Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124256
題名: 多元時代的挑戰—安康平宅社區家長參與ACT親職教育方案之經驗
Challenge in the era of diversification— Experience of parents of An-Kang Low-cost Housing Community participating in ACT Program
作者: 阮菲
Ruan, Fei
貢獻者: 傅如馨
Fu, Juh-Sin
阮菲
Ruan, Fei
關鍵詞: 安康平宅
親職壓力
親職韌性
ACT Raising Safe Kids親職教育方案
An-Kang Low-cost Housing
Parenting stress
Parental resilience
ACT Raising Safe Kids Program
日期: 2019
上傳時間: 1-七月-2019
摘要: 本研究將美國心理學會暴力預防處與美國幼兒教育協會所共同發展的ACT Raising Safe Kids親職教育方案(Adults and Children Together-Raising Safe Kids Program,以下簡稱ACT親職教育方案)為範本,濃縮課程內容及時長,以其簡要版於台灣平宅開展,面向有自主意願參與的安康平宅民眾。本研究希望藉由該簡要方案接觸并瞭解平宅家長的親職壓力,旨在深入瞭解,台灣安康平宅自願參與簡要ACT親職教育方案對當事人之影響。本研究從接受方案當事人的角度來回覆三個研究問題與目的:一、瞭解研究當事人的生命脈絡、家庭互動經驗對其家庭關係之影響。二、探索并瞭解研究當事人的親職壓力與因應。三、瞭解當事人在接受簡要版ACT親職教育方案之後,對其親職行為的影響,並對日後方案的開展提出建議。\n為深入瞭解安康平宅接受簡要版ACT親職教育方案當事人的心聲,本研究採質化研究方法,經由深入訪談蒐集資料,共邀請到兩位母親參與研究,她們均已完成簡要版ACT親職教育方案。\n研究發現當事人面臨來自幼兒教養、親子不良互動、外界環境、生活調適和人際互動五個方面的親職壓力。且貧窮之因素對當事人生活產生嚴重負向影響。對此,當事人發展出親職韌性,從個人特質、問題解決的因應方式、家庭內支持、社會支持與社會資源四個因素幫助自己應對壓力和困境。在接受簡要版ACT親職教育方案之後,對當事人產生情緒覺察度提升、情緒管控方式增加、教養觀念改變、出現積極教養行為、教養經驗交流這五方面積極影響。
Based on Adults and Children Together-Raising Safe Kids Program (hereinafter referred to as ACT Raising Safe Kids Program) co-developed by American Psychological Association (APA) Violence Prevention Office and National Association for the Education of Young Children, this study is a case study on the public from a Taiwanese low-cost housing community--An-Kang Low-cost Housing Community with an intention to participate in the program, wherein the program is in a simplified edition with condensed content and shorter duration. This study targets the parenting stress of low-cost housing parents through the simplified program with a purpose of an in-depth understanding about the impact of the intention of the parties from Taiwan`s An-Kang Low-cost Housing Community to participate in the simplified ACT Program on the parties. From the perspective of the parties in the program, this study has three research questions or objectives: I. To study and understand effects of the parties` life and family interaction experience on their family relations. II. To explore and understand the parenting stress and relevant response of the parties. III. To understand effects of the parties` experience of accepting the ACT Program on their following parenting behaviors and give advice for the following implementation of the program.\nTo have a thorough understanding about opinions of the parties from An-Kang Low-cost Housing Community involved in the ACT Program, this study is conducted in the qualitative research method, where data are collected from an in-depth interview on two mothers in total, both of whom have completed the simplified ACT Program.\nIt is found in the study that the parties are confronted with the parenting stress in such five respects as early children education, poor parent-children interaction, external environment, life adjustment and interpersonal interaction. In addition, poverty is a factor that makes severely adverse effects on the parties` life. To handle the stress, the parties develop their parental resilience to help themselves cope with the stress and plight from four perspectives: personal characteristics, problem solutions, family support, social support and social resources. And the experience of participating in the simplified ACT Program has five positive effects on the parties including better emotional awareness, more emotional control, movement in parenting philosophy, positive parenting and exchange of parenting experience.
