Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/63727
題名: 中高齡失業者職業訓練與再就業問題之探討
A Study of Middle-aged Umemployed Vocational Training and Re-employment
作者: 陳羿岑
Chen, Yi Cen
貢獻者: 成之約
Cheng, Zhi Yue
陳羿岑
Chen, Yi Cen
關鍵詞: 中高齡失業者
職業訓練
重複參訓
再就業
日期: 2013
上傳時間: 10-Feb-2014
摘要: 隨著社會人口結構的變化,高齡化與少子化對未來勞動力的運用、及相關社會保險產生很大的影響,因此提高中高齡人力資源的運用是必要的。在提升中高齡勞動力的運用政策下,期望中高齡失業者參加藉由職業訓練以協助其再就業。然而卻發現重複參加訓練者大多是中高齡的問題,未因為接受職業訓練而就業或穩定就業,反而再度回到職業訓練中,代表著中高齡的職業訓練制度出現了問題,以致無法發揮原來的效用。本研究從提升中高齡人力資源的角度,了解中高齡人力資源運用的現況、運用及再就業所面臨的問題,進而討論我國職業訓練制度現況、問題及相關規範,做為了解中高齡職業訓練的研究基礎。藉由訪談結果,分析影響中高齡職業訓練成效的原因,以探討中高齡重複參訓的原因,以釐清職業訓練在對於提升中高齡人力資源運用可能存在的問題。\n 本研究發現從參加職業訓練前、課程開始、訓練過程、到訓練結束,皆存在可能影響中高齡重複參加職業訓練的原因。職業訓練未能使中高齡者順利再就業或穩定就業,職業訓練對於提高就業的效果不佳,顯示職業訓練制度存在者一些問題。本文將造成中高齡者重複參訓的問題結論出四個面向,即中高齡受訓者與環境互動所形成的選擇、中高齡受訓者與職業訓練單位的相互關係、訓練單位在職業訓練制度中的選擇、職業訓練制度模組與社會的連結等所衍生出來的現象。\n 最後對於減少、解決中高齡者重複參加訓練的情況,提出相關建議。分為三個部分,首先為職業訓練制度設計的規定,包括職業訓練生活津貼、失業給付的規範、就業輔導、評鑑制度的調整等。及職業訓練執行過程,對於篩選機制的落實、課程設計與實務連結度、就業服務之資源連結、資訊宣導等。再者為中高齡與職業訓練的關係,包括協助創業、就業機會的連結與結合產業發展、增加職業訓練專班等,不僅減少重複參訓所產生資源配置不均的問題,同時也期望職業訓練能確實發揮促進中高齡者就業的功用。
參考文獻: 一、中文部分\n丁玉珍(2009)。中高齡者失業問題分析與因應策略,臺灣勞動者季刊,20,頁30-41。\n王瑞宏(2004)。職業訓練機構辦理中高齡失業者再就業訓練方案規劃與成效之研究,國立中正大學成人及繼續教育學系博士論文。\n王德睦、陳寬政(1991)。台灣地區的勞動力老化,賴澤涵、黃俊傑主編,光復後台灣地區的發展經驗,頁261-274,臺北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。\n成之約(1999)。中高齡勞工就業的障礙與突破:兼論我國中高齡勞工就業促進政策,李漢雄、曾敏傑主編,中高齡勞動者就業問題與對策,頁167-203,嘉義:國立中正大學勞動者研究所。\n成之約(2007)。中高齡人力資源運用的探討,臺灣勞工雙月刊,5,頁8-17。\n吳秀光、鄭錫鍇(2005)。中高齡者適合受訓職類之研究,勞委會職業訓練局泰山職業訓練中心委託報告。\n李健鴻(2008)。地方政府辦理特定對象就業訓練之問題分析:差序治理體制觀點,就業安全半年刊,7(1),頁48-53。\n李德純(2009)。職業訓練成效與就業轉銜網絡研究,國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系博士論文。\n周玟琪(2006)。高齡社會時代下我國高齡者就業對策,就業安全半年刊,5(2),頁11-17。\n林素霞(1992)。我國中高年勞工職業問題之研究,中國文化大學勞工研究所碩士論文。\n林毓堂(1997)。中高齡勞工職業問題之探討,職業與訓練月刊,15(6),頁52-58。\n故鄉市場調查股份有限公司(2012)。職前訓練職類盤點與訓後就業追蹤計畫調查報告,行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局委託調查。\n孫仲山(2009)。中長期失業者職業訓練成效之影響因素與評估研究,行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局泰山職業訓練中心委託研究報告。\n孫仲山、李德純(2007)。職業訓練學員學習成效的影響因素-學員屬性的周密化分析,高雄師大學報,23,頁29-50。\n馬財專(2010)。臺灣中高齡勞工失業問題之檢視及政策思考,臺灣社會福利學刊,9(1),頁45-94。\n高忠義(譯)(2001)。老年、社會、法律經濟學。(Richard A.Posner原著),台北:商周出版。\n梁鍾廷(2009)。臺灣中高齡勞動市場參與及退休後再就業意願影響因素之探討,國立中正大學社會福利研究所碩士論文。\n異視行銷市場調查股份有限公司(2012)。101年度雲嘉南地區職業訓練供需資訊蒐集及評估調查計畫調查報告,行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局臺南職業訓練中心。\n陳伸賢(1995)。臺灣地區中老年人力資源之探討,職業與訓練月刊,13(3),頁70-75。\n陳志敏(2009)。臺灣中高齡人力資源運用與就業歧視之探討。中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。\n陳信木、林佳瑩、陳雅琪(2009)。從調控勞動參與行為分析少子化下我國人口依賴關係及因應對策,行政院經濟建設委員會委託報告。\n陳璿憶(2011)。中高齡勞工工作價值觀與求職傾向的探討,國立政治大學勞工研究所碩士論文。\n曾敏傑(2000)。中高齡員工職務再設計:勞方觀點與資方作法的比較,政大勞動學報,9,頁111-148。\n曾敏傑、李漢雄(1999)。中高齡工作表現與企業職務再設計,李漢雄、曾敏傑主編,中高齡勞動者就業問題與對策,頁167-203,嘉義:國立中正大學勞動者研究所。\n黃同圳(2007)。高齡化趨勢下就業環境變化與因應對策之探討。臺灣勞工雙月刊,5,頁18-29。\n楊靜利、翟本瑞、郭振昌(2012)。我國青年與中高齡勞動力就業問題之探討,行政院研究發展考核委員會委託報告。\n劉建良(1999)。中高齡受僱者退休後再就業意願的決定因素,國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。\n蔣震夷(2001)。以公共職業訓練促進中高齡失業者再就業之研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。\n蔡文輝(2008)。老年社會學,臺北:五南圖書出版公司。\n蕭立宏(2011)。中高齡勞動者就業競爭力關係之研究,高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所。\n戴淑媛(2001)。中高齡職業訓練成效評估之研究,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。\n薛承泰、曾敏傑(2002)。中高齡退休生涯規劃與影響因素之研究。 勞資關係論叢,11,頁33-68。\n藍科正(1999)。