Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/128142
題名: 實踐與挑戰 : 台灣在亞太地區的政府開發援助
The implementation and challenge: Taiwan’s official development assistance to the Asia-Pacific region
作者: 李旻臻
Lee, Min-Chen
貢獻者: 李栢浡
Lee, Pai-Po
李旻臻
Lee, Min-Chen
關鍵詞: 政府開發援助
國際援助合作
新南向政策
區域安全
Official development Assistance (ODA)
International aid
he New Southbound Policy
Regional security
a Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy
日期: 2019
上傳時間: 3-Jan-2020
摘要: 本文旨在解析並闡明中華民國(台灣)於亞洲及太平洋地區的政府開發援助之方式與成果比較,並從實證經驗與案例中歸納出台灣政府開發援助的基本理論體系,進而解構台灣政府開發援助之獨特性,藉由政府開發援助現狀之分析、援外政策之檢討以及執行層面的改善,進一步探討台灣的國際合作及區域安全。研究方法為先定義何謂政府開發援助,其次界定研究對象與範圍(東南亞地區與太平洋地區的國家),再依照台灣政府開發援助之不同性質分為兩大主軸。分別為:一、以「國際合作發展基金會」為主的技術協助及能力建構援助,二、以「行政院經貿談判辦公室」為主的投資、貸款、利息補貼援助。其藉由深入訪談兩位國際合作發展基金會的技術官員、三位國際關係與國際援助的學者、兩位行政院經貿談判辦公室的談判代表、一位中華民國外交部官員、一位海外投資開發公司代表以及一位中華民國國家安全局官員,以實證經驗與案例分析台灣政府開發援助的政策與執行,以及分析檢討援外政策的執行模式與探究其特殊性,分點說出結果以及研究發現:政府同時以這兩大援外主軸分別專責發展「能力建構」、「技術援助」、「呼應聯合國千禧年發展目標及建置ODA統計資料庫」與「政府利息補貼」、「建立政府主導的海外公共工程延攬機制」以此互補互助,並再以是否為邦交國分類進而判定相關主責單位。最後探討台灣於亞太地區的的國際參與及區域安全,與其政府開發援助之關聯及影響,並給予建議:政府應建置「為執行政策目標所設立的金融機構」、設置民間部門投資融資中心以爭取第三國合作案件、以及將現行的執行計劃放寬條件,除水利、供電、道路等硬體的實質基礎建設,亦可考慮醫療衛生等社會性基礎設施。
This research aims at providing objective analysis and comparison of Official Development Assistance (ODA) models of the Republic of China (Taiwan) in the Asia-Pacific region. The thesis tries to build a theoretical framework on Taiwan’s ODA by examining empirical evidence and case studies to shed light on the perspective and possible improvement of Taiwan’s ODA. Through deliberating and summing up targets of Taiwan’s ODA policy, the author analyzes related international cooperation and regional security. This paper defines ODA in the very beginning, followed by framing the research target into two groups— Southeast Asia counties and Pacific countries. Then the author builds a framework based on two distinctive ODA’s characteristics. First, technical assistance and capacity-building assistance, which are related to the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (TaiwanICDF). Second, investment, loans, and interest subsidy assistance, which are related to the Office of Trade Negotiations (OTN) under the Executive Yuan (the Cabinet). By interviewing ten stakeholders — two TaiwanICDF officials, three scholars in international relation and ODA, two trade representatives of the Office of Trade Negotiations, one official from Ministry of Foreign Affairs, one representative from overseas investment and development cooperation, and one official from the National Security Bureau — the author indicates the challenges of Taiwan’s ODA policy and improvement of execution capability while concludes with Taiwan’s government carried out its ODA projects through two framework: financing facility by OTN and technical assistance by TaiwanICDF. The government has two roles in the ODA program, to review and approve the proposed infrastructure plan and subsidize the interest on the loans disbursed. In addition, it is suggested that the government should establish a suitable policy-based financial institution and initiate a state government level of ODA, which takes social infrastructure like sanitary and medical services into concern.
