Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/63172
題名: 99課綱中「信賴區間」單元之教材設計與學生學習成效評估探討
On Study Material Design and Students’ Learning Assessment for Confidence Interval Based on the 99 Curriculum
作者: 黃聖峯
貢獻者: 江振東
黃聖峯
關鍵詞: 信賴區間
高中數學
99 課綱
統計
Confidence Interval
Mathematics Courses in High School
99 Curriculum
Statistics
日期: 2013
上傳時間: 2-Jan-2014
摘要: 本研究主要是針對高中數學課程中「信賴區間」的這個單元,依據99 課綱中的課程規劃,設計出一套專題式的研究教材,並以筆者所任教高中的高二及高三學生作為研究對象,進行專題性的課程授課,且對其學習成果進行評量。主要研究結果如下:\n一、高三學生雖已進行過「信賴區間」及其先備知識之授課,但前測的成績並不理想。\n二、高二與高三學生經由筆者授課教學後,其後測成績均較前測成績有非常明顯之進步,不過高二與高三學生的後測成績並無顯著差異。\n三、高二自然組與高二社會組學生經由筆者授課教學後,其學習成效亦無顯著差異,但社會組學生學習上普遍較為認真,後測成績稍高於自然組。\n四、高三自然組與高三社會組學生經由筆者授課教學後,其後測成績具顯著差異,而進步成績的學習成效亦具有顯著差異,自然組優於社會組。\n五、依高中數學學習成就分成高分群、中分群與低分群三群,雖然在前測與後測成績表現上顯著不同,但進步的成績則三群並無顯著差異。\n\n此外,筆者於本次研究中也對學生問卷調查一些筆者有興趣的相關議題,並進行問卷分析,得到以下結果:\n一、對於本研究所編撰「信賴區間」之課程教材,學生普遍能夠接受且瞭解,並知曉「信賴區間」在生活上的用處,且能解讀其資訊。唯實務面上,他們對「信賴區間」之學習則持可有可無的態度。\n二、本次研究的授課方式對於自然組與社會組學生的接受程度是具有差異的,其中自然組學生較能接受本次非傳統型的授課方式。 \n三、學生普遍認為高中數學中,「非統計類數學課程」是比較有趣的,「統計類數學課程」則在學習上具相對困難性。而在統計的課程中,「信賴區間」倒是比較感興趣的這單元。\n\n整體而言,本次研究對學生進行信賴區間的教學結果,是具有學習成效的。
Based on the 99 Curriculum Guidelines for the Senior High School Math, a special set of study material for Confidence Interval was composed. Eleventh and twelfth grade students from a girl’s senior high school were recruited voluntarily and lectured, and their learning performance were evaluated before and after the completion of the lecture. The primary findings are as the following:\n1. Though twelfth grade students have already studied Confidence Interval before the lecture, their pre-test scores were still low.\n2. On the average, both eleventh and twelfth grade students performed better after the lecture, and no significant differences were observed between them.\n3. For the eleventh grade students, no significant differences were observed between social science and natural science groups. However, students in social science group appeared to work harder, and their post-test results were slightly better than those in natural science group.\n4. For the twelfth grade students, significant differences were observed between social science and natural science groups. Natural science group students appeared to outperform their counterparts in social science group. \n5. Among the top third, the middle third, and the bottom third of all the participating students, although their pre-test and post-test scores differed significantly, the differences between the two tests were not significant.\nIn addition, some secondary issues were also explored, and the related findings are summarized as follows: \n1. Students showed appreciation for the study material, understood the concept of Confidence Interval better after the lecture and even realize how to apply the concept to their daily life. Surprisingly, however, they didn’t think learning Confidence Interval would make any difference in their life.\n2. Students in the natural science group appeared to have greater acceptance toward the unconventional teaching method than those in the social science group.\n3. For the topics covered in senior high school math, students generally considered those unrelated to statistics more interesting, and thought that statistics-related topics were more difficult to learn. However, among the statistics-related topics, Confidence Interval was the most intriguing one.\nIn conclusion, this study reveals that the experimental teaching approach concerning Confidence Interval are apparently positive and effective.
