Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131828
題名: 廠商投標意願影響因素之研究—以空軍某單位採購案件為例
A study on factors affecting the bidders’ willingness to bid: the procurement cases of one unit of the Air Force
作者: 劉申瑋
Liu, Shen-Wei
貢獻者: 胡偉民
Hu, Wei-Min
劉申瑋
Liu, Shen-Wei
關鍵詞: 政府採購
投標家數
投標意願
普通最小平方法
Ordinary least squares(OLS)
The willingness of bidders
The number of bidders
The procurement of government
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 2-Sep-2020
摘要: 政府採購是國內最大的消費來源,運作得當則公部門及私部門均獲取所需,然而,其過程中如有產生多次流、廢標情況,不僅消耗政府人力、物力、時間及相關資源,也造成民間廠商困擾。政府採購法自88年正式施行以來,政府採購政策歷經更迭,行政院始於105年推行最有利標,因政策施行前,機關多採最低標決標,故本研究以空軍某單位105年至109年採購案件分析其影響廠商投標意願之因素,以期全面分析影響廠商投標意願之因素。本研究變數取自行政院公共工程委員會政府電子採購網決標公告揭示欄位,被解釋變數為投標家數,解釋變數分為四大類:「固定項」、「機關選擇(招決標相關)」、「機關選擇(履約相關)」及「非控制項」,以普通最小平方法進行被解釋變數與解釋變數實證分析,並根據實證結果提出建議,藉以提供機關訂定採購策略時參考,以提升廠商投標意願,減少流、廢標情況產生,並兼具採購效率及品質。
The procurement of government is the main source of domestic consumption. As the procurement of government operates appropriately, both of the public sector and the private sector can acquire what they need. On the other hand, while an opening of a tender cannot be proceeded or is nullified in the procurement processes, it not only drains on manpower, material resources, and time but also disturbs the private sector. Since the Government Procurement Act was released in 1999, the policy of government procurement was revised several times. The Department of Executive gave impetus to the most advantageous tenders in 2016. Before this policy was implemented, the government agencies intended to adopt the minimum standards. In order to comprehensively analyze the factors of influence of bidders’ willingness, this study was based on the data of procurement cases of one unit of the Air Force of R.O.C from 2016 to 2020. The variables come from the information of the publication of tender awarding of the government e-procurement system of the Public Construction Commission of the Department of Executive. The response variable is the number of bidders. The explanatory variables are categorized into four types: "fixed items", "government agencies’ selections (related to tender opening and awarding)", " government agencies’ selections (related to performance)" and "non-controlling items". The empirical analysis of response variable and explanatory variables are carried out by means of ordinary least squares(OLS). According to the empirical results, this study made suggestions and provided the reference for the government agencies to formulate the procurement strategy to enhance the manufacturer’s willingness to bid, reduce the situation that an opening of a tender cannot be proceeded or is nullified, and generate both efficiency and quality of procurement.
