Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54501
題名: 北北基地區國民小學校長正向領導和教師組織承諾關係之研究
The study of the relationship between the principals` positive leadership and teachers` organizational commitment in elementary school in Taipei City, New Taipei City, and Keelung
作者: 張碧容
Chang, Pi Jung
貢獻者: 林邦傑
張碧容
Chang, Pi Jung
關鍵詞: 國小校長
校長正向領導
教師組織承諾
elementary school principals
principals` positive leadership
teachers’organizational commitment
日期: 2011
上傳時間: 30-Oct-2012
摘要: 本研究旨在瞭解北北基地區國民小學教師知覺校長正向領導與教師組織承諾的現況,並分析教師人口變項、學校環境變項在校長正向領導以及教師組織承諾的差異情形,最後探討校長正向領導與教師組織承諾之關係。\n本研究以問卷調查法為主,所稱「國民小學」校長,僅包括公立(含\n國立與縣市立)國民小學,不含私立小學。問卷調查法以自編「北北基地區國民小學校長正向領導與教師組織承諾關係之調查問卷」(內含基本資料、校長正向領導量表與教師組織承諾量表)為工具,對北北基地區國民小學進行問卷調查。問卷以國小教師為調查對象,計調查 78 所學校,發出問卷836 份,回收 764 份,有效問卷 744 份,回收有效率89.00%。調查所得資料分別以描述性統計、t 考驗、單因子變異數分析、Pearson 積差相關、多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法實施資料分析,據以進行研究結果的分析與討論。\n研究主要發現如下:\n一、 目前北北基地區國小校長在整體正向領導與教師在整體組織承諾方面表現均屬中上程度。\n二、在教師人口變項中,不同性別、服務年資與現任職務之教師知覺校長正向領導具有顯著差異。其中以男性教師、服務年資較深以及兼任主任教師知覺校長正向領導程度較高。\n三、在教師人口變項中,不同性別、年齡、服務年資與現任職務之教師知覺教師組織承諾具有顯著差異。其中以男性教師、年齡較長、服務年資較深以及兼任主任教師知覺教師組織承諾程度較高。\n四、在教師人口變項中,不同年齡、學歷之教師知覺校長正向領導沒有顯著差異。不同學歷之教師知覺教師組織承諾沒有顯著差異。\n五、在學校環境變項中,不同學校規模及學校位置之教師知覺校長正向領導具有顯著差異存在。其中以學校班級數12班(含)以下學校規模較小及學校位置位居偏遠地區之學校教師知覺校長正向領導程度較高。 \n六、在學校環境變項中,不同學校歷史之教師知覺校長正向領導沒有顯著差異。不同學校歷史、學校規模及不同學校位置之教師知覺教師組織承諾沒有顯著差異。\n七、校長正向領導不論整體或是各層面都與教師組織承諾整體或各層面具有顯著正相關。\n八、整體而言,校長正向領導對於教師組織承諾具有預測力。\n最後依據研究結果與結論,提出具體建議,以作為教育行政機關、學校校長、教師以及未來研究之參考。
This study aims to probe into elementary school teachers’ perceived principals’ positive leadership and teachers’ organizational commitment in Taipei City, New Taipei City, and Keelung , and analyze the difference of teachers’ demographic variables and schools’ environment variables on principals’ positive leadership and teachers’ organizational commitment. Finally, this study explores the relationship between principals’ positive leadership and teachers’ organizational commitment. \nThis study conducted questionnaire surveys on public elementary schools only (national and municipal and schools of counties), while excluding private school. The research tool was self-designed “Questionnaire on relationship between principals’ positive leadership and teachers’ organizational commitment in elementary schools in Taipei City, New Taipei City, and Keelung ”, which covers basic information, scale of principals’ positive leadership and scale of teachers’ organizational commitment. The surveys were conducted in 78 schools, and a total of 836 questionnaires were distributed to elementary school teachers. Among the 764 retrieved samples, there were 744 valid samples, with a valid return rate of 89.00%. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, t test, One-Way ANOVA, Pearson’s product-moment correlation and multiple stepwise regression analysis. The research findings are as follows: \n1. Currently, in Taipei City, New Taipei City, and Keelung , elementary school principals’ overall positive leadership and teachers’overall organizational commitment are medium to high. \n2. As to teachers’ demographic variables, perception of teachers of different genders, working years and current posts on principals’ positive leadership are significantly different. Male teachers, teachers with longer working years, and teachers as directors highly perceive principals’ positive leadership. \n3. As to teachers’ demographic variables, perception of teachers of different genders, ages, working years and current posts on teachers’ organizational commitment are significantly different. Male teachers, older teachers, teachers with longer working years and teachers as directors highly perceive teachers’ organizational commitment.\n4. As to teachers’ demographic variables, perception of teachers of different ages and educational levels on principals’ positive leadership are not significantly different. Perception of teachers of different educational levels on teachers’ organizational commitment is not significantly different. \n5. As to schools’ environment variables, perception of teachers of different school scales and locations on principals’ positive leadership is significantly different. Teachers from schools with less than (including) 12 classes and remote locations highly perceive principals’ positive leadership. \n6. As to schools’ environment variables, perception of teachers of different schools backgrounds on principals’ positive leadership is not significantly different. Perception of teachers with different school backgrounds, school scales and locations on teachers’ organizational commitment is insignificantly different. \n7. Overall principals’ positive leadership or the related dimensions are significantly and positively related to overall teachers’ organizational commitment or the dimensions. \n8. Generally speaking, principals’ positive leadership can predict teachers’ organizational commitment. \nAccording to research findings and conclusions, this study proposes the suggestions as references for educational authority, school principals, teachers and future researchers.
