Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118769| 題名: | 健康保險能促進生育率嗎？臺灣全民健保對生育率的影響 Can Health Insurance Boost Fertility? The Fertility Effect of National Health Insurance in Taiwan |
作者: | 麥麗施 Mark, Elyse |
貢獻者: | 蘇昱璇 Su,Yu-Hsuan 麥麗施 Mark, Elyse |
關鍵詞: | 臺灣 全民健康保險 生育率 差異中之差異 Taiwan National health insurance Fertility Pronatalism Difference in differences |
日期: | 2018 | 上傳時間: | 19-Jul-2018 | 摘要: | 自1995年臺灣實施全民健康保險起，健保幾乎影響了所有臺灣居民的醫療選擇。臺灣的健保包括產前和產後檢查、分娩服務、兒童保健的費用補助，表明健保政策潛在的鼓勵生育性。本研究利用1995年全民健保的實施估計國家醫療保健對臺灣生育率的影響，首先用普通最小平方法估計完成生育子女數與健保以及其他的人口因素之間的相關性，並使用差異中之差異方法來估計健保實施對實驗組和對照組的影響。我們的數據來源是内政部1979年至2016年的婦女婚育與就業調查。我們假設1995年的健保政策減緩了臺灣婦女自1980年代開始的生育率下降趨勢。然而，普通最小平分析未能顯示健保與臺灣婦女生育率的正相關。此外，使用母親年齡和受孕時間作為截止點的差異中之差異估計也拒絕了通過健保降低生育成本會刺激臺灣生育的假設。 The implementation of Taiwanese National Health Insurance in 1995 affected almost every Taiwanese citizen’s healthcare options and coverage. Inclusion of low-cost prenatal and postnatal care, delivery services, and child healthcare coverage indicates the implicit pronatalism of NHI policy. Given the endogeneity of healthcare availability to childbearing decisions, this study uses the 1995 implementation of NHI to estimate the impact of national healthcare on Taiwanese fertility. We first approach this question using OLS regression to test for correlation between completed childbearing and an NHI dummy, among other demographic factors. In the second approach, difference-in-differences methodologies estimate the effect of 1995 NHI implementation on the treatment group of Taiwanese women and state-insured control group. Our data sources are the 1979-2016 waves of the Women’s Marriage, Fertility, and Employment Survey conducted by the Statistical Department of the Taiwanese Ministry of the Interior. We hypothesize that the 1995 NHI policy change increased the fertility of Taiwanese women around the cutoff date despite sub-replacement national fertility beginning in the 1980s. OLS analysis fails to show a positive correlation between NHI and women’s fertility in Taiwan, however. Further, DID estimations using a maternal age and a conception time both reject the hypothesis that lowered cost of childbearing through NHI stimulated Taiwanese fertility. |
參考文獻: | Ashraf, Q. H., Weil, D. N., & Wilde, J. (2013). The effect of fertility reduction on economic growth. Population and development review, 39(1), 97-130.\nBecker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209-240): Columbia University Press.\nBecker, G. S. (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time. The economic journal, 493-517.\nBecker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the Interaction between the Quantity and Quality of Children. Journal of political Economy, 81(2, Part 2), S279-S288.\nChang, M.-C. (2006). Taiwan`s Transition from High Fertility to Lowest Low Levels. Asian Journal of Health and Information Sciences, 1(1), 1-15.\nChang, M.-C., Freedman, R., & Sun, T.-H. (1987). Trends in fertility, family size preferences, and family planning practices in Taiwan, 1961-85. Studies in family Planning, 18(6), 320-337.\nChen, C.-S., Liu, T.-C., & Chen, L.-M. (2003). National Health Insurance and the antenatal care use: a case in Taiwan. Health policy, 64(1), 99-112.\nChen, K., & Yang, C. (2005). Nuptiality effects on fertility: A compositional analysis. Paper presented at the International Conference on Lowest Low Fertility and Response: The French Experience and East-Asian Realities. Taipei.\nChen, L., Chen, C.-L., & Yang, W.-C. (2008). The influences of Taiwan`s National Health Insurance on women`s choice of prenatal care facility: Investigation of differences between rural and non-rural areas. BMC health services research, 8(1), 67.\nChen, Y. (2015). The factors and implications of rising housing prices in Taiwan. Brookings Taiwan-US Quarterly Analysis.\nChesnais, J.-C. (1996). Fertility, family, and social policy in contemporary Western Europe. Population and development review, 729-739.\nChou, S.-Y., Grossman, M., & Liu, J.-T. (2014). The impact of national health insurance on birth outcomes: a natural experiment in Taiwan. Journal of Development Economics, 111, 75-91.\nChou, S.-Y., Liu, J.-T., & Hammitt, J. K. (2003). National health insurance and precautionary saving: evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Public Economics, 87(9-10), 1873-1894.\nDavis, K. (1945). The world demographic transition. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 237(1), 1-11.\nDeLeire, T., Lopoo, L. M., & Simon, K. I. (2011). Medicaid expansions and fertility in the United States. Demography, 48(2), 725-747.\nDemeny, P. (1986). Pronatalist policies in low-fertility countries: Patterns, performance, and prospects. Population and development review, 12, 335-358.\nDemeny, P. (2005). Ethical and political constraints on public choices in the field of fertility. Genus, 331-345.\nEasterlin, R. A. (1975). An economic framework for fertility analysis. Studies in family Planning, 6(3), 54-63.\nFeeney, G. (1991). Fertility decline in Taiwan: A study using parity progression ratios. Demography, 28(3), 467-479.\nFreedman, D. S. (1975). Consumption of modern goods and services and it`s relation to fertility: A study in Taiwan. The Journal of Development Studies, 12(1), 95-117.\nFreedman, R., Chang, M.-C., & Sun, T.-H. (1994). Taiwan`s transition from high fertility to below-replacement levels. Studies in family Planning, 317-331.