Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60129
題名: 數位遊戲之行動載具使用者行為與開發分析─以智慧型手機為例
Mobile device game player behaviors and games development analysis - using smartphone as an example
作者: 林姿旻
Tzu-Min Lin
貢獻者: 陳聖智<br>郭正佩
Chen, Sheng Chih<br>Kuo, Pei Jeng
林姿旻
Tzu-Min Lin
關鍵詞: 行動遊戲
動機理論
科技接受模型
主觀規範
社會互動
認知娛樂性
mobile game
motivation theory
technology acceptance model (TAM)
subject norm
social interaction
perceived playfulness
日期: 2010
上傳時間: 4-Sep-2013
摘要: 數位遊戲已成為探討現代生活科技中一項重要的領域。智慧型手機,為近兩年興起的行動平台載具,根據資策會資料顯示,在手機進行娛樂活動應用程式的排行,第一為聽音樂,第二即為進行遊戲。觀察智慧型手機上的應用程式市集(如:android market、app store),使用者可以快速方便的利用網路下載遊戲,在眾多遊戲中,使用者選擇何種類型遊戲下載並進行遊戲,對遊戲開發商非常重要。在智慧型手機上結合許多科技技術(如:無線網路、各式感測器......等),皆有可能影響使用者進行遊戲和選擇遊戲的動機。因此,了解並且針對使用者需求與使用者行為設計遊戲,在數位內容領域進行數位遊戲研究與開發是重要的議題。\n\n 為了解使用者在智慧型手機上進行遊戲的動機,本研究使用科技接受模型和動機理論探討使用者的內在動機和外在動機,透過問卷分析初步了解使用者在智慧型手機上進行遊戲的原因,以及在智慧型手機上擷取使用者在手機上進行遊戲的行為和訪談使用者進行遊戲的因子,將兩資料進行比對驗證,找出使用者在智慧型手機上進行遊戲的模型,以及外在和內在動機之相互影響,作為未來規劃與策略發展方向的參考依據。\n\n 根據資料分析發現,使用者進行遊戲的動機會受到遊戲的操作性和在遊戲中得到的樂趣影響。並且使用者會因為他人推薦或看到他人進行遊戲,影響到使用者進行遊戲的意願,而使用者在進行遊戲時,遊戲中提供與他人互動的功能也能激發使用者進行遊戲。此外,在智慧型手機遊戲情境中,使用者會受到外在動機影響,改變本身對遊戲的觀點,影響到使用者的內在動機,進而改變使用者對遊戲的意願。
Digital games have become an important domain of exploration the technology of modern life. The smartphone which is a mobile device rises due two years. Follow the MIC data of entertainment applications on mobile phone rank, the first is listening music and the second is playing games. User can easy download games quickly by wireless from application market like Android market or app store. It is important for game developers to know which game user chooses and downloads in large games.\n\nThe smartphone combine different technology and sensors that may influence user’s motivations to choose games and play games. Therefore, to understand user’s need and user’s behavior for game design which is important discuss for digital game study and developer of digital content domain.\n\nTo understand the motivations of user playing games on the smartphone, so this study uses technology acceptance model (TAM) to explore intrinsic motivations and extrinsic motivations of playing game. Through questionnaire to find the factors that user plays games on smartphone, and we also collect users’ behavior from smartphone and interview users. The study combines these data to find the model of user playing game on the smartphone, and the relationship between intrinsic motivations and extrinsic motivations.\n\nThe study finds that perceived ease of use and the fun in games effect user’s motivation. The user intention influenced by people who around user and also affected in the game which provide user to interact with others. By the way, user’s extrinsic motivations affect intrinsic motivations on smartphone context, and change the mind of playing games.