參考文獻: 丁嘉妮(2007)。憂鬱症家屬與患者相處過程中的逆境經驗及其復原力發展之探究 (未發表之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學教育心理與諮商研究所,新竹市。\n王永慈 (2005)。外籍與大陸配偶家庭之貧窮分析。臺灣社會工作學刊,(4),1-32。\n王碧君(2015)。新住民及其子女的教養問題與改善建議。台灣教育,(695),21-28。\n王鐘和(2000)。單親家庭的親職教育。載於何福田(主編),單親家庭之教育與輔導(頁3-4)。台北:心理出版社。\n古思潔(2016)。家庭復原力與父母身心健康狀況之相關研究: 以發展遲緩兒童家庭為例(碩士論文)。http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=U0015-2308201617434700。\n申廼晃 (2013)。請聽我說-探討接受強制性親職教育輔導之當事人經驗(碩士論文)。取自http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=U0002-1907201312270100。\n朱儀羚、 康萃婷、柯禧慧、蔡欣志、 吳芝儀 (2004)。敘事心理與研究:自我,創傷與意義的建構 (原作者: Crossley, ML)。嘉義市:濤石文化。\n吳少菁(1996)。 談兒童的自我概念及貧窮家庭兒童之輔導。福利社會,57,7-10。\n吳佳玲(2008)。台灣親職壓力相關研究之回顧與分析。台南科技大學通識教育學刊,7,63-90。\n吳瓊洳,蔡明昌(2014)。新住民家長參與親職教育課程之行動研究。嘉大教育研究學刊,(32),1-32。\n李自強(2013)。家庭暴力的代間傳遞: 一位觸法少年的個案分享。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,9(2),121-136。\n李淑容(2007)。台灣新貧現象及其因應對策。東吳社會工作學報,(17),193-219。\n林佩儀 (2004)。兒童虐待成因探討。諮商與輔導,(220),2-9。\n林長杰(2000)。窮人的烙印:以台北市安康平宅為例(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/pyqt3e。\n林家興(2007)。親職教育團體對親子關係與兒童行為問題的影響。教育心理學報, 39(1),91-109。\n林惠雅、周玉慧(2009)。婚姻教養互動類型及親職參與: 人夫,人妻與人父,人母。教育心理學報,41(S),167-183。\n林惠雅(2008)。學前兒童父母角色認同與共親職之關係。應用心理研究,(38),209-251。\n林錦蘭、劉波兒、林孟燕、黃芝瑋、賴詩雅、劉懿瑩…馬維芬 (2007)。現存台灣外籍配偶子女教養問題之文獻探討。弘光學報,(51),51-58。\n姚卿騰(2015)。臺灣社區心理衛生政策回顧,發展現況與未來展望。護理雜誌,62(4),5-11。\n柳娜、张亚林(2012)。家庭暴力施暴行为的代际传递。中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,21(11),1044-1045。\n柳娜、陳琛、曹玉萍、張亞林(2015)。家庭暴力嚴重軀體施暴行為的代際傳遞——目睹家庭暴力。中國臨床心理學雜誌,23(1),84-87.\n孫頌賢、李宜玫(2009)。暴力的代間傳遞: 原生家庭暴力經驗與依戀系統對大學生約會暴力行為的預測比較。家庭教育與諮商學刊,(7),23-43。\n師豫玲、孫淑文、陳肯玉(2008)。臺北市平價住宅問題探討,因應策略與未來發展方向。社區發展季刊,121,100-119。\n翁酼秀(1999)。親職壓力與兒童虐待兼論兒童虐待的預防。社區發展季刊,86,262-279。\n高淑清(2008)。質性研究的 18 堂課: 首航初探之旅。 台北市:麗文文化事業股份有限公司。\n張子嫺、曹純瓊(2013)。嘉義縣學前特殊需求幼兒與一般幼兒主要照顧者的教養態度, 問題與親職壓力差異之探究。幼兒教保研究,(11),21-41。\n張淑敏、宋惠娟(2003)。促進高危險性兒童的復原力。護理雜誌,50(5), 61-64。\n梅心潔、蔡昆瀛、陳若琳(2008)。聽損幼兒母親的親職韌性, 配偶共親職與親職壓力之關係。應用心理研究,(38),107-150。\n許惠淳(2018)。身心障礙學生家長參與親職教育學習歷程研究(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d4vrmp。\n陳向明(2002)。社会科學質的硏究。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。\n陳玟伶、蔡曉婷、周汎澔(2015)。學齡期注意力缺陷過動症兒童之母親憂鬱及其相關因素之探討。護理雜誌, 62(1), 39-49。\n陳若琳、李青松 (2001)。台北縣雙工作家庭父母親的親職喜悅與壓力之探討。生活科學學報, (7), 157-180。\n陳密桃、陳玲婉(2006)。國小學童母親的人格特質與親職壓力,幸福感之相關研究。高雄師大學報:教育與社會科學類, (20), 1-20。\n陳富美、利翠珊(2004)。夫妻的育兒經驗: 親職分工與共親職的探討。中華心理衛生學刊,17(4),1-28。\n陳富美、黃芝瑋(2017)。為施虐父母提供到宅式親職教育之行動研究。家庭教育與諮商學刊,(20),33-55。\n陳惠茹(2015)。教養嬰幼兒親職壓力之研究:以家庭壓力理論分析。幼兒教保研究,(14),19-39。\n陳雅鈴(2006)。貧窮如何影響學童。教育研究月刊,(146),87-101。\n陳瑋婷(2012)。 親職壓力, 社會支持與生活品質之關係研究: 身心障礙者家長與普通家長之比較。特殊教育研究學刊,37(3), 1-26。\n傅如馨(2017)。含攝文化的兒少虐待預防與親職教育以美國ACT Raising Safe Kids親職教育方案的文化調適為例。本土諮商心理學學刊,9(3),1-24。\n曾仁美(2005)。 親子遊戲治療對憂鬱症兒童父母親職復原力之建構(未發表之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。\n曾許達(2010)。平宅青少年的生活經驗—一個以青少年為主體陳述的探討(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/m8dxsc。\n黃淑真、詹秀美、朱明建(2010)。新住民身心障礙學生家長的親職教育。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊, 245-257。