Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/71030
題名: 國中輔導人員對心理師校園駐區服務的需求與滿意度研究
The study of junior high school guidance workers’ needs and satisfaction of school-based mental health services.
作者: 林郁倫
Lin, Yu Lun
貢獻者: 陳婉真
林郁倫
Lin, Yu Lun
關鍵詞: 學校輔導
心理師駐區服務
質性研究
跨專業合作
專業風格
日期: 2013
上傳時間: 3-十一月-2014
摘要:   台北市教育局於2010年正式設置「台北市學生輔導諮商中心 」, 期望透過心理專業人員的加入,提升中小學輔導工作品質。本研究旨在以質性訪談探究對於學校輔導人員而言,學校輔導工作的困境為何?對於心理師引入校園的期待為何?以及學校輔導系統如何與心理師系統發展跨專業合作模式等議題。並接續建立衡量國中輔導人員對於心理師駐區服務的需求與滿意度之量化工具,進行現況之調查。\n  本研究採質性訪談與問卷調查法。質性研究部分,以目前在國中服務之輔導工作者(包含輔導主任、組長、輔導教師)為研究對象,進行一對一半結構式訪談,共訪談五位。以紮根理論為研究方法,透過逐字稿分析、編碼,將實務工作現場所呈現之資料建構出歸納式結論。量化研究部分,使用自編的「學校輔導人員對心理師駐區服務之需求量表」、「學校輔導人員對心理師駐區服務之滿意度量表」進行研究,以分層抽樣抽取250名國中輔導人員為正式研究對象。所得資料以探索性因素分析、描述性統計、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關等統計方式進行分析。\n\n  本研究結果發現如下:\n\n一、質性訪談發現:(一)學校輔導之主要困境:學生家庭的溝通與介入、授課負擔重及工作熱忱耗竭、系統性困境、校內處室合作與輔導室同仁合作問題。(二)校方對心理師之期待:「證照」帶來的「保證」、「信任感」,甚至具有「月暈效應」和「不可質疑性」;然而心理師效能的關鍵因素並非專業知識或技術,而是「專業風格」,包括:實際處理個案的能力、個人特質、系統整合能力、情境能力。(三)校方與心理師之「合作模式」與「合作關係」:合作模式在角色定位差異的情況下,可分為:專業競爭與精緻分工;合作關係則分為:階級關係─地位與權力不平等、一體關係─平等彼此融入。\n二、自編之「學校輔導人員對心理師駐區服務之需求量表」、「學校輔導人員對心理師駐區服務之滿意度量表」經正式施測後,量表間的同質性佳,累積解釋變異量分別達58.63%、64.99%,有不錯的效標關連效度;需求總量表與滿意度總量表的內部一致性分別為.808、.925。縱論之,本研究自編之需求量表、滿意度量表均在信效度有良好表現,唯一頗佳的測量工具。\n三、現況調查發現,國中輔導人員對於心理師駐區服務的整體需求為中高程度,對於「合作的模式與關係」之需求得分平均數最高。\n四、國中輔導人員對於心理師駐區服務的整體滿意度為普通略偏滿意的程度,其中「場域需求之滿意度」得分平均數最低。\n\n  整體而言,本研究的貢獻在以在位觀點從國中輔導人員之角度出發,並發展「學校輔導人員對心理師駐區服務之需求量表」、「學校輔導人員對心理師駐區服務之滿意度量表」,協助現況調查之量化工具。據研究結果,提出相關之建議,供學校輔導、心理師教育養成及未來相關研究作為參考。
In August 2010, Taipei student counseling center was officially set by the Taipei City Department of Education. With the new teams of counseling psychologists and social workers, the helping system is operated to improve the profession and quality of school guidance networks. The new system, known as the Taipei Student Counseling Center, is still in its infancy and in the phases of conflict between competition and cooperation. However, to build trans-disciplinary professional school guidance resource teamwork is important. What are the school guidance systems’ needs and expects? What are the impacts and challenges brought when psychologists work in the campus environment? How can school guidance systems be integrated with psychologist systems, and how can interdisciplinary cooperation models be developed. These issues are explored in this study. Second, this study was to devolope a quantitative measure to assess school guidance workers’ needs and degree of satisfaction with the school-based mental health services, and to investigate the status.\n  This study used semi-structured interviews to collect data from 5 guidance workers (including managers and teachers) who work in junior high school in Taipei. All recordings were transcribed, analyzed, and coded. Grounding theory methodology is adopted and to construct the new working model. Then, the study adopted a method of questionnaire survey, and the instruments used in this study were “school guidance workers’ needs of school-based mental health services scale” and “school guidance workers’ satisfaction of school-based mental health services scale ”. The study used the stratified sampling to get the questionnaires, and the population was 250 school guidance workers in Taiwan. The study was analyzed by exploratory factor analysis, descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA and Pearson product-moment correlation.