Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131335
題名: 成年初顯期子女知覺父母教養方式、自我分化程度與親職化情形之關聯性研究
The Association Among Parenting Style, Self Differentiation and Parentification in Emerging Adulthood.
作者: 李欣樺
Lee, Hsin-Hua
貢獻者: 傅如馨
Fu, Ju-Hsin
李欣樺
Lee, Hsin-Hua
關鍵詞: 成年初顯期
父母教養方式
自我分化
親職化
Emerging adulthood
Parenting style
Self differentiation
Parentification
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 3-八月-2020
摘要: 本研究旨在瞭解成年初顯期子女知覺之父母教養方式、自我分化程度與親職 化情形之關聯性,研究工具包含「父母教養方式量表」、「自我分化量表」與「親 職化量表」,以網路問卷蒐集 425 份 18 ~ 25 歲個體為研究樣本,將調查所得 資料以描述統計、 t 考驗、皮爾森積差相關分析、ANOVA 單因子變異數分析、 階層式線性迴歸分析之統計方法進行資料的分析。\n本研究之主要發現如下:\n一、成年初顯期子女知覺到最多的父母教養方式類型為忽視冷漠教養類型,其次 是民主威信教養類型;父親與母親之要求層面均高於回應層面。\n二、子女之自我分化程度約為略低於中等之程度,在各分層面上,「我位置」略 高於中等之程度,「情緒化反應」、「情緒截斷」以及「與他人融合」的情形皆 多於中等之程度。\n三、子女之親職化情形為低於中等之程度。在各分層面中,最多的為「情感性照 顧」分層面。\n四、不同性別之成年初顯期子女在自我分化上具有顯著差異,生理男性之自我分 化程度顯著高於生理女性之自我分化程度。\n五、成年初顯期子女知覺之「父母教養方式」、「親職化整體以及部分分層面」、 以及「自我分化整體以及部分分層面」兩兩之間皆具有顯著相關存在。 六、自我分化在父母教養方式與親職化的關係中具部分中介效果。\n最後,根據以上研究結果,本研究提出對成年初顯期子女、父母、諮商實務 相關工作者及未來研究之建議,以供參考。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the association among the parenting style, self differentiation and parentification in emerging adulthood. The measurements applied in this study included the Parenting Style Scale, the Differentiation of Self Inventory and the Parentification Scale. Researcher recruited 425 individuals aged 18 to 25 as the research sample by using the internet questionnaire.\nThe obtained data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product correlation analysis, and hierarchical regression analysis.\nThe main findings of this study were as followings:\n1. Most of the emerging adults perceived their parents using the neglecting parenting style with them, while the second most adopted style by parents was the authoritative parenting style.In terms of levels of parenting style, the level of demanding was higher than the level of responding. Mothers’ demanding and responding were more than fathers’.\n2. The self differentiation degree of emerging adults was average toward negative. The _I-position was average toward positive.The emotional reactivity, emotional cutoff, fusion with others were more than average.\n3. The parentification degree of emerging adults was average toward negative. Among the various levels of the parentification, the emotional caregiving were average toward positive, perceived unfairness was average toward negative. The most the emerging adults gave their parents were the emotional caregiving.\nVI\n4. Males and females were statistically significant in terms of levels of self differentiation. Males’ self differentiation were significantly higher than females’ self differentiation. Among the various levels of self differentiation, different genders have no significant differences in terms of emotional cutoff. Other levels include: emotional reactivity and fusion with others, males are significantly less then the females. Males’ I-position were significantly higher than females’.\n5. There were significant correlations between parenting style and self differentiation, parenting style and parentification, self differentiation and parentification.\n6. Some parenting styles have a significant impact on parentification.\n7. Fathers’ demand, mothers’ demand and self differentiation could effectively predict parentification. Self differentiation had partial mediation between parenting style and parentification.\nAccording to the findings above, this study provided some suggestions for emerging adults, counselors, parents and the future researchers.
