Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131295
題名: 臺北市國民小學兼任行政教師社群媒體使用行為、職場友誼與工作投入之關係研究
A Study on the Relationship among Use Behavior of Social Media, Workplace Friendship and Work Engagement of Administrative Teachers in Elementary Schools in Taipei City
作者: 王惠瑩
Wang, Hui-Ying
貢獻者: 郭昭佑
Kuo, Chao-Yu
王惠瑩
Wang, Hui-Ying
關鍵詞: 兼任行政教師
社群媒體使用行為
職場友誼
工作投入
Administrative Teachers
Use Behavior of Social Media
Workplace Friendship
Work Engagement
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 3-Aug-2020
摘要: 本研究以臺北市公立國民小學兼任行政教師為研究對象,探討社群媒體使用行為、職場友誼與工作投入之關係。採問卷調查法,發放408份問卷,回收有效問卷368份,問卷有效率為90.20%。\n運用敘述統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關、迴歸分析等統計方法分析,研究主要發現如下:\n一、臺北市國民小學兼任行政教師社群媒體使用行為、職場友誼與工作投入的現況程度良好,具中高程度。\n二、不同婚姻狀況對社群媒體使用行為之「工作聯繫運用」構面具顯著差異。\n三、不同婚姻狀況與兼任行政職務對職場友誼具顯著差異。\n四、不同性別、年齡、婚姻狀況、行政年資、兼任行政職務與學校規模對工作投入具顯著差異。\n五、最高學歷與學校歷史,對社群媒體使用行為、職場友誼與工作投入皆不具顯著差異。\n六、社群媒體使用行為、職場友誼與工作投入彼此具正向相關。\n七、社群媒體使用行為、職場友誼對工作投入具預測力,且以職場友誼預測力較高。\n八、職場友誼在社群媒體使用行為與工作投入之間具部分中介效果。\n最後根據研究發現及結論,提出實務運作與未來研究相關建議。
This study takes administrative teachers in Taipei public elementary schools as the research object, to find the relationship among use behavior of social media, workplace friendship and work engagement. This study adopts questionnaire survey method. 408 questionnaires were distributed, and 368 valid questionnaires were recovered. The recovery rate was 90.20%.\nThe responses were analyzed by descriptive statistics, independent t-Test, one-way ANOVA, correlation and regression analysis. The main findings of the study are as follows:\n1.The status of use behavior of social media, workplace friendship and work engagement of administrative teachers in elementary schools in Taipei City is good, and it is at a medium to high level.\n2.Marital status has significant differences in the "work connection application" dimension of Use Behavior of Social Media.\n3.Marital status and administrative position have significant differences in Workplace Friendship.\n4.Gender, age, marital status, administrative seniority, administrative position and school size have significant differences in work engagement.\n5.The highest academic degree and school history have no significant differences in use behavior of social media , workplace friendships, and work engagement.\n6.Use behavior of social media , workplace friendship and work engagement are positively related to each other.\n7.Use behavior of social media and workplace friendship are predictable on work engagement, and workplace friendship has a higher predictability.\n8.Workplace friendship has a partial intermediary effect between use behavior of social media and work engagement.\nFinally, based on the research findings and conclusions, provide suggestions for practical operations and future studies.
