Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123238
題名: 側彎人生正向行-早發性脊椎側彎青少年與疾病共舞之生命經驗
The experiences of adolescents living in harmony with early onset scoliosis
作者: 陳思淳
Chen, Szu-Chun
貢獻者: 呂寶靜
Lu, Pau-Ching
陳思淳
Chen, Szu-Chun
關鍵詞: 早發性脊椎側彎
青少年
發展任務
復原力
Early onset scoliosis
Adolescents
Developmental tasks
Resilience
日期: 2014
上傳時間: 2-May-2019
摘要:   本研究以深度訪談的方式,訪談6位早發性脊椎側彎青少年患者,了解他們罹病的主觀感受與經驗詮釋,分析疾病對青少年發展的影響,並探究少年在罹病過程中復原力的展現。\n\n  脊椎側彎的青少年生理上許多不舒適的感受,包括痠痛、睡不好、活動受限,或因器官受壓迫,而有喘、尿床、進食困難的症狀。脊椎側彎少年的治療經驗,是隨著病況依時續向前延伸的歷程,本研究將其歷程分為四個階段:(1)焦急的四處求醫;(2)治療的挫折與無力;(3)不得不的手術;(4)治療後的影響與調適。\n\n  罹病少年與一般青少年有著相同的發展職責,卻面對與一般青少年有不同的壓力與考慮,他們的人生選擇也會圍繞著疾病,而存在著相當程度的限制。研究發現青少年(1)身體心像紊亂;(2)過度保護下失去對自主的掌控;(3)人際關係遭霸凌與排拒;(4)在治療與學業中分身乏術;(5)生涯選擇影響上:青少年因健康因素帶來生涯選擇的限制,家長也會對少年職涯發展期待降低。但青少年則較希望從事助人工作;(6)消極的婚姻擇偶考量:擔心身體的限制成為交往上的阻礙及能否正常生育。\n\n  青少年經歷疾病的歷程後,支持他們度過這些困境的復原力量為何,這股復原的動能又如何對少年的生命或未來產生影響。研究發現影響復原力的保護因子有(1)個人保護因子:獨立、懂得努力並勇於嘗試、主動爭取資源、樂觀面對疾病苦痛、忍耐、疾病中求生存,發展出因應疾病的方式;(2)家庭保護因子:情緒性支持(家人引導正向思考、家人給予無條件心理支持)、工具性支持(協助身體照顧);(3)社區保護因子:學校環境的支持(提供少年機會擁有正向經驗、師長適度關心,增加少年安全感、同儕關心和接納,獲得團體歸屬感)、醫療環境的支持(醫療人員給予專業的建議與協助、支持與鼓舞、醫療補助減輕家庭經濟負擔、病友間同理與激勵的力量)。復原力量展現的結果面貌可分為四個面向,分別為(1)改變慣性認知,重新建構生命意義;(2)感同身受,滋養寬以待人的同理能力;(3)樂於助人;(4)生命態度的樣貌-懷抱感恩心情,並更珍惜當下,勇於表達愛與感謝。\n 
 In-depth interviews were conducted in this study, and six adolescents with early onset scoliosis were interviewed to understand their subjective feelings and experience interpretations, analyzing the impact of the illness on their development, and investigating the demonstrations of resiliencies in the course of the illness.\n\n Adolescents with scoliosis experience much physiological discomfort, including pain and soreness, poor sleep quality, limited mobility, or symptoms caused by organ compression such as shortness of breath, bed-wetting, and difficulties in eating. The treatment experiences of adolescents with scoliosis are continuous processes extending alongside their conditions; the process is divided into four stages in this study: (1) a frantic search of medical help; (2) frustration and helplessness during the treatment; (3) unavoidable surgery; (4) impacts and adaption after the treatment.\n\n The adolescents with the illness have the same responsibilities to develop themselves as normal adolescents do, but have to face different pressures and concerns; moreover, with their life choices revolving around the illness, there are considerable levels of limitations. Studies have found the adolescents to be: (1) disturbed in body images; (2) deprived of autonomy due to overprotection; (3) bullied and rejected in relationships; (4) unable to handle medical treatments and academic work at the same time; (5) affected in career choices: the adolescents’ career choices are limited by their health, and their parents also have lower expectations for their career development; (6) pessimistic when it comes to considering marriage or partner choices: they worry that their body limits may become dating obstacles, and that they may not have be able to have children normally.