Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131300
題名: 課程改革中的掙扎:一位英文領召老師情緒與專業認同轉變之個案研究
Struggles for Curriculum Reform: A Case Study on an English Subject Leader`s Change of Emotions and Professional Identity
作者: 賴姿好
Lai, Tzu-Hao
貢獻者: 黃怡萍
Huang, Yi-Ping
賴姿好
Lai, Tzu-Hao
關鍵詞: 教師情緒
專業認同
課程改革
校本課程發展
Teacher emotion
Professional identity
Curriculum reform
School-based curriculum development
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 3-Aug-2020
摘要: 鑑於教師兼任各領域召集人在新一波108新課綱的課程改革中扮演關鍵的成敗角色,本論文藉由個案分析,深入探索一位台灣英文領召老師在發展校本課程期間所經歷的情緒轉變,以及身為領域課程設計者在專業認同上的另一層體悟,兩者交互呈現教師在改革浪潮之下,持續掙扎、最終生存並自我成長的一段歷程。經由分析與個案教師的半結構訪談、口語敘事及教師在社群網站上發佈的貼文,本研究發現,由新課綱宣導實施,直到課程設計、發展到最終實踐,領召教師的情緒由一開始的期許轉為憂慮、歷經躁動不安而後歸於安定,而過程中的情緒起伏突顯教師倦怠來自於兼顧多重身份與課程設計工作下的長期壓力。此外,在學校特定情境下所引發的種種負面情緒,如:緊張、焦慮、擔憂、壓力…等,並非獨立於情境之內,而是與校內人事物息息相關。因此,隨著課程逐步發展成型,領召教師的個人生活與工作的情緒連結亦更為緊密;然而,教師所面臨的負面工作壓力並未得到釋放,取而代之在情境中轉移,形成經年累月、彈性疲乏的無限迴圈,進一步剝奪領召教師的幸福感,讓個體在課程改革的大環境中更加失落、疏離。\n透過本論文之個案研究,希望能提供未來課程發展與改革不同的觀點。首先,除了正向案例宣導,鼓勵並提供領召教師抒發負面情緒之管道與方式,有助於形塑教師對於課程改革的認知。除此之外,提倡校長以轉型領導風格提升校內氣氛,有益於增進校長、行政單位與領召教師三方之有效溝通,進而昇華教師幸福感及教師承諾,開啟課程改革成功實踐的契機。
Concerning teachers’ involvement as a critical role in the recent curriculum reform—New Curriculum Guidelines of 12 Year Basic Education, the case study attempts to provide a comprehensive overview of a Taiwanese English subject leader’s survival in school-based curriculum development. The purpose of the study is to explore the teacher-participant’s emotions and perception of her professional identities, including her interpretation of these emotional experiences and her view on subject leadership in curriculum design.\nData was generated through her online journals, the researcher’s notes, semi-structured interviews and oral narratives over a six-month period with a female in-service English teacher in a junior high school located in the capital city of Taiwan. Her accounts were reconstructed to give snapshots of how a teacher struggles to manage feelings of nervousness, worry, anxiety and stress on a daily basis. As the eight narratives offer a glimpse into each unique moment in which she was emotionally provoked, events are interwoven with one another and there emerges the dynamic interaction between emotions and professional identities. The findings illustrate a burned-out teacher undergoing a massive reform has experienced multiple emotions in a process of change. Additionally, her stories present a chronic tendency from a positive state to a negative one. In particular, the interpretations of them elicit more negative emotional terms rather than positive ones; that exemplifies teachers’ persistent struggles in all aspects. On the other hand, the stressed teacher also encountered problems, such as enduring excessive workload, having difficulties to meet the principal’s expectations or identifying with the set goals. Struggles with these conflicting situations elevate the level of anxiety, which made her fall into a trap of dreary cycles. However, from struggle to strength, the novice subject leader has survived the bad stories and grown into a proficient master of multi-tasking towards her journey’s end.\nThe research provides implications for the complex nature of teacher emotion and professional identity in the context of curriculum reform. First, opportunities should be present for teachers to articulate internal emotional experiences in various situations that evoke their strong feelings. Second, better coordinating efforts towards effective implementation of educational reform are required to improve teachers’ task perception and support them go through the period of adopting new ideas. Lastly, the transformational leadership style of school principals determines the tremendous effects of building positive school climate, which enhances teachers’ well-being and hence has profound influence on the success of achieving fundamental curriculum changes.
