Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54456
題名: 成人華語文教學課堂遊戲之調查研究
A survey on using games to teach adult Chinese learners
作者: 翁書怡
Weng, Shu I
貢獻者: 葉潔宇
翁書怡
Weng, Shu I
關鍵詞: 華語文教學
課堂遊戲
成人學生
Mandarin Chinese teaching
classroom games
adult student
日期: 2011
上傳時間: 30-Oct-2012
摘要: 本研究旨在瞭解目前成人華語文教學課堂遊戲設計、規劃與實施的現況,以及成人華語教師對課堂遊戲的看法;調查的內容包括遊戲實施的頻率、目的、優缺點和適用性等。為達成研究目的,本研究採用調查研究法,以調查問卷與焦點團體訪談為研究工具,蒐集研究資料,作為分析與討論問題的依據。本調查研究針對臺北市11所公私立大學校院華語文教學中心之華語教師進行調查,以滾雪球抽樣發出120份調查問卷,回收有效問卷91份,彙整分析調查結果。其後,從表達參與訪談意願的受試華語教師中,隨機選取6位教師進行焦點團體訪談,探討華語教師對成人華語文教學課堂遊戲實施的經驗、想法與意見。\n經過研究實施與資料分析,歸結研究結果如下:(一)儘管課堂遊戲並非臺灣成人華語文教學課堂中的主要活動,多數教師仍肯定課堂遊戲應用於成人學生的適用性,並且同意課堂遊戲能有效提升學生的語言能力與學習興趣;課堂遊戲訓練學生的主要語言技能為口說和聽力,確實表現了語言的溝通交際功能;成人學生的華語程度、個性、年齡是主要影響課堂遊戲實施的個別差異。(二)華語教師的「教育程度」會影響其對於「遊戲能否有效提升學生學習興趣」的評估;華語教師在「成人華語文教學以外的教學工作類型」會影響其「設計或規劃課堂遊戲的時間點」。(三)華語教師認為使用課堂遊戲所遭遇的主要問題為「遊戲設計與教具製作費時、缺乏遊戲資料來源」,建議包括同事交換心得、參加教學研習、請學生提供適合的遊戲等;次要問題為「成人學生對課堂遊戲沒興趣、參與意願低」,建議是一旦出現學生不配合的情況,教師應該改變遊戲規則、類型、帶領方式,或是直接結束遊戲。\n最後根據調查結果提出相關建議,以供華語教師、學校行政單位以及教學研究者在成人華語文教學課堂遊戲設計、規劃與實施等方面的參考。
The present study aims to investigate the current situation of classroom games applied in adult Chinese teaching, and teachers’ perspectives toward games used in adult Chinese teaching. A total of 91 teachers of Chinese language center, from universities in Taipei city, responded to a questionnaire designed for this survey. The collected data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and cross analysis. Afterward, six Chinese teachers were chosen randomly to participate in a focus group interview. They discussed their experiences and perception of using games to teach adult Chinese learners.\nResults of this study show: (1) Games are not the main activity used in adult Chinese teaching, but teachers mostly have positive response toward game-using in teaching adult Chinese learners. (2) Teachers’ different educational backgrounds significantly influence their attitude toward the statement “games teaching would increase students’ learning interest”. Teachers’ teaching experiences also influence significantly the timing of preparing classroom games. (3) The duration of game-preparing, the insufficiency of game material, and adult students are unwilling to participate in those games are the main challenges reported by teachers.\nBased on the findings of the survey, teaching implications and suggestions for further research are included at the end of the thesis.
參考文獻: (一) 中文部分\n王文科、王智弘(譯)(1999)。Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. (著)。焦點團體訪談─教育與心理學適用(Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology)。臺北:五南。\n王昭正、朱瑞淵(譯)(1999)。Floyd J. Fowler, Jr. (著)。調查研究方法(Survey Research Method)。臺北:弘智。\n王曉修(譯)(2007)。Ruane, J. M. (著)。研究方法概論(Essentials of Research Methods: A Guide to Social Science Reasearch)。臺北:五南。\n成令方。(1987)。學寓於戲─漢語教學遊戲舉例。載於世界漢語教學學會舉辦之第二屆國際漢語教學討論會,北京。\n朱榮智、黃春貴、許怡貞、張正男、楊如雪、陳美琪、傅武光、邵曼珣、柯華葳。(2009)。實用華語文教學概論,臺北:新學林。\n吳幸玲、郭靜晃(譯)(2003)。Johnson, J. E., Christie, J. F., & Yawkey, T. D.(著)。兒童遊戲─遊戲發展的理論與實務﹝第二版﹞。臺北:楊智。\n吳幸玲(2003)。兒童遊戲與發展。臺北:揚智。\n林佩璇、黃政傑(1996)。合作學習。臺北:五南。\n邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北:五南。\n洪志成、廖梅花(譯)(2003)。Krueger, R. A. & Casey, M. A.(著)。焦點團體訪談(focus groups)。嘉義:濤石。\n徐振邦、梁文蓁、吳曉青、陳儒晰(譯)(2006)。Cohen, L., Manion, L.,& Morrison, K. (著)。最新教育研究法(Research Methods in Education)。臺北:韋伯。\n張于忻(2008)。華語文遊戲設計與實施。中原華語文學報,2,113-133。\n張正男(1993)。語文遊戲─語文活動設計的理論與實際。臺北:師大書苑。\n張可婷(譯)(2010)。Barbour, R.(著)。焦點團體研究法(Doing Focus Groups)。臺北:韋伯文化。\n陳向明(2002)。教師如何作質的研究。臺北:洪葉。\n陳杭生(1993)。視聽媒體與教學正常化。視聽教育雙月刊,34(3),1-10。\n教育部(無日期)。國語辭典簡編本【網路版】。2011年8月20日,取自http://dict.concised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/jdict/GetContent.cgi?DocNum=41353&GraphicWord=&QueryString=遊戲\n教育部(無日期)。重編國語辭典修訂本【網路版】。2011年8月20日,取自http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/newDict/dict.sh?cond=%B9C%C0%B8&pieceLen=50&fld=1&cat=&ukey=-833796959&serial=1&recNo=2&op=f&imgFont=1\n教育部國際文化教育事業處(2011)。更新我國各大學校院附設華語文教學中心一覽表。2011年9月15日,取自http://www.edu.tw/bicer/itemize_list.aspx?site_content_sn=15042\n曾加勁(2010)。以教學遊戲帶動零起點成人對外漢語綜合課的互動教學。教育導刊,(04),88-90。\n黃富順(1985)。成人的學習動機─成人參與繼續教育動機取向之探討。高雄:復文。\n黃富順(2000)。成人教育導論。臺北:五南。\n黃富順、陳如山、黃慈(2003)。成人發展與適應。臺北:空大。\n馮瑞龍(2001)。修辭教學遊戲手冊。香港:中華書局。\n葉重新(2001)。教育研究法。臺北:心理。\n葉潔宇、林美瑩(2005)。國小英語與遊戲活動。人文及社會學科教學通訊,16(22),39-60。\n鄧巧如(2008)。「遊戲中學習」-7~12歲兒童華語遊戲教學之活動設計。