\n\n The main findings of this study were as follows:\n\n1. Results are emergent with three major threes through the narrative, that is, the first is the challenges in school guidance, discovering that the current challenges primarily lie in: communication and involvement of students ` families, guidance workers’ overburdened teaching responsibilities that and diminishing motivation, and systematic burdens such as policy advocacy, cooperation with other offices in schools, and other colleagues in guidance work.The second is school’s expectations for psychologist, delving into issues such as that “licenses” bring, including “guarantee” and “trust” and sometimes as far as “Halo effect” and “impressions of being indisputable”. For psychologists to be as effective as guaranteed by their licenses, the key factor is not their professional knowledge or techniques, but rather their professional styles, including clinical performance, personal trait, embodiment knowledge, and situated ability. The third is to explore the model of cooperation and partnership between schools and psychologists. Professional self-orientation differences divide the model of cooperation into: professional competition and specialized division of labor; partnership is divided into: unequal power and rank relations, and equal status relations.\n2. The analysis results exhibited that the “school guidance workers’ needs of school-based mental health services scale” and “school guidance workers’ satisfaction of school-based mental health services scale ” were both internal consistency, good construct validity and criterion-related validity. It also showed the good reliability, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of scales were .808 and .925. In short, the scales were quite good measurements.\n3. The status investigation found that the degree of needs for school-based mental health services was medium to the high. The degree of need for the ”cooperation model and relations” was the highest scoring averages.\n4. School guidance workers’ degree of satisfaction for school-based mental health services was ordinary bit more satisfaction, And “satisfaction of field needs” is the average minimum.\n\n Based on the above findings, the researchers proposed suggestions and point out the future study agenda about the school-based mental health services and people working in the field of counseling guidance.\n\nKeywords: school guidance; school-based mental health services; interdisciplinary collaboration; professional style; qualitative study
參考文獻: 王文秀(2000)。國小輔導相關人員對學校輔導工作者角色知覺與角色衝突之研 究。中華輔導學報,7,1-30。\n王俊明(1999)。問卷與量表的編製及分析方法。載於張至滿、王俊明(主編),體育測驗與評價(139-158 頁)。臺北市:中華民國體育學會。\n王婉玲(2006)。國中輔導人員角色壓力、輔導自我效能與職業倦怠之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。 國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。\n王麗斐、杜淑芬(2009)。臺北市國小輔導人員與諮商心理師之有效跨專業合作 研究。教育心理學報,41,295-320。\n王麗斐、杜淑芬、趙曉美(2008)。國小駐校諮商心理師有效諮商策略之探索性 研究。教育心理學報,39(3),413-434。\n牛格正、王智弘(2008)。助人專業倫理。台北:心靈工坊。\n方惠生、戴嘉南(2008)。彰化縣專業諮商人員介入國小校園輔導工作實驗方案評估研究。諮商輔導學報,18,89-121。 \n田秀蘭、王麗斐、王文秀、林美珠、林幸台(1999)。國小輔導師資培育模式之研究:輔導工作現況與困境之訪談研究。 「跨世紀輔導與諮商學術研討會」發表之論文,彰化師範大學。\n刑志彬(2009)。心理專業人員協助學校輔導工作之參與經驗探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹縣 。\n伍育英(2003)。美國諮商心理師證照制度現況與台灣心理師法實施後比較省思。諮商與輔導,215,2-7。\n朱秉欣(1970)。八十年來美國輔導學的演進及今後的趨勢。載於中國輔導學會主編,輔導學的回顧與展望( 77-95頁)。臺北市:幼獅文化。 \n吳芝儀(2005)。我國中小學校輔導與諮商工作的現況與挑戰。教育研究月刊,134,23-40。\n吳明隆(2000)。SPSS 統計應用實務。臺北市:松崗電腦圖書。\n吳武典(1993)。學校輔導工作。臺北市:張老師。 \n吳姿瑩(2005)。國民中學輔導教師角色認同與角色實踐之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,臺北市。\n呂俐安、張黛眉、鄭玲宜、楊雅明(譯)(2001)。諮商過程(原作者:L. E. Patterson 和 E. R. Welfel)。臺北市:五南。\n邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市:五南。\n周明蒨(2002)。台北市立國民中學輔導老師資訊需求之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學,臺北市。 \n周麗玉(2003)。承諾與實踐-國中輔導工作的專業發展空間。載於劉焜輝、洪莉竹、周麗玉、賈紅鶯、李玉嬋(主編),學校輔導工作之多元面貌:專業理念與實務的對話(161-222頁)。 臺北市:天馬。\n林美珠(2000)。國小輔導工作實施需要、現況與困境之研究。