Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134133
題名: 容積移轉在不同公共設施服務水準地區對房價之影響
The Impact of Transfer of Development Rights on Housing Price among Different Public Facility Service Regions
作者: 楊元宜
Yang, Yuan-Yi
貢獻者: 江穎慧<br>丁秀吟
Chiang, Ying-Hui<br>Ding, Hsiu-Yin
楊元宜
Yang, Yuan-Yi
關鍵詞: 容積移轉
公共設施服務水準
住宅價格
Transfer of Development Rights
Public Facility Service
Housing Price
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 2-三月-2021
摘要: 近年來越來越多研究討論容積移轉機制的「空間外部性」,相關研究多分別聚焦於經濟影響面、環境影響面及社會交互作用面。在環境影響面相關研究中,Aken et al.(2008)認為,地方公共設施的服務品質是考量容積移入接受地區的重要因素之一。許多國內相關研究亦提出,容積移入會使地區公共設施服務水準降低,並造成擁擠外部性與生活品質惡化。然而,經濟影響面的相關研究中,Shih et al.(2019)則證實,容積移轉接受基地對周邊不動產交易價格具有正向外溢效應,且移入總量對房價的影響效果在統計上不具解釋力,該研究結果和環境影響面的結果有所出入。\n本研究試圖同時討論容積移轉機制的經濟、環境二面向外部性。以容積移轉空間型態不同的新北市中和區、三重區作為研究範圍,使用「每人享有公共設施面積」指標衡量地區公共設施服務品質。針對公共設施服務水準不符合都市計畫通盤檢討標準之地區,再分為服務水準變動趨勢改善與惡化情況進行後續討論。而後使用2013年至2019年不動產實價登錄交易資料,透過特徵價格效用理論,衡量交易點周邊容積移轉總量對交易價格的關係,探討在不同公共設施服務水準地區,交易點周圍容積移入總量對價格會造成什麼樣不同的影響。實證結果顯示,交易點周圍容積移轉總量具外溢效應,但隨地方公共設施服務條件而有不同的折價效果,且在不同都市發展脈絡地區,不同容積移轉空間分布型態對房價影響具結構性差異。
Recently, there are more and more researches discussing the &quot;spatial externality&quot; of Transfer of Development Rights (TDRs). Most of the related researches analyzed this issue from the economic impact, environmental impact, and social interaction aspects (Akerlof, 1997). In the studies related to the environmental impact of TDRs, Aken et al. (2008) found that the quality of local public facility service was one of the crucial factors considering how much TDRs could be sent to a receiving area. Additionally, many domestic studies have suggested that the amount of receiving TDRs would lower the quality of public facilities service in a region and cause the crowding externality and deteriorate the quality of life. On the other hand, in the studies related to the economic impact of TDRs, a positive spillover effect on sale prices if the transaction was within 150 meters of a TDRs-using development project was confirmed by Shih et al. (2019). Besides, the influence of the total amount of TDRs was not statistically significant. The results of Shih et al. (2019) differ from other discussions in the environmental impact of TDRs studies.\nThis article discusses both the economic and environmental impacts of receiving TDRs. The analysis presented in this article is based on a case study of the Zhonghe District and Sanchong District in New Taipei City because of their different spatial patterns of TDRs. The metric of &quot;public facility area per capita&quot; is used to measure public facility service quality in different regions. For those some regions whose level of public facility service does not meet the standards of general plans, I divide the trend of service quality into improvement and deterioration for further discussion. After that, I used the Hedonic Model to measure the relationship between the total amount of TDR around transaction sales and housing prices from 2013 to 2019. Then, I explore how the price will be influenced by the total amount of TDRs around transaction points in regions with different facilities service quality. The empirical results show that the total amount of TDRs around transaction points have spillover effects but with different discount, effects depending on the public service conditions. Moreover, both spillover effects and discount effects will have structural differences in housing prices under diverse urban development contexts and TDRs` spatial patterns.
