Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119057
題名: 早期英語學習經驗與國小課室互動觀察之個案研究
A Case Study on Children`s Early English Learning Experiences and their Classroom Interaction
作者: 余黛君
Yu, Tai-Chun
貢獻者: 招靜琪
Chao, Chin-Chi
余黛君
Yu, Tai-Chun
關鍵詞: 英語學ˋ習經驗
課室互動
可供性
父母
生態語言教育觀
Experiences
Interaction
Affordance
Parents
Ecological
日期: 2018
上傳時間: 30-Jul-2018
摘要: 此研究旨在探究三位國小二年級學童早期的英語學習經驗。藉由觀察課室互動,探討其早期英語學習經驗於課室英語學習上的可供性,分析可供性形成的因素及有助於建構英語學習經驗的生態語言環境。\n研究初期,由筆者(亦即該班之級任兼英語教師)針對英語學習狀況,進行班級焦點對談、班親會討論以及班級問卷調查後,選出三位學習經驗迥異的學生為研究對象。個案英語學習經驗的建構過程,則透過與其父母的半結構式一對一面談以及學生的非正式訪談進行了解和驗證。二年級期間的課室互動經由錄影、學生學習日記、形成性及總結性評量、教師教學日誌進行觀察和紀錄,過程中以生態語言教育觀的可供性進行綜合分析。\n研究討論依縱軸和橫軸兩方向進行: 縱軸為課室活動、可供性與學童感知之間的衍生情況;橫軸為學童、可供性與課室環境之間的交互關係。研究分析顯示,課室互動中學童能覺察到的可供性,因其早期英語學習經驗的不同而有所差異。本研究因此進而建議:(一)、教師可依學童不同的早期英語學習經驗,創造多樣的可供性,營造優質的生態語言課室環境。(二)、學童可能因完全沒有或較少的英語學習經驗,在課室互動過程中顯得相對弱勢,需要教師敏銳地關注,給與更多的支持,維持平衡的課室互動學習生態。(三)、教師可提供父母便於使用的資源管道,增加其子女於課外接觸英語的機會,建構多樣化的英語學習生態環境。
As a global language, English represents a powerful medium of various resources that many parents in Asian EFL countries would like their children to access to as early as possible. Parents in Taiwan are no exceptions. In turn, children`s early English learning experiences are varied before the formal English learning begins at the elementary school level. These diverse EFL learning experiences inevitably interplay with the learners’ classroom interaction; however, most empirical EFL research focused on the results of learners’ academic achievements, relatively little is known about how EFL young learners’ English learning experiences are constructed, what their classroom interaction are, and the interrelationship between the two.\nThe aim of this research is to investigate three second graders’ early English learning experiences. In particular, it explores what affordances they perceived during the classroom interaction, analyzes how their early English learning experiences played a role in these affordances, which in turn gains a better understanding of constructing a balanced ecology of children’s early English learning.\nThe study followed a multi-data approach combining with two phases of resources. Phase I: In order to determine the three focused participants with varied early English learning experiences, this phase included: (1) a class discussion as a group interview, (2) the discussion during the parent-teacher meeting, and (3) a questionnaire with the class’s 24 parents. Phase II included: (4) semi-structured interviews with three focused participants’ parents, (5) informal interviews and conversations with the three participants, (6) video recorded classroom activities observation and field notes, (7) learning journals kept by the three focused participants, and (8) documentation such as worksheets and assignments. The social constructionist grounded theory proposed by Charmaz (2008) and the ecological approach developed by van Lier (2004) were adopted to analyze data.\nThe results revealed that the affordances learners could perceive during classroom interaction varied with their early English learning experiences. Cross-case analysis and discussion were presented in two different directions: (a) classroom activities, affordance, and perceptions and (b) agent (learner), affordance, and EFL class.\nIn conclusion, this study highlights the importance of constructing EFL children’s early English learning experiences both at and after school. Implications of the findings are: (1) EFL educators could apply the idea of affordance to provide learners of various experiences perceivable learning opportunities from the ecological perspective, (2) EFL young learners with little or no English learning experiences prior to elementary school need teachers’ attention for them during classroom interaction, and (3) EFL educators could provide parents with approachable access and resources for their children to access to a variety of English, constructing a balanced ecology of English learning outside school.