參考文獻: Acker, S. (1999). The Realities of Teachers’ Work: Never a Dull Moment. London: Cassell.\nAkın, U., Aydın, İ., Erdoğan, Ç., & Demirkasımoğlu, N. (2013). Emotional labor and burnout among Turkish primary school teachers. The Australian Educational Researcher, 41(2), 155-169.\nAssunção Flores, M. (2005). Teachers’ views on recent curriculum changes: Tensions and challenges. Curriculum journal, 16(3), 401-413.\nBall, S. J., Ball, S., Goodson, I. F., & Goodson, I. (2002). Teachers’ lives and careers. London: Falmer Press.\nBalyer, A. (2012). Transformational Leadership Behaviors of School Principals: A Qualitative Research Based on Teachers’ Perceptions. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3), 581-591.\nBaviskar, S. (2019). Who Creams? Explaining the Classroom Cream-Skimming Behavior of School Teachers from a Street-Level Bureaucracy Perspective. International Public Management Journal, 22(3), 524-559.\nBazeley, P. (2009). Analysing qualitative data: More than ‘identifying themes’. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(2), 6-22.\nBeauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175-189.\nBeijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107-128.\nBond, M. H. (1993). Emotions and their expression in Chinese culture. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 17(4), 245-262.\nBottiani, J. H., Duran, C. A., Pas, E. T., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2019). Teacher stress and burnout in urban middle schools: Associations with job demands, resources, and effective classroom practices. Journal of School Psychology, 77, 36-51.\nBritzman, D. P. (1998). Lost subjects, contested objects: Toward a psychoanalytic inquiry of learning. Albany: State University of New York Press.\nBullock, S. M. (2013). Learning to teach and the false apprenticeship: Emotion and identity development during the field experience placement. In M. Newberry, A. Gallant & P. Riley (Eds.), Emotion and school: Understanding how the hidden curriculum influences relationships, leadership, teaching and learning (pp. 119-140). Bingley, UK: Emerald.\nCanrinus, E. T., Helms‐Lorenz, M., Beijaard, D., Buitink, J., & Hofman, A. (2011). Profiling teachers’ sense of professional identity. Educational Studies, 37(5), 593-608.\nCarnoy, M., & Rhoten, D. (2002). What Does Globalization Mean for Educational Change? A Comparative Approach. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 1-9.\nCarspecken, F. P. (2013). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.\nChen, H. L., & Chung, J. (2000). The implementation of school-based curriculum development. School improvement in Taiwan: Problems and possibilities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Hong Kong, China.\nChen, J. (2016). Understanding teacher emotions: The development of a teacher emotion inventory. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 68-77.\nChen, J. K., & Astor, R. A. (2008). Students’ reports of violence against teachers in Taiwanese schools. Journal of School Violence, 8(1), 2-17.\nClement, J. (2014). Managing mandated educational change, School Leadership & Management, 34(1), 39-51.\nColdron, J., & Smith, R. (1999). Active location in teachers’ construction of their professional identities. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(6), 711-726.\nCollie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2011). Predicting teacher commitment: The impact of school climate and social–emotional learning. Psychology in the Schools, 48(10), 1034-1048.\nCollie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social–emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189-1204.\nCooper, K., & Olson, M. (1996). The multiple ‘I’s’ of teacher identity, in M. Kompf, T. Boak,W. R. Bond & D. Dworet (Eds) Changing research and practice: teachers’ professionalism, identities and knowledge, 78-89. London: Falmer Press.\nCowie, N. (2011). Emotions that experienced English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers feel about their students, their colleagues and their work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 235-242.\nDamasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 351(1346), 1413-1420.\nDatnow, A., Hubbard, L., & Mehan, H. (1998). Educational reform implementation: A co-constructed process (Technical report). Santa Cruz, CA: University of California, Center for Research on Edu-cation, Diversity, and Excellence\nDay, C., & Kington, A. (2008). Identity, well-being and effectiveness: The emotional contexts of teaching. Pedagogy. Culture & Society, 16(1), 7-23.