Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131998
題名: 美國對北韓核武問題的政策與作為研究
The Study on the Policy and Conduct of America against North Korea`s Nuclear Weapons Issue
作者: 李哲誠
Lee, Che-Chen
貢獻者: 朱新民
李哲誠
Lee, Che-Chen
關鍵詞: 北韓核武問題
霸權穩定論
戰略三角理論
東北亞區域和平
Regional peace in Northeast Asia
North Korea nuclear weapons issue
Hegemonic stability theory
Strategic triangle theory
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 2-Sep-2020
摘要: 朝鮮核武問題一直是東北亞的不定時炸彈。朝鮮金氏王朝固然自此獲得國際社會之言說權。以美國而言,其在此議題之處理態度積極與否,或左或右均影響著世界局勢。何況其間還有關係綿密之日本、俄國、中國、韓國等周邊國家共同捲入此議題的處理當中。\n本研究以美國小布希總統、歐巴馬總統以及川普總統,\n對北韓核武問題的因應做為研究標的,其間又指涉美國之全球策略、國家定位以及亞太地區的布局等。本研究以歷史研究法、文獻分析法做為研究方法,而由戰略三角以及霸權穩定法為研究途徑,經由文獻的歸納與探討,得出三項結論,各種自有盤算的北韓核武三角關係,北韓核武準戰爭邊緣戰略奏效,美國霸權無法貫徹使得北韓核武問題懸而未決。
North Korea`s nuclear weapons issue has always been a time bomb in Northeast Asia. Of course, since then, the North Korea’s Kim dynasty has gained the right of speech in the international community. As far as the United States, its positive attitude towards this issue somewhat affects the world situation. Moreover, Japan, Russia, China, South Korea and other neighboring countries are involved in the handling of this issue.\nThis study takes President Bush, President Obama and\nPresident Trump`s response to North Korea`s nuclear weapons issue as the research object, which also refers to the United States` global strategy, national positioning and the layout of the Asia Pacific region. This investigation uses historical research method and literature analysis method as research methods and takes strategic triangle and hegemonic stability law as research approaches. Through induction and review of literature,there are three conclusions are drawn as the research results.Triangular relations that was set out various agenda for North Korea`s nuclear weapons.The Brinkmanship of quasi war of North Korea`s nuclear weapon has worked.The failure of US hegemony to implement makes the issue of North Korea`s nuclear weapons in suspense.
參考文獻: 一、中文文獻\n丁學良(1994)。共產主義後與中國。香港:牛津大學出版社。\n中央日報(1994)。版6。\n中央通訊社(2017)。北韓釋放美大學生過世陸:盼雙方妥處。\n中時電子報(2017)。日薩德爭議難解套,中韓關係變數多。\n中國時報(1993)。版17。\n方冰(2017)。聯合國安理會一致通過對北韓最新制裁決議。美國之音。\n王佳煌、潘中道、郭俊賢、黃瑋螢譯(2002)。當代社會研究法:質化與量化途徑(Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches)(原著:W. Lawrence Neuman)。學富文化事業有限公司。\n王浦劬等譯(1992)。政治生活的系統分析(原著:David Easton)。臺北:桂冠書局。\n王嘉源(2018)。開發東北亞韓俄合作含「9座橋」。中國時報。\n卡卡新聞(2017)。政策髮夾彎薩德部署南韓喊卡。\n台經院(2004)。我國因應東協與中國簽訂自由貿易協定之研究,行政院研考會。\n平可夫(1994)。面對北韓核武問題,中共左右為難。中央日報,版6。\n朱松柏(2003)。六邊會談與朝鮮半島核武危機。展望與探索,1(9),6。\n朴斗福(1977)。中共參加韓戰原因之研究。台北:黎明文化年。\n自由時報(2014)。星期專訪:普廷重要外交智囊托羅拉亞︰俄轉向亞洲應強化台俄關係。\n吳正偉(2002)。北韓與美國核子協議的演變。共黨問題研究,28(9),114。\n呂光耀(2018)。川普主政下的美國霸權角色探討。國防雜誌,48-58。\n宋偉(2014)。捍衛霸權利益:美國地區一體化戰略的演變(1945-2005)。北京:北京大學出版社。\n李明(1996)。北韓核爆後的東亞國際情勢研析。展望與探索,4(11),17。\n李明(2013)。歐巴馬政府的朝鮮半島政策(2009-2012 年)。遠景基金會季刊,14(2),1-52。\n李明(2013a),朴槿惠勝選與未來周邊國際安全。全球政治評論,第41期,頁1-6。