\n\n After the adolescents go through the journey of the illness, what are the resiliencies supporting them through the difficulties, and how do the resiliencies impact their life and future? Studies have found that protecting factors that can influence recovery include: (1) personal protecting factors: independence, an understanding that hard work is required and courage in venturing, positivity in facing the pain from the illness, resilience, the will to survive the illness and figure out ways to cope with it; (2) family protecting factors: emotional support (guidance in positive thinking and unconditional psychological support from the family), instrumental support (body care assistance); (3) community protecting factors: school environmental support (opportunities to create positive experiences, appropriate attention from teachers, a sense of safety, acceptance and affection from peers, which can provide a sense of belonging), medical environmental support (professional advice and assistance from the medical staff, support and cheering from the medical staff, medical financial support to alleviate family burdens, empathy and the power of encouragement between patient friends). The results of recovering strength demonstration can be divided into four aspects: (1) adjustment of habitual mindsets and the reconstruction of life meaning; (2) feeling for others and the cultivation of the ability to be forgiving and have empathy; (3) eagerness in helping others; (4) exhibiting a life attitude embracing feelings of gratitude, and possessing a stronger appreciation of the moment and courage in expressing love and gratefulness.
參考文獻: 壹、中文部份\n小兒脊椎側彎(2013)。小兒脊椎側彎定義與分類。取自http://rehab.ym.edu.tw/child/Untitled-2.html。\n王金蓮、黃春梅、奉季光、林麗華(2010)。兒童早發性脊柱側彎的治療與照護。榮總護理,27(2),188-194。\n包康寧(2011)。臺北市國中生依附關係、求助態度與復原力之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。\n台灣脊椎中心(2012)。脊柱側彎各類診斷。取自http://www.taiwanspinecenter.com.tw/web/00_diagnosis/01Scoliosis_1.htm。\n江振亨(2009)。從復原力探討矯治社會工作在犯罪矯治之運用與發展。社區發展季刊,125,424-439。\n行政院主計處與青輔會合編 (1997)。中華民國台灣地區青少年狀況調查報告。台北。\n行政院青輔會(1998)。青少年白皮書。台北。\n吳文興(2010)。談脊椎側彎與矯正。傳統醫學雜誌,21(1),83-92。\n吳宇娟(2004)。少年家庭照顧者之生命故事(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。\n吳芝儀(2003)。生涯輔導與諮商:理論與實務。嘉義:石濤文化。\n吳麗敏(2001)。化療期間患童的身體心像滿意度及其相關因素(未出版之碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學,高雄市。\n宋淑偵(2010)。新診斷癌症青少年之疾病症狀與復原力(未出版之碩士論文)。國立國防醫學院,台北市。\n宋麗玉、施教裕(2003)。優勢觀點:社會工作理論與實務。臺北:洪葉文化。\n李宜芳(2001)。癌症靑少年社會關係與疾病適應之硏究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣大學,台北市。\n林哲立、邱曉君、顏菲麗譯(2007)。人類行為與社會環境(原作者:J.B.Ashford,C.W.Lecroy,K.L. Lortie)。台北:雙葉。(原著出版年:2001)\n林雅娟(2007)。親職角色之探討。網路社會學通訊期刊,取自http://mail.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/61/index.htm\n法務部(2013)。民法。取自http://law.moj.gov.tw/\n法務部(2013)。刑法。取自http://law.moj.gov.tw/\n法務部(2013)。兒童及少年福利與權利保障法。取自http://law.moj.gov.tw/\n邱文彬(2001)。社會支持因應效果的回顧與展望。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,11(4),311-330。\n施世亮、劉建麟(1997)。特發性脊柱側彎。臨床醫學,40(4),195-210。\n施靜芳(2004)。