | 林綺雲 Lin, Chi-Ying |
貢獻者: | 日文系 | 關鍵詞: | 可能表現;「」型;「」型;「可能動詞」;移轉 “kanoo”expression;“reru”;“rareru”;“kanoodoosi”;Evolution |
日期: | Jun-1999 | 上傳時間: | 12-Dec-2016 | 摘要: | 關於『破戒』中“可能表現”之探討本稿以夏目漱石之作品『坊』同時期所寫的島崎藤村之作品『破戒』為例,探討該作品中“可能表現”之「」型、「」型以及「可能動詞」型的使用狀況。本研究得到的結論,與先前筆者對夏目漱石之作品『坊』的研究,結論是一致的:發現了甚多足以啟示由使用“可能表現”之「」型,移轉到使用「可能動詞」型的例子,也發現了即使移轉確實在進行,但仍有少數的“可能表現”之「」型,照常的被使用。但是否這就足以推斷,明治末期的作品都顯示出相同的移轉趨勢呢?作品個性不同,其間必然會有差異性存在吧?此課題將留待日後探討。 The article uses Simazaki. tooson`s 『hakai』which was in the same period as Natsume, sooseki`s 『bocchan』as an example to deal with“rareru”and“kanoodoosi”.Theconclusion I`ve got is the same as what I`ve got in my research about Natsume. sooseki`s『bocchan』and I got a few examples that could show the evolution from“reru”to“kanoodoosi”. The evolution did happen but some of the“kanoo”expression`s type“reru”were still used as before.Does it mean all the worke in late Meiji show the same trend of evolution? As long as the novelists` characters are different, there will be differences between then. This will be explored in fuaure studies. |
關聯: | 國立政治大學學報,78,115-153 | 資料類型: | article |
Appears in Collections: | 期刊論文 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
78-115-153.pdf | 2.66 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.