\n黃淑賢(2003)。 復原力對自閉症兒童家長心理調適影響之研究(未發表之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。\n黃薏靜(2016)。ACT Raising Safe Kids 親職教育方案於臺灣家庭的應用--探討親職壓力與兒童行為問題的關聯與改善(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c5s4du。\n劉百純、陳若琳(2010)。新手媽媽的配偶支持, 親職效能與親職壓力之相關研究。幼兒教育,(297), 22-40。\n潘淑滿(2005)。台灣母職圖像。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,(20),41-91。\n蔡春美、翁丽芳、洪福财(2005)。親子關係與親職教育。心理出版社,台北市。\n蔣姿儀、李文意、林季宜(2014)。 學齡前幼兒母親親職壓力與親子關係之研究。幼兒教育年刊, (25), 141-161。\n鄭白玉(2015)。臺灣父母親職壓力之整合分析與理論發展研究(博士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/y3axcu。\n謝美娥(2008)。離婚女性單親家長復原力的初探。東吳社會工作學報,(18),1-33。\n鍾燕宜、潘雨辰、陳右振、郭煌宗(2010)。發展遲緩兒童母親親職壓力之初探。身心障礙研究季刊,8(2),83-98。\n簡文英、卓紋君(2003)。國內親職教育團體研究的回顧與分析。諮商與輔導, (211), 2-10。\n蘇子珊(2017)。父母親職壓力與特殊需求兒童生活自理能力之相關探討(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9p7ssy。\nAbidin, R R (1982).parenting stress and the utilization of pediatric services. Children’s health care,11(2),70-73\nAbidin, R. R. (1990). Introduction to the special issue: The stresses of parenting. Journal of clinical child psychology, 19(4), 298-301.\nAllen, S. M., & Hawkins, A. J. (1999). Maternal gatekeeping: Mothers` beliefs and behaviors that inhibit greater father involvement in family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 199-212.\nBandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.\nBelsky, J. (1984). The determinants of parenting: A process model. Child development, 83-96.\nCappa, K. A., Begle, A. M., Conger, J. C., Dumas, J. E., & Conger, A. J. (2011).\nChi, T. C. & Hinshaw, S. P. (2002). Mother-child relationships of children with ADHD: The role of matermal depressive symptoms and depression-related distortions. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(4), 387-400.\nColvin, M., Cullen, F. T., & Ven, T. V. (2002). Coercion, social support, and crime: An emerging theoretical consensus. Criminology, 40(1), 19-42.\nCrnic, K. A., Greenberg, M. T., Ragozin, A. S., Robinson, N. M., & Basham, R. B. (1983). Effects of stress and social support on mothers and premature and full-term infants. Child development, 209-217.\nHuang, C. Y., Costeines, J., Kaufman, J. S., & Ayala, C. (2014). Parenting stress, social support, and depression for ethnic minority adolescent mothers: Impact on child development. Journal of child and family studies, 23(2), 255-262.\nKelley, M. L., Klostermann, K., Doane, A. N., Mignone, T., Lam, W. K., Fals-Stewart, W., & Padilla, M. A. (2010). The case for examining and treating the combined effects of parental drug use and interparental violence on children in their homes. Aggression and violent behavior, 15(1), 76-82.\nKnox, M. S., Burkhart, K., & Hunter, K. E. (2011). ACT against violence parents raising safe kids program: Effects on maltreatment-related parenting behaviors and beliefs. Journal of Family Issues, 32(1), 55-74.