Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119614
題名: 2010年至2017年英語科國中基測與會考克漏字測驗分析
Analysis of the Cloze Test Items in English Basic Competence Test and Comprehensive Assessment Program from 2010 to 2017
作者: 彭凡家
Peng, Fan-Chia
貢獻者: 尤雪瑛
Yu, Hsueh-Ying
彭凡家
Peng, Fan-Chia
關鍵詞: 克漏字測驗
國中教育會考
國中基本學力測驗
Cloze test
Basic competence test
Comprehensive assessment program
日期: 2018
上傳時間: 27-八月-2018
摘要: 對台灣國中生而言,2001年實施至2013年的國中基本學力測驗以及2014年開始實施的國中教育會考,是兩項重要的高中入學考試。其中,英文閱讀測驗題組中每年會有二篇的克漏字測驗,克漏字測驗能夠測驗受試者英文學習的整合能力,且在台灣被廣泛地使用於各項考試中,本研究主要目的在於:(1)研究從2010年至2017年基測與會考的克漏字試題主要測驗了哪些語言能力; (2)分析這8年的克漏字試題分別在基測與會考中測驗的能力為何,以及討論其相同與相異之處。本研究使用Jonz (1990)的克漏字分類法為其研究工具以探討其分類結果。\n本研究結果顯示:(1) 2010年至2017年基測與會考著重於受試者要能找出跨越句子與句子間文本線索的能力; (2) 2010至2013年的基測,著重於檢視受試者時態句法的能力; (3) 2014至2017年的會考,著重於檢視受試者篇章結構的能力。根據本研究發現,筆者針對未來研究方向及教學實務提出了建議。\n\n關鍵字:克漏字測驗、國中教育會考、國中基本學力測驗
Abstract\nTo every ninth-grade student of junior high school, the Basic Competence Test (BCT) from 1999 to 2013 and the Comprehensive Assessment Program (CAP) from 2014 are the two most important senior high school entrance examinations. Among the reading tests of both exams, two of them are the cloze tests. The cloze test targets at measuring the candidates’ performances on the integrated ability in language, and it is widely used in the different testing contexts in Taiwan. The research thus aims to investigate: (1) from 2010 to 2017, what kind of language knowledge in the cloze tests were measured in BCT and CAP, and (2) the similarities and differences of the cloze item types tested and designed in BCT and CAP. To achieve the purpose, this research analyzed the cloze items in BCT and CAP in the past 8 years, and Jonz’s taxonomy was utilized as the instrument to classify the target test items.\nThe analysis results of the present study are shown as follows: (1) the primary language knowledge tested from 2010 to 2017 was about the higher-order knowledge that focused on the ability to integrate the contextual clues across sentential level; (2) the most frequently-tested items in BCT was the syntactic knowledge in tense; and (3) the most frequently-measured item in CAP was the textual relationship in discourse. Based on the findings of this research, the researcher yielded suggestions for the future research and implications for teaching.\n\nKey words: cloze test, Basic Competence Test, Comprehensive Assessment Program
參考文獻: References\nAlderson, J. C. (1979). The cloze procedure and proficiency in English as a\nforeign language. TESOL Quarterly, 13(2), 219-227.\nAlderson, J. C. (1980). Native and nonnative speaker performance on cloze\ntests. Language Learning, 20, 59-76.\nAlderson, J.C. (2005). Assessing reading. (5th ed). Cambridge: Cambridge\nUniversity. Press.\nBachman, L. F. (1982). The trait structure of cloze test scores. TESOL Quarterly,\n16(1), 61-70.\nBachman, L. F. (1985). Performance on cloze with fixed-ratio and rational\ndeletions. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 535-556.\nBailey, K. M. (1998). Learning about language assessment: Dilemmas, decisions,\nand directions. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.\nBensoussan, M. (1990). Redundancy and the cohesion cloze. Journal of\nResearch in Reading, 13, 18-17.\nBrown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language\npedagogy. (2nd ed.). NY: Longman.\nBrown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic\napproach to program design. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.\nBrown, J. D. (2005). Testing in language programs: A comprehensive guide to\nEnglish language assessment. NY: McGraw-Hill.\nChang, W. C. (1994). A brief analysis of the principles for constructing cloze\nitems. Newsletter for Teaching the Humanities and Social Studies, 5(4),\n69-80.\nChavez-Oller, M. A., Chihara, T., Weaver, K. A., & Oller, J. W. (1994). When are\ncloze items sensitive to constraints across sentences? Language\nLearning, 35(2), 181-206.\nChou, S. Y. (2009). A Study of Cloze Test Items in Scholastic Aptitude English\nTest and Department Required English Test. Unpublished master’s\nthesis, National Chung Cheng University, Taipei, Taiwan.\nChen, W. Y. (2008). The relationship between the rational cloze test and the\ndiscourse structure test. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan\nNormal University, Taipei, Taiwan.\nCheng, H. Y. (2007). A study of the cohesion items in the cloze tests of SAT and\nAST. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei,\nTaiwan.\nDale, E. & Chall, J. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational\nResearch Bulletin, 27, 11-20.\nDastjerdi, H. V., & Talebinezhad, M. R. (2006). Chain-processing deletion\nprocedure in cloze: A discourse perspective. Language Testing, 23, 58-\n72.\nDick, W., Carey, J. O., & L. Carey. (2000). The systemtic design of instruction.\nUpper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Educational.\nDupuis, M. M. (1980). The cloze procedure as a predictor of comprehension in\nliterature. Journal of Education Research, 74(1), 27-33.\nFlech, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32,\n221-233.\nGreene, B.B. (2001). Testing reading comprehension of theoretical discourse\nwith cloze. Journal of Research in Reading, 24(1), 82-98.