參考文獻: 一、中文部分\n丁虹(1987)。企業文化與組織承諾之關係研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n方淑芬(2007)。臺北縣市高中校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立政治大學教育學院學校行政碩士在職專班學位論文,未出版,臺北市。\n方雅漣(2004)。完全中學教師組織變革知覺與組織承諾關係之研究。臺南師範學院教育經營與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。\n王愛麗(2007)。自我傷害青少年復原力之研究。高雄師範大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。\n方聰安(2005)。國民小學教師組織變革知覺與組織承諾關係之研究。國立臺南大學教育管理研究所學校行政組碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。\n王雅玄(1996)。教師組織承諾之理論分析。教育資料文摘,38,15-23。\n白崇亮(1986)。組織承諾研究:理論與實務。管理評論,5(2),31-51。\n仲秀蓮(2004)。臺北縣市國民小學校長正向思考、領導型式與學校效能關係之研究。國立臺北師範學院教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n仲秀蓮(2011)。臺灣地區國民小學校長正向領導、學校文化對學校創新經營效能影響之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育學院教育經營與管理學系博士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n杜金璋(1991)。組織承諾的概念與測量。高雄市:中山大學中山學術研究中心。\n吳清山(1991)。學校行政。臺北市:心理。\n吳清山(2004)。學校行政,第六版。臺北市:心理。\n吳清基 (1989)。民主法治與教育。臺北市:台灣書店。\n吳明隆 (2007)。SPSS 統計應用學習實務--問卷分析與應用統計。臺北:\n 知城。\n李新民(2011)。正向心理學在學校教育的應用。高雄市:麗文。\n李嘉明(2009)。國小校長與教師對校長領導行為的知覺、落差與回應之個\n 案研究。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士班碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。\n李麗素(2005)。桃園縣國民中小學人事人員角色壓力與組織承諾之研究。\n臺北師範學院教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n呂浚瑀(2011)。國民小學校長正向領導、團隊情感氛圍與組織創新能力關\n 係之研究。國立新竹教育大學人資處教育行政碩士專班學位論文,未出\n 版,新竹市。\n林永城(2008)。國小教師知覺校長的溝通行為與其領導效能之研究。東海大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。 \n林月盛(2003)。國民中學教改壓力、組織衝突、權力運用與組織承諾關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,高雄市。\n林志峰(2005)。主管領導型態、人格特質、組織承諾與工作績效關聯性之研究—以國防部軍備局生產製造中心生產工廠為例。南臺科技大學高階主管企管碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。\n林明地(2007)。以證據領導:讓學校更睿智(評K. Leithwood, R. Aitken,& D. Jantzi之Making Schools Smarter: Leading with Evidence)。教育研究集刊,53(1),119-127。\n林政宏(2003)。國民小學教師覺知教育改革壓力、組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。\n林新發(2006)。營造優質學校的策略與作法。取自: http://www.tmue.edu.tw/~adeva/activity_photo/photo/nation/Great_school/agenda.html\n林新發(2010a)。正向領導的意涵與實施策略。國民教育,50(3),1-5。\n林新發(2010b)。校長正向領導的策略與技巧。國民教育,50(6),1-7。\n林慈愛(2009)。高雄市國民小學教師之校長服務領導知覺與組織承諾之相關研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。\n林靜如(1990)。臺北市國民小學教師工作經驗、內外控信念與組織承諾之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n林曜聖(2007)。「故事領導」在國民小學行政情境之應用研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n周崇儒(1997)。國民小學教師專業成長、組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究。\n 臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n邱春堂(2010)。國民小學校長社會資本、教導型領導與教師組織承諾關係\n 之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育學院教育政策與管理研究所博士論文,\n 未出版,臺北市。\n邱馨儀(1995)。國民小學學校組織文化與教師組織承諾之研究。臺北市立師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n范熾文(2002)。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究。\n 國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n施碧珍(2002)。國民小學教師組織承諾量表發展之驗證性研究。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n洪蘭(譯)(2003)。著。真實的快樂(原作者:M. E. P. Seligman)。臺北市:遠流。\n侯志偉(2008)。學校創新經營與教師工作投入之關係研究-以校長領導風\n 格、行政服務品質及教師專業成長為干擾變項。國立臺南大學教管所學校經營與管理教學碩士碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。\n徐善德(1997)。高職教師工作價值觀、組織承諾與教學效能關係之研究。\n 國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n秦夢群(2001)。教育行政-理論部份。臺北市:五南。\n秦夢群(2006)。教育行政-理論部分。臺北市:五南。\n莊榮霖 (1994)。國中教職員工工作滿足與組織承諾之研究。國立政治大學公\n 共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n陳木金(2007)。以優質行政管理策略推動優質學校經營,載於臺北市教師研習中心(主編),優質領航─行政篇,頁10-25。臺北市:北市教研中心。5-38。\n陳生民(2006)。你是自己的最高主管。取自\n http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_472708e101000301.html\n陳金水(1988)。國民中學教師制握信念、工作經驗與組織承諾之關係。\n 國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。\n陳怡君(2001)。職業學校校長領導行為與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立\n 彰化師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。\n陳勇全(2008)。國民小學教師工作壓力、組織氣氛與組織承諾相關之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。\n陳茂盛(2005)。臺南市國小教師組織政治知覺與組織承諾關係之研究。\n國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。\n陳滄智(2005)。臺北市國民小學教育人員組織承諾與學校效能相關之研\n究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n陳聖謨 (2000)。現在校長角色與職責評析。教育研究,8,29-40。\n許籐繼(2001)。學校組織權力重建。臺北:五南。\n張志毓(1997)。國民小學教師組織承諾與專業承諾研究。臺北市立師範\n學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n張美芳(譯)(2000)。積極思考就是力量(原作者:Peale, N. V.)。台北縣:世朝。\n張惠英(2002)。