參考文獻: 王浩威(2013)。晚熟世代:王浩威醫師的家庭門診。臺北市:心靈工坊。\n王鍾和(1993)。家庭結構、父母管教方式與子女行為表現(未出版博士學位論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北市。\n王鑾襄、賈紅鶯(2013)。Bowen自我分化理論與研究:近十年文獻分析初探。輔導季刊,49(4),27-39。\n石芳萌(2007)。高中職學生親職化、自我分化與身心健康之相關研究(未出版碩士學位論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系,臺北市。\n何友暉、陳淑娟、趙志裕(1991)。關係取向:為中國社會心理方法論求答案。載於楊國樞、黃光國(主編),中國人的心理與行為(頁49-66)。臺北市:桂冠圖書公司。\n吳佳霓(2002)。青少年家庭系統分化、自我發展與生活適應之相關性的研究(未出版碩士學位論文)。南華大學教育社會學研究所,嘉義縣。\n吳金香(1979)。父母教養方式與國中學生自我觀念的關係(未出版碩士學位論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所,臺北市。\n吳婷盈、鄧志平、王櫻芬(譯)(2012)。家族治療概觀(原作者:Herbert Goldenberg & Irene Goldenberg)。臺北:雙葉書廊。(原著出版年:2007)\n吳嘉瑜(2005)。倒轉的親子位置-“親職化”兒童之相關文獻探討。輔導季刊 41(1),21-28。\n吳麗娟(1998)。父母自我分化、教養態度對青少年子女自我分化、因應策略及適應影響之研究。教育心理學報,30(1),91-132。\n吳麗娟、蔡秀玲、杜淑芬、方格正、鄧文章(譯)(2017)。人際歷程取向治療:整合模式(原作者:Edward Teyber & Faith Holmes Tyber)。臺北市:雙葉書廊。(原著出版年:2016)\n宋根瑜(1980)。台灣北部地區犯罪少年輿一般少年家庭及學校環境之比較研究(未出版碩士學位論文)。中央警察大學警政研究所,桃園市。\n李文瑄(1999)。客體關係心理治療。臺北市:天馬。\n李雪禎(1996)。青少年的情緒經驗與父母教養方式之分析研究(未出版碩士學位論文)。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所,高雄市。\n阮琳雅(2017)。Bowen 自我分化概念應用在華人文化脈絡中之初探。諮商與輔導,375,40-44。\n林婉玲(2008)。臺中地區父母教養方式與幼兒社會能力之關係研究(未出版碩士學位論文)。國立臺中教育大學幼兒教育學系碩士班,臺中市。\n洪莉竹(1999)。臺灣諮商輔導人員在學習諮商過程中文化議題的衝擊與統整(未出版博士學位論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所,臺北市。\n修慧蘭(2011)。何謂糾結/疏離關係-本土大學生親子界限之研究。諮商輔導學報,23,1-18。\n孫頌賢、修慧蘭(2004)。大學生的親子界限∶親子關系-自我界限量表編製與模式初探。測驗學刊,51(1),45-78。\n徐安立(2013)。大學生父母教養方式與自尊高低之相關研究(未出版碩士學位論文)。國立臺中教育大學諮商與應用心理學系碩士班,臺中市。\n徐君楓(2004)。大學生知覺之家庭界限與其自我分化之關係(未出版碩士學位論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北市。\n翁樹澍、王大維(譯)(1999)。家族治療理論與技術(原作者:Irene Goldenberg & Herbert Goldenberg)。臺北市:揚智文化。(原著出版年:1989)\n馬承逸(2010)。大學生自我分化、壓力感受與身心健康之關係(未出版碩士學位論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北市。\n張虹雯(1999)。父母爭吵時的三角關係運作與兒童行為問題之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。\n張榕芸(2010)。青少年時期經歷親職化者經驗之探究─以單親家庭為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學社會工作研究所,臺北市。\n許晨韋(2014)。成年初顯期年輕人待業歷程與生涯調適力之紮根研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系,臺北市。\n郭孟瑜(2003)。青少年的親子三角關係類型與人際行為之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學心理學系,臺北市。\n郭芳君(2003)。父母教養方式、自我韌性與內在性自我控制、少年偏差行為之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學教育研究所,臺南市。\n陳秉華、游淑瑜(2001)。台灣的家庭文化與家庭治療。Asian Journal of Counselling,8(2),153-174。\n陳俐伶(2012)。大學生自我分化與不同親密關係情境下人際行為之關係研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。\n陳冠中(2000)。背景變項、父母管教方式、手足關係與高中生寂寞之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北市。\n陳惠文(2005)。國中生父母的教養方式與子女的快樂學習之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄市。\n陳慧珊、吳麗娟(2013)。大學生親職化現象、個體化程度與身心健康指標之相關研究。教育心理學報,45(1),103-120。\n陳靜宜(2001)。自我分化在家庭治療理論中的意義。諮商與輔導,191,17-20。\n彭偉峰(2004)。國小高年級學童人格特質、父母管教方式對生活壓力影響之研究-以中部地區為例(未出版之碩士論文)。臺中師範學院諮商與教育心理研究所,臺中市。\n彭清宏(2009)。國中學生父母教養方式、情緒智力與自我調節學習之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所,彰化市。\n惠風(1995)。大一學生原生家庭經驗、心理分離:個體化、與情緖適應之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系,臺北市。\n程景琳、廖小雯、林書萱(2009)。台灣成年初顯期現象初探。未出版手稿。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系,臺北市。\n黃宗堅、李佳儒、張勻銘(2010)。代間關係中親職化經驗之發展與自我轉化:以成年初期女性為例。本土心理學研究,33,59-106。\n游淑瑜、游明麟(2009)。心理劇治療的人格理論:角色理論及重要概念。輔導\n季刊,45(1),50-59。\n勞雅文(2012)。父母關心未明言,變相增子女壓力。文匯報。取自\nhttp://paper.wenweipo.com。\n黃富新(2017)。大學生自我分化、社會興趣與寂寞感之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學諮商與應用心理學系碩士班,臺中市。\n黃儀婷(2016)。大學生自我分化、生涯因應策略與生涯定向之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學教育心理與諮商研究所碩士班,新北市。\n黃德祥(1997)。親職教育。臺北市:偉華。\n楊佳穎(2008)。大學生父母教養方式、親職化與心理適應之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導學系,屏東市。\n楊國樞(1985)。現代社會的新孝道:現代生活態度研討會論文集。中華文化復\n興月刊,19(1),51-67。\n楊國樞(1986)。家庭因素與子女行為:台灣研究的評析。中華心理學刊,28(1),7-28。\n楊國樞、陸洛(2008)。中國人的自我:心理學的分析。臺北:臺大出版中 心。\n楊國樞、黃光國(1989)。中國人的心理與行為。臺北:桂冠圖書。\n楊瑛慧(2006)。父母教養態度對幼兒解決問題能力之影響研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學國民教育研究所,臺北市。\n葉致芬(2005)。孝悌楷模的家庭系統運作(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系所,彰化市。\n葉雅婷(1999)。高中生知覺其父母教養方式、完美主義及身心健康之關係。