參考文獻: Bailey, K. M. (1996). Voices from the language classroom: Qualitative research in second language education. New York: Cambridge University Press.\nBeckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., & Ellis, N. C. Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position Paper. Language Learning, 59, 1-26.\nBorja, L. A., Soto, S. T., & Sanchez, T. X. (2015). Differentiating instruction for EFL learners. International Journal of Humanities and Social Scinece, 5(8), 30-36.\nBruner, J. S., & Haste, H. (2010). Making sense: The child`s construction of the world. New York: Routledge.\nButler, Y. G. (2013). Parental factors and early English education as a foreign language: A case study in Mainland China. Asia-Pacific Education, Language Minorities, and Migration (ELMM) Network Working Paper Series. 8.\nButler, Y. G. & Le, V.-N. (2017), A longitudinal investigation of parental social-economic status (SES) and young students’ learning of English as a foreign language. System, 73, 4-15.\nChang, Y. -f. (2008). Parents’ attitudes toward the English education policy in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(4), 423-435.\nCharmaz, Kathy (2008). Constructionism and the grounded theory. Handbook of Constructionist Research, 397-412.\nChen, A.-h. (2011). Parents` perspectives on the effects of the primary EFL education policy in Taiwan. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 205-224.\nChiang, L.-y. (2007). The study of the effects of early English learning experiences on third grade student’ English learning-A case study in an elementary school in Taipei county. (Master’s thesis), National Taipei University of Education, Taipei.\nChien, C.-w. (2012) Differentiated instruction in an Elementary school EFL classroom. TESOL Journal, 3(2), 280-291.\nCorpland, F., Garton S., & Burn, A. (2014) Challenges in Teaching English to Young Learners: Global Perspectives and Local Realities. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 738-762.\nCrystal, D. (2012). English as a global language. UK: Cambridge University Press.\nDörnyei, Z. (2009). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteritics and learning environment. Language Learning, 59(1), 230-248.\nDuff, P. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Taylor & Francis.\nFalout, J. (2012). Coping with demotivation: EFL learners` remotivation processes. TESL-EJ, 16(3), 403-417.\nGall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. Boston: Longman Publishing.\nGardner, H., & Hatch, T., (1989). Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 4-10.\nGarton, S., Copland, F., & Burns, A. (2011). Investigating global practices in teaching English to young learners. British Council ELT, 11, 1-29.\nGibson, J. J. (1979). The ecology approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.\nGross, M. (2007). Restoration and the origins of ecology. Restoration Ecology, 15(3), 375-376.\nHall, J. K., & Verplaetse, L. S. (2000). Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\nHe, T. H., Gou, W. J., & Chang, S. M. (2015). Parental involvement and elementary school students’ goals, maladaptive behaviors, and achievement in learning English as a foreign language. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 205-210.\nHeacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: How to reach and teach all learners, grade 3-12. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.\nHung, B. P. (2014). Improving EFL classroom interaction by understanding students’ learning styles. International Journal of Language and Linguistic, 2(6), 379-386.\nJenkins, J. (2009). English as a lingua franca: Interpretations and attitudes. World Englishes, 28(2), 200-207.\nKachru, B. B. (2006). The English language in the outer circle. World Englishes, 241-255.\nKramsch, C. (1993). Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nKramsch, C. (2008). Ecological perspectives on foreign language education. Language Teaching, 41(3), 389-408.\nKrashen, S. (2003). English: The world’s second language. Paper presented at the The Proceeding of Twelfth International Symposium on English Teaching, Taipei: Crane Publishing Company. 100-108.\nKrashen, S. D., Long, M. A., & Scarcella, R. C. (1979). Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 13(4), 573-582.\nLantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. New York: Oxford University Press.\nLarsen-Freeman, D. (2012). Complex, dynamic systems: A new transdisciplinary theme for applied linguistics? Language Teaching, 45(2), 202-214.\nLieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. CA: Sage.\nLin, S.-H. (2008). The Future for English Education of Taiwan`s Youth Identified from Misdirection of English Education and Policy Development. Early Childhood Education, 289, 9-22. doi:10.6367/ECE.200803.0009\nLiu, L. (2002, December 20). Studying English: A national obsession. T@iwan Today. Retrieved August 16, 2015, from http://taiwantoday.tw/ct.asp?xItem=19773&ctNode=122\nMiles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. CA: Sage.\nMuñoz, C. (2008). Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 578-596.\nNikolov, M., & Djigunović, J. M. (2006). Recent research on age, second language acquisition, and early foreign language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 234-260.\nNorton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. England: Pearson Education Limited.\nNunan, D. (1996). Hidden voices: Insiders’ perspectives on classroom interaction. In K. M. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom (pp. 41-56). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.\nNunan, D. (2001). English as a global language. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 605-606.\nNunan, D. (2003). The Impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia‐Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589-613.\nOladejo, J. (2006). Parents` attitudes towards bilingual education policy in Taiwan. Bilingual Research Journal, 30(1), 147-170.\nPatton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research method. CA: SAGE.\nSeedhouse, P. (1996). Classroom interaction: possibilities and impossibilities. ELT Journal, 50(1), 16-24.\nSeidlhofer, B. (2009). Common ground and different realities: World Englishes and English as a lingua franca. World Englishes, 28(2), 236-245.\nTahta, S., Wood, M., & Loewenthal, K. (1981). Foreign accents: Factors relating to transfer of accent from the first language to a second language. Language and Speech, 24(3), 265-272.\nTeng, M.-H. (2009). Effective Teaching in large multilevel classes : A qualitative study on the beliefs and practices of experienced EFL elementary school teachers. (Master’s thesis), National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.\nTreko, N. (2013). The big challenge: Teaching large multi-level classes. Academic journal of interdisciplinary studies, 2(4), 243-251.\nvan Lier, L. (1989). The classroom and the language learners: Ethnography and second-language classroom research. Singapore: Longman.\nvan Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Pearson Eduction.\nvan Lier, L. (1996). An ecological-semiotic perspective on language and linguistics. Language Acquisition and Language Socialization: Ecological perspectives 140-164. New York: Continuum.\nvan Lier, L. (1997). Approach to observation in classroom research: Observation from an ecological perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 31(4), 783-781.\nvan Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 245-259. New York: Oxford.\nvan Lier, L. (2003). A tale of two computer classrooms: The ecology of projected-based language learning. Ecology of Language Acquisition, 49-63. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.\nvan Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A socioculture perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic.\nVolk, Dinah. & Angelova, Maria. (2007). Language ideology and the mediation of language choice in peer interactions in a dual-language first grade. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 6(3), 177-199.\nVygotsky, L., Hanfmann, E., & Vakar, G. (2012). Thought and language. Camgridge: MIT press.\nWalsh, S. (2016). Role of Interaction in a Blended Learning Context. In M. MacCarthy. Editor (Ed.), Blended Learning for Language Teaching (pp. 36-51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nWragg, E. C. (1994). An introduction to classroom observation. London: Clays Ltd., St Ives PLC.\nYin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. VA: Sage.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
英語教學碩士在職專班
102951015
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102951015
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
101501.pdf3.47 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.