國民小學教師工作價值觀、工作生活品質與組織承諾關係\n 之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。\n張瑞村(1994)。高級職業學校校長領導型態與教師組織承諾關係之研究。\n 高雄市:復文書局。\n張瑞村(1998)。高級工業職業學校校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校效\n 能之關係之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,台北市。\n張樵益(2004)。國民小學校長道德領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立\n 台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中。\n連銘棋(2008)。國小教師對校長領導風格之知覺與其組織承諾關係之研究—以新竹縣、市為例。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n連舒婷(譯)(2012)。翁山蘇姬傳:自由無懼.因愛而戰(原作者:Jesper Benqtsson)。臺中市:晨星。\n梁丁財(2002)。國民小學校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。臺\n 中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。\n梁俊堯(2005)。臺北市國民小學組織結樣與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立臺北師範學院教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n梁瑞安(1990)。國民小學教師組織溝通、角色壓力與組織承諾關係之研究。\n 國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。\n郭振生(2002)。內部行銷導向、組織承諾、工作滿意與學校效能關係之研究─以台南地區國民小學為例。南華大學管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。\n郭素芬(2009)。桃園縣國民小學行政團隊的正向組織行為對團隊衝突管理影響之研究。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n程實定(譯)(1991)。動機與人格(原作者:Maslow, Abraham H.)。臺北市 : 結構群文化。\n彭雅珍(1998)。國小校長領導風格、教師工作價值觀與教師組織承諾關係\n 之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n曾文志(2010)。讓正向情緒擴展與建構孩子的未來。師友月刊,5187,62-67。\n曾南薰(1998)。我國教師組織承諾之整合分析。國立嘉義師範學院國民教\n 育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。\n黃怡雯(2006)。客籍國中小校長的領導風格、教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。\n黃昆輝(1989)。教育行政學。臺北市:東華。\n黃國隆(1986)。中學教師的組織承諾與專業承諾之研究。國立政治大學\n 學報,53,55-83。\n黃裕敏(2003)。國民小學學校組織文化與教師組織承諾、工作滿意關係之\n 研究。國立臺東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台東市。\n葉佳文(2007)。臺灣地區公立高中校長教學領導、教師組織承諾與教學效\n 能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n賀斌(2007)。積極心理治療的基本理論與主要實施過程。臨床心身疾病雜\n 誌,13(6),558-560。\n詹明娟(2009)。好領導從覺察與正向解讀開始。取自\nhttp://ioistudygroup.blogspot.com/2009/01/blog-post_6309.html\n詹益鉅(2001)。桃園縣國民小學校長轉型領導行為、學校文化與教師組\n 織承諾關係之研究。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出\n 版,臺北市。\n詹雅茹(2011)。從溝通黃金法則淺談家有青少年時期之家庭溝通。家庭教育雙月刊第,29 (1),72-74。\n詹婷姬(1994)。國民小學教師工作環境知覺與組織承諾關係之研究。國\n 立臺北師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n蔡炳坤(2007)。高中校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織效能關係之\n 研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n蔡淇華(2009)。中投區高中校長轉型領導、內部行銷導向與教師組織承諾\n 關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所學校行政碩士班論文,未出\n 版,彰化市。\n蔡進雄(1993)。國民中學校長領導方式與教師組織承諾。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n蔡進雄(2009)。國民中小學校長領導之研究:專業、情緒與靈性的觀點。\n 臺北市:高等教育文化。\n蔡寬信(1993)。國民小學學校組織氣氛、教師內外控信念與教師組織承諾\n 關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n蔡錦治(1999)。國民小學組織氣候、組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究─以台南市國小為例。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。\n賴慧玲(2002)。英國初任校長領導與管理專業進修方案(HEADLAMP)應用於我國之調查研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n鄭文宗(2004)。高中職行政主管轉型領導與學校效能之研究-以高雄市為例。私立義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄縣。\n劉志鵬(1995)。國民小學教師參與決定、組織承諾與組織效能關係之研究。\n 國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。\n劉春榮(1993)。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係研究。國立\n 政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n謝文全(2004)。教育行政學(二版)。臺北市:高等教育。\n謝文全(2006)。學校本位管理的實施與困境。取自 http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/jw!Am.2ViWaBRkSgd75pS7j.STEbdeqvw--/article?mid=365\n謝惠卿 (2002)。國中導師領導行為、班級氣氛與學習滿意度之研究─以高雄市某國中為例 。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。\n謝傳崇(譯)(2011)。正向領導(原作者:Kim Cameron)。臺北市:巨流。(原著出版年:2008)\n謝傳崇 (2011a)。校長正向領導激發學校超越表現。師友月刊,529,51-55。\n謝傳崇(2011b)。校長正向領導對教師教學影響之研究。教育資料與研究\n雙月刊,101,59-82。\n魏珠恩(譯)(2006)。腦內革命-腦內荷爾蒙創造不同的人生(原作者:春山茂雄)。臺北市:創意力。\n簡佳珍、林天祐(2002)。桃園縣國民小學教師組織承諾與教師效能感關係\n 之研究。教育研究資訊,10(5),137-16。\n簡政為(2005)。國民中學校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾相關之研究。私立\n 中華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹縣。\n羅俊龍(1995)。教師個人變項與工作價值觀、工作滿足、組織承諾關係之\n 研究─宜蘭縣公立國民中學現任教師實證研究。東吳大學商學院企業管\n 理學系碩士班碩士論文,末出版。臺北市。\n羅虞村(1986)。領導理論研究。臺北市:文景。\n 二、外文部分\nAngle, H. L. & Perry, J. L. (1981). An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 1-13.\nAntonakis, J., Cianciolo, A. T., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Leadership: Past, present, and future. In J. Antonakis, A. T. Cianciolo, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). (2004). The nature of leadership (pp.3-10). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.\nBagozzi, R. P. (2003). Positive and negative emotions in organizations. In K. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp.176-193). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.\nBaumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings of life. New York: Guilford Press.\nBaumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370.\nBaumeister, R. F., & Wilson, B. (1996). Lifestories and the four needs for meaning.Psychological Inquiry, 7, 322-325.\nBecker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology,66:32-42 .\nBright, D., Cameron, K., & Caza, A. (2006). The amplifying and buffering effects of virtuousness in downsized organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 249-269.\nBrown S. L., Nesse, R. M., Vinokur, A. D., & Smith, D. M.(2003). Providing social support may be better than receiving it: Results from a prospective study. Psychological Science, 14, 320-327.\nBryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. London: SAGE Publications.\nBuchanan, B.II.(1974). Building organizational commitment:The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1974(19),533-546.\nCameron, K. S.(1994). Strategies for successful organizational downsizing. Human Resource Management Journal, 33, 89-112.\nCameron, K. S. (2007). Building relationships by communicating supportively. In D. A. Whetten, & K. S. Cameron (Eds.), Developing management skills (pp. 237-282). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.\nCameron, K. S. (2008). Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.\nCameron, K., & Caza, A. (2002). Organizational and leadership virtues and the role of forgiveness. Journal of Leadership and Organizational studies, 9(1), 33-48.\nCameron, K. S., & Lavine, M. (2006). Making the impossible possible. San Francisco: Berrett Koehler.\nCameron, K., S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R.E. (2003). Foundations of positive organizational scholarship. In K. Cameron, J. Dutton, & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 3-13). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Kohler.\nCherniss, C. (1998). Social and emotional learning for leaders. Educational Leadership, 55(7), 26-28.\nCrocker, J., Nuer, N., Olivier, M., & Cohen, S. (2006). Egosystem and ecosystem: Two motivational orientations foe the self. Working paper, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan. \nDenison, D. R. (1996). What is the different between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review,21(3),619-654.\nDiener, E. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,851-864.\nDinkmeyer, D., & Losoncy, L. (1996). The skills of encouragement:Bringing out the best in yourself and others. Boca Raton,LA:St.Lucie Press.\nDutton, J. E., & Ragins, B. R. (2007). Exploring positive relationships at work. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.\nEpel, E., McEwen, B. S., & Ickovics, J. R. (1998). Embodying psychological thriving: Physical thriving in response to stress. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 301-322.\nEtzioni,A. (1961). A review and reconceptualization of organization commitment. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 468.\nFarnell, D. & Rusbult, C.E.(1981). Exchange variables as predictors of jobsatisfaction, job commitment and turnover: The impact of reward, cost,alternatives andinvestment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,28, 78-95.\nFerris, K. R. & Aranya, V.(1983). A comparison of two organizational\ncommitment scales. Personnel Psychology, 36, 26-30.\nFirestone,W. A. & Pennell, J. R.(1993). Teacher commitment,working condition, and differential incentive policies. Review of Educationa Research,63(4), 484-526.\nFredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300-319.\nFredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.\nFredrickson, B. L. (2002). Positive emotions. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 120-134). New York: Oxford University Press.\nFredrickson, B. L. (2003). Positive emotions and upward spirals in organizations. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organization scholarship (pp.163-175). San Francisco: Berrett Koehler.\nGable, S. L. (2008). Capitalizing on positive events: Flourishing individuals and flourishing relationships. Retrieved from http://www.ppc.sas.upenn.edu/aboutus.htm\nGeorge, J. M. (1998). Salesperson mood at work: Implications for helping customers. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 18, 23-30.\nGordon, J. (2008). The case for positive energy. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.leadervalues.com/Content/detail.asp?ContentDetailID=1207\nGrant, A. M. (2008). Enhancing work motivation in public service : Connecting employees to the prosocial impact of their jobs. International Public Management Journal, 11 (in press).\nGrant, A. M., Campbell, E. M., Chen, G., Cottone, K., Lapedis, D., & Lee, K. (2007). Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: The effects of contact with beneficiaries on persistent behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103,53-67.\nHrebiniak, L.G. (1974). Effects of job level and participation on employee attitudes and perceptions of influence. Academy of Management Journal, 17(4),649-662.\nHrebiniak, L.G. & Alutto, J.A.(1972). Personal and role related factors in the development of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(4), 555-573.\nKantor, R. M.(1968). Commitment and social organization. American\nSociological Review,33,499-517.\nKelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51-60.\nKo, J. W., Price, J. L., Mueller C. W. (1997). Assessment of myer and allen`s three-component model of organizational commitment in south korea. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6):961-973.\nKoch, J. L. & Steers, R. M. (1978). Job attachment, satisfaction, and turnover among public sector employees, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 12, 119-128.\nKushman, J.W. (1992). The organizational dynamics of teacher workplace commitment: A study of urban elementary and middle school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(1), 5-42.\nLe Poire, B. A. (2006). Family communication: Nurturing and control in a changing world.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.\nLewis M. (1993). The lexical approach. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.\nLewis, M. (1993). Self-conscious emotions: Embarassments, pride, shame,and guilt. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions(563-573.). N.Y.: Guilford.\nLuthans, F., (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23,695-706.\nLuthans, F., Luthans, K. W., Hodgetts, R. M. & Luthans, B. C. (2001). Positive approach to leadership(PAL)implications for today’s organizations. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2),1-20.\nLuthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143-160.\nLuthans, F., & Youssef, C. M.(2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33, 321-349.\nMathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.\nMcAdams, D. P. (1996). Personality, modernity,and the storied self: A contemporaryframework for studying persons. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 295-321.\nMeyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 64-98.\nMeyer, J. P., Paunonem, S. V., Gellatly, I. R., Goffin, R. D., & Jackson, D.N., (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It`s the nature of the commitment that count. Journal of Applied Psychology,74, 152-156.\nMorris, J. H. & Sherman, J. D.(1981). Generalizability of an organizational commitment model. Academy of Management Journal, 24(3), 512-526\nMorrow, P. C.(1983). Concept redundancy in organizational research:The case of work commitment . Academy Management Review, 8(3), 486-500.\nMowday, R.T., Steers, R.M., and Porter,L.W(. 1982). Employee-organization linkage: the psychology of commitment absenteeism and turnover. New York:Academic Press.\nOffice of Fraternity & Sorority Affairs (2010). Leadership lessons. Retrieved from http://www.greeks.cornell.edu/fso/fso_handbookpg10.html\nO’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A., (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 18) (pp. 157-200). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.