南海仲裁案裁決之研究-兼論臺灣的未來訴訟策略

Abstract

依據聯合國海洋法公約附件七成立之仲裁庭於2016年7月12日公布第2013-19號中菲南海仲裁決定後，我國政府及學界雖多所批判，但裁決見解是否為國外學者及既有之國際司法實務所認同並影響未來走向，攸關我國在南海之權益。本論文透過分析國外學者見解、國際司法機關案例及國家實踐，評析南海仲裁對歷史性權利及島礁爭議裁決之妥適性，並經由中、菲雙方提出之證據資料及中華民國國際法學會出具之法庭之友意見書，分析仲裁庭對證據之評價，進而提出我國未來因應訴訟之策略。

After the arbitral tribunal pursuant to Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea announced the Philippine South China Sea Arbitration Awards No. 2013-19 on July 12, 2016, it has aroused severe criticism by the governments and scholars from R.O.C. and P.R.C. However, should the ruling has received recognitions from the foreign academic society and international judicial regime, it will lead future judgements and influence the interests of states around the South China Sea. By analyzing the applicability of foreign scholars, international judicial precedence and state practices, this thesis tries to verify the suitability of the Arbitration regarding the issues of historical rights and island disputes. It is also based on the evidence submitted by the governments of China and Philippines, as well as the Amicus Curiae by the Chinese(Taiwan) Society of International Law, trying to analyzes the evidence evaluation by the Arbitration, and then proposes the strategy of future response to litigation.