Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134451
題名: 不當督導、情感性組織承諾與留任意願關聯之研究-以陸軍戰鬥部隊為例
The Relationship among Abusive Supervision on Affective Organization Commitment, and Intention to Stay: A Case Study of Army Combat Troops
作者: 馮健祥
Feng, Jian-Xiang
貢獻者: 甯方璽<br>董祥開
馮健祥
Feng, Jian-Xiang
關鍵詞: 不當督導
情感性組織承諾
留任意願
Abusive supervision
Affective organization commitment
Intention to stay
日期: 2021
上傳時間: 1-Apr-2021
摘要: 自2018年募兵制全面推行之後,為使志願役人員持續、穩定服役並能達到長任久用,逐漸成為當前招募與留營政策的主要目標。戰鬥部隊在遂行繁重演訓任務之際,同時面臨單位主官不當督導行為,是否因此影響部屬的留任意願,殊值得進一步探究。\n本研究探討不當督導、情感性組織承諾與部屬留任意願之間的關聯,並探究情感性組織承諾是否具有中介效果;抽樣調查方式採用立意抽樣方式,研究對象為中部地區陸軍某聯兵旅之戰鬥部隊所屬人員,總共發出問卷450份,回收374份有效問卷,運用統計分析軟體SPSS及AMOS,實施多元階層迴歸分析檢驗假設。\n本研究發現,主官對部屬的不當督導行為越嚴重,部屬的情感性組織承諾及留任意願越低;部屬的情感性組織承諾越高,能提升其留任意願;且情感性組織承諾能中介不當督導與留任意願之間的關係,具有完全中介的效果。\n本研究最後依據實證分析的結果,提出後續研究方向建議,以及提供陸軍教育訓練課程規劃修訂,與部隊實務工作執行之參考運用。
Ever since the complete implementation of the voluntary recruitment system in 2018, it has become the main goal of the current recruitment and retention program to ensure the volunteers would serve continuously and stably as to achieve long-term tenure. Despite the heavy training missions that are carried out by the combat troops, the supervisions applied by the unit chief can be improper at times. Whether this effects the subordinates` intention to stay is worthy of further investigation.\nThis study explores the relationship between the intention to stay for affective organization commitment that had been under abusive supervision, and explores whether affective organizational commitment has an intermediary effect. The intentional sampling method had been adopted as the sampling survey method, with the research object to be a member of the combat troops of a joint brigade of the Central Army. A total of 450 questionnaires were sent out, and 374 were returned. By using statistical analysis software SPSS and AMOS, the hierarchical multiple regression analysis was implemented to test the hypotheses.\nThis study found that the more severe the chief official’s abusive supervision to the subordinates, the lower the subordinate’s affective organization commitment and intention to stay. Then again, higher affective organization commitment amongst the subordinates would have a positive effect on their intention to stay. Also, the study found that the affective organization commitment is able to mediate the relationship between abusive supervision and the intention to stay, to the degree of fully intermediary effect.\nAt the end, based on the results of empirical analysis, this research raised recommendations for follow-up research directions, and provided guidance for the Army’s education and training curriculum planning revisions, and the practical application for the implementation into the army’s work.