參考文獻: 工程會(2019),「政府採購法公布施行 10 年來,關於限制性招標、最有利標、最低標之成效檢討」,網頁文件,網址: https://www.pcc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=E1E74775426E9A0F,2019 年 12 月查閱。\n工程會(2020),政府採購彙編,行政院公共工程委員會。\n王國武(2016),《政府採購決標實務》,翰盧圖書出版。\n王筱雯(2018),「政府採購作為勞動及社會政策工具之正當性與界限─以歐盟及我國法治為中心」,國立中正大學法律學系碩士學位論文。\n李瀚良(2019),「政府採購法最有利標爭議問題之探討─以評選階段為中心」,國防大學管理學院法律學系碩士班碩士學位論文。\n林志憲(2013),「投標組合決策模型之研究」,國立成功大學建築研究所碩士學位論文。\n林柔君(2012),「公共營建工程招標與決標之研究」,國立高雄大學高階法律暨管理碩士在職專班(EMLBA)論文。\n姚乃嘉、楊志斌、郭文達(2001),「投標決策因素之分析與應用」,《建築學報》,36, 21-37。\n范鈺秋(2015),「政府採購法在學校採購適用之研究-以新竹縣某公立國中常見採購案例為中心」,中原大學財經法律學系碩士學位論文。\n徐源裕(2019),「應用圖形分析模式於決標方式選擇之探討與實證」,中華大學土木工程學系博士班博士學位論文。\n康德龍(2019),「低價搶標與公共工程施工品質關聯之研究」,國立臺北科技大學土木工程系土木與防災博士班博士學位論文。\n張鳳蘭(2015),「財物採購程序之研究-以招標、決標為中心」,中原大學財經法律學系碩士學位論文。\n張寶慧與許碧敏(2019),「運用系統性決策方法及R軟體建置投標決策系統」,《危機管理學刊》, 16(1), 1-6。\n張馨櫻(2018),「公共工程採購決標比與工程品質關係之研究」,國防大學管理學院財務管理學系碩士班碩士學位論文。\n陳怡靜,林映州,陳如慧與陳立奇(2016),「公立醫院藥品聯標創新採行最有利標之執行成效分析」,《臺灣臨床藥學雜誌 》, 24(2) ,131 - 138。\n陳信璁(2018),「警察制服採購方式之研究」,中央警察大學行政管理研究所碩士學位論文。\n陳冠樺(2012),「政府採購決標制度之研究—以最低標與次低標爭議為中心」, 國立中正大學法律學研究所在職專班碩士學位論文。\n陳基峰(2009),「政府勞務採購最有利標作業之研究」,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士學位論文。\n陳敏裕(2014),「最低標與最有利標適用之探討」,義守大學管理學院管理碩士在職專班碩士學位論文。\n傅澤偉、呂宗霖、林曼莉(2016),「影響政府採購決標金額與預算金額比值之因素:運用政府公開大規模資訊」,《輔仁管理評論》,23(2),35-60。\n曾廣彧(2011),「政府採購法決標之研究-以最有利標爭議個案為例」,中原大學財經法律學系碩士學位論文。\n黃鈺華與蔡佩芳(2014),《政府採購法解讀:逐條釋義》第五版,元照出版股份有限公司,2014 年 1 月,頁 237。\n黃銘弘(2006),「影響營造業公共工程投標決策因素之探討」,淡江大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士學位論文。\n黃慧仁(2000),「公共工程共同投標制度之檢討與初步機制設計」,國立臺灣大學工學院土木工程研究所碩士學位論文。\n潘秀菊(2009),《政府採購法》,新學林出版股份有限公司。\n潘朝烈與黃營芳(2007),「應用層級分析法(AHP)於最有利標評選權重之研究」,《商業現代化學刊》, 4(1) ,118-132。\n謝昇和(2006),「公共工程競標機率量化模式」,國立中興大學土木工程學系碩士學位論文。\n羅天昀(2019),「複數投機競標者決策行為探討最有利標評選」,國立臺北科技大學土木工程系土木與防災碩士班碩士學位論文。\n羅昌發(2008),《政府採購法與政府採購協定論析》,元照出版股份有限公司。\n \n英文部分\nBageis, Abdulrahman Salem & Fortune, Chris (2009): Factors affecting the bid/no bid decision in the Saudi Arabian construction contractors, Construction Management and Economics, 27:1, 53-71.\nDulaimi, Mohammed Fadhil & Shan, Hon Guo (2002): The factors influencing bid mark-up decisions of large- and medium-size contractors in Singapore, Construction Management& Economics, 20:7, 601-610.\nFu, W. K., Drew, Derek S. and Lo, H. P. (2002) The effect of experience on contractors` competitiveness in recurrent bidding, Construction Management & Economics, 20:8, 655-666.\nLowe,David J. and Parvar, Jamshid (2004) A logistic regression approach to modelling the contractor`s decision to bid , Construction Management and Economics, 22:6, 643-653.\nOnsarigo, Lameck, Duncan, Kevin and Atalah, Alan (2020): The effect of prevailing wages on building costs, bid competition, and bidder behaviour: evidence from Ohio school construction, Construction Management and Economics.\nOo, Bee‐Lan, Drew, Derek S. and Runeson, Goran (2010): Competitor analysis in construction bidding, Construction Management and Economics, 28:12, 1321–1329.\nShash, Ali A. (1993): Factors considered in tendering decisions by top UK contractors, Construction Management and Economics, 11:2, 111-118.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
107921215
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107921215
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
121501.pdf1.46 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.