\n李明峻(2013),韓國的中國政策,台灣國際研究季刊,第9卷第4期,頁63-85。\n李軍(2003)。盧武鉉政府和平繁榮政策淺析。現代國際關係,(4),64。\n李楠(2009)。布希政府對朝關係戰略評估。當代亞太,3,91-108。\n李楠(2016)。『戰略忍耐』的得與失─歐巴馬政府對朝鮮政策評析。太平洋學報,24(8),53~63。\n杜章智譯(1990)。列寧與哲學(原著:L.Altusser。臺北:遠流出版公司,162-164。\n汪劍釗譯(1999)。俄羅斯的命運(原著:尼別爾嘉耶夫)。昆明:雲南人民出版社。\n沈有忠(2004)。中共解放軍戰略與軍事裝備的現代化。展望與探索,2(8),37。\n林金樹(2012)。北韓核武問題下的中國角色研究──以「六方會談」為例。國立政治大學國際事務學院國家安全與大陸研究碩士在職專班碩士論文。\n林展弘(2012)。冷戰後中美在朝鮮半島的政策比較以權力平衡理論探析。國立政治大學國際事務學院國家安全與大陸研究碩士在職專班碩士論文。\n林賢參(2011)。北韓威脅對日本飛彈防禦戰略之影響。全球政治評論,第33期,113-114。\n林參賢(2016)。北韓試爆「氫彈」對東北亞區域安全影響之觀察。展望與探   \n  索,14卷2期,頁34-40。\n河凡植(2008)。和平繁榮政策與韓中關係的發展。問題與研究,47(1),131。\n河凡植(2014)。中國大陸建構新型大國關係戰略與其對南北韓政策的影響:從權力轉移觀點分析。展望與探索,12(5),24。\n波丹茨基(1994)。北韓危機:金日成之死與核武威脅的效應。臺北:新新聞。\n邱秋瑩(2011)。中國大陸洽簽自由貿易協定(FTA)之佈局策略研析。行政院經濟建設委員會綜合計劃處:綜合規劃研究98及99年(臺北)。\n金玄(2008)。布希政府的外交政策理念與對北韓政策(부시 행정부의 외교정책이념과 대북한정책)。國家戰略,14(1),143-146。\n門洪華(2007)。中國軟實力評估報告(下)。國際觀察(上海),2007年第3期,40-41。\n姚競之(1994)。朝鮮半島核子危機與中共。共黨問題研究,20(8),18-27。\n姜遠珍(2003)。北韓核武爭議懸而未決。王永志主編,2004世界年鑑。臺北:中央出版社。\n胡敏遠(2019)。北韓核武危機:川普強制外交策略之分析。遠景基金會季刊,20(3),101-150。\n唐家璇(1994)。當前國際形勢與我國對外關係。解放軍報。\n徐成芳(2001)。和平方略-中國外交策略研究。北京:時事出版社。\n馬準威(2018)。從「嚇阻理論」與「螺旋模式」檢視北韓第四次至第六次核試爆之間的美朝戰略互動。問題與研究,57(4),28。\n國防大學譯(2012)。維持美國世界領導地位:21世紀國防優先事項(Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership:Priorities for 21 Century Defense)。\n張幼文、黃仁博等(2004)。2004中共國際地位報告。北京:人民出版社。\n張正樺(2019)。經濟制裁對北韓發展核武影響之研究。國立中正大學戰略暨國家安全碩士在職專班碩士論文。\n張登及(2004)。中共朝鮮半島戰略偏好架構試擬。展望與探索,2(5),110-114。\n統一教育研究開發小組(2006)。統一問題的理解,80-81。\n許禎元(1998)。政治學研究與網路應用。臺北:立威出版社。\n陳子平(2006)。北韓飛彈試射危機的意涵與影響。國防雜誌,21(5),137。\n陳光炳(2004)。中共在北韓核武危機之角色。國立政治大學國家安全與大陸研究碩士在職專班碩士論文。\n陳怡萍(2019)。美國與北韓外交互動之研究:核武嚇阻與經濟制裁的平衡。國立中央警官大學公共安全研究所碩士論文。\n陳建民(2007)。兩岸關係中的美國因素。臺北:紅螞蟻圖書有限公司。\n陳郁芬(2016)。中國的北韓核武政策分析。東亞研究,47(2),74-112。\n陳寧寧、劉德海(2001)。韓國研究導論。台北:中國文化大學。\n陳鋒君、王傳劍(2002)。亞太大國與朝鮮半島。北京:北京大學出版社。\n陳曉杭(2007)。北韓共產制度實施現況與核武危機演變之探討。展望與探索,5(3),88-90。\n馮世則譯(1991)。建設和平與民主(原著:金大中)。北京:世界知識出版社。\n黃宗良、林建勳主編(2003)。冷戰後社會主義國家的改革開放。北京:北京大學出版社。\n黃奕婷、張登及(2017)。冷戰後韓美同盟變遷之研究(1992-2013)。遠景基金會季刊,18(4),61-112。\n黃國賢譯(2019)。美「中」競爭與朝鮮半島的未來(原著:Kim Sunghan)。國防譯粹,46(4),17。\n黃裕美譯(2001)。文明衝突與世界秩序的重建(原著:Samucl P. Huntington)。台北:聯經年。\n黃鴻博(1996)。中共與「北韓核武危機」。共黨問題研究,22(2),39。\n葉自成(1997)。俄羅斯政府與政治。臺北:揚智。\n葉基仁(2017)。川普全球戰略下的印度─太平洋策略。台灣經濟研究月刊,41(1),92。\n雷永生等譯(1995)。俄羅斯思想(原著:尼別爾嘉耶夫)。北京:三聯書店。\n廖欣慧(2018)。日本對北韓核武危機之因應:安全與同盟困境之視。政治大學國際事務學院日本研究碩士學位學程碩士論文。\n趙翊達(2012)。到手熟鴨豈可吐出:從日本觀點看西南諸島之爭。黃銘俊主編,規復釣魚台-從漢疆突擊隊出發。台北:菁典。\n劉承宗(2017)。川普主政下的東北亞新局勢。嶺東通識教育研究學刊,7(2),46。\n劉芳君(2019)。北韓核武議題對東北亞區域安全之影響。國立中興大學國際政治研究所碩士論文。\n劉德海(2000)。一九九二年以來中共與兩韓關係。國際關係學報,第15期,215。\n劉德海(2016)。美韓部署薩德飛彈影響評析,展望與探索,第14卷第8期。\n蔡明彥(2006)。當前東亞安全問題中的中國因素分析-以地緣政治、經貿整合與北韓核武問題爲例。全球政治評論,第26期,1-20。\n蔡增家(2017)。韓國總統大選後東北亞局勢的變與不變。政治大學國際關係研究中心。\n鄭羽(2016)。當前國際熱點的快速轉換與中俄美三國政策互動。俄羅斯東歐中亞研究,第4期,17-27。\n鄭得興(2014)。中東歐國家之歷史遺緒與轉型正義─以捷克及斯洛伐克為例。台灣國際季刊,10(2),64。\n盧業中(2019)。霸權國家與核武發展:論東北亞的安全情勢。遠景基金會季刊,20(3),55。\n閻亢宗(2019)。朝核問題衝擊下北韓對俄日的戰略選擇及東北亞面臨的安全困境。遠景基金會季刊,20(1),108。\n閻學通、孫學峰(2001)。國際關係研究實用方法。