參考文獻: 王大明、黃永全、林若蕎(2018)。工作價值觀、組織承諾、工作滿足與留任意願關係之研究-以國籍民航機師為例。觀光產業與航空管理期刊,1(1),頁70-94。\n王郁智、章淑娟、朱正一(2006)。升遷機會、社會支持、工作滿意度與留任意願之相關性研究。志為護理:慈濟護理雜誌,5(4),頁90-101。\n王俊明,(2015)。論文的研究、統計與測驗方法。臺北市:師大書苑。\n王翊安、吳守從(2017)。負向情感特質與身心健康、偏差行為關係之探討:以不當督導為中介變項。觀光與休閒管理期刊,5(2),頁1-12。\n中華民國108年國防報告書編纂委員會(2019)。中華民國108年國防報告書。臺北市:國防部。\n吳明隆(2008)。SPSS操作與應用-問卷統計分析實務。臺北市:五南。\n李元墩、鍾志明、林育理(2000)。台灣企業員工組織承諾衡量模式建構之研究。成功大學學報,35,頁133-157。\n李幸鎧(2019)。知覺風險、工作滿意度、轉換型領導、組織認同與國軍人留營意願關係之研究。聯大學報,16(2),頁143-157。\n林淑芳、雲安琪、張書菁(2016)。工作滿意度、護理人員留任意願-以職場暴力為調節變數。健康管理學刊,14(2),頁43-68。\n林鉦棽、彭台光(2012)。組織研究的中介檢測:緣起、爭議、研究設計和分析。管理學報,29(4),頁333-354。\n邱皓政(2019)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS與R資料分析範例解析-第六版。臺北市:五南。\n姜定宇、鄭伯壎(2003)。組織忠誠、組織承諾、及組織公民行爲研究之回顧與前瞻。應用心理研究,(19),頁175-209。\n洪錦成、施奕暉(2013)。我國兵役制度的演進、變革與展望。檔案季刊,12(2),頁30-45。\n胡昌亞、鄭瑩妮(2014)。不當督導研究回顧與前瞻。中華心理學刊,56(2),頁191-214。\n蘇仲泓(2020)。1年爆3起自殺案,269旅排長上吊被指案情不單純。風傳媒新聞網。2020年4月29日,取自:https://reurl.cc/zb1x16。\n凃金堂(2015)。SPSS與量化研究-第二版。臺北市:五南。\n國防部(2015)。國防部澄清說明某平面媒體刊載民人投書認為「馬政府搶軍購功勞、募兵連續三次跳票、戰鬥部隊勤務加給及留營慰助金分配不均」等情新聞稿。2021年2月4日,取自:https://reurl.cc/bzVOer。\n國防部(2017)。國防部106年度施政績效報告。臺北市:國防部。\n國防部(2018)。國防部107年度施政績效報告。臺北市:國防部。\n國防部(2019)。國防部108年度施政績效報告。臺北市:國防部。\n國防部(2019)。國防部「109年重大國防施政成果暨未來展望」說明新聞稿。2021年2月5日,取自:https://reurl.cc/mqMmXY。\n國防部(2020)。109年度國防部所屬單位法定預算書表。2021年2月5日,取自:https://reurl.cc/OXMyDA。\n張永煬、方顯光、劉海東(2018)。國軍志願役士兵留任意願影響因素與行銷溝通訊息鏈路之探討-以某分隊為例。全球管理與經濟,14(1),頁1-14。\n張有恆、劉恩廷(2018)。組織變革對工作滿意、組織承諾、組織績效影響之研究-以桃園機場公司為例。航空安全及管理季刊,5(1),頁1-41。\n張珈進、費吳琛、黃克任(2017)。國軍留營政策與組織依附之關係:知覺組織支持的中介角色與階級之調節效果。國防管理學報,38(1),頁1-10。\n張倖慈(2017)。不當督導、情感性承諾與離職意向關係之研究-以團隊成員交換關係為調節變項。義守大學醫務管理學系碩士班,未出版之碩士論文,高雄市。\n張偉豪(2011)。SEM論文寫作不求人。高雄市:三星統計。 \n張毓騰、葉采婕(2016)。應用層級分析法探討空軍女性軍職人員留營的因素調查研究。管理資訊計算,5(2),頁85-91。\n戚樹誠、羅新興、梁欣光、賴璽方、朱志傑(2017)。職場偏差行為之實證發現與展望:2000-2015亞洲研究的回顧。臺大管理論叢,27(2),頁259-305。\n梁欣光(2018)。不當督導與部屬的主管導向偏差行為之關聯性:道德疏離的中介角色與道德認定的調節角色。組織與管理,11 (1),頁1-31。\n梁欣光、陳彥君(2018)。揮之不去:以反芻思考認知的觀點連結不當督導與部屬長期負向情感狀態。人力資源管理學報,18(1),頁35-56。\n許順旺、王寶惜、黃韶顏、羅明庚、梁郁(2019)。員工之工作投入重要嗎?組織氣候調節工作投入、工作滿意度與組織承諾關係之研究。全球科技管理與教育期刊,8(3),頁38-69。\n郭木智(2010)。陸軍志願役士兵留營意願影響因素之研究。朝陽科技大學企業管理系碩士班,未出版之碩士論文,臺中市。\n陳建志(2018)。陸軍234旅驚傳女輔導長寢室留遺書上吊身亡。自由時報電子報。2018年9月5日,取自:https://reurl.cc/L0WYo9。\n陳淑貞(2012)。心理契約實現知覺與回任人員組織承諾、離職意圖關係之研究:以組織信任為中介變數。人力資源管理學報,12(3),頁1-22。\n陳銘薰、黃新龍(2019)。工作壓力、幸福感、組織承諾與離職傾向關聯之研究-以國軍軍士官為例。商管科技季刊,20(2),頁157-179。\n陳順宇、陳譽仁(2015)。結構方程模式:中介與干擾效果。臺北市:三民書局總經銷。\n傅政榮、朱風繽(2019)。我國募兵制度推動情形。政府審計季刊,39(2),頁3-14。\n彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),頁77-98。\n曾旭民、陳慧玲、莊月娥、黃瑋婷(2019)。護理人員留任意願之相關因素探討:護理工作環境與性格特質的交互作用。台灣公共衛生雜誌,38(1),頁42-52。\n曾妤如、陳國嘉(2016)。領導型態與組織承諾關係之研究。全球管理與經濟,12(2),頁94-111。\n楊佳穎(2017)。全軍留營率77% 國防部喊:志願士兵招募全年可達標。ETtoday新聞雲。2021年2月5日,取自:https://reurl.cc/e9zNnR。\n劉廷揚、陳世通、杜怡潔(2017)。員工組織承諾對主管領導風格和工作績效之中介作用兼論員工幸福感之調節效果。經營管理學刊,(12、13),頁1-20。\n劉俊昌(1999)。企業文化契合度與留職傾向之研究:以中國石油公司為例。