\nPolodny, J. M., Khurana, R., & Hill-Popper, M. (2005). Revisiting the meaning of leadership. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 1-36.\nPorter, L. W. & Smith, F. J. (1970). The etiology of organizational commitment. Unpublished paper. University of California at Irvine.\nPorter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974).\nOrganizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among\npsychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.\nRandall, D.M.(1987). Commitment and the organization:The Organization Man Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 462.\nReyes, P. (1990). What research has to say about commitment, performance and productivity. In P. Reyes. (Ed.). Teachers and their workplace: Commitment, performance and productivity. (pp.15-21). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.\nReyes, P. (1992). Preliminary models of teacher organizational commitment: Implications for restructuring the workplace. Madison,WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.\nReyes, P.& Pounder, D. G. (1990). Teacher commitment, job satisfaction,and school value orientation: A study of public and private school.University of Wisconsin, Madison.\nRobbins.(2001). Organization behavior (9th ed.),Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.\nRousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreement. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.\nRyff, C. D., Singer, B., Wing, E., & Love, G. D. (2001). Elected affinities and uninvented agonies: Mapping emotion with significant others onto health. In C. D. Ryff & B. Singer (Eds.), Emotion, social relationships, and health (pp. 133-175). New York: Oxford University Press.\nSalancik, G.R.(1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In B.W. Staw & G.R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior. Chicago:St Clair.\nSchein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. \nSchwartz, B. (1994). The Costs of living: How market freedom erodes the best things in life. New York: W. W. Norton.\nSeeman, T. (2001). How do others get under our skin? Social relationships and health. In C. D. Ryff & B. Singer (Eds.), Emotion, social relationships, and health (pp. 189-210). New York: Oxford University Press.\nSeligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.\nSeligman, M. E. P., (2005). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp.3-9). Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nSeligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.\nSmidts, A., Pruyin, A. T. H., & Van Riel, C. B. M. (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1051-1062.\nStaws, B. M. (1977). Two side of commitment. Paper presented at the National Meeting of the Academy of Management. Orlando, Florida.\nStaws, B. M. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Management Review, 6(4), 577-587.\nSteers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational\ncommitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 46-56.\nStevens, J. M., Beyer, J. M. & Trice, H. M. (1978). Assessing personal,role, and organizational predictors of managerial commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 380-396.\nTaylor, S.E. (2002). The tending instinct: How nurturing is essential for who we are and how we live. New York: Time Books.\nWeber, M. (1992). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Routledge.\nWiener, Y.(1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 418-28.\nWiener, Y. & Vardi, Y.(1980). Relationships between job, organization, and career commitments and work outcomes-an integrative approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26, 81-96.\nYukl, G. A. (2002). Leadership in organizations(5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. \nZaccaro, S. J., Kemp, C., & Bader, P. (2004). Leader traits and attributes. In J. Antonakis, A. T. Cianciolo, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp.101-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
98911015
100
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098911015
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
101501.pdf1.85 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.