國\n立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系,臺北市。\n詹寓婷(2012)。大學生自我分化、社會支持與生活適應之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系,臺北市。\n賈紅鶯(1991)。父母自我分化、子女自我分化與子女適應水準之相關研究-Bowen 家庭系統理論之驗證。教育心理學報,30(1),91-132。\n廖小雯(2009)。成年初顯期年輕人的自我認同狀態、自我定義記憶與心理幸福\n感之關係探討。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系,臺北市。\n\n\n廖莉彣(2014)。大學生自我分化、衝突因應方式與愛情關係滿意度之相關研究\n(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學諮商與應用心理學系碩士班,臺\n中市。\n劉玉鈴(2015)。台灣女性自我分化與婚姻關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系,南投縣。\n劉紀谷(2008)。大學生自我分化與社交焦慮之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北市。\n劉瓊英(譯)(2011)。家族治療(原作者:Michael P. Nichols)。臺北市:洪葉文化。(原著出版年:2010)\n歐陽儀(2009)。父母自我分化、親子三角關係、青少年子女自我分化對青少年子女身心健康影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系,臺北市。\n蔡玉瑟(1996)。國小高成就與低成就資優兒童的父母教養方式與學習行為、生活適應、成就動機之比較研究。台中師院學報,10,525-567。\n鄭雅婷(2007)。跨文化家庭中主要照顧者之教養方式對幼兒社會行為表現之探究—以台南市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。私立朝陽科技大學幼兒保育系碩士班,臺中。\n賴婉甄(2008)。高雄地區高中生父母教養方式、情緒智力與道德判斷之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄市。\n薛鈞芳(2007)。大學生自我分化、愛情態度與其愛情關係中衝突因應方式之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學輔導與諮商研究所,南投縣。\n謝喆瑋(2008)。大學生知覺父母衝突之程度、情緒安全感受與親職化的相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學教育研究所,新竹市。\n譚子文、董旭英(2010)。自我概念與父母教養方式對臺灣都會區高中生偏差行為之影響。教育科學研究期刊,55(3),203-233。\nAllison, M. D., & Sabatelli, R. M.(1988). Differentiation and individuation as mediators of identity and intimacy in adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 3,1-16.\nArnett, J. J. (1994). Are college students adults? Their conceptions of the transition to adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 1, 213-224.\nArnett, J. J. (1998). Learning to stand alone: The contemporary American transition to adulthood in cultural and historical context. Human Development, 41, 295-315.\nArnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American psychologist, 55(5), 469.\nArnett, J. J., Ramos, K. D., & Jensen, L. A. (2001). Ideological views in emerging adulthood: Balancing autonomy and community. Journal of Adult Development, 8, 69-79.\nAusubel, D. P., Sullivan, E. V., & Ives, S. W. (1980). Theory and problems of child development. New York, NY: Grune and Stratton.\nBarnhill, L. R.(1979). Healthy family systems. Family Coordinator, 28, 94-100.\nBartle, S. E., Anderson, S. A., & Sabatelli, R. M. (1989). A model of parenting style, adolescent individuation and adolescent self-esteem: Preliminary findings. Journal of Adolescent Research, 4(3), 283-298.\nBaumrind, D. (1967). Child care practices anteceding 3 patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75, 43-88.\nBaumrind, D. (1977). Socialization determinants of personal agency. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child development, New Orleans, LA.\nBecker, W. C. (1964). Consequences of different kinds of parental discipline. Review of child development research, 1(4), 169-208.\nBowen, M. (1976). Theory and practice in psychotherapy. In P.J. Guerin (Ed.), Family therapy: Theory and practice (pp. 42-90). New York, NY: Gardner Press.\nBowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York, NY: Jason Aronson.\nBowen, M. (1985). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York, NY: Jason Aronson.\nBowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds: Etiology and psychopathology in the light of attachment theory. British Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 201-210.\nBroszormenyi-Nagy, 1., & Spark, 0. M. (1973). Invisible loyalties: Reciprocity in intergenerational family therapy. Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row.\nBurton, L. (2007). Childhood adultification in economically disadvantaged families: A conceptual model. Family Relations, 56(4), 329-345.\nByng-Hall, J. (2002). Relieving parentified children’s burdens in families with insecure attachment patterns. Family Process, 41(3), 375-388.