論中高齡就業輔導政策,李漢雄、曾敏傑主編,中高齡勞工就業問題與對策,頁105-131,嘉義:國立中正大學勞工研究所出版。\n鐘琳惠(2008)。臺灣中高齡失業勞工再就業需求與政策因應之研究,國立暨南大學社會政策與社會工作研究所博士論文。\n行政院主計總處。101年人力資源運用調查統計,檢索日期:2013年10月2日。網址:http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=33646&ctNode=3247&mp=1。\n行政院主計總處。101年人力運用調查報告,檢索日期:2013年11月3日。網址:http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=32738&ctNode=4987&mp=1。\n行政院主計總處。102年人力運用調查報告,檢索日期2013年12月11日。網址:http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=35192&ctNode=4987&mp=1。\n行政院勞工委員會。2013年國際勞動統計,檢索日期2013年12月9日。網址:http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/nat/0228menu.htm。\n行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局統計資料庫,檢索日期2013年11月5日。網址:http://stat.evta.gov.tw/statis/stmain.jsp?sys=100&kind=10&type=1&funid=qrymenu2&cparm1=q13&rdm=H4BreedZ。\n薛承泰(2000)。「當前中高齡就業困境與因應」,國政研究報告,財團法人國家政策研究基金會,檢索日期:2012年12月16日。http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SS/089/R/SS-R-089-002.HTM。\n\n二、英文部分\nAngotti, R. & Belmonte, S. (2012). Investigating the learning-age gap in Europe and Italy: attractiveness and benefits of learning later in life. In CEDEFOP (Ed.), Working and aging-The benefits of investing in an ageing workforce, 55-87. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.\nBarabasch, A., Dehmel, A. & Van Loo, J. (2012). Policy implications: making the most of learning later in life-Where do we go from here?. In CEDEFOP (Ed.), Working and aging-The benefits of investing in an ageing workforce, 308-315. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. \nBarabasch, A., Dehmel, A. (2012). Working beyond 65 in Canada and the United States. In CEDEFOP (Ed.), Working and aging-The benefits of investing in an ageing workforce, 230-253. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.\nBarnes, H., Smeaton, D., & Taylor, R. (2009). An Ageing Workforce: The Employer’s Perspective, Report 468. Institute for Employment Studies.\nBillett, S., Dymock, D., Johnson, G., & Martin, G. (2011). Overcoming the Paradox of Employers’ Views about Older Workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(6), 1248-1261.\nBoersch-Supan, Axel. ( 2001). Labor Market Effects of Population Aging, Working Paper 8640, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.\nCarmichael F., Hulme. C., Porcellato, L., Ingham. B., Prashar, A., (2011). Ageism and age discrimination: the experiences and perceptions of older employees, in Parry, E. and Tyson, S. (eds.) Managing age diversity, Palgrave Macmillan.\nChiu, W. C. K., Chan A.W., Snape, E. & Redman, T. (2001). Age Stereotypes and Discriminatory Attitudes Towards Older Workers: An East-West Comparison, Human Relations, 54(5), 629-661.\nDe Baets, S. & Warmoes, V. (2012). Learning later in life: the Older Worker`s perspective. In CEDEFOP(Ed.), Working and aging-The benefits of investing in an ageing workforce, 88-105. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.\nDepartment of Education , Employment and Workplace Relations (2011). Ageing & the Barriers to Mature Age Labour Force Participation in Australia.\nGreider, P., Denise-Neinhaus, S., & Statham, A. (1992). Education and Training as Facilitating Reemployment after a Plant Shutdown. Sociological Practice Review, 3, 220-227.