中山大學企業管理學系研究所,未出版之碩士論文,高雄市。\n劉娜婷、蔡秉毅、陳淑貞、王政文(2018)。不當督導與強迫性組織公民行為之關係:心理安全感與組織政治知覺所扮演的角色。人力資源管理學報,18(1),頁57-84。\n劉祥得、吳宗霖(2016)。公務員與政府機關負向交換關係之研究-形式主義思想的干擾效果。政策與人力管理,7 (1),頁87-127。\n蔡志旻、李欣怡(2016)。軍眷服務對志願役軍士官兵留營意願之研究-以陸軍司令部為例。休憩管理研究,3(1),頁47-64。\n蔡孟穎(2013)。不當督導對員工組織承諾影響:權力距離為干擾效果。多國籍企業管理評論,7(2),頁127-146。\n潘明宏、陳志瑋(譯)(2003)。最新社會科學研究方法(Nachmias, C. F., & Nachmias, D.原著)。臺北市:韋伯文化事業出版社。\n涂鉅旻(2019)。國軍戰鬥部隊苦,七種部隊至今編現比低於8成。自由時報電子報。2019年10月15日,取自:https://reurl.cc/NXQ3mq。\n涂鉅旻(2020)。招募留營成效佳 國軍動支7.7億預備金。自由時報電子報,2021年2月5日,取自:https://reurl.cc/dVnM8k。\n蕭靜雅、賴于婷(2015)。國際觀光旅遊員工之職場幸福感、留任意願之相關性研究-以工作滿意度為中介變數。觀光與休閒管理期刊,3(2),頁31-42。\n賴彥如、黃同圳(2007)。人力資源管理措施對情感性承諾之影響-轉換型領導知覺之調節效果探討。人力資源管理學報,7(2),頁93-111。\n藍春琪、羅潔伶、李雅雯(2018)。不當督導之關係脈絡研究:質性研究的建構觀點。勞資關係論叢,20(1),頁1-26。\n蘇維文(譯)(1994)。19顆星:美國近代四大陸軍名將(Edgar F. Puryear, Jr.原著)。臺北市:麥田出版社。\nAryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L.-Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model. Journal of applied psychology, 92(1), 191.\nBagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.\nBaron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.\nBecker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American journal of Sociology, 66(1), 32-40.\nBuchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 533-546.\nChandler, G. E. (1990). Retention: Has it obstructed nursing`s view? Nursing administration quarterly, 14(4), 70-75.\nClarke, H., Laschinger, H., Giovannetti, P., Shamian, J., Thomson, D., & Tourangeau, A. (2001). Nursing shortages: workplace environments are essential to the solution. Hospital Quarterly, 4(4), 50-57.\nDalton, D. R., Todor, W. D., & Krackhardt, D. M. (1982). Turnover overstated: The functional taxonomy. Academy of management Review, 7(1), 117-123.\nFornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.\nGuest, D. E. (1997). Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda. International journal of human resource management, 8(3), 263-276.\nHair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Prentice-Hall.\nHerzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B.B. (1959). The motivation to work, New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc.\nHirschorn, L. (1991). Managing in the new team environment, New York: Addison-Welsey Publishing Co.\nHomans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.\nKanter, R. M. (1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American sociological review, 499-517.\nKaye, B., & Jordan-Evans, S. (2014). More stay interviews, fewer exit interviews. Talent Management, 1-7.\nLikert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology, 140, 1-55.\nLiu, D., Liao, H., & Loi, R. (2012). The dark side of leadership: a three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Manogement Journal, 55(5), 1187-1212.\nMaslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.\nMeyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.\nMeyer, J. P., Paunonen, S. V., Gellatly, I. R., Goffin, R. D., & Jackson, D. N. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It`s the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of applied psychology, 74(1), 152.\nMeyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52.\nMitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of applied psychology, 92(4), 1159.\nO`Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of applied psychology, 71(3), 492.\nPodsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of management, 12(4), 531-544.\nPorter, L. W., & Smith, F. J. (1970). The etiology of organizational commitment. unpublished paper, University of California, Irvine, 970.\nPorter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1973). Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Among Psychiatric Technicians. Technical Report, 16, 21.\nPrice, J. L. (1977). The study of turnover. Iowa State Press.\nRobbins, S.P. (1993). Essentials of Organization Behavior. 670-673.\nSteven, P., & Brian, P. (2007). A management development model. Journal of management development.\nStevens, J. M., Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1978). Assessing personal, role, and organizational predictors of managerial commitment. Academy of management journal, 21(3), 380-396.\nTepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of management journal, 43(2), 178-190.\nTepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of management, 33(3), 261-289.\nTett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: path analyses based on meta‐analytic findings. Personnel psychology, 46(2), 259-293.\nWarner, R. M. (2008). Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques. Sage.\nWasti, S. A. (1999). A Cultural Analysis of Organizational Commitmentand Turnover Intentions in a Collectivist Society. Academy of Management Proceedings, (1), 1-6.\nWhyte, W. H. (1956). The organization man: University of Pennsylvania Press.\nWilliams, T. H. (1972). Educational aspirations: Longitudinal evidence on their development in Canadian youth. Sociology of Education, 107-133.\nWoodside, A. G., & Lysonski, S. (1989). A general model of traveler destination choice. Journal of travel Research, 27(4), 8-14.\nYang, J.-T. (2008). Effect of newcomer socialisation on organisational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover intention in the hotel industry. The Service Industries Journal, 28(4), 429-443.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
108921320
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108921320
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
132001.pdf3.2 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.