北京:人民出版社。\n戴政龍(2012)。歐巴馬的核外交與核戰略。全球政治評論,第38期,1-8。\n聯合報(1992)。版8-9。\n聯合報(1993)。版14。\n聯合報(1994)。版9。\n鍾永和(2017)。北韓研發導彈及核武之概念與影響。海軍學術雙月刊,51(6),87。\n羅翊豪(2018)。北韓金正恩政權核武外交之研究。國立中正大學戰略暨國家安全碩士在職專班碩士論文。\n\n二、外文文獻\nAllen Carlson and J.J. Suh(2008). The Value of Rethinking East Asian Security: Denaturalizing and Explaining a Complex Security Dynamic. Peter Katzenstein and Allen Carlson eds., Rethinking Security in East Asia: Identity, Power and Efficiency, pp.214-215.\nAmitav Acharya(2003/04). Will Asia’s Past be its Future? International Security, 28(3), pp.149-164.\nAndrew Osborn(2017/8/24). Russian nuclear bombers fly near North Korea in rare show of force. Reuters.\nAndrew Scobell(2004). China and North Korea: from Comrades-In-Arms to Allies at Arm’s Length. Carlisle: National Defense University Press, 10.\nArtyom Lukin, Liudmila Zakharova. Russia-North Korea Economic Ties: Is There More Than Meets the Eye?, pp. 21-22.\nASEAN-China Expert Group (2001). Forging Closer ASEAN-China Economic Relations in the 21st Century, October.\nAsia Policy Debate(2008). The Next President’s Strategy for Engagement, McCain and Obama Advisors Debate. The National Bureau of Asian Research. The National Press Club, September 22, 2008.\nAxel Berkofsky, “Japan-North Korea Relations - (Sad) State of Play and (Sad) Prospects, pp. 10.\nBonnie Glaser(2016/1/13). The US Response to North Korea’s Nuclear Provocations, Statement before the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific.\nBonnie S. Glaser, Wang Liang(2008). North Korea: The Beginning of a China-U.S. Partnership? Washington Quarterly, 31(3), pp. 168–174.\nBrands, H. W., Jr.(1988). Testing Massive Retaliation: Credibility and Crisis Managementin the Taiwan Strait. International Security, 12(4), pp. 124-151.\nCallahan, P.(2007). Logics of American Foreign Policy: Theories of America's World Role. New York: Pearson Education.\nCharles L. Pritchard(2005). The Korean Peninsular and the Role of Multilateral Talks. Disarmament Forum, No. 2, pp. 27.\nChung-in Moon, Taehwan Kim(2004). South Korea’s International Relation: Challenges to Developmental Realism? In Samuel Kim ed., The International Relation of North Asia, Lanjam, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 260.\nCory Bennett(2018). All the major players in the North Korean summit, Politico.\nDavid E. Sanger(2002/6/17). Bush to Formalize a Defense Policy of Hitting First, the NewYork Times.\nDongsoo Kim(2018). The Obama Administration’s Policy toward North Korea: the Causes and Consequences of Strategic Patience, Journal of Asian Public Policy, 9, pp. 32-44.\nDougherty, James E., Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr. (1986). American Foreign Policy: FRDto Reagan, New York: Harper & Row.\nDouglas John Maclntyre(2012). Emering from Behind the U.S. Shield: Japan’s Strategy of Dynamic, Joint Force Quartely, pp. 81-89.