走過生命的幽谷~九二一喪親青少年的悲傷與復原(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。\n胡幼惠(1996)。質性研究:理論方法以及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流。\n孫鴻明(2007)。分析胸椎脊椎側彎術後結果之影響因子與臨床探討(未出版之碩士論文)。私立長庚大學,桃園市。\n常欣怡、宋麗玉(2007)。青少年復原力概念與相關研究之探究。東吳社會工作學報,17(3),171-192。\n張秀玉(2003)。從社會工作力量觀點探討身心障礙兒童對家庭之影響。社區發展季刊,102(20),293-301。\n張秀如、余玉眉(2007)。身體觀點-體現與身體心像。護理雜誌,54(3),71-81。\n張春興(1983)。青年的認同與迷失。臺北:臺灣東華。\n張淑慧(2007)。中輟輔導的思考--談中輟少年的復原力。中等教育,第58(5),56-73。\n張添洲(1997)。青少年生涯發展探討。輔導通訊,49(3),24-26。\n莫黎黎(1997)。高危險群青少年復原力之探討。輔導季刊,40(3),32-41。\n許崇銘(2007)。混沌之後,開竅之前:台灣憂鬱症患者的疾病角色、疾病經驗與醫療化過程(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣大學,台北市。\n郭靜晃、吳幸玲譯(1994)。發展心理學(原作者:R. Philip and N. Barbara原著。臺北:揚智。(原著出版年:1975)\n陳月琴(2005)。創業家失敗復原歷程之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。\n陳坤虎、雷庚玲、吳英璋(2005)。不同階段青少年之自我認同內容及危機探索之發展差異。中華心理學刊,47(3),249-268。\n陳秉華、游淑瑜(2001)。台灣的家庭文化與家庭治療。亞洲輔導學報,8(2),153-174。\n陳珮娥、湯玉英、徐淑芬、王桂芸(2005)。照顧一位脊柱側彎之青少年病患接受脊柱手術之護理經驗。護理雜誌,52(6),82-90。\n陳雅玲(2007)。貧窮學童復原力發展之研究:以總統教育獎得主為例。屏東教育大學學報,26(1),1-36。\n陳毓文、鄭玲惠(2000)。為什麼是我?胰島素依賴型糖尿病少年生活經驗之初探。中華心理衛生學刊,13(1),1-26。\n陳靜敏(1997)。北市某國中學生脊柱側彎盛行率之調查研究。醫學雜誌,18(3),173-183。\n曾文志(2005)。復原力的構念與研究之分析。臺中護專學報,4(3),45-68。\n曾翠華(1997)。自發性脊椎側彎青少年的疾病知識、身體心像與自我照顧行為(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣大學,台北市。\n黃德祥(1994)。青少年發展與輔導。臺北:五南。\n楊雅嵐(2005)。老幼兼顧之經驗初探:以兼顧失能配偶與年幼孫兒的女性照顧者為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。\n楊麗麗(2008)。雙足的開始-一位長期使用呼吸器脊椎側彎青年之生命敘說(未出版之碩士論文)。私立南華大學,嘉義縣。\n溫雅蘭、溫千慧、王桂芸、陳金彌(2013)。癌症病人的復原力及其護理處置。護理雜誌,29(4),93-96。\n雷靂、張雷(2003)。青少年心理發展。北京:北京大學出版社。\n趙碧華、朱美貞譯(2001)。研究方法:社會工作暨人文科學領域的運用(原作者:A. Rubin and E. Babbie)。臺北:雙葉。(原著出版年:1995)\n劉月敏、謝湘俐、駱敏淑、馬麗卿、張宏哲(2010)。血液透析患者的復原力與社會支持。臺灣腎臟護理學會雜誌,9(1),33-43。\n潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北:心理出版社。\n鄭芳欣(2009)。不同椎體旋轉角度與施力條件對脊柱側彎之矯正效果影響-有限元素分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立陽明大學,台北市。\n鄭美玲(1997)。青少年癌症患者的住院經驗(未出版之碩士論文)。私立高雄醫學院,高雄市。\n蕭文(1999)。災變事件前的前置因素對心理復健的影響—復原力的探討與建構。測驗與輔導,156,3249-3253。\n戴昀、伊慶春(2008)。弱勢青少年的成長歷程:復原力的建構。2008年台灣人青少年成長歷程研究第二次學術研討會,臺北市:中央研究院社會學研究。\n簡春安、鄒平儀(1998)。社會工作研究法。臺北:巨流。\n曠慧君(2003)。兒童腦瘤長期存活者的工作期望與困境(未出版之碩士論文)。私立東海大學,台中市。\n羅文苑(2005)。一位綜合高中學生反敗為勝的求學歷程之研究-探討其間的復原力(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。\n\n貳、英文部分\nBonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss Trauma and Human Resilience:Have We Understand the Human Capacity to Thrive after Extremely Aversive Events. American Psychologists, 59(1):20-28.\nBuchanan, D. , C. Labarbera, R. Roelofs & W. Olson (1979). Reactions of Families to Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. General Hospital Psychiatry , 1(3):262-269.\nEgeland, B., E. Carlson. & L. A. Sroufe (1993). Resilience as Process. Development and Psychopathology, 5(4):517-528.\nEnright, R. , D. Lapsley , A. Drivas & L. Fehr (1980). Parental Influences on the Development of Adolescent Autonomy and Identity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 9(6):529-545.\nFayssoux, R. S., R. H. Cho, & M. J. Herman (2010). A History of Bracing for Idiopathic Scoliosis in North America. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, 468(3):654-664.\nHightower, E. (1990). Adolescent Interpersonal and Familial Precursors of Positive Mental Health at Midlife. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19(3):257-275.\nIan shaw (2005). Practitioner Research:Evidence or Critique. British Journal of Social Work, 35(1):1-18.\nKoff, E., J. Rierdan & M. L. Stubb (1990). Gender, Body Image, and Self-concept in Early Adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescent, 10(1):56-68.\nLuther, s. s., D. Cicchetti & B. Becker (2000). The Construct of Resilience:A Critical Evalution and Guidelines for Future Work. Child Development, 71(3):543-562.\nMacLean, W.E., N.E. Green, C.B. Pierre & D. C. Ray (1989). Stress and Coping with Scoliosis:Psychological Effects on Adolescents and Their Families. Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics, 9(3):257-261.\nMurray, C. (2003). Risk Factors, Protective Factors, Vulnerability, and Resilience:A Framework for Understanding and Supporting the Adult Transitions of Youth with High-incidence Disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24(1):16-26.\nNoonan, KJ., LA. Dolan, WC. Jacobson & SL. Weinstein (1997). Long-term Psychosocial Characteristics of Patients Treated for Idiopathic Scoliosis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 17(6):712-717.\nOlesson, C. A. , L. Bond , J. M. Burns , D.A. Vella-Brodrick & S. M. Sawyer (2003). Adolescent Resilience:A Concept Analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 26(1):1-11.\nPayne, W., J. Ogilvie, M. Resnick, R. Kane, E. Transfeldt & R. Blum (1997). Does Scoliosis Have a Psychological Impact and Does Gender Make a Difference?. Spine, 22(12):1380-1384.\nSaleebey, D. (1996). The Strength Perspective in Social Work Practice:Extensions and Cautions. Social Work, 41(3):296-305.\nSapountzi-Krepia, D.S., J. Valavanis , G.P. Panteleakis , D.T. , P.C. Vlachojiannis & G.S. Sapkas (2001). Perceptions of Body Image, Happiness and Satisfaction in Adolescents Wearing a Boston Brace for Scoliosis Treatment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(3):683-690.\nScoliosis research society (2013). Early Onset Scoliosis. Scoliosis Research Society website(http://www.srs.org/)\nWalsh, F. (2002). A Family Resilience Framework:Innovative Practice Applications. amilies Relations, 51(2):130-137.\nWarner, R. (1995). Resilience in Development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(3):81-85.\nWarner, R. (2009). Recovery from Schizophrenia and The Recovery Model. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22(4):374-380.\nWilliam, N.R. (2003). Rising from the Ashes:Stories of Recovery, Adaptation and Resiliency in Burn Survivors. Social Work in Health Care, 36(4):53-77.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
社會工作研究所
97264007
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097264007
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
400701.pdf1.16 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.