Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116183| 題名: | 以Instagram限時動態探討社會資本對幸福感的影響 The impact of social capital via Instagram stories upon well-being |
作者: | 徐華國 | 貢獻者: | 黃葳威 徐華國 |
關鍵詞: | Instagram限時動態 社會資本 關係維持 社會支持 幸福感 Stories of Instagram Social capital Relationship maintenance Social support Well-being |
日期: | 2018 | 上傳時間: | 2-Mar-2018 | 摘要: | 近年來社交媒體發展迅速，以Facebook為代表的社群網站已多次被證實在維繫線上與線下的人際互動上扮演舉足輕重的角色。而誕生至今近六年的時間，Instagram在各大社群數據排行中已擠進前五名。Instagram自身的社交與媒體屬性給用戶多樣的使用方式，使用者不僅可以透過Instagram進行人際互動累積社會資本，更能透過互動中獲得自身心理的幸福感。而近期Instagram新增的「限時動態」功能，更開創出一個新的社交模式，允許用戶更容易進行一對一的社交互動。\n\n本研究將以Instagram限時動態功能為主要的研究對象，檢驗Instagram限時動態使用強度、黏結型與橋接型社會資本與幸福感之間的關係。透過482份Instagram用戶的網路問卷調查發現，Instagram限時動態使用強度能夠顯著預測黏結型與橋接型社會資本。此外，透過橋接型與黏結型社會資本的累積更能顯著預測幸福感。研究更發現，用戶更能透過黏結型社會資本的累積獲得更高的心理幸福感。本研究為Instagram研究開闢新的研究取徑，引介過往文獻將社會資本與幸福感等概念融合至Instagram。 The rise of social media has changed the way people interact with each other. Literatures have examined social media such as how Facebook could help people maintain interpersonal interaction online and offline. And nearly six years after birth of Instagram, it has topped the first five rankings in major social media. Instagram`s own social and media attributes give users a variety of ways in which users can not only accumulate social capital through social interaction via Instagram, but also gain their own psychological well-being through interaction. The new function on “Stories” let Instagram create a new social model that makes it easier for users to engage in one-on-one social interactions.\n\nIn this study, we will use Stories of Instagram as the main research approach to examine the significance of usage intensity, bonding and bridging social capital, and well-being. Based on 482 internet questionnaire survey, this study finds that usage intensity indicates significance influence to bonding and bridging social capital. Bonding and bridging social capital indicate significance influence to well-being. The study also found that users are more likely to get a higher sense of psychological well-being through interaction with bonding social capital. This study opens up a new avenue for research on Instagram and quotes from past literatures such as Social Capital and Well-being integrating into Instagram. |
參考文獻: | Ahn, J. (2012). Teenagers’ experiences with social network sites: relationships to bridging and bonding social capital. The Information Society, 28 (2), 99-109.\nAndrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1994). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum.\nBradburn N.M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine. \nBaumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.\nBourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital". In JG Richardson (ed). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.\nBourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.\nBryant, F. B., & Veroff, J. (1982). The structure of psychological well-being: A sociohistorical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(4), 653-673.\nBurke, M., Kraut, R., & Marlow, C. (2011). Social captial on facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In D.Tab (Ed.), Proceedings of CHI 2011, ACM Confrence on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 571-580. NY:ACM.\nBurke, M., & Kraut, R. (2013). Using Facebook after losing a job: Differential benefits of strong and weak ties. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’13) (pp. 1419–1430). New York, NY: ACM Press.\nBurke, M., & Kraut, R. (2016) The Realtionshop Between Facebook Use and Well-Being Depends on Communication Type and Tie Strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21, 265-281.\nCaplan, G., & Killilea, M. (1976). Support System and Mental Help: Multidisciplinary Explorations, New York: Grune and Stratton.\nColeman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. The American Journal of Sociology ,94, 95-120.\nColeman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.\nCohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological bulletin, 98(2), 310-357.\nCohen, D., Prusak, L., & Prusak, L. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work (Vol. 15). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.\nCho, V. (2015). The Impacts of participating social networking sites: A Study of University students in Hong Kong and Wuhan in China. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 5(2), 181-212.\nDunbar, R. (1998). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Harvard University Press.\nDunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Cross, A. H. (1986). Mediating influences of social support: Personal, family, and child outcomes. American journal of mental deficiency.\nDuck, S. (2007). Human relationships. Los Angeles: Sage.\nDonath, J. S. (2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 231–251.\nDiener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (2010). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.\nDeAndrea, D. C., & Walther, J. B. (2011). Attributions for inconsistencies between online and offline self-presentations. Communication Research, 38(6), 805-825.\nDainton, M. (2013). Relationship maintenance on Facebook: Development of a measure, relationship to general maintenance, and relationship satisfaction. College Student Journal, 47, 113-121.\nEllison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook\n"friends:"Social Capital and college students` use of online social networksites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.\nEllison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873-892.\nEllison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855-870.\nFrison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2015). Toward an integrated and differential approach to the relationships between loneliness, different types of Facebook use and adolescents’ depressed mood. Communication Research (e-published ahead of print), 1-28. \nGranovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.