參考文獻: 壹、中文部分\nLINE官方網站 (2014)。【LINE 3週年】LINE&LINE周邊應用程式的全球下載數突破10億次!。取自http://official-blog.line.me/tw/archives/39522419.html\nLINE官方網站 (2018)。LINE 宣佈全面擴大在台投資 三大面向看LINE 2018發展策略。取自https://linecorp.com/zh-hant/pr/news/zh-hant/2018/2085\n卜敏正、徐如宜、陳秋雲(2019年8月4日)。教師行政逃亡潮 從山壁崩落變土石流。聯合新聞網。取自https://udn.com/news/story/11319/3968436\n王嵩音(2007)。網路使用之態度、動機與影響。資訊社會研究,(12),57-85。\n王鈺雯(2015)。中小學教師職場友誼與工作投入之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。\n朱信吉(2018)。領導風格、職場友誼與組織效能關係之研究—以調查局調查人員為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。\n何美欣(2017)。探討行政人員職場友誼、工作投入、組織認同感對工作績效影響之研究-以南部科技大學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。\n吳玉琦(2016)。國民小學課後照顧教師組織支持對工作投入影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。\n吳政達(2019a)。國民中學校長包容性領導對教師助人行為與工作投入之影響。教育與心理研究,42(2),1-30。\n吳政達(2019b)。國中校長真誠領導、教師心理資本與工作投入關係之研究:信任的中介效果分析。臺東大學教育學報,30(1),1-31。\n吳珮瑤(2018)。社群媒體成癮對使用者的工作敬業心之影響-以Facebook、Line為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮縣。\n吳清山(2014)。學校行政。臺北市(第七版):心理\n吳紫誠(2009)。即時通訊使用與組織溝通及線上領導效能相關性之研究 -以MSN Messenger為例(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。\n李怡樺(2017)。職場霸凌、樂觀、工作敬業心與幸福感關聯性 之研究-以國民小學教師為例(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新北市。\n李秉芳(2017)。國中教師運用即時通訊軟體LINE進行親師溝通之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。世新大學,臺北市。\n李建宏(2019)。即時通訊群組交流頻率與職場友誼關係之研究-以主管加入群組為干擾變數(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化縣。\n李柏蓉(2006)。高雄縣市國民小學行政人員溝通行為與教師工作投入及組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。\n李培銘(2005)。職場友誼與工作投入關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北市。\n李涵芝(2019)。即時通訊軟體LINE於親師溝通之家長滿意度探討(未出版之碩士論文)。樹德科技大學,高雄市。\n李清榮(2006)。教師人際關係的經營。通識研究集刊,10,241-258。\n李嘉奇(2001)。國民小學教職員工採用的溝通媒介類型與組織溝通滿足關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺南師範學院,臺南市。\n李靜宜(2019)。國小導師班級經營和親師溝通—智慧型手機即時通訊軟體LINE親師群組的運用(未出版之碩士論文)。南華大學,嘉義縣。\n沈采薇(2016)。行動通訊軟體使用者之職場關係與溝通焦慮感關聯研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。\n周玉青(2019)。即時通訊軟體與社群軟體使用行為對工作投入之影響—以職場友誼為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化縣。\n官惠卿(2016)。公務人員知覺主管服務領導、職場友誼與工作滿意度之相關研究—以臺北市政府為例(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立大學,臺北市。\n林玉惠(2019)。學校行政人員工作不安全感、職場友誼 與工作敬業心之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。南臺科技大學,臺南市。\n林錦慧、但漢敏(譯)(2007)。人生一定要有的8個朋友(原作者:Tom Rath )。臺北市(第一版),商智文化。(原著出版年:2006)\n林瓊惠(2016)。職場友誼和員工幸福感關連性研究-----組織認同之中介作用與Line群組溝通之調節效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。\n林瓊瀛(2018年4月19日)。「上班好同事,下班不認識」──職場情誼、私人友誼,到底要不要劃清界線?。Cheers快樂工作人雜誌。取自https://www.cheers.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5089400&page=2\n凃保民、顏春枝(2017)。即時通訊軟體與行政溝通:以臺南市學校行政人員採用Line為例。康大學報,7,83-98。\n徐文翠(2015)。職場友誼對敬業貢獻之關係以金融儲備幹部為例。科技與人力教育季刊,2(2),46-60。\n秦夢群(2017)。教育行政理論與模式。臺北市(第三版):五南圖書。\n袁偉華(2015)。職場友誼、工作鑲嵌、組織承諾與工作敬業心關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學,高雄市。\n財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2018)。「台灣寬頻網路使用調查」結果公布。上網日期:2019年10月17日,取自https://www.twnic.net.tw/doc/twrp/201812e.pdf\n財團法人資訊工業策進會(2016a)。《行動App消費者調查》超愛聊 逾80%每天使用社交通訊App。取自https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=423&List=106\n財團法人資訊工業策進會(2016b)。《行動App消費者調查》台灣手機用戶平均每人下載16個App。取自https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=424\n財團法人資訊工業策進會(2018)。台灣人更黏手機了!近8成民眾每天使用手機逾2小時 資策會:掌握娛樂市場需求成下一波商機。取自https://www.iii.org.tw/Press/NewsDtl.aspx?nsp_sqno=2081&fm_sqno=14\n張芳全(2019)。統計就是要這樣跑。臺北市(第四版):心理出版\n教育部(2018)。國民小學與國民中學班級編制及教職員員額編制準則。檢自https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0070006\n教育部統計處(2019)。國民中小學主管人數。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/qframe.aspx?qno=OQAwAA2\n梁進龍(2005)。職場友誼與員工創造力關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北市。\n許尹玟(2018)。即時通訊軟體LINE應用於幼兒園親師溝通之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東大學,屏東縣。\n連娟瓏(2012)。大專院校校長真誠領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究—以教師工作敬業為中介變項。服務業管理評論,10,67-98。\n陳玉芬(2016)。即時通訊軟體的應用偏好度對工作壓力及組織溝通效能之影響-以自我效能為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。\n陳怡伶(2013)。職家衝突、職場友誼對幸福感與敬業貢獻度之影響—以組織氣候為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。\n陳俊緒(2019)。國小教師職場友誼對組織認同之影響-以職場八卦為調節作用(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化縣。\n陳建佑(2009)。公家機關會審人員職場友誼與工作壓力、工作倦怠之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。亞洲大學,臺中市。\n陳彥琪(2016)。工作敬業、職家增益與心理幸福感關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化縣。\n陳美芳(2017)。工作壓力與工作敬業之研究─以職場友誼為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。嶺東科技大學,臺中市。\n陳貞內(2017)。即時通訊軟體使用時間與內容對員工工作投入、工作績效影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北市。\n陳淑幸(2018)。樂觀、工作敬業與個人工作適配關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。