\nHale, N. (1990). The Older Worker: Effective Strategies For Management and Human Resource Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.\nHedge, J. W. (2008). Strategic Human Resource Managementand the Older Worker. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 23(1/2), 109-123.\nHenkens, K. (2005). Stereotyping older workers and retirement: The managers` point of view. Canadian Journal on Aging, 24(4), 353-366.\nHumphrey, A., Costigan, P., Pickering, K., Stratford, N. & Barnes, M. (2003). Factors Affecting the Labour Market Participation of Older workers, Research Report 200. Department for Work and Pensions.\nIrving, P., Steels, J. & Hall, N. (2005). Factors Affecting the Labour Market: Participation of Older Workers: Qualitative Research, Research Report 281, Department for Work and Pensions.\nKirkpatrick, D. (1996). Great ideas revisited: Techniques for evaluating training programs .Training and Development, 50, 54 -59.\nKirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.\nKooij, D., De Lange, A., Jansen, P., & Dikkers, J. (2008). Older workers` motivation to continue to work: five meanings of age. Aconceptual review, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(4), 364-394.\nLazear, E. P. (1979). Why is there mandatory retirement? Journal of Political Economy, 87, 1261-1274.\nLesser, E., Farrell, B., & Payne, M. (2004). Addressing the challenges of an aging workforce: A human capital perspective for firms operating in Asia Pacific. IBM Business Consulting Services.\nLindsay, C. & McQuaid, R. (2004). Avoiding the “McJobs”: Unemployed Job Seekers and Attitudes to Service Work. Work, Employment and Society, 18(2), 297-319.\nLoretto, W., & White, P. (2006). Employers` attitudes, practicesand policies towards older workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 16(3), 313-330.\nLuger, B., Anselmann, S. & Mulder, R.H. (2012). Characteristics of informal learning activities of older trainers at work. In CEDEFOP (Ed.), Working and aging- The benefits of investing in an ageing workforce, 254-279. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. \nLyon, P., Hallier, J., & Glover, I. (1998). Divestment or investment? The contradictions of HRM in relation to older employees, Human Resource Management Journal, 8(1),56-66. \nMacleod A., Worman D., Wilton P., Woodman P. & Hutchings P. (2010). Managing an Ageing Workforce: How employers are adapting to an older labour market, Chartered Management Institute and Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.\nMalul, M. (2009). Older workers` employment in dynamic technology changes. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 809-813.\nMcGregor, J. & Gray, L. (2002). Stereotypes and Older Workers: The New Zealand experience. Social Policy Journal, 18, 167-177.\nMcNair, S. and Flynn, M. (2005) The age dimension of employment practices: employer case studies. Department of Trade and Industry Employment Relations Research Series No. 42. London: DTI \nMcPherson, M. (2012). Older Workers: Challenging Myths and Managing Realities. EEO Trust.\nMicro-Economic Policy Analysis Branch, Industry Canada and Policy Research Directorate, Human Resources and Social Development Canada. (2008). The Labour Market and Skills Implications of Population Aging in Canada: A Synthesis of Key Findings and Policy Implications.