\nEconomic and Security Review Commission(2004). Washington: US Government Printing Office, pp. 107-108.\nEmma Chanlett-Avery(2008/3/19). North Korea’s Abduction of Japanese Citizens and the Six-Party Talks, FAS, vol. 3.\nEtel Solingen(2007). Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 253-254.\nFrank Loy(2011). Obama Abroad: Ambitious Realism. World Affairs, pp. 25-32.\nFRUS (1947/4/2). N SC-8, Position of the United States with Respect to Korea, 6, pp. 1163-1169.\nHwang, Jihwan(2004). Realism and U.S. Foreign Policy toward North Korea: The Clinton and Bush Administrations in Comparative Perspective, World Affairs, 167(1), pp. 15-29.\nInternational Crisis Group(2018/1/23). The Korean Peninsula Crisis (I): In the Line of Fire and Fury.\nJames Chace(1997). The Dilemmas of the Cityupon a Hill, World Policy Journal, 14(1), pp. 105-107.\nJoseph Lepgold, Timothy McKeown(1995). Is American Foreign Policy Exceptional? An EmpiricalAnalysis, Political Science Quarterly, 110(3), pp. 369-384\nJoshua Stanton, Sung-Yoon Lee, Bruce Klingner(2017/5-6). Getting Tough onNorth Korea: How to Hit Pyongyang Where It Hurts, Foreign Affairs, 96(3), pp.71-72.\nKim, Yongho, Myung Chul Kim(2008). China in the North Korean NuclearQuagmire: Rethinking ChineseInfluence on North Korea, Issues & Studies44, 3, pp.149-175.\nKirshner,Jonathan, Peter A. Gourevitch, Barry Eichengree(1997). Crossing Disciplines and Charting New Paths: The Influence of Charles Kindleberger on International Relations, Mershon International Studies Review, 41(2), pp. 333-345。\nKyung-Ae Park(2004/1-2). North Korea in 2003: Pendulum Swing between Crisis and Diplomacy, Asian Survey, 44(1), pp. 141-143.\nLarry A. Niksch (2003). North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Systems, CRS Report for the Congress, pp. 6.\nLee Jeong-Ho(2018/10/5). North Korea looks to get China, Russia on side before denuclearization talks with U.S., Politico.\nMari Yamaguchi(2017/12/15). Japan imposes new sanctions on North Korea, USA Today.\nMark E. Manyin(2001). North Korea-Japan Relations: The Normalization Talks and the ompensation/Reparations Issues ,Washington, D.C., Congressional Research Service, pp. 2-4.\nMo, Jongryn(2007). What Does South Korea Want? Policy Review, (142),pp. 48-49.\nMorgan, Patrick M. (1983). Deterrence: A Conceptual Analysis, 2nd ed. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.\nNicholas D Kristof(1993). The Rise of China, Foreign Affairs, 172(5), pp. 59-74。\nNicole Gaouette, Elizabeth Joseph(2017/12/24). UN adopts tough new sanctions on North Korea, CNN.\nPark, Jongchul(1999). Seoul’s Engagement Policy towards Pyongyang: Setting, Framework and Conditions. Korea and World Affairs, 23(1), pp. 5-25.\nPyungse Cho, Jae-cheon Lim(2018). North Korea’s Foreign Policymaking and Nuclear Weapons, Asian Survey, 58(2), pp.320-340.