國立台灣師範大學華語文教學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n蔡培村、武文瑛(2010)。成人教育學。高雄:麗文文化。\n歐素汝(譯)(1999)。Stewart, D. W. & Shamdasani, P. N.(著)。焦點團體:理論與實務(Focus Groups: Theory and Practice)。臺北:弘智文化。\n簡楚瑛(1993)。「遊戲」之定義、理論與發展的文獻探討。國立新竹師院學報,6,105-133。\n韓鑫興(2009)。試論遊戲教學法在小學初中對外漢語教學中的應用。華東師範大學人文社會科學學院中國語言文學系,學科教學(語文)領域教育碩士論文,未出版,中國上海。\n蘇育任(1993)。課程與教學─漫談遊戲導向的教學設計。國教輔導,33(2),4-6。\n\n(二) 英文部分\nBateson, G. (1955). A theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports, 2, 39-51.\nBerlyne, D. (1960). Conflict, arousal and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.\nBodrova, E., & Leong, D. (1996). Tools of mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.\nBrown, D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Education Company.\nBruner, J. (1972). The nature and uses of immaturity. American Psychologist, 27, 687-708.\nBrunner, E., Wilder, D., Kirchner, C., & New-berry, J. (1959). An overview of adult education research. Chicago: Adult Education Association of the U.S.A.\nCross, D. (1995). A practical handbook of language teaching. Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, (England): Phoenix ELT. \nCrookes, G., & Chaudron, C. (2001). Guidelines for language classroom instruction. In Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.) (pp. 29-42). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.\nCsikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.\nEllis, M. (1973). Why people play. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.\nHilles, S., & Sutton, A. (2001). Teaching adults. In Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.) (pp. 385-400). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.\nJohnson, K., & Marrow, K. (1981). Communication in the classroom. London: Longman.\nKnowles, M. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Cambridge Adult Education.\nKnowles, M. S., & Associates (1984). Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.\nKnowles, M. S. (1989).The making of an adult educator: An autobiographical journey. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.\nKumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Problematizing cultural stereotypes in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 37, 709-718.\nLarsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nLee, W. R. (1979). Language teaching games and contests (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nNational Advisory Council on Adult Education. (1980). Terms, definitions, organization and councils associated with adult learning. NACAE.\nReid, J. (1987). The learning style preference of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly 21(1): 87-111.\nRichards, J., & Rogers, T. (2001). Approches and methods in language teaching.(2nd ed.) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.\nRichards, J., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). New York: Longman.\nRixon, S. (1981). How to use games in language teaching. London: MacMillan Publishers Ltd.\nShipley, C. D. (1998) Empowering children: Play-based curriculum for lifelong learning (2nd ed.). New York: Nelson College Publishing.\nSutton-Smith, B. (1967). The role of play in cognitive development. Young Children, 22, 361-370.\nSmith, R. M. (1982). Learning how to learn: Applied theory for adults. Chicago: Follett Publishing Company.\nThiagarajan, S. (2001). Training games. In Sanders, E. & Thiagarajan, S. (Eds.). Performance intervention maps: 36 strategies for solving your organization’s problems (pp. 53-57). Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training & Development. \nThiagarajan, S. (2003). Design your own games and activities: Thiagi’s templates for performance improvement. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.\nVygotsky, L. S. (1976). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylvia(Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution (pp.537-554). New York: Basic Books.\nWright, A., Betteridge, D., & Buckby, M. (2006). Games for language learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
華語文教學碩士學位學程
98161005
100
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098161005
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
100501.pdf1.55 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.