中華輔導學報,8,51-76。\n林美華(2002)。國小輔導人員自我概念、輔導角色知覺與輔導角色踐行之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院, 屏東縣。\n林家興(2002)。中學輔導教師與專業輔導人員工作內容的時間分析。教育心理學報,33(2),23-40。\n林家興、洪雅琴(2001)。學校人員對國中輔導工作及專業輔導人員試辦方案之評估研究。教育心理學報,32(2),103-120。 \n林家興、洪雅琴(2002)。專業輔導人員參與國中輔導工作的概況與成效。教育心理學報,34(1),83-102。\n林清文(2003)。行政組織再造對學校輔導工作的衝擊。「中國輔導學會2003年會暨諮商心理與輔導專業國際學術研討會」發表之論文,國立師範大學。\n林萬億、黃韻如(2005)。學校輔導團隊工作。臺北市:五南。\n林耀盛、李維倫(2011)。不再是玫瑰:臨床心理學訓練與實踐的反思。中華心理衛生學刊,24(2),165-171。\n金玉萍(2004)。國中教師個案處理能力之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市 。 \n洪莉竹(2005)。創造學校輔導人員的專業定位—專業學校諮商師的角色與功能。教育研究月刊,134,11-22。 \n洪惟泉(2001)。不同學業成就對專校學生休閒活動參與狀況之差異比較(未出版之碩士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北市 。 \n許育光(2011)。國小輔導教師之實務培訓與督導需求初探。教育實踐與研究,24(2),99-128。\n許雅凱(2008)。學校輔導中與個案家長溝通的倫理問題。諮商與輔導,265,34-37。\n張紹勳、林秀娟(1995)。SPSS for Windows 統計分析-初等統計與高等統計。臺北市:松崗電腦圖書。\n楊世瑩(2006)。SPSS 統計分析實務。臺北市:旗標。\n黃運生(1993)。臺灣省國民小學輔導室主任工作滿意調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。\n黃?莉(1999)。人際和諧與衝突:本土化的理論與研究。臺北市:桂冠圖書公司。\n張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華。\n張植珊、吳正勝(1999)。中國輔導學會早期的功能與貢獻-兼論八十年來我國的輔導運動。載於中國輔導學會(主編),輔導學大趨勢(3-23頁)。臺北市:心理。 \n張詩音(2007)。人際關係的情緒表現:文化與性格的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣大學,臺北市 。\n曾端真(2001)。個案研究在班級兒童輔導上的運用。諮商與輔導月刊,189,2-8。\n陳武宗、趙善如、陳政智、黃松林(2005)。二 O O 四年高雄市老人生活狀況與需求調查結果。長青研究發展通訊,22,1-6。\n陳為堅(2004)。學校憂鬱傾向學生推估及預防策略之研究。教育部委託之專題研究成果報告(編號:DOH93-NNB-1012)。臺北市:教育部。\n陳惠雯、王曉薇、韓昌宏、彭瑞連、張雅苓(2006)。從中小學輔導工作的挫敗看專業證照助人工作者駐效模式的救濟:走一條尋回專業的路。應用心理研究,30,144-179。 \n陳秉華(1999)。邁向專業—臺灣輔導界發展的回顧與前瞻。亞洲輔導學報,6(2),21-44。\n陳秉華(2005)。我國中小學學校輔導與諮商工作的現況與挑戰。「現代教育論壇:第一屆中小學學校輔導與諮商學術研討會」發表之論文,國立嘉義大學。 \n陳錦如(2006)。國小駐校諮商心理師角色功能之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。\n趙曉美、王麗斐、楊國如(2006)。臺北市諮商心理師國小校園服務方案之實施評估。教育心理學報,37(4),345-365。 \n趙曉美、王麗斐(2008)。國小兒童個案問題與輔導室對校外心理健康專業協助需求之研究-以臺北市為例。北體學報,16,351-362。\n趙曉美、潘淑芬(2003)。臺北市國民小學家庭功能不足之適應欠佳兒童調查分析報告。臺北市政府教育局委託之專題研究成果報告。臺北市:教育局。\n趙慧芳(2010)。國民中學輔導教師專業承諾與工作滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市 。 \n劉淑慧(1987)。助人工作者職業倦怠量表之編製與調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣教育學院,臺北市。\n劉焜輝(2003)。回到原點-學校輔導工作是向上提升或是向下沉淪。劉焜輝、洪莉竹、周麗玉、賈紅鶯、李玉嬋(主編),學校輔導 工作的多元面貌-專業理念與實務的對話(1-91頁)。臺北市:天馬。\n劉福鎔(2006)。高中職輔導教師專業承諾影響因素模式驗證之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。\n賴炘棠(2007)。臺北縣國民中學心理師進駐學校方案實施成效之評估(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學,臺北市。\n鄭安伶(2002)。國小教師對學校輔導工作及學生輔導觀點之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。屏東師範學院,屏東縣 。\n鄭如安、葉宣瑩(2011)。高雄市駐校心理師服務現況與困境之分析研究。美和學報,30(2),15-40。\n鄭熙彥(1980)。國民中學輔導教師工作滿意之研究。教育學院輔導學報,3,1-35。\n謝明如(2011)。新北市完全中學輔導教師之角色知覺與專業發展需求之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,臺北市 。\n蕭文(1999)。學校輔導工作的發展趨勢。載於中國輔導學會(主編),輔導學大趨勢(103-122頁)。臺北市:心理。\nAdelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (1999). Mental health in schools and system restructuring. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 137–163.\nBattistich, V., Schaps, E., Watson, M., & Solomon, D. (1996). Prevention effects of the Child Development Project: Early findings from an ongoing multisite demonstration trial. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11, 12–35.\nBierman, K. L. (2003). Commentary: New models for school-based mental health services. School Psychology Review, 32(4), 525-529.\nBotvin, G., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L., Botvin, E., & Diaz, T. (1995). Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle class population. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 1106–1112.\nChristenson, S.L. (1995). Supporting home-school collaboration. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (pp. 253-267). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.