\nFreedman, R., Hermalin, A. I., & Chang, M.-C. (1975). Do statements about desired family size predict fertility? the case of Taiwan, 1967–1970. Demography, 12(3), 407-416.\nFreedman, R., & Sun, T.-H. (1969). Taiwan: Fertility trends in a Crucial period of transition. Studies in family Planning, 1(44), 15-19.\nFrejka, T., & Zakharov, S. (2013). The apparent failure of Russia`s pronatalist family policies. Population and development review, 39(4), 635-647.\nGauthier, A. H. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: a review of the literature. Population research and policy review, 26(3), 323-346.\nHermalin, A. I. (1976). Empirical research in Taiwan on factors underlying differences in fertility. In Economic Factors in Population Growth (pp. 243-272): Springer.\nHoem, J. M. (2008). Overview Chapter 8: The impact of public policies on European fertility. Demographic research, 19(10), 249-260.\nJoyce, T., Kaestner, R., & Kwan, F. (1998). Is Medicaid pronatalist? The effect of eligibility expansions on abortions and births. Family Planning Perspectives, 108-127.\nKeng, S.-H., & Sheu, S.-J. (2011). Can education subsidy reverse falling fertility? The case of Taiwan. Journal of development studies, 47(11), 1677-1698.\nLai, N. M. S., & Tung, A.-C. (2015). Who supports the elderly? The changing economic lifecycle reallocation in Taiwan, 1985 and 2005. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 5, 63-68.\nLandry, A. (1987). Adolphe Landry on the demographic revolution. Population and development review, 13(4), 731-740.\nLee, G. H., & Lee, S. P. (2014). Childcare availability, fertility and female labor force participation in Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 32, 71-85.\nLee, M., & Lin, Y.-H. (2016). Transition from Anti-natalist to Pro-natalist Policies in Taiwan. In Low Fertility, Institutions, and their Policies (pp. 259-281): Springer.\nLee, S.-S. (2009). Low fertility and policy responses in Korea. The Japanese Journal of Population, 7(1), 57-70.\nLegge Jr, J. S., & Alford, J. R. (1986). Can government regulate fertility? An assessment of pronatalist policy in Eastern Europe. Western Political Quarterly, 39(4), 709-728.\nLeibowitz, A. (1990). The response of births to changes in health care costs. Journal of Human Resources, 697-711.\nLi, W. L. (1973). Temporal and spatial analysis of fertility decline in Taiwan. Population studies, 27(1), 97-104.\nLuoh, M.-C. (2007). The appearance and reality of declining total fertility rates in Taiwan. Journal of Taiwan Studies, 3, 37-60.\nMcDonald, P. (2002). Sustaining fertility through public policy: The range of options. Population, 57(3), 417-446.\nMilligan, K. (2005). Subsidizing the stork: New evidence on tax incentives and fertility. Review of Economics and statistics, 87(3), 539-555.\nMontgomery, M. R., & Casterline, J. B. (1993). The diffusion of fertility control in Taiwan: Evidence from pooled cross-section time-series models. Population studies, 47(3), 457-479.\nNakajima, R., & Tanaka, R. (2014). Estimating the effects of pronatal policies on residential choice and fertility. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 34, 179-200.\nNotestein, F. W. (1945). Population - The Long View. In T. W. Schultz (Ed.), Food for the World (pp. 36-57). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.\nParish, W. L., & Willis, R. J. (1993). Daughters, education, and family budgets Taiwan experiences. Journal of Human Resources, 863-898.\nRindfuss, R. R., & Brewster, K. L. (1996). Childrearing and fertility. Population and development review, 22, 258-289.\nRindfuss, R. R., Guilkey, D. K., Morgan, S. P., & Kravdal, Ø. (2010). Child‐Care Availability and Fertility in Norway. Population and development review, 36(4), 725-748.\nRutstein, S. O. (1974). The influence of child mortality on fertility in Taiwan. Studies in family Planning, 5(6), 182-188.\nSchmidt, L. (2007). Effects of infertility insurance mandates on fertility. Journal of health economics, 26(3), 431-446.\nSun, T.-H., Lin, H.-S., & Freedman, R. (1978). Trends in fertility, family size preferences, and family planning practice: Taiwan, 1961-76. Studies in family Planning, 9(4), 54-70.\nSzreter, S. (1993). The idea of demographic transition and the study of fertility change: a critical intellectual history. Population and development review, 659-701.\nVan de Kaa, D. J. (1987). The Idea of a Second Demographic Transition in Industrialized Countries. Paper presented at the Sixth Welfare Policy Seminar of the National Institute of Population and Social Security, Tokyo, Japan.\nVan de Kaa, D. J. (2001). Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behavior. Population and development review, 27, 290-331.\nWhittington, L. A., Alm, J., & Peters, H. E. (1990). Fertility and the personal exemption: implicit pronatalist policy in the United States. The American Economic Review, 80(3), 545-556.\nZaidi, B., & Morgan, S. P. (2017). The Second Demographic Transition: A Review and Appraisal. Annual Review of Sociology(0).\nZavodny, M., & Bitler, M. P. (2010). The effect of Medicaid eligibility expansions on fertility. Social Science & Medicine, 71(5), 918-924. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS) 105862023 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105862023 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 202301.pdf | 623.1 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.