\nRobert Ross(1999). The Geography of Peace: East Asia in the Twenty-First Century, International Security, 23(4), pp. 84-118.\nSamuel Huntington(1982). American Ideals versus American Institutions, Political Science Quarterly, 97(1), pp. 1-37.\nSangbo Park(2002/12/16). Implications of the General Security of Military Information Agreement for South Korea, 6, STIMSON,\nScott D. Sagan(2018). Armed and Dangerous. Foreign Affairs, 97(6), pp. 35-43.\nSerghei Golunov, “Does North Korea Have A Place in Russia’s ‘Turn to the East?’” pp. 2-3.\nStephan Haggard, Marcus Noland(2007). Famine in North Korea: Markets,Aid and Reform, New York: Columbia University Press, pp.246-248.\nSuyoun Jang, Jae-Jung Suh(2017). Development and Security in International Aid to North Korea: Commonalities and Differences among the European Union, the United States and South Korea, The Pacific Review, pp. 1-21.\nThe Pacific Review (2017/3/7). Commonalities and Differences among the European Union, the United States and South Korea, pp.1-21.\nThomas Lum et al, China’s (2008). Soft Power” in Southeast Asia. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Senate Committee of Foreign Relations, pp. 2.\nTismaneanu, Vladimir. 2001. “Discomforts of Victory: Democracy, Liberal Values and Nationalism in Post-Communist Europe.” Western European Politics, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 82-83。\nTong Whan Park(1998). South Korea’s Nuclear Option: The Interplay of Domestic and International Politics, From: The U.S. and the Two Koreas: A New Triangle, Tong Whan Park ed., Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp. 100-103.\nUS-China Economic and Security Review Commission (2004). 2004 Report to Congress of the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, pp.107-108.\nVictor D. Cha(2002). Korea’s Place in the Axis, Foreign Affairs, 81(3), p. 81.\nVictor D. Cha(2009/10). What Do They ReallyWant? Obama’s North Korea Conundrum, The Washington Quarterly, 32(4), pp. 119-138.\nWest Point,New York (2002/6/1). Remarks by the President at 2002 Graduation Exercise of the United States Military Academy.\n\n\n三、網路資源\nLeon V. Sigal(2016/4). Getting What We Need with North Korea, Arms Control Association, retrieved from: https://www.armscontrol.org/ACT/2016_04/Features/Getting-What-We-Need-With-North-Korea.\nTHAAD decision irreversible: Park,(August 2, 2016),The Korea Times, http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2016/08/116_210960.html.\n大紀元新聞(2004/2/25)。取自http://www.epochtimes.com/gb/4/2/25/n462841.htm。\n中央社。美國加強制裁北韓 金融業者恐衝擊最大,取自http://www.cna.com.tw/news/aopl/201709220074-1.aspx.\n中國戰略網。朝鮮半島的地緣戰略價值,取自:http://observe.chinaiiss.com/html/20121/10/ a46fa3.html。\n中華人民共和國人民政府網站(2006/11/17)。胡錦濤會見盧武鉉表示中韓致力於朝鮮半島無核化,取自:http://www.gov.cn/ldhd/2006-11/17/content_446140.htm。\n中華人民共和國外交部(2005/7/14)。外交部發言人劉建超在例行記者會上答記者問。取自:http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/pds/gjhdq/gj/yz/1206_7/fyrygth/t203677.htm。