高職專業教室整修用後評估之研究 -以某私立高職時尚創藝中心為例

Abstract

本研究以某私立高職專教室及其使用者為研究對象，旨在了解時尚創藝中心整修後是否發揮期待功能、使用上是否符合需求，並整合實務面使用後產生的問題，以作為日後學校建築改善及未來規劃學校建築的參考。本研究採用調查問卷及訪談為研究方法，學生問卷共發出650份、教師問卷共發出30份，得到有效問卷學生為646份、教師為26份，回收可用率為99.4%及86.7%。以獨立樣本t檢定(t-test)及單因子變異數分析(one-way ANOVA)來進行統計檢定，本研究之結論如下：\n一、師生對時尚創藝中心之整體用後評估給予高程度評價，以「空間佈置」最高。\n二、師生對時尚創藝中心之「教室環境」、「教學設備」給予中高程度評價，分別以「採光照明」、「玻璃書寫板」最高，對「空間佈置」、「管理維護」、「教學使用」給予高程度評價，分別以「整體設計」「教學器具清潔」「咖啡社社團教學」最高。\n三、女學生及男老師之使用評價較高，二年級學生評價較低，使用頻率愈高之學生評價愈高，非上課原因使用之學生評價較高，下課時間使用評價較高。\n四、時尚創藝中心之教學器具大都符合教育部專業實習科目設備基準。\n\n最後，本研究依據上述結果提出建議，供行政管理單位未來規劃校園建築之參考，及公、私部門推行多用途教學空間或相關專業教室的參考。

The participants of this study is the professional classroom of the private vocational high school and its users.The purpose of this study is to find out whether the professional classroom performs its expected functions after renovation, whether it meets the needs in use, and to integrate the problems arising from practical use, so as to provide reference for the future improvement of school buildings and future planning of school buildings.This study adopted questionnaire and interview as research methods, and A total of 650 questionnaires were sent out to students and 30 teachers, and 646 valid questionnaires were obtained from students and 26 from teachers. The effective response rate was 99.4% and 86.7%. The data is analyzed by t-test and One-way ANOVA, conclusions of this study are as follows :\n1.Teachers and students give a high degree evaluation on the Post-Occupancy Evaluation of the professional classrooms, with "space arrangement" being the highest.\n2.Teachers and students give a medium high level evaluation on the "classroom environment" and "teaching equipment" of the professional classrooms, respectively by "lighting" and "glass writing board" is the highest. Teachers and students give a high level evaluation on the " space arrangement ", "management maintenance" and "teaching" to give high degree evaluation, respectively by "integral design" , " clean teaching equipment" and "coffee club teaching" is the highest.\n3.Female students and male teachers had higher use evaluation, and the second grade students had lower evaluation. The higher the frequency of use, the higher the evaluation.Students don`t use classrooms for course have higher evaluation, and students who use it after class have higher evaluation.\n4.Most of the teaching equipment in the professional classrooms meet the standards of the Ministry of Education.\nFinally, based on the above results, this study provides suggestions for future school building planning by administrative management units, and for public and private sectors to promote multi-purpose teaching space or related professional classrooms.