\nDay, C., Elliot, B., & Kington, A. (2005). Reform, standards and teacher identity: Challenges of sustaining commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 563-577.\nDay, C., Kington, A., Stobart, G., & Sammons, P. (2006). The personal and professional selves of teachers: Stable and unstable identities. British Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 601-616.\nDen Brok, P., van der Want, A., Beijaard, D., & Wubbels, T. (2013). The interpersonal dimension in the classroom: a model of teachers’ interpersonal role identity, appraisal and teacher-student relationships. In M. Newberry, A. Gallant, & P. Riley (Eds.), Emotion and school: understanding how the hidden curriculum influences relationships, leadership, teaching, and learning (pp. 141-159). UK: Emerald.\nDinham, S. (2000). Teacher satisfaction in an age of change. In S. Dinham & C. Scott (Eds.), Teaching in context (pp.18-35). Camberwell: ACER.\nDixon, T. (2012). “Emotion”: The history of a keyword in crisis. Emotion Review, 4(4), 338-344.\nEisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 665-697.\nEmmer, E. T. (1994). Teacher emotions and classroom management. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.\nFarouk, S. (2010). Primary school teachers’ restricted and elaborated anger. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(4), 353-368.\nFried, L., Mansfield, C., & Dobozy, E. (2015). Teacher emotion research: Introducing a conceptual model to guide future research. Educational Research, 25(4), 415-441.\nFullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform (Vol. 10). London: Falmer Press.\nFullan, M. (2007). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.\nFullan, M. G. (1993). Why teachers must become change agents. Educational Leadership, 50, 12-12.\nGee, J. P. (2000). Chapter 3: Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99-125.\nGolombek, P., & Doran, M. (2014). Unifying cognition, emotion, and activity in language teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 102-111.\nGötz, T., & Hall, N. C. (2013). Emotion and achievement in the classroom. In J. Hattie & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 192-195). New York: Routledge.\nGross, J. J., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2011). Emotion generation and emotion regulation: One or two depends on your point of view. Emotion Review, 3(1), 8-16.\nHargreaves, A. (2001). Emotional geographies of teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1056–1080.\nHargreaves, A. (2004). Inclusive and exclusive educational change: Emotional responses of teachers and implications for leadership. School Leadership & Management, 24(3), 287-309.\nHargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 967-983.\nHarris, B. (2004). Leading by heart. School Leadership & Management, 24(4), 391-404.\nHøigaard, R., Giske, R. & Sundsli, K. (2011). Newly qualified teachers’ work engagement and teacher efficacy influences on job satisfaction, burnout, and the intention to quit. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 347-357.\nHollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research Differently: Free Association, Narrative and the Interview Method. London: Sage.\nHong, J. Y. (2012). Why do some beginning teachers leave the school, and others stay? Understanding teacher resilience through psychological lenses. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(4), 417-440.\nHuberman, A. M., Grounauer, M. M., & Marti, J. (1993). The lives of teachers. New York: Teachers College Press.\nIzard, C. E. (2009). Emotion theory and research: Highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 1-25.\nIzard, C. E. (2010). The many meanings/aspects of emotion: Definitions, functions, activation, and regulation. Emotion Review, 2(4), 363-370.\nJ.W. Little. (1996). The emotional contours and career trajectories of (disappointed) reform enthusiasts. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26 (3), 345-359.\nKaufmann, D., Johnson, S. M., Kardos, S. M., Liu, E., & Peske, H. G. (2002). “Lost At Sea”: New Teachers’ Experiences with Curriculum and Assessment. Teachers College Record, 104(2), 273-300.\nKelchtermans, G. (1993). Getting the story, understanding the lives: From career stories to teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(5-6), 443-456.\nKelchtermans, G. (1996). Teacher vulnerability: Understanding its moral and political roots. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 307-323.\nKelchtermans, G. (2005). Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 995-1006.\nLasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 899-916.\nLaurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238-1251.\nLee, J. C. K. & Yin, H. B. (2011). Teachers’ emotions and professional identity in curriculum reform: A Chinese perspective. Journal of Educational Change, 12(1), 25-46.\nLeithwood, K., & Beatty, B. (2008). Leading with teacher emotions in mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\nLevin, B. (1998). An Epidemic of Education Policy: (What) Can We Learn from Each Other? Comparative Education, 34(2), 131-141.\nLinnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 69-78.\nLipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.\nLiu, Y., & Xu, Y. (2011). Inclusion or exclusion?: A narrative inquiry of a language teacher’s identity experience in the ‘new work order’ of competing pedagogies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 589-597.\nMacdonald, D. (2003). Curriculum change and the post-modern world: Is the school curriculum-reform movement an anachronism?. Journal of curriculum studies, 35(2), 139-149.\nMelucci, A. (1996). The playing self: Person and meaning in the planetary society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nMeyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Re-conceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 377-390.\nMinistry of Education. (2014). Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education: General Guidelines. https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/946/70456.pdf\nMishler, E. G. (1999). Storylines: Craft artists’ narratives of identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nMitchell, A. (1997). Teacher Identity: A Key to Increased Collaboration. Action in Teacher Education, 9(3), 1-14.\nNias, J. (1996). Thinking about feeling: The emotions in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 293-306.\nO’Connor, K. E. (2008). “You choose to care”: Teachers, emotions and professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 117-126.\nOlibie, E. (2013). Emergent global curriculum trends: Implications for teachers as facilitators of curriculum change. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(5), 161-167.\nParker, P. D., Martin, A. J., Colmar, S. & Liem, G. A. (2012). Teachers’ workplace wellbeing: Exploring a process model of goal orientation, coping behavior, engagement, and burnout. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 503-513.\nParrott, W. G. (Ed.). (2001). Emotions in social psychology: Essential readings. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.\nPeker, B. G. (2010). A study of emotion in Turkish teacher education: Task appraisal styles. Egitim Ve Bilim-Education and Science, 35(157), 100-112.\nPekrun, R. (2005). Progress and open problems in educational emotion research. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 497-506.\nPepper, K., & Thomas, L. H. (2002). Making a change: The effects of the leadership role on school climate. Learning Environments Research, 5(2), 155-166.\nPini, B., Price, R., & McDonald, P. (2010). Teachers and the emotional dimensions of class in resource‐affected rural Australia. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(1), 17-30.\nPrice, H. E., Moolenaar, N. M., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. R. (2015). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 66-92.\nPriestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as agents of change: Teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum. In M. Priestley, G. J. J. Biesta, & S. Robinson (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 187-206). London: Bloomsbury.\nQu, R., & Zhang, Z. (2005). Work group emotions in Chinese culture settings. Singapore Management Review, 27(1), 69–86.\nSachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of Education Policy, 16(2), 149-161.\nSachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession (Vol. 33). Buckingham: Open University Press.\nSachs, J. (2005). Teacher education and the development of professional identity: Learning to be a teacher. In P. Denicolo & M. Kompf (Eds.), Connecting policy and practice: Challenges for teaching and learning in schools and universities (pp. 5-21). Oxford: Routledge.\nSchultze, U., & Avital, M. (2011). Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research. Information and Organization, 21(1), 1-16.\nSchwandt, T. A., Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2007). Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 114, 11-25.\nSeifert, T, (2004). Understanding student motivation. Educational Research, 46(2), 137-149.\nShapiro, S. (2010). Revisiting the teachers’ lounge: Reflections on emotional experience and teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 616-621.\nShenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75.\nSkilbeck, M. (1984). School-based Curriculum Development. London: Harper & Row.\nSong, J. (2016). Emotions and language teacher identity: Conflicts, vulnerability, and transformation. Tesol Quarterly, 50(3), 631-654.\nStake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\nSutton, R., & Wheatley, K. (2003). Teachers’ emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 327-358.\nTsouloupas, C. N., Carson, R. L., Matthews, R., Grawitch, M. J. & Barber, L. K. (2010). Exploring the association between teachers’ perceived student misbehaviour and emotional exhaustion: The importance of teacher efficacy beliefs and emotion regulation. Educational Psychology, 30(2), 173-189.\nTugade, M. & Fredrickson, B. (2007). Regulation of positive emotions: Emotion regulation strategies that promote resilience. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(3), 311-333.\nTummers, L. G., V. Bekkers, E. Vink, and M. Musheno. (2015). “Coping during Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099-1126.\nVähäsantanen, K., & Eteläpelto, A. (2011). Vocational teachers’ pathways in the course of a curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 291-312.\nvan den Berg, R. (2002) Teachers’ Meanings Regarding Educational Practice. Review of Educational Research, 72(4), 577-625.\nVan Maele, D., & Van Houtte, M. (2015). Trust in school: a pathway to inhibit teacher burnout?. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 93-115.\nvan Veen, K., & Sleegers, P. (2006). How does it feel? Teachers’ emotions in a context of change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(1), 85-111.\nvan Veen, K., & Sleegers, P. (2009). Teachers’ emotions in a context of reforms: To a deeper understanding of teachers and reforms. In P. A. Schutz & M. Zembylas (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research: The impact on teachers’ lives (pp. 233-251). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.\nvan Veen, K., Sleegers, P., & Van de Ven, P. H. (2005). One teacher’s identity, emotions, and commitment to change: A case study into the cognitive–affective processes of a secondary school teacher in the context of reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 917-934.\nVeen, K. V., & Lasky, S. (2005). Emotions as a lens to explore teacher identity and change: Different theoretical approaches. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 895-898.\nWatson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 219-335.\nWebster, L., & Mertova, P. (2007). Using narrative inquiry as a research method: An introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching. London: Routledge.\nWinograd, K. (2003). The functions of teacher emotions: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1641-1673.\nWoods, P., & Jeffrey, B. (2002). The reconstruction of primary teachers’ identities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 89-106.\nWoods, P., Jeffey, R. J., Troman, G., & Boyle, M. (1997). Restructuring Schools, Reconstructing Teachers. Buckingham: Open University Press.\nZembylas, M. (2003a). Caring for teacher emotion: Reflections on teacher self-development. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 22(2), 103-125.\nZembylas, M. (2003b). Emotions and teacher identity: A poststructural perspective. Teachers and Teaching, 9(3), 213-238.\nZembylas, M. (2004). The emotional characteristics of teaching: An ethnographic study of one teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 185-201.\nZembylas, M. (2005). Discursive practices, genealogies, and emotional rules: A poststructuralist view on emotion and identity in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 935-948.\nZembylas, M., Charalambous, C., Charalambous, P., & Kendeou, P. (2011). Promoting peaceful coexistence in conflict-ridden Cyprus: Teachers’ difficulties and emotions towards a new policy initiative. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 332-341.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
英語教學碩士在職專班
106951001
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106951001
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
100101.pdf3.23 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.