\n世界民報。面對北韓軍事威脅55%南韓人不害怕,取自:http://www.worldpeoplenews. com/news/2/2013-03/36691?page=18。\n光榮與夢想。取自:http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2005年-10-17/06508025158.shtml。\n自由時報(2018/11/23)。美國不滿北韓完全棄核前南北韓推進關係,取自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/2621308。\n東森新聞報(2005)。有個北韓壞鄰居,擬主導北韓經濟。中國以投資當金援,取自:www.ettoday.com。\n東森新聞報(2005/11/12)。有個北韓壞鄰居,擬主導北韓經濟。中國以投資當金援,取自:www.ettoday.com。\n林保華(2005)。中國正在揚棄韜光養晦策略。自由電子報,取自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/paper/29726。\n林保華(2005/8/15)。中國正在揚棄韜光養晦策略。自由電子報,取自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/paper/29726。\n林翠儀(2016/10/16)。牽制北韓核威脅美韓演練『斬首金正恩』。自由時報,取自:http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/paper/1040702,\n林賢參。聯合國對北韓核試制裁及『中』朝情勢觀察。行政院大陸委員會大陸與兩岸情勢簡報,取自:http://www.mac.gov.tw/public/Attachment/72613511062.pdf。\n施施(2018/6/7)。金正恩邀陸開發北韓4據點。中國時報,取自:http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20180607000604-260119。\n查君紅(2013)。中國戰略利益:毛澤東和鄧小平的判定之比較。中國在線,取自:http:www.cnolo.com/China/ns/2007424/0265347249.htm。\n袁幼林(2013/03/13)。朝核危機中的中國:從被動到主動。政見,取自:http://cnpolitics.org/2013/03/korean-nuclear-crisis-china/\n袁鵬(2002/8/1)。中國威脅論的歷史演變。環球時報,版3,取自:http://big5.china.com.cn/chinese/ch-yuwai/183410.htm。\n陳建瑜。制裁北韓核爆安理會一致通過。旺報,取自:http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20161202000807-260309\n陳韋廷、季晶晶。美韓軍演北韓恐再射飛彈。聯合報,取自:https://udn.com/news/story/11267/2760896\n陳竫詒。聯合國又通過對北韓新制裁,到底有沒有效?天下雜誌,取自:http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5084979。\n彭惠鸞。韓國李明博政府。政治大學國際關係研究中心情勢發展與評估,取自:http:// iiro.nccu.edu.tw/index.php?include=article&id=2312。\n朝鮮民主主義人民共和國外務省聲明(2005),取自:http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2005/53490.htm。\n新華網(2003/5/24)。胡錦濤在中共中央政治局第五次集體學習時強調:密切關注世界新軍事變革的發展態勢積極關心支持國防和軍隊現代化建設,取自:http://news.xinhuanet.com/zhengfu/2003-05/24/content_885152.htm。\n新華網(2004/8/9)。韜光養晦,有所作為──鄧小平外交思想淺議,取自:http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/world/2004-08/09/content_1741467.htm。\n新華網(2006/9/3)。朝鮮要求美國立即從韓國撤軍,取自:http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2006-09/03/content_5041669.htm。\n楊志恆(2017)。近期中共在東北亞軍事作為觀察。行政院大陸委員會。取自:http://www.mac.gov.tw/public/Attachment/7459562468.pdf\n葉亭均(2018/9/20)。兩韓峰會共識恢復經濟合作。聯合新聞網,取自:https://udn.com/news/story/12504/3377128。\n蔡鵑如(2018/2/6)。美撂狠話「不讓北韓綁架奧運」。中國時報,取自:http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20180206000534-260119。\n蕭徐行(2019/12/23)。蕭徐行觀點:中俄同盟抗美北韓制裁再成焦點。新頭殼,取自https://newtalk.tw/news/view/2019-12-23/344581。\n鍾堅。北韓與核武,世局變亂局。取自:http://www.dsis.org.tw/peaceforum/papers/2003-03/APK0303002.htm.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
外交學系戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班
106922009
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106922009
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
200901.pdf1.34 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.