\nCarter, B. E., & McGoldrick, M. E. (1988). The changing family life cycle: A framework for family therapy. New York, NY: Gardner Press.\nChase, N. D. (1999). Burdened children: Theory, research, and treatment of parentification (Vol. 4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\nCochran, N.B. (2011). Bowen family systems theory and its relationship to teachers: Does differentiation of self-predict teacher job satisfaction? (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg). Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1446&context=dissertations\nCombrinck-Graham, L. (1985). A developmental model for family systems. Family Process, 24, 139–150.\nCooper, C. R., Grotevant, H. D., & Condon, S. M. (1983). Individuality and connectedness in the family as a context for adolescent identity formation and role‐taking skill. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1983(22), 43-59.\nDarling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Child Development, 113, 487-496.\nDiCaccavo, A. (2006). Working with parentification: Implications for clients and counselling psychologists. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 79(3), 469-478.\nEarley, L., & Cushway, D. (2002). The parentified child. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 74, 163−178.\nElder, G. H. (1963). Parental power legitimation and its effects on the adolescent. Sociometry, 26, 50–65.\nFriedman, E. H. (1991). Bowen theory and therapy. In A. S. Gurman & D. S. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy(pp.134-170). New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.\nFuligni, A. J. (2007). Family obligation, college enrollment, and emerging adulthood in Asian and Latin American families. Child Development Perspectives, 1, 96-100.\nFullinwinder-Bush, N., & Jacobvitz, D.B. (1993). The transition to young adulthood: Generational boundary dissolution and female identity development. Family Process, 32(1), 87-103.\nGoldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (2000). Family therapy: An overview (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.\nGoodnow, J.J. (1988). Children’s household work: Its nature and functions. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 5-26.\nGracer, A. D. (1993). Parentification, narcissistic vulnerability, empathy, and the choice of a helping profession. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Adelphi University, New York.\nGuerin, P., Fay, L., Burden, S., & Kautto, J. (1987). The evaluation and treatment of marital conflict. New York, NY: Basic Books.\nJones, R. A., & Wells, M. (1996). An empirical study of parentification and personality. American Journal of Family Therapy, 24(2), 145-152.\nJurkovic, G.J. (1997). Lost childhoods: The plight of the parentified child. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.\nKenny, M.E. (1987).The extent and function of parental attachment among first- year college students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, l6,17-29.\nKlieman, J. I. (1981). Optimal and normal family functioning. The American Journal of Family, 9, 37-44.\nKerr, M. E., & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation: An approach based on Bowen theory. New York, NY: Norton.\nKins, E., Beyers, W., Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2009). Patterns of home\nleaving and subjective well-being in emerging adulthood: The role of\nmotivational processes and parental autonomy support. Developmental\nPsychology, 45(5), 1416-1429.\nLam, C. M., & Chan‐So, P. C. (2015). Validation of the Chinese version of Differentiation of Self Inventory (C‐DSI). Journal of marital and family therapy, 41(1), 86-101.\nLuyckx, K., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., & Berzonsky, M. D. (2007). Psychological control and dimensions of identity formation in emerging adulthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 546-550.\nMaccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction, in P. H. Mussen (ed.). Handbook of child Psychology, 41-101, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.\nMacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimated mediating effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17, 144–158.\nMartin, M. T. (1996). Mother-daughter relations in divorced families: Parentification and internalizing and relationship problems. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 56(9-B), 5176.\nMinuchin, S., Montalvo, B., Guerney, B. G., Rosman, B. C., & Schumer, F. (1967). Families of the slums. New York, NY: Basic Books.\nMoreno, J. L. (1946) Psychodrama, first volume. New York : Beacon House.\nMoreno, J. L. (1975) Mental catharsis and psychodrama. Group Psychodrama and\nPsychotherapy, 28, 5-31.\nMunsinger, H. (1975). Fundamentals of child development. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.\nNelson, L. J., & Chen, X. (2007). Emerging adulthood in China: The role of social and cultural factors. Child Development Perspectives, 1, 86-91.\nNelson, L. J., Badger, S., & Barry, C. M. (2006). Perceptions of the transition to adulthood among Chinese and American emerging adults. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 84-93.\nNelson, L. J., Badger, S., & Wu, B. (2004). The influence of culture in emerging adulthood: Perspectives of Chinese college students. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 26-36.\nNichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (1998). Family therapy: Concepts and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.\nPeleg-Popko, O. (2002). Bowen theory: A study of differentiation of self, social anxiety, and physiological symptoms. Contemporary Family Therapy, 24(2), 355-369.\nPola, L. E. (1993). Parentification level as predictor of self-esteem and academic achievement in Hispanic children. Dissertation Abstracts international, 54(3-B), 1695-1696.\nSabatelli, R. M.,& Anderson, S. A.(1991). Family system dynamics, peer relationships, and adolescents’ psychosocial adjustment. Family Relations, 40, 363-369.\nShulman, S., & Klein, M. M. (1982). The family and adolescence: A conceptual and experimental approach. Journal of Adolescence, 5(3), 219-234.\nSkowron, E. A., Krystal, A., Stanley, L., Michael, A., & Shapiro, D. (2009). A longitudinal perspective on differentiation of self, interpersonal and psychological well-being in young adulthood. Contemporary Family Therapy, 31(1), 3-18.\nSneed, J. R., Johnson, J. G., Cohen, P., Gilligan, C., Chen, H., Crawford, T. N., & Kasen, S. (2006). Gender differences in the age-changing relationship between instrumentality and family contact in emerging adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 42(5), 787-797.\nStein, J. A., Rotheram‐Borus, M. J., & Lester, P. (2007). Impact of parentification on long‐term outcomes among children of parents with HIV/AIDS. Family process, 46(3), 317-333.\nSullivan, H. S. (1953). Conception of modern psychiatry (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Norton.\nTeyber, E. (1983). Effects of the parental coalition on adolescent emancipation from the family. Journal of marital and family therapy, 9(3), 305-310.\nTeyber, E. (2011). Interpersonal process in psychology (5th ed.). California, CA: Belmont Brooks/Cole.\nvan Ecke, Y., Chope, R. C., & Emmelkamp, P. M. (2006). Bowlby and Bowen: Attachment theory and family therapy. Counseling & Clinical Psychology ournal, 3(2), 81-108.\nWells, M., & Jones, R. (2000). Childhood parentification and shame-proneness: A preliminary study. American Journal of Family Therapy, 28(1), 19-27.\nYeh, K. H., & Bedford, O. (2003). A test of the dual filial piety model. Asian Journal\nof Social Psychology, 6, 215-228.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
輔導與諮商碩士學位學程
106172004
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106172004
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
200401.pdf2.23 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.