\nNg, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 392-423.\nOECD(2006). Live Longer, Work Longer: A Synthesis Report, OECD, Paris.\nPorcellato, L., Carmichael, F., Hulme, C., Ingham, B., & Prashar, A. (2010). Giving older workers a voice: Constraints on the employment of older people in the north west of England. Work, Employment and Society, 24(1), 85-103.\nPrenda, K. M., & Stahl, S. M. (2001). The truth about older workers. Business & Health, 19(5), 30-37.\nRoscigno, V. J., Mong, S., Byron, R., & Tester, G. (2007). Age discrimination, social closure and employment. Social Forces, 86(1), 313-334.\nRosen, B. & Jerdee, T.H. (1977). Too Old or Not Too Old. Harvard Business Review November, 55, 97-106.\nShapiro, D., & S. H. Sandell(1987). The reduced pay of older job losers: Age. 37-51, in S.H.. Sandell (ed.), The Problem Isn`t Age: Work and Older Americans. New York: Praeger.\nShore, L. M., Cleveland, J. N., & Goldberg, C. B. (2003). Work attitudes and decisions as a function of manager age and employee age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 529-537.\nSkirbekk, V. (2004). Age and individual productivity: A literature survey.Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 2, 133-153.\nSkirbekk, V. (2008). Age and productivity capacity: descriptions, causes and policy options, Ageing Horizons, 8, 4-12.\nSporket, M. (2012). Organizational demographic literacy: developing a conceptual framework. In CEDEFOP (Ed.), Working and aging- The benefits of investing in an ageing workforce, 207-226. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. \nStufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, model, and applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.\nTemple, J., Adair, T., & Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. (2011). Ageing and the barriers tolabour force participation in Australia. Productive Ageing Centre, National Seniors Australia, Canberra.\nThomas J. Calo, Meredith M. Patterson, Wayne H. Decker. (2013). Employee Perceptions of Older Workers’ Motivation in Business, Academia, and Government, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(2).\nVan Dalen, H. P., Henkens, K. & Schippers, J. (2009). Dealing with older workers in Europe: A comparative survey of employers’ attitudes and actions. Journal of European Social Policy, 19(1), 47-60.\nVan Dalen, H. P., Henkens, K., Hendrikse, W. & Schippers, J. (2006). Dealing with an Ageing Labour Force: What do European Employers Expect and Do?, NIDI-report 73. The Hague: NIDI.\nWood, G., Wilkinson, A., & Harcourt, M. (2008). Age discrimination and working life: Perspectives and contestations – a review of the contemporary literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(4), 425-442. Zealand Experience. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 18, 163-177.\nZwick, T. (2011). Why Training Older Employees is Less Effective, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 11-046.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
勞工研究所
100262015
102
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100262015
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
201501.pdf1.49 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.