參考文獻: American Institute in Taiwan, “Global Cooperation and Training Framework (GCTF),” webpage, undated(a).\n\nAsian Development Bank. (2012). The Saemaul Undong Movement in the Republic of Korea: Sharing Knowledge on Community-Driven Development. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/29881/saemaul- undong-movement-korea.pdf\n\nAlam, S. (2017, July 11). Estimating the costs of SDGs implementation. Daily Sun. Retrieved from http://www.daily- sun.com/printversion/details/239574/Estimating-the-costs-of-SDGs-implementation\n\nBreuning, M. (2002). Foreign Aid, Development Assistance, or Development Cooperation: What`s in a Name? International Politics, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 369-377.\n\nBisbee, J. H., Hollyer, J. R., Rosendorff, B. P., & Vreeland, J. R. (2016). The millennium development goals and education: Accountability and substitution in global assessment.\n\nCouncil on Hemispheric Affairs, “The Big China and Taiwan Tussle: Dollar Diplomacy Returns to Latin America,”\n\nCrawford, Gordon. (2001). Foreign Aid and Political Reform: A comparative Analysis of Democracy Assistance and Political Conditionality. New York: Palgrave.\n\nFidrmuc, J., Kostagianni, S. (2015), Impact of IMF Assistance on Economic Growth Revisited. Economics and Sociology, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 32-40.\n\nGardner, Cory, “Gardner, Markey Introduce Legislation to Ensure Taiwan’s Role on World Stage Is Not Diminished by China,” Washington, D.C., May 25, 2018.\n\nGray, Kevin. (2014). U.S. Aid and Uneven Development in East Asia. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 656, No. 1, pp. 41-58.\n\nGwin, C. (1997). US relations with the World Bank. In D. Kapur, J. P. Lewis, & R. Webb (Eds.), The World Bank: Its First Half Century, 2, 195–275. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.\n\nHorton, Chris, “In Taiwan, U.S. Official Says Commitment ‘Has Never Been Stronger,’” New York Times, March 21, 2018a.\n\nHughes, H. (2003). Trade Or Aid? Which Benefits Developing Countries More? Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 1-19.\n\nHuang, Kuei-Bo, Rong-Hui Chou, 2014/8, 〈我國「南向政策」之 回顧與影響展望與探索〉, Prospect & Exploration, Vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 61-69.\n\nJones, Sam, “World Heading for Catastrophe over Natural Disasters, Risk Expert Warns,” The Guardian, April 24, 2016.\n\nKan, Shirley A., and Wayne M. Morrison, U.S.-Taiwan Relationship: Overview of Policy Issues, Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service, R41952, December 11, 2014.\n\nKaul, I., P. Conceicao, K. Le. Goulven, and R. U. Mendoza. (2003). Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.\n\nKelly, James, “Overview of U.S. Policy Toward Taiwan,” testimony at hearing on Taiwan, House International Relations Committee, Washington, D.C., April 21, 2004.\n\nKosack, Stephen. (2003). Effective Aid: How Democracy Allows Development Aid to Improve the Quality of Life. World Development, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 1-22.\n\nKathuria, Rajat, Mansi Kedia, Yu-Yin Wu, & Yu-Chia Hsu, 2013. “The Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Sector,” in Parthapratim Pal, Arpita Mukherjee, & Kristy Tsun-Tzu Hsu eds., Enhancing Trade, Investment and Cooperation between India and Taiwan. New Delhi: Academic Foundation. pp. 245-286.\n\nKhan, Haider A., “Technology and Economic Development: The Case of Taiwan,” Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 13, No. 40, 2004, pp. 507–521.\n\nLanteigne, M. (2015). Chinese foreign policy: An introduction. New York: Routledge.\n\nLee, P. P. (2016). Managing International Development and Cooperation. Great Coronora Press.\n\nLu, Zhenhua, “U.S. Urges China–Taiwan ‘Dialogue’ Despite Panama’s Jilting of Taipei,” South China Morning Post, June 14, 2017\n\nLu, I-Hsuan, and Sherry Hsiao, “Taiwan Force for Good in World, U.S. Official Says,” Taipei Times, April 28, 2018.\n\nMinistry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China. (2016). White Paper on Foreign Aid Policy (Summary).\n\nMinistry of Economic Office of the R.O.C.(Taiwan), 2001/4/25. 〈「加強對東南亞及紐澳地區經貿工作綱領」專案報告〉, Library Legislative Yuan, R.O.C.(Taiwan), <http://npl.ly.gov.tw/ npl/re port/900425/5.pdf>.\n\nMinistry of Economic Office of the R.O.C.(Taiwan), 2003/3/26. 〈我 國推動南向政策面臨問題與解決之道〉, Library Legislative Yuan, R.O.C.(Taiwan), <http://npl.ly.gov.tw/npl/report/920326/3. pdf>\n\nManyin, M.E., S. Daggett, B. Dolven, S.V. Lawrence, M.F. Martin, R. O’Rourke, & B. Vaughn. (2012). Pivot to the Pacific?: The Obama administration’s “rebalancing” toward Asia. Washington, D.C: Congressional Research Service.