參考文獻: 中文參考文獻\n內政部營建署,2018,「各直轄市、縣(市)政府辦理都市計畫容積移轉成果統計表」。\n王薇凱,2008,「台中市公共設施保留地容積移轉機制檢討之研究」,逢甲大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文:台中市。\n吳憶如,2008,「容積外部對房價影響之實證-以台北市為例」,台北大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文:台北市。\n宋東鉉,1997,「容積移轉接收區之實施範圍及移轉量之研究:以臺北市為例」,國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文:台北市。\n宋豐荃,2014,「鄰近公園有助提升房價嗎?大小公園對高低房價影響程度之研究」,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文:台北市。\n李泓見、張金鶚、花敬群,2006,「台北都會區不同住宅類型價差之研究」,『台灣土地研究』,9(1):63-87。\n李家儂,2007,「容受力應用於都市地區建築容積總量管制之探討」,『土地問題研究季刊』,6(3):82- 97。\n林英彥,1991,『土地經濟學通論』二版,台北市:文笙書局。\n林峰田,1997,「公共設施檢討空間分析方法」,『都市與計劃』,24(2):171-192。\n林祖嘉、林素菁,1993,「台灣地區璟境品質與公共設施對房價與房租影響之分析」,『住宅學報』,1:21-45。\n林淑英,2012,「緊密都市發展策略及衡量指標之研究」,『綜合規劃研究』,台北市:國家發展委員會。\n林莉婷,2001,「建構容積移轉接收基地選址之研究」,國立臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所碩士論文:台北市。\n邱士哲,2017,「容積移轉接受地區鄰里性公共設施服務水準之研究」,逢甲大學都市計畫與空間資訊學系研究所碩士論文:台中市。\n施甫學,2008,「高密度發展對房價之影響:以台北市為例」,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文:台北市。\n徐國城,2006,「緊密都市形態之正負面效益論述─兼論對台灣城鄉空間發展之參考觀點」,『土地問題研究季刊』,5(4):32-45。\n國泰建設、國立政治大學台灣房地產研究中心,2017,「國泰房地產指數季報2017年第4季」。\n國泰建設、國立政治大學台灣房地產研究中心,2018,「國泰房地產指數季報2018年第4季」。\n張剛維、林森田,2008,「以容積移轉進行都市保存之制度與執行--財產權觀點分析」,『建築學報』,66:97-118。\n張麗姬,1994,「從遠期契約和現貨的角度論預售屋和成屋的價格關係-以台北市為例」,『住宅學報』,2:67-85。\n梁仁旭、陳奉瑤,2014,『不動產估價』三版,台北市:財團法人中國地政研究所。\n陳彥仲,1997,「住宅選擇之程序性決策模式」,『住宅學報』,5:37-49。\n彭建文、楊宗憲、楊詩韻,2009,「捷運系統對不同區位房價影響分析-以營運階段為例」,『運輸計劃季刊』,38(3): 275-296。\n曾建穎、張金鶚、花敬群,2005,「不同空間、時間住宅租金與其房價關聯性之研究—台北地區之實證現象分析」,『住宅學報』,14(2):27-49。\n華昌宜,2010 ,「容積移轉制度-容積銀行操作機制可行性研究」,臺北市政府都市發展局專業服務委託案。\n黃萬翔,1994,「鄰里性公共設施服務水準與住宅特徵價格之交互影響分析」,國立政治大學地政研究所博士論文:台北市。\n新北市三重區公所,2017,「新北市三重區106年區政統計年報」。\n新北市政府,2014,「擬定三重都市計畫細部計畫(第一階段)書」。\n新北市政府,2014,「變更中和都市計畫(第二次通盤檢討)(都市計畫圖重製)書」。\n新北市政府教育局,2017,「新北市106學年度各公立國民小學學區一覽表」。\n監察院,2012,「現行容積移轉、買賣及總量管制規定」專案調查研究,監察院101年度專案調查研究報告。\n管士元,2008,「容積移入地區地價變動調查之研究─以台北市基隆河大灣北段與小灣地區為例」,中國文化大學推廣教育部建築及都市計畫研究所碩專班論文:台北市。\n劉宜論,2009,「容積移轉對接受基地地價影響之研究-以台中市七期重劃區為例」,逢甲大學土地管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文:台中市。\n鄧志松,2006,「選舉的空間因素:以三次總統選舉為例」,『國家發展研究』,6(1):89-144。\n學邑工程技術顧問股份有限公司,2016,「新北市容積檢討與容積調整機制之建立案」,新北市政府城鄉發展局專業服務委託案。\n賴宗裕、李家儂,2000,「現行容積移轉制度與容積可移轉量評估之探討」,『土地經濟年刊』,11:69-98。\n賴宗裕、胡宏昌,1999,「建構容積移轉機制之探討─對都市計畫容積移轉辦法草案之評論」,『經社法制叢論』,22:311-328。\n戴國正、張金鶚、江穎慧,2012,「大眾捷運系統對房價影響效果之再檢視」,論文發表於〈世界華人不動產學會年會〉,澳門大學工商管理學院:澳門,2012年7月3–5日。\n謝秀蓉,2014,「容積移轉對接受地外部性衝擊之研究--台中市新市政專用區為例」,逢甲大學土地管理學系碩士在職專班論文:台中市。\n謝俊亮,2016,「由都市容受力觀點探討容積移轉對基地周邊環境影響之研究-以大臺北地區住宅區為例」,台北科技大學建築系建築與都市設計碩士在職專班論文:台北市。\n謝琦強、莊翰華,2006,「台灣容積移轉制度的潛在開發區位特性-台中市個案研究」,『華岡地理學報』,19:39-57。\n謝琦強、莊翰華,2009,「台中市都市土地使用強度「區位特性」之研究-以容積移轉制度為例」,『地理研究』,51:23-43。\n\n外文參考文獻\nAken,J., Eckert,J., Fox,N. & Swenson, S., 2008, Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) in Washington State: Overview, Benefits, and Challenges, Washington : The Cascade Land Conservancy.\nAkerlof, G. A., 1997, “Social distance and social decisions”, Econometrica, 65: 1005-1027.\nAnselin, L., 1998, Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic publishers.\nBender, B., 1981, “Urban housing density and the price of housing services”, Journal of Urban Economics, 9(1): 80–84.\nBurton, E., 2000, “The compact city: just or just compact? A preliminary analysis”, Urban Studies, 37 (11): 1969-2006.\nCorrell, M. R., Lillydahl, J. H. & Singell, L. D., 1978, “The effect of greenbelts on residential property values: some findings on the political economy of open space”, Land Economics, 54(2): 207–217.\nCrompton, J. L., 2005, “The impact of parks on property values: empirical evidence from the past two decades in the United States”, Managing Leisure, 10(4): 203-218.\nFesselmeyer, E. & Seah, K. Y. S., 2018, “The effect of localized density on housing prices in Singapore”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 68: 304-315.