\n陳淑玲、黃讌茹(2014)。轉換型領導對工作敬業心的影響歷程:心理資本與服務氣候之跨層次中介觀點。臺大管理論叢,25(1),29-156。\n陳勝發(2019)。企業社會責任知覺、員工組織認同與工作敬業心之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。\n陳逸珊(2019)。高雄市區公所員工Line使用行為與其工作績效關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。\n陳詩盈(2015)。即時通訊軟體LINE的應用偏好度對組織溝通效能及團隊凝聚力之影響-以工作壓力為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。\n陳潔靈(2019)。成就動機對工作士氣及工作投入之影響:以即時通訊軟體使用行為為調節變數(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化縣。\n陳麗英、張奕財和顏弘欽(2016)。承諾感、工作敬業心與工作表現之關聯性:臺灣地區國小教師的實證研究。教師專業研究期刊,12,1-32。\n揭維恆(2017)。職場友誼因果關係觀念性模式之建構(未出版之博士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。\n辜令蓁(2017)。以LINE作為軍隊非正式溝通管道對組織溝通效能及社會支持之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國防大學政治作戰學院,臺北市。\n黃志灯、林惠芳、洪福源(2018)。國小教師時間觀點、教師學業樂觀與教師工作投入之關係研究。運動與遊憩研究,13(2),93-115。\n楊豐華、黃萱如、楊豐松(2019)。轉型領導、心理所有權與工作敬業關係之研究。致理學報,39,107-142。http://dx.doi.org/10.29858/SIMR.201212.0003\n楊麗櫻(2019)。國小學童家長運用即時通訊軟體LINE進行親師溝通行為意圖與滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中華大學,新竹市。\n廖千惠(2019)。職場友誼對工作壓力及組織溝通之影響 -以即時通訊軟體使用行為為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化縣。\n廖國巽(2016)。即時通訊軟體LINE之群組在學校運用現況之探討-以臺中地區某完全中學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中臺科技大學,臺中市。\n臺北市政府教育局(2019年8月26日)。教育局學生到離校訊息line推播服務,請家長多加利用!。取自http://www.thps.tp.edu.tw/files/15-1000-3436,c133-1.php\n臺北市政府資訊局(2019年5月18日)。設備網路管理。取自https://doit.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=6CB3401DAD37F659&s=3284900CC421A8E1\n趙國成(2018)。以即時通訊軟體作為親師溝通之研究-以臺中某舞蹈班為例(未出版之碩士論文)。世新大學,臺北市。\n趙國斌(2015)。科技大學教師組織公平知覺對組織公民行為影響之研究-以職場友誼、工作活力為中介變項(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。\n劉至鈞(2017)。LINE的使用行為對組織溝通效能與工作壓力之影響-以組織氣候為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,臺中市。\n劉宏斌(2019)。公務人員使用即時通訊軟體LINE 的態度與應對行為研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。\n劉和然(2017)。國民中小學校人事人員情緒勞務、職場友誼以及組織認同關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學,臺北市。\n劉昱志(2007)。即時通訊軟體使用對於組織溝通滿意影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園市。\n潘佳嫻(2012)。職場友誼對組織認同之影響-以工作投入為干擾變數(未出版之碩士論文)。育達商業科技大學,苗栗縣。\n蔡宜樺(2019)。探討職場友誼與工作投入之關係-以組織認同感為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。元智大學,桃園市。\n蔡玟蘋(2019)。矛盾領導、職場友誼與工作敬業心三者之關聯性(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄科技大學,高雄市。\n蔡金田、董德佑(2017)。行動即時通訊軟體應用於學校行政溝通之探討–以南投縣國民小學為例。教育行政論壇,9(1),49-72\n蔣黃花(2018)。教師使用LINE和FACEBOOK進行親師溝通之意願研究-以高雄市國小為例(未出版之碩士論文)。高苑科技大學,高雄市。\n謝安田、楊新生(2011)。職場友誼對組織認同之影響-以工作滿意與群體凝聚力爲中介變數。人文暨社會科學期刊,7(1),77-90\n簡秋丹(2017)。運用即時通訊進行公務溝通所產生的影響: 溝通效能、工作壓力及焦慮(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。\n羅鈞議(2014)。個人與組織契合度、職場友誼與工作敬業-代理代課教師之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化縣。\n譚偉晟(2016年11月16日)。LINE 都得叫一聲大哥?「ICQ」正式邁入 20 週年!。自由時報。取自https://3c.ltn.com.tw/news/27364\n貳、英文部分\nAgarwal, U. A., Datta, S., Blake-Beard, S., & Bhargava, S. (2012). Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement. Career Development International, 17 (3), 208-230.\nAjzen, I. (1985). From intention to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp.11-39).\nAjzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.\nBakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (Eds.). (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press.\nBakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L., & Leiter, M. P. (2011). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 4-28. doi:10.1080/1359432x.2010.485352\nBakker, A., Schaufeli, W., Leiter, M., & Taris, T. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3),187-200.\nBaron, R.M.,& Kenny,D.A.(1986)The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations .Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51,1173-1182.\nBerman, E. M., West, J. P., & Maurice N. Richter, J. (2002). Workplace Relations: Friendship Patterns and Consequences (According to Managers). Public Administration Review, 62(2), 217-230.\nBilgin, Y. N., & Kiral, B. (2019). The Relation between Workplace Friendship and School Culture Perception of Teachers. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(9) ,73-93. doi:10.5281/zenodo.2540489\nBlomme, R. J., Kodden, B., & Beasley-Suffolk, A. (2015). Leadership theories and the concept of work engagement: Creating a conceptual framework for management implications and research. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(2), 125-144. doi:10.1017/jmo.2014.71\nBoyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x\nBoyd, N.G. & Taylor, R.R. (1998). A developmental approach to the examination of friendship in leader-follower relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 9(1), 1-25.