\nChristenson, S.L., Rounds, T., & Gomey, D. (1992). Family factors and student achievement: An avenue to increase students` success. School psychology quarterly, 7(3), 178-206.\nClarke, G., Hawkins, W., Murphy, M., & Sheeber, L. (1993). School-based primary prevention of depressive symptomatology in adolescents: Findings from two studies. Journal of Adolescent Research, 8, 183-204.\nConoley, J.C. (1989). Cognitive-behavioral approaches and prevention in the schools. In J.N. Hughes & R.J. Hall (Eds.), Cognitive behavioral psychology in the schools (pp. 535-568). New York, NY: Guilford Press.\nHostetler, M., & Fisher, K. (1997). Project C.A.R.E. substance abuse prevention program for high-risk youth: A longitudinal evaluation of program effectiveness. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 397-419.\nHudley, C., & Graham, S. (1993). An attributional intervention to reduce peer-directed aggression among African American boys. Child Development, 64, 124-138. \nEndacott, R. (1997). Clarifying the concept of need: A comparison of two approaches to concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(3), 471-476.\nErikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company.\nFlammger, D. M. (1991). Nontraditional students and postsecondary school satisfaction (Unpublished master’s thesis). State University of Buffalo, Buffalo. \nGillham, J., Reivich, K., Jaycox, L., & Seligman, M. (1995). Prevention of depressive symptoms in school children: Two-year follow-up. Psychological Science, 6, 343-351.\nHawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Kosterman, R., Abbott, R., & Hill, K. (1999). Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 153, 226-234. \nKataoka, S., Zhang, L., & Wells, K. (2002). Unmet need for mental health care among U.S. children: Variation by ethnicity and insurance status. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1548-1555.\nKauffman, J. M. (2005). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.\nKnoff, H., & Batsche, G. (1995). Project ACHIEVE: Analyzing a school reform process for at-risk and underachieving students. School Psychology Review, 24, 579-603.\nKoyanagi, C. (1995). Systems change: Moving beyond reports. In L. Bickman & J. Rog (Eds.), Children’s mental health services: Research, policy and evaluation (pp. 42-63). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\nLuker, K., & Orr, J. (1992). Health Visiting. (2nd ed.). Boston: Oxford.\nMaslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.\nMaslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper.\nMaslow, A. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York, NY: The Viking Press.\nMaslow, A., & Lowery, R. (1998). Toward a psychology of being (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.\nMcKillip, J. (1987). Need analysis for the human services and education. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.\nNational Association of School Psychologists. (2003). NASP position statement on minority recruit- ment. Bethesda, MD: Author. Retrieved October 30, 2003, from http://nasponline.org/infor- mation/pospaper_mr.html\nOliver, R. L. (1999). Whence Consumer Loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 63, 33-44. \nOrnum, W. V., Dunlap, L. L., & Shore, M. F. (2008). Psychological testing across the life span. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson Prentice Hall.\nPaavola, J. C., Carey, K., Cobb, C., Illback, R. J., Joseph, H. M., Routh, D. K., & Torruella, A. (1996). Interdisciplinary school practice: Implications of the service integration movement for psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 21, 34-40.