參考文獻: 大學入學考試中心(2011)。99課綱指定科目考試數學甲、乙考科命題方向。2011年9月30日,擷取自大考中心網站http://www.ceec.edu.tw/99課綱考試說明/1000930/99課綱考試說明.htm。\n李宛臻(2010):桃園縣高中職數學教師信賴區間學科教學知識之研究。中原大學教育研究所碩士論文。\n李虎雄、朱亮儒、陳昭地、林礽堂、黃登源、柯明忠、李政貴、陳嘯虎、儲啟政、張敏雪(2012)。普通高級中學選修數學(甲版)上冊。台北:康熹文化事業股份有限公司。\n李虎雄、朱亮儒、陳昭地、林礽堂、黃登源、柯明忠、李政貴、陳嘯虎、儲啟政、張敏雪(2012)。普通高級中學選修數學甲(甲版)上冊教師用書。台南:南一書局。\n林炯伊(2011)。如何以自由軟體「R」輔助高中機率統計課程的學習。高中數學學科中心電子報,第54期。2011年4月22日,擷取自高中數學學科中心網站http://mathcenter.ck.tp.edu.tw/Resources/ePaper/Default.aspx?id=54。\n林福來、陳順宇、徐正梅、林信安、陳冒海、陳創義、邱顯義、許清土、葉善雲 (2012)。普通高級中學選修數學(甲版)上冊。台南:南一書局。\n林福來、陳順宇、徐正梅、林信安、陳冒海、陳創義、邱顯義、許清土、葉善雲 (2012)。普通高級中學選修數學(甲版)上冊教師手冊。台南:南一書局。\n邱婉嘉(2009)。台灣與美國高中信賴區間單元教材內容之分析比較。國立臺灣師範大學數學研究所碩士論文。\n張玫玲(2011):高中數學信賴區間教材設計與學習成效之研究。國立臺北大學統計學系碩士論文。\n教育部(民94)。普通高級中學課程暫行綱要。台北:教育部。\n教育部(民98)。普通高級中學課程綱要。台北:教育部。\n許志農、黃森山、許琬青、陳清風、廖森游、南婷婷(2012)。普通高級中學選修數學甲(上)。台北:龍騰文化事業股份有限公司。\n許志農、黃森山、許琬青、陳清風、廖森游、南婷婷(2012)。普通高級中學選修數學甲(上)教師手冊。台北:龍騰文化事業股份有限公司。\n陳建州(2010):高中數學中信賴區間的問題導向之研究。中原大學應用數學研究所碩士論文。\n陳彥良(2007)。電腦數學實驗運用在高中數學統計單元教學之研究─以「大數法則」、「常態分佈」及「信賴區間」等單元為例。國立交通大學理學院網路學習學程碩士論文。\n游森棚、林延輯、柯建彰、洪士薰、洪育祥、張宮明(2012)。普通高級中學選修數學甲(上)。台南:翰林出版事業股份有限公司。\n游森棚、林延輯、柯建彰、洪士薰、洪育祥、張宮明(2012)。普通高級中學選修數學甲(上)教師手冊。台南:翰林出版事業股份有限公司。\n葉裕益(2010):高三學生在信賴區間與其先備知識的學習表現和錯誤認知。國立臺灣師範大學數學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文。\n鍾彥源(2011):高中數學教師對於信賴區間課程認知之研究。中原大學應用數學研究所碩士論文。\n藍汎群(2011):商職生對信賴區間與信心水準觀念之量表編製與診斷探討。淡江大學中等學校教師在職進修數學教學碩士學位班碩士論文。
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
應用數學系數學教學碩士在職專班
100972009
102
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1009720091
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
009101.pdf3.31 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.