參考文獻: Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior: Prentice- Hall.\nAmabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3(3), 185-201. \nAtkinson, M., & Kydd, C. (1997). Individual characteristics associated with World Wide Web use: an empirical study of playfulness and motivation. SIGMIS Database, 28(2), 53-62. \nBainbridge, W. S. (2009). Online Multiplayer Games. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, 1(1), 1-113. \nBell, M., Chalmers, M., Barkhuus, L., Hall, M., Sherwood, S., Tennent, P., . . . Hampshire, A. (2006). Interweaving mobile games with everyday life. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. \nBourgonjon, J., Valcke, M., Soetaert, R., de Wever, B., & Schellens, T. (2011). Parental acceptance of digital game-based learning. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1434-1444. \nCastañeda, J. A., Muñoz-Leiva, F., & Luque, T. (2007). Web Acceptance Model (WAM): Moderating effects of user experience. Information & Management, 44(4), 384-396. \nChen, L. (2008). A model of consumer acceptance of mobile payment. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 6(1), 32-52. \nChua, A. Y. K., Goh, D. H., Lee, C.S., & Tan, K.T. (2010). Mobile Alternate Reality Gaming Engine: A Usability Evaluation.\nCompeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 189-211. \nCrabtree, A., Benford, S., Rodden, T., Greenhalgh, C., Flintham, M., Anastasi, R., Drozd, A., Adams, M., Farr, J., Tandavanitj, N., Steed, A. (2004). Orchestrating a mixed reality game `on the ground`. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Vienna, Austria. \nCronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. \nCsikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: The experience of play in work and games: San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.\nCsikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness,15-35, New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.\nCsikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience: Harper Perennial.\nCsikszentmihalyi, M. (1994). The evolving self: A psychology for the third millennium: Harper Perennial.\nDavis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. \nDavis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132. \nDeci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior: Plenum Press.\nDesurvire, H., Caplan, M., & Toth, J. A. (2004). Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games. Paper presented at the CHI `04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, Vienna, Austria.\nFabricatore, C., Nussbaum, M., & Rosas, R. (2002). Playability in action videogames: a qualitative design model. Hum.-Comput. Interact., 17(4), 311-368. \nFederoff, M. A. (2002). Heuristics and Usability Guidelines for the Creation and Evaluation of FUN in Video Games. Thesis at the University Graduate School of Indiana University, Dec. 200.\nFang, X., & Zhao, F. (2010). Personality and enjoyment of computer game play. Computers in Industry, 61(4), 342-349. \nFishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research.\nFlintham, M., Benford, S., Anastasi, R., Hemmings, T., Crabtree, A., Greenhalgh, C., Tandavanitj, N., Adams, M., Row-Farr, J. (2003). Where on-line meets on the streets: experiences with mobile mixed reality games. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA. \nFornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. \nFreeman, T. (1997). Creating a great design document. Game Developer Magazine, Auguest 1997. 58-66. \nGallaway, B. (2008). PC Games Versus Console Games. Voice of Youth Advocates, v. 31 no. 1 (April 2008), 30-1. \nGhani, J. A., & Deshpande, S. P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. The Journal of psychology, 128(4), 381-391. \nGuo, Y., & Barnes, S. (2007). Why people buy virtual items in virtual worlds with real money. SIGMIS Database, 38(4) .\nHa, I., Yoon, Y., & Choi, M. (2007). Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information & Management, 44(3), 276-286. \nHair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis Macmillan, New York..\nHarrison, D. A., Mykytyn, P. P., Jr., & Riemenschneider, C. K. (1997). Executive Decisions About Adoption of Information Technology in Small Business: Theory and Empirical Tests. Information Systems Research, 8(2), 171-195. \nHeijden, H. V. d. (2004). User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695-704. \nHerbst, I., Braun, A. K., McCall, R., & Broll, W. (2008). TimeWarp: interactive time travel with a mobile mixed reality game. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. \nHerodotou, C. (2010). Social Praxis Within and Around Online Gaming: The Case of World of Warcraft. Paper presented at the Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (DIGITEL), 2010 Third IEEE International Conference.\nHerzberg, A. (2003). Payments and banking with mobile personal devices. Communications of the ACM, 46(5), 53-58. \nHoffman, D., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. The Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50-68. \nHong, S. J., Thong, J., Moon, J. Y., & Tam, K. Y. (2008). Understanding the behavior of mobile data services consumers. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 431-445. \nHsu, C. L., & Lu, H. P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management, 41(7), 853-868. \nHsu, C. L., & Lu, H. P. (2007). Consumer behavior in online game communities: A motivational factor perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1642-1659. \nHsu, C., & Lu, H. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management, 41(7), 853-868. \nIgbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., & Baroudi, J. (1996). A motivational model of microcomputer usage. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(1), 127-143. \nJärvinen, A. (2009). Game design for social networks: interaction design for playful dispositions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games, New Orleans, Louisiana. \nJarvinen, A., Helio, S., & Mayra, F. (2002). Communication and Community in Digital Entertainment Services. Prestudy Research Report. \nJohnson, S. (2011). The end of games? Game Developer, 18(5), 44. Retrieved from Academic Research Library.\nKarahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183-213. \nKleijnen, M., Ruyter, K. d., & Wetzels, M. G. M. (2003). Factors influencing the adoption of mobile gaming services Mobile commerce, 202-217, IGI Publishing.\nKwon, H. S., & Chidambaram, L. (2000). A test of the technology acceptance model: the case of cellular telephone adoption. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2000. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on.\nLazzaro, N. (2004). Why We Play Games: Four Keys to More Emotion Without Story. Paper presented at the Game Developers Conference.\nLiang, T.P., & Yeh, Y.H. (2010). Effect of use contexts on the continuous use of mobile services: the case of mobile games. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. \nLin, T. M., Chen, S. C. and Kuo, P. J. (2011). Motivations for Game-playing on Mobile Devices –Using Smartphone as an Example. Edutainment 2011 is the sixth International Conference on E-Learning and Games.\nMalhotra, Y., & Galletta, D. F. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 1999. HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on.\nMallat, N., Rossia, M., Tuunainen, V. K., & Öörni, A. (2009). The impact of use context on mobile services acceptance: the case of mobile ticketing. Information & Management, 46(3), 190-195. \nMaslow, A. H., Frager, R., & Fadiman, J. (1970). Motivation and personality (Paperback ed.): ADDISON WESLEY PUB CO INC.\nMoon, J.W., & Kim, Y.G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230. \nPinelle, D., Wong, N., & Stach, T. (2008). Heuristic evaluation for games: usability principles for video game design.\nPrato, G. D., Feijóo, C., Nepelski, D., Bogdanowicz, M., & Simon, J. P. (2010). Born digital/ Grown digital : Assessing the Future Competitiveness of the EU Video Games Software Industry. In European Communities (Series Ed.) , 187. \nRollings, A., & Adams, E. (2003). Andrew Rollings and Ernest Adams on Game Design: New Riders Publishing.\nRyan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. \nSchwabe, G., & Göth, C. (2005). Mobile learning with a mobile game: design and motivational effects. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 204-216. \nShin, D.H. (2007). User acceptance of mobile Internet: Implication for convergence technologies. Interacting with Computers, 19(4), 472-483. \nShin, D.H., & Shin, Y.J. (2011). Why do people play social network games? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 852-861. \nSpikol, D., & Milrad, M. (2008). Combining Physical Activities and Mobile Games to Promote Novel Learning Practices.\nSweetser, P., & Wyeth, P. (2005). GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Comput. Entertain., 3(3), 3-3. \nTamminen, S., Oulasvirta, A., Toiskallio, K., & Kankainen, A. (2004). Understanding mobile contexts. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 8(2), 135-143. \nVenkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. \nWebster, J., Trevino, L. K., & Ryan, L. (1993). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9(4), 411-426. \nWolf, M. (2008). The video game explosion: a history from PONG to Playstation and beyond: Greenwood Pub Group.\nYee, N. (2006). Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(6), 772-775. \nYu, J., Ha, I., Choi, M., & Rho, J. (2005). Extending the TAM for a t-commerce. Information & Management, 42(7), 965-976.\nZagal, J. P., Nussbaum, M., & Rosas, R. (2000). A model to support the design of multiplayer games. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 9(5), 448-462. \n王樑華 (2010)。 手機遊戲的開發與未來趨勢 傳播學院【數位閱聽人次研究群】12月實務專題座談。 國立政治大學。\n吳鬆亮 (2004)。 國小教師使用教學網站行為意圖影響因素之探究。 樹德科技大學。 \n李志宏 (2000)。 組織公民行為意圖影響因素之研究-以兩岸資訊從業人員為例。 博士論文,國立中央大學,桃園縣。 \n余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS的應用。臺北:高等教育文化。\n邱皓政 (2004)。 社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析。 台北市: 五南。\n洪聖敏 (2009)。 行動裝置嵌入式應用軟體市場與應用趨勢前瞻。In 產業情報研究所(MIC)。\n許育誠 (2009)。 手機體感遊戲使用者之科技接受度分析。碩士論文,國立成功大學,台南市。\n許朝欽 (2004)。 大型多人線上角色扮演遊戲中個人化服務設計之探討。碩士論文,元智大學,桃園縣。 \n陳佩瑜 (2007)。 知覺娛樂性及情境因素對行動遊戲使用意願之影響。碩士論文,國立中山大學,高雄市。 \n陳祈年 (2005)。 動機、可玩性與社交性對於多人線上角色扮演遊戲玩家沉浸經驗之影響。 碩士論文,國立交通大學,新竹市。 \n楊蘭詞 (2010)。 智慧型手機遊戲研發策略之研究。 碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學,臺北。 \n蔡雨軒 (2011)。 台灣現上娛樂行為調查-已年齡別分群(上) (產業情報研究所(MIC)。 台灣。\n戴群達 (2010a)。 從消費者觀點剖析行動生活應用發展。In 產業情報研究所(MIC)。\n戴群達 (2010b)。 數位遊戲之創新應用發展趨勢: 資策會MIC。
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
數位內容碩士學位學程
98462013
99
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0984620131
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文
學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
013101.pdf4.52 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.