\nPaisley, P. O. & Borders, L. D. (1995). School counseling: An evolveing specialty. Journal of Counseling and Development. 74(2), 150-153.\nPayzant, T. M. (1992). New beginnings in San Diego: Developing a strategy for interagency collaboration. Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 139-146.\nReinke, Stormont, Herman, Puri, & Goel. (2011). Supporting children’s mental health in schools: Teacher perceptions of needs, roles, and barriers. School Psychology Quarterly, 26(1), 1-13.\nRobert, D. R. (1971). Critical behavior in effective and ineffective role fulfillment of school psychologists. Professional Psychology, 262-265.\nRones, M., & Hoagwood, K. (2000). School-based mental health services: A research review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 3, 223-241.\nRones, M., & Hoagwood, K. (2000). School-based mental services: A research review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 3(4), 223-241.\nRosenbaum, D., & Hanson, G. (1998). Assessing the effects of school-based drug education: A six-year multilevel analysis of project D.A.R.E. Journal of Research in Crime and Delin- quency, 5, 381-412.\nRutter, M., & Smith, D. J. (1995). Psychosocial disorders in young people: Time trends and their causes. London: Wiley.\nSheridan, S. M., & Gutkin, T. B. (2000). The ecology of school psychology: Examining and chang-ing our paradigm for the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 29, 485-502.\nSondheimer, D. L., & Evans, M. E. (1995). Developments in children’s mental health services re- search: An overview of current and future demonstration directions. In L. Bickman & J. Rog (Eds.), Children’s mental health services: Research, policy, and evaluation (pp. 64-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\nU.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1999). Mental health: A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health.\nU. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). Report of the Surgeon General`s Conference on Children`s Mental Health: A National Action Agenda. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved July, 24, 2006, from http://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/topics/cmh/cmhreport.pdf\nVanderbleek, L. M. (2004). Engaging families in school-based mental health treatment. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 26, 211-224.\nWalsh, M. E., Brabeck, M. E., & Howard, K. A. (1999). Interprofessional collaboration in children’s services: Toward a theoretical framework. Children’s Services: Social Policy, Research, and Practice, 2(4), 183-208.\nWaxman. R. P., Weist, M. D., & Benson, D. M. (1999). Toward collaboration in the growing education mental health interfaces. Clinical Psychology Review, 19(2), 239-253.\nWeist, M. D., Ambrose, M. G., & Lewis, C. P. (2006). Expanded school mental health: A collaborative community-school example. Children & Schools, 28(1), 45-50.\nWeist, M. D., & Ghuman, H. (2002). Principles behind the proactive delivery of mental health services to youth where they are. In H. Ghuman, M. D. Weist, & R. Sarles (Eds.). Providing mental health services to youth where they are: School- and community-based approaches (pp.1-15). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.\nYura, H., & Walsh, M. B. (1983). Human needs and the nursing process. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
輔導與諮商碩士學位學程(MPCG)
100172002
102
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100172002
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
200201.pdf9.28 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.