\nChang, H.-T., Hsu, H.-M., Liou, J.-W., & Tsai, C.-T. (2014). Psychological contracts and innovative behavior: A moderated path analysis of work engagement and job resources. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43 (10), 2120-2135.\nCrawford, E. R., Lepine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834-848. doi:10.1037/a0019364\nDavis, Fred D., Bagozzi, Richard P. and Warshaw, Paul R. (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science. 35(8), 982-1003\nDemerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499\nDeVany, C. (2003). Working relationships, relationships that work. Journal of Property Management, 68(4), 24.\nDevin Coldewey(2016, November 16). Happy 20th birthday,ICQ! TechCrunch. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/15/happy-20th-birthday-icq/\nDotan H. (2007)Friendship ties at work: Origins, evolution and consequences for managerial effectiveness. Los Angeles: University of California.\nDotan, H. (2009). Workplace friendships: origins and consequences for managerial effectiveness. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2009(1), 1-6\nFaceook Newsroom(2012,July 6). Yahoo! and Facebook Launch Strategic Alliance and Resolve Patent Dispute.Facebook. Retrieved from https://about.fb.com/news/2012/07/yahoo-and-facebook-launch-strategic-alliance-and-resolve-patent-dispute/\nFan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56-83.\nFishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. MA: Addison-Wesley.\nFornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18, 39-50.\nFritz, J. H. (1997). Men`s and Women`s Organizational Peer Relationships: A Comparison. The Journal of business communication, 34(1), 27-44.\nGay, L.R., Mills, G.E., &Airasian, P.W. (2012) .Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. 10th Edition, Pearson, Upper Saddle River.\nGrinter, R. E., & Palen, L. (2002). Instant messaging in teen life. Presented at the\nProceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.\nHackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reaction to job characteristics. Journal of applied psychology, 55(3), 259-286.\nHays, R. B. (1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 909-924.\nHesel, R. A., & Williams, R. C. (2009). Social networking sites and college-bound students. StudentPoll, 7(2), 1-8.\nHobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44 (3), 513–524.\nHobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: Aadvancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337-421.\nHuselid, M.A. (1995). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover,Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38,635–672.\nJenkins-Guarnieri, M. A., Wright, S. L., & Johnson, B. (2013). Development and validation of a social media use integration scale. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(1), 38-50. doi:10.1037/a0030277\nKahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 692-724.\nKanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 341-349.\nKaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003\nKaranika-Murray, M., Duncan, N., Pontes, H. M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Organizational identification, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology,30 (8), 1019-1033.\nKietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241-251. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005\nKlassen, R. M., Aldhafri, S., Mansfield, C. F., Purwanto, E., Siu, A. F. Y., Wong, M. W., & Woods-McConney, A. (2012). Teachers’ Engagement at Work: An International Validation Study. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(4), 317-337. doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.678409\nKline, R. B. (2011). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.).New York, NY: Guilford Press.\nKrackhardt, D., & Stern, R. N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 123-140.\nKram, K.E.,& Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 110-132.\nKruger, L. J., Bernstein, G., & Botman, H. (1995). The Relationship Between Team Friendships and Burnout Among Residential Counselors. Journal of Social Psychology, 135(2), 191-201.\nLodahl, T. M., & Kejnar, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of applied psychology, 49(1), 24.\nMacey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement.Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3–30.\nMacLeod, D., and Clarke, N. (2009), Engaging for Success: Enhancing Performance Through Employee Engagement, London: Office of Public Sector Information.