\nHoshino, T. & Kuriyama, K., 2010, “Measuring the benefits of neighbourhood park amenities: application and comparison of spatial hedonic approaches”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 45(3): 429-444.\nKim, H., Hung, K., Park, S. Y., 2015, “Determinants of housing prices in Hong Kong: a Box-Cox quantile regression approach”, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 50(2): 270–287.\nLancaster, K.J., 1966, “A new approach to consumer theory”, The Journal of Political Economy, 74(2): 132-157.\nLinkous, E. R., 2016, “Transfer of Development Rights in theory and practice: the restructuring of TDR to incentivize development”, Land Use Policy, 51:162–71.\nLyon, D.W., 1972, The Spatial Distribution and Impact of Public Facility Expenditures, Berkeley, CA: University of California. Department of City and Regional Planning, PhD dissertation\nMalpezzi, S., Ozanne, L. & Thibodeau, T., 1980, Characteristic Prices of Housing in Fifty-Nine Metropolitan Areas, Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.\nMcconnell, V., Kopits, E. & Walls, M., 2006, “Using markets for land preservation: Results of a TDR program”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49(5): 631-651.\nMiller, A.R., 2001, Valuing open space: Land economics and neighborhood parks, Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Real Estate.\nNeil, D., Sotirios, T. & Glen, B., 2013, “Planning policy, housing density and consumer preferences”, Journal of Property Research, 30 (3): 221-238.\nPruetz, R. & Standridge, N., 2008, “What makes Transfer of Development Rights work?: success factors from research and practice”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(1): 78-87.\nPruetz, R., 1993, Putting Transfer of Development Rights to Work in California, New York: Solano Press Book.\nRosen, S., 1974, “Hedonic prices and implicit market: product differentiation in pure competition”, The Journal of Political Economy, 82(1): 34-55.\nShih, M., Chiang, Y., Chang, H. B., Chang C., 2019, “Commodification of development rights and what it does to the urban housing market in Taiwan”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(2): 194–205\nShih, M., Chiang, Y., Chang, H. B., 2019, “Where does floating TDR land? An analysis of location attributes in real estate development in Taiwan”, Land Use Policy, 82: 832–840.\nShih, M. & Chang, H. B., 2016, “Transfer of development rights and public facility planning in Taiwan: An examination of local adaptation and spatial impact.”, Urban Studies, 53(6): 1244–1260.\nSirmans, S., Macpherson, D. & Zietz, E., 2005, “The composition of Hedonic Pricing Models”, Journal of real estate literature, 13(1): 1-44.\nSmall, L. E. & Derr, D. A., 1980, “Transfer of Development Rights: a market analysis”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(1): 130-135.\nSmyth, H., 1996, “Running the gauntlet: a compact city within a doughnut of decay”, in The Compact city a sustainable urban form?, London, UK : E & FN Spon.\nSöderberg, B., 2002, “A note on the Hedonic Model specification for income properties”, pp. 157-180 in Real Estate Valuation Theory, edited by Wang, K. and Wolverton, L. M., Boston: Springer.\nTroy, P., 1996, The Perils of Urban Consolidation, Sydney: The Federation Press.\n\n網頁參考資料\n三重區公所,2017,「歷史沿革」,6月12日,https://www.sanchong.ntpc.gov.tw/content/?parent_id=10063,取用日期:2019年12月1日。\n中和區公所,2016,「昨日中和」,8月24日,https://www.zhonghe.ntpc.gov.tw/content/?parent_id=10038,取用日期:2019年12月1日。\nHouse+好時價,2019,「好時價房價指數 2019 年 7 月六大都會區」,https://www.houseplus.tw/re port##%E6%96%B0%E5%8C%97,取用日期:2019 年12 月 8 日。
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系
107257010
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107257010
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
701001.pdf4.57 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.