\nHadley, A. M. (2000). Teaching language in context. (3rd ed.). Boston: Heinle &\nHeinle.\nHalliday, M. A. K., & Hassan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.\nHeaton, J. B. (1998). Writing English language tests. NY: Longman.\nHinofotis, F. B., & Snow, B. G. (1978). An alternative cloze testing procedure:\nMultiple-choice format. In J. W. Oller & K. Perkins (Eds.), Research in\nlanguage testing. Massachusetts: Newbury House.\nHuang, L. (1992). A feasibility study of using the revised cloze test as a measure\nof reading comprehension. Proceedings of the eighth conference on\nEnglish teaching and learning in the R.O.C. (pp. 305-332). Taipei: Crane.\nHuang, T. S. (1994). A qualitative analysis of the JCEE English tests. Taipei:\nCrane.\nHughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. (2nd). Cambridge: Cambridge\nUniversity Press.\nIto, A. (2004). Two types of translation tests: Their reliability and validity.\nSystem, 32,395-405.\nJonz, J. (1990). Another turn in the conversation: What does cloze measure?\nTESOL Quarterly, 24(1), 61-81\nKeshavarz, M. H., & Salimi, H. (2007). Collocational competence and cloze test\nperformance: A study of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of\nApplied Linguistics, 17, 81-92\nKintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. Toward a model of text comprehension and\nproduction. Psychological Review, 1978, 85, 363-394.\nKlein-Braley, C. 1997. C-Test in the context of reduced redundancy testing: an\nappraisal. Language Testing 14: 47-84.\nKolers, P. A. Some modes of representation. In P. Pliner, L. Krames, and T.\nAlloway (Eds.), Communication and effect: language and thought. New\nYork: Academic Press, 1973.\nLee, S. H. (2008). Beyond reading and proficiency assessment: The rational\ncloze procedure as stimulus for integrated reading, writing, and\nvocabulary instruction and teacher-student interaction in ESL. System,\n36, 642-660.\nMarkman, P. L. (1985). Rational deletion cloze and global comprehension in\nGerman. Language Learning, 35, 423-430.\nMcHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia\nMedica, 22(3), 276-282.\nMessick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language\nTesting, 13, 241-256.\nMiller, M. J., DeWitt, J. E., McCleeary, E. M., & O’Keefe, K. J. (2009). Application\nof the cloze procedure to evaluate comprehension and demonstrate\nrewriting of pharmacy educational materials. Annals of\nPharmacotherapy, 43, 650-657\nOller, J. W. (1979). Language tests at school. London: Longman.\nNicholls, A & Nicholls, S. (1972). Developing a curriculum: a practical guide.\nLondon: Allen and Unwin.\nPanackal, A. A. & Heft, C. S. (1978). Cloze technique and multiple choice\ntechnique: Reliability and validity. Educational and Psychological\nMeasurement. 38, 917-932.\nRichards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2003). Approaches and methods in language\nteaching. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nSasaki, M. (2000). Effects of cultural schemata on students’ test-taking\nprocesses for cloze tests: A multiple data source approach. Language\nTesting, 17(1), 85-114.\nShanahan, T., Kamil, M. L., & Tobin, A. W. (1982). Cloze as a measure of\nintersentential comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(2), 229-\n255.\nSchmitt, M. C., & Sha, S. (2009). The developmental nature of meta-cognition\nand the relationship between knowledge and control over time. Journal\nof Research in Reading, 32, 254-271\nSharp, A. (2009). Reading comprehension in two cultures. International Journal\nof Learning, 16, 281-292.\nSpolsky, B. (1996). Measured words: The development of objective language\ntesting. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nStorey, P. (1997). Examining the test-taking process: A cognitive perspective on\nthe discourse cloze test. Language Testing, 14, 214-231.\nStuart, W., & Eve, K. (2009). The effects of vocabulary learning on collocation\nand meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 55-77.\nTaylor, W. L. (1953). Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability.\nJournalism Quarterly, 30, 415-433.\nTaylor, W. L. (1956). Present developments in the use of the cloze procedure.\nJournalism Quarterly, 33, 42-48.\nTyler, R. W. (2010). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago:\nUniversity of Chicago Press.\nViera, A. J. & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: the\nkappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360-363.\nWittrock, M. C. Reading as a generative process. Journal of Educational\nPsychology, 1975, 67, 484-489.\nWu, H. L. (2002). Rational cloze: Item-generation approaches and construct\nvalidity. English Teaching and Learning, 26(4), 85-106.\nYang, T. H. (1996). Fundamental considerations in the test, with special\nreference to its use in EFL testing in Taiwan. Sun Yat-sen Journal of\nHumanities, 4, 57-77.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
英語教學碩士在職專班
1009510201
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1009510201
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
020101.pdf1.69 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.