\nKnox, M., Burkhart, K., & Cromly, A. (2013). Supporting positive parenting in community health centers: The ACT Raising Safe Kids Program. Journal of Community Psychology, 41(4), 395-407.\nKnox, M., Burkhart, K., & Howe, T. (2011). Effects of the ACT Raising Safe Kids parenting program on children`s externalizing problems. Family Relations, 60(4), 491-503.Bidirectional relationships between parenting stress and child coping competence: Findings from the PACE study. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(3), 334-342.\nLuthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child development, 71(3), 543-562.\nMaurer, T. W., Pleck, J. H., & Rane, T. R. (2001). Parental identity and reflected‐appraisals: Measurement and gender dynamics. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 309-321.\nMiguel, J. J., & Howe, T. R. (2006). Implementing and evaluating a national early violence prevention program at the local level: Lessons from ACT (adults and children together) against violence. Journal of Early Childhood and Infant Psychology, 2, 17-39.\nPorter, B., & Howe, T. (2008). Pilot evaluation of the “ACT parents raising safe kids” violence prevention program. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 1(3), 193-206.\nPortwood, S. G., Lambert, R. G., Abrams, L. P., & Nelson, E. B. (2011). An evaluation of the adults and children together (ACT) against violence parents raising safe kids program. The journal of primary prevention, 32(3-4), 147.\nRenner, L. M., & Boel-Studt, S. (2013). The relation between intimate partner violence, parenting stress, and child behavior problems. Journal of Family Violence, 28(2), 201-212.\nRodriguez, C. M., & Green, A. J. (1997). Parenting stress and anger expression as predictors of child abuse potential. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21(4), 367-377.\nSanderson, S., & Thompson, V. L. S. (2002). Factors associated with perceived paternal involvement in childrearing. Sex roles, 46(3-4), 99-111.\nWalton, A. G. (2013). ACT around the world. Monitor on Psychology, 44(10), 32.\nWardlaw, D. M. (2000). Persistent themes in the history of community psychology: A preliminary analysis of the community psychologist or do we have an identity after all? The Community Psychologist, 33, 15–18.\nWeymouth, L. A., & Howe, T. R. (2011). A multi-site evaluation of parents raising safe kids violence prevention program. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(10), 1960-1967.\nWilliford, A. P., Calkins, S. D., & Keane, S. P. (2007). Predicting change in parenting stress across early childhood: Child and maternal factors. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 35(2), 251-263.\nZax, M., & Specter, G. A. (1974). An introduction to community psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
輔導與諮商碩士學位學程
1051720131
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1051720131
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
013101.pdf2.3 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.