\nMacnamara, J., & Zerfass, A. (2012). Social Media Communication in Organizations: The Challenges of Balancing Openness, Strategy, and Management. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 6(4), 287-308. doi:10.1080/1553118x.2012.711402\nMao, H.-Y. (2006). The relationship between organizational level and workplace friendship. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(10), 1819-1833. doi:10.1080/09585190600965316\nMarkiewicz, D., Devine, I., & Kausilas, D. (2000). Friendships of women and men at work Job satisfaction and resource implications. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(2), 161-184.\nMaslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.\nMay, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harte, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–13.\nNielsen, I. K., Jex, S. M., & Adams, G. A. (2000). Development and validation of scores on a two-dimensional workplace friendship scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(4), 628-643.\nOfoegbu, O. E., Akanbi, P. A., & Akhanolu, I. O. (2012). Association Between Perception of Organizational Politics and Workplace Friendship. International Business and Management, 5(2), 61-70. doi:10.3968/j.ibm.1923842820120502.1020\nPeruta, A. and A. B. Shields (2016). Social media in higher education: understanding how colleges and universities use Facebook. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(1): 131-143.\nPlant, R. (2004). Online communities. Technology in Society, 26(1), 51-65. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2003.10.005\nRich, B. L., LePine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement:Antecedents and effects on job performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635.\nRiordan, C. M., & Griffeth, R.W. (1995). The opportunity for friendship in the workplace:An underexplored construct.Journal of Business & Psychology,10, 141-154.\nRothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 655-684. doi:10.2307/3094827\nSchaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multisample study. Journal of organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.\nSchaufeli, W. B., Bakker A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire A Cross-National Study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4),701-716.\nSeligman, M. E. P., and Csikszentmihalyi, M. 2000. Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55 (1): 5-14.\nSeppanen, S., & Gualtieri, W. (2012). The millenial generation research review. Retrieved October 30, 2019, Retrieved from https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/reports/millennial-generation-research-review\nSias, P. M., & Cahill, D. J. (1998). From coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication, 62(3), 273-299. doi:10.1080/10570319809374611\nSias, P. M., & Perry, T. (2004). Disengaging from Workplace Relationships. Human Communication Research, 30(4), 589–602.\nTim O’Reilly (2005). What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Retrieved November 20, 2019, from https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html?page=1\nTims, M., Bakker, A. B., Derks, D., & van Rhenen, W. (2013). Job crafting at the team and individual level: Implications for work engagement and performance. Group & Organization Management, 38 (4), 427-454.\nTruss, C., Shantz, A., Soane, E., Alfes, K., & Delbridge, R. (2013). Employee engagement, organizational performance and individual well-being: exploring the evidence, developing the theory. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24 (14), 2657-2669.\nVenkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.\nWinstead, B. A., Derlega, V. J., Montgomery, M. J., & Pilkington, C. (1995).The quality of friendships at work and job satisfaction. Journal of Social and\nPersonal Relationships, 12(2), 199-215.\nWright, P. H. (1969).A model and a technique for studies of friendship.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(3), 295-309.\nWright, P. H. (1974). The delineation and measurement of some key variables in the study of friendship. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 5(2), 93–96.\nWright, P. H. (1978). Toward a theory of friendship based on the conception of self. Human Communication Research, 4, 196-207.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
106911008
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106911008
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
100801.pdf3.05 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.