\nGangadharbatla, H. (2008). Facebook me: Collective self-esteem, need to belong, and internet self-efficacy as predictors of the iGeneration’s attitudes toward social networking sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(2), 5–15. \nGreitemeyer T., Mügge D., & Bollermann I. (2014). Having Responsive Facebook Friends Affects the Satisfaction of Psychological Needs More Than Having Many Facebook Friends. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 252-258.\nHouse, J. S., Kahn, R. L., McLeod, J. D., & Williams, D. (1985). Measures and concepts of social support.\nHuang, C. (2010). Internet use and psychological well-being: A Meta-Analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 241–249.\nKoch, N. S., & Emrey, J. A. (2001). The Internet and opinion measurement: Surveying marginalized populations. Social Science Quarterly, 82(1), 131-138.\nLin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.\nLeary, M. R., Kelly, K. M., Cottrell, C. A., & Schreindorfer, L. S. (2001). “Individual differences in the need to belong”. Unpublished manuscript, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC. \nLee, E., Kim, Y. J., & Ahn, J. (2014). How do people use Facebook features to manage social capital? Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 440-445. \nLin, J. H. (2016). Need for relatedness: a self-determination approach to examining attachment styles, Facebook use, and psychological well-being. Asian Journal of Comminication, 26(2), 1-21.\nPutnam, R. D. (1995a). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78.\nPutnam, R. D. (1995b). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28, 664-683.\nPutnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.\nPortela, M., Neira, I., & del Mar Salinas-Jiménez, M. (2013). Social capital and subjective wellbeing in Europe: A new approach on social capital. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 493-511.\nPittman, M., Reich, B. (2016). Social Media and Loneliness: Why an Instagram Picture May Be Worth More Than a Thousnd Twiier Words. Computer in Human Behavior, 62, 155-167.\nPaige, S. R., Stellefson, M., Chaney, B. H., Chaney, D. J., Alber, J. M., Chappell, C., & Barry, A. E. (2017). Examining the Relationship between Online Social Capital and eHealth Literacy: Implications for Instagram Use for Chronic Disease Prevention among College Students. American Journal of Health Education, 1-14.\nPhua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. J. (2017). Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 115-122.\nRodríguez-Pose, A. and von Berlepsch V. (2014). Social Capital and Individual Happiness in Europe. Journal of Happiness Studies,15(2), 357-386.\nSteinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online soical network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 434-445.\nStafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991).Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender, and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217–242.\nSachs, J. D. (2015). Investing in social capital. World Happiness Report, 152-166.\nThoits, P. A.(1982). Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical problems in studying social support as a buffer against life stress. Journal of Health and Social behavior, 145-159.\nTracy, B. H. (1990). Sex roles and social support as moderators of life stress adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 576-585.\nThelwall, M., & Wilkinson, D. (2010). Public dialogs in social network sites: What is their purpose? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 392-404.\nTong, S., & Walther, J. B. (2011). Relational maintenance and CMC. Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships, 98-118.\nTrepte, S., Dienlin, T., & Reinecke, L. (2015). Influence of social support received in online and offline contexts on satisfaction with social support and satisfaction with life: A longitudinal study. Media Psychology, 18(1), 74-105.\nValenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students` Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation1. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication,14, 875-901.\nVitak, J., Ellison,N. B., & Steinfield, C. (2011). The ties that bond: Reexamining the relationship between facebook use and bonding social capital. In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Science 2011, 1-10.\nValkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 267.\nVitak, J. (2012). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 451-470.\nWalther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction a relational perspective. Communication research, 19(1), 52-90.\nWalsh, J. P., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L. S., & Hesse, B. W. (1992). Self-selected and randomly selected respondents in a computer network survey. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(2), 241-244.\nWalther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication research, 23(1), 3-43.\nWilliams, D. (2006). On and off the’Net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11, 593-628.\nYang, C. C. (2016). Instagram use, loneliness, and social comparison orientation: interact and browse on social media, but don`t compare. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(12), 703-708.\nZade, H. A., Habibi, L., Arabtani, T. R., Sarani, E. M., & Farpour, H. R. (2017). Functions of Social Networks in a Community of Cancer Patients: The Case of Instagram. International Journal of Networks and Communications, 7(4), 71-78.\n林玟君（2011）。〈Facebook使用者對資訊隱私態度之研究〉。中國文化大學新聞學系碩士論文。\n陳騏龍（2001）。《國小學童情緒智力與幸褔感、人際關係及人格特質之相關研究》。國立屏東師範學院碩士論文。\n黃國庭（2009）。《大學生的社會網絡網站使用行為與社會資本之關連性研究-以無名小站為例》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n鄭照順（1999）。青少年生活壓力與輔導，台北：心理出版社。\n鄭敏芝、蔡合和、洪秀婉、王文生、呂英傑、林哲如（2015）。〈使用用途與隱私政策對社群網站持續參與意圖影響之探討：以臉書（Facebook）為例〉，《企業管理學報》，106：59-79。 | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程 104464025 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104464025 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 402501.pdf | 714.01 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.