\n\nMOFA. (2016). Japan’s official development assistance white paper 2016. Government of Japan. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA). Retrieved from: http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/page22e_000815.html\n\nMOFA. (2014), International Cooperation and Development Report 2013\n\nNdiaga, Thiam, and Jess Macy Yu, “Taiwan ‘Sad, Angry’ as It Loses Second Ally in a Month Amid China Pressure,” Reuters, May 24, 2018. \n\nOECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2018). DAC glossary of key terms and concepts. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dac/dac-glossary.htm\n\nOffice of the President, Republic of China (Taiwan), 2016/5/20. “Inaugural address of ROC 14th-term President Tsai Ing-wen,” Office of the President, Republic of China (Taiwan), <http://eng lish.president.gov.tw/NEWS/4893>.\n\nOffice of the President of the R.O.C.(Taiwan), 2016/8/16.〈總統召 開「對外經貿戰略會談」通過「新南向政策」政策綱領〉, Office of the President of the R.O.C.(Taiwan), <http://www.presi- dent.gov.tw/NEWS/20639/>.\n\nPrizzon, A., Greenhill, R., & Mustapha, S. (2016). An age of choice for development finance: Evidence from country case studies. Synthesis Report. Overseas Development Institute.\n\nPryke, J. (2018). The bad – and good – of China’s aid in the Pacific, January 11. The Interpreter. Retrieved from https:// www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/bad-and-good-china-aid- pacific\n\nPompeo, Michael R., “Remarks on ‘America’s Indo-Pacific Economic Vision,’” Washington, D.C.: U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Indo-Pacific Business Forum, July 30, 2018\n\nRich, Timothy, and Andi Dahmer, “Taiwan, International Aid, and the Challenge of Official Recognition,” Taiwan Sentinel, May 6, 2018. As of February 1, 2019:
https://sentinel.tw/taiwan-intl-aid-recognition/\n\n“Taiwan, U.S. Sign MOU to Extend Partnership in Global Health, Aid,” Focus Taiwan, June 1, 2015.\n\nTaiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund, “About Us > Executive Officers,” webpage, undated(b).\n\nTaiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund, “Bilateral Projects, Central America and South America,” webpage, undated(d).\n\nTaiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund, “History > History of the Taiwan ICDF,” webpage\n\nThe ASEAN Secretariat, 2015. ASEAN 2025: Forging Ahead Together. Jakarta: The ASEAN Secretstiat.\n\nTubilewicz, Czeslaw, and Alain Guilloux, “Does Size Matter? Foreign Aid in Taiwan’s Diplomatic Strategy, 2000–2008,” Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 65, No. 3, June 2011, pp. 322–339.\n\nU.S. Agency for International Development, “Foreign Aid Explorer: U.S. Foreign Aid by Country,” webpage, undated(b). \nUSAID—See U.S. Agency for International Development.\n\nU.S. Agency for International Development, “Missions, Visions and Values,” webpage\n\n“U.S. Lawmakers Introduce TAIPEI Act,” Taipei Times, September 7, 2018.\n\nSchmidt-Traub, G., & Shah, A. (2015). Investment needs to achieve the sustainable development goals. Paris and New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.\n\nShambaugh, D. (2015). China’s soft-power push: The search for respect. Foreign Affairs, (July/August).\n\nWHO (2017, July 17). WHO estimates cost of reaching global health targets by 2030. World Health Organization (WHO). Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/cost-health-targets/en/\n\nWoods, E. (2013). Smart city progress report: Japan. Smart Cities Council. Retrieved from:\nhttp://smartcitiescouncil.com/resources/smart-city-progress-report-japan\n\nWorld Bank. (2016). IDA 18 replenishment. Retrieved from: http://ida.worldbank.org/financing/replenishments/ida18- replenishment\n\nXinhua. (2017). China`s FDI inflow rises 4.1 pct in 2016, January 13. Retrieved from http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-01/13/ c_135980877.html\n\nYu, Jess Macy, and Ben Blanchard, “Taiwan Says China Dangled $3 Billion to Grab Ally Dominican Republic,” Reuters, April 30, 2018.\n\nZawacki, B. (2017). America`s biggest southeast Asian ally is drifting toward China, September 29. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from foreignpolicy.com/2017/09/29/its-on-trump-to-stop- bangkoks-drift-to-beijing/
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS)
106862005
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106862005
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
200501.pdf915.07 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.