Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/74296
題名: 公立大學國際化指標建構之研究
A Study on the Construction of Indicators for Internationalization of Public Universities in Taiwan
作者: 魏琦
Wei, Chi
貢獻者: 湯志民
Tang, Chih Min
魏琦
Wei, Chi
關鍵詞: 公立大學
公立大學國際化指標
模糊德菲法
public universities
indicators for internationalization of public universities
Fuzzy Delphi Method
日期: 2014
上傳時間: 1-Apr-2015
摘要: 本研究旨在建構公立大學國際化指標。研究方法部分,先以文獻分析歸納出公立大學國際化初擬指標,再以專家適切性評估問卷及模糊德菲法問卷進行調查。模糊德菲法調查樣本為14 位學者專家,透過三角模糊數整合專家對指標重要性之看法並篩選指標,最後以歸一化法求得各指標之權重,完成公立大學國際化指標。根據研究之結果與分析,歸納主要結論\n如下:\n一、本研究建構之公立大學國際化指標,一級指標有5 項,二級指標\n有35 項。\n二、本研究建構之公立大學國際化一級指標,依權重排序依序為「研\n究與學術成果」(20.70%)、「行政與環境支援」(20.34%)、「學生與教\n師國際流動」(20.12%)、「學術交流與聯盟」(20.08%)及「課程與教\n學」(18.76%)。\n三、本研究建構之公立大學國際化二級指標,在研究與學術成果方面,以\n國際合作之研究計畫案件數及金額重要性最高;在行政與環境支援方\n面,以國際化業務行政人員具備外語專長之比例重要性最高;在學生\n與教師國際流動方面,以攻讀學位之境外學生人數重要性最高;在學\n術交流與聯盟方面,以教師擔任國際學術團體職位之數量重要性最高;\n在課程與教學方面,以外語授課之課程數量重要性最高。\n 最後,依據研究結果分別對教育主管機關、公立大學及後續研究提出\n建議。
The purpose of this study is to construct the indicators for internationalization of public universities in Taiwan. The study is conducted by means of literature review, developeing the indicators of internationalization of public universities preliminarily, investigating the suggestion of 12 experts by questionnaire for research methods. It used Fuzzy Delphi Method. Moreover, it choosed 14 experts to show the importance of the indicators by questionnaire and qualitified the experts’ opinions and analyze the symmetric triangular fuzzy number. In the final stage, normalization of fuzzy number’s total score determined the weight of each indicator. Accordingly, the indicators for internationalization of public universities in Taiwan was constructed.The conclusions are listed below:\n\n1. The indicators for internationalization of public universities consists 5 first level indicators and 35 second level indicators.\n\n2. The 5 first level indicators are: research and academic achievement (20.70%), administrative and environmental support (20.34%), student and teacher mobility (20.12%), academic exchanges and alliances (20.08%), curriculum and teaching (18.76%).\n\n3. The second level indicators are: “the number of cases and the amount of international cooperation research project”is the most important indicator in “research and academic”; “the proportion of international business staff with expertise in foreign languages”is the most important indicator in “administrative and environmental support”;“the number of foreign students enrolled in degree”is the most important indicator in “student and teacher mobility”; “teacher as positions of international academic communities”is the most important indicator in “academic exchanges and alliances”; “the number of courses taught in foreign languages”is the most important indicator in “curriculum and teaching”.\n\n To sum up, the suggestions for educational administrative institutions, public universities and future study are based on the findings and results.
參考文獻: 壹、中文部分\n王如哲(2013)。臺灣、韓國國際教育之展望。教育研究月刊,231,121-135。\n吳明烈(2002)。WTO體系中的教育變革與發展:全民終身學習的觀點。成人教育雙月刊,66,23-30。\n吳政達(2008)。教育政策分析:概念、方法與應用。臺北:高等教育文化事業有限公司。\n卓玟琪(2011)。我國與日本高等教育國際化之比較研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。\n姜麗娟(2004)。從理念到實務-高等教育教學之國際化經驗與限制。載於淡江大學高等教育研究與評鑑中心(主編),21世紀高等教育的挑戰與回應-趨勢、課程、治理(235-263頁)。臺北:高等教育。\n姜麗娟(2011)。大學國際化評鑑。臺北市:財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會。\n姜麗娟(2012)。大學國際化評鑑:實例介紹及其對國內的啟示。評鑑雙月刊,35,27-32。 \n政治大學(2013a)。日本東北大學合作專案計畫報告書。臺北市:未出版。\n政治大學(2013b)。邁向頂尖大學計畫102年度計畫期中報告「國際學城計畫」。取自http://topu.nccu.edu.tw/files/archive/45_7a2becc3.pdf\n政治大學(2014)。國際合作事務處簡史與使命。取自http://oic.nccu.edu.tw/\nchinese/about.php\n徐村和(1998)。模糊德菲層級分析法。模糊系統學刊,4(1),59-72。\n張碧娟(2013)。現階段高中國際教育的評析與展望。教育研究月刊,231,27-40。 \n教育部(2001)。大學教育政策白皮書。臺北市:作者。\n教育部(2004a)。發展國際一流大學及頂尖研究中心計畫。取自http://www.edu.tw/userfiles/url/20120920144654/附件-1發展國際一流大學及頂尖研究中.pdf\n教育部(2004b)。「大學校務評鑑規劃與實施計畫」評鑑手冊。臺北市:作者。\n教育部(2011a)。邁向頂尖大學計畫。取自 http://www.edu.tw/\n教育部(2011b)。中小學國際教育白皮書。取自http://www.edu.tw/userfiles/url/20120920153930/ 100.04中小學國際教育白皮書.pdf\n教育部(2011c)。南韓第一位「共同學位」博士生誕生。教育部電子報。取自 http://epaper.edu.tw/\n教育部(2012)。101學年度技專校院國際化調查表。取自 http://www.edu.tw/\n教育部(2013a)。人才培育白皮書。臺北市:作者。\n教育部(2013b)。日本提升高等教育卓越計畫考察報告。日本提升高等教育卓越計畫考察(編號:C10203757),未出版。\nwindows.aspx?windows_sn=7140湯家偉(2005)。台灣地區大學排名指標建構之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。\n楊巧玲(2004)。高等教育國際化的意義與爭議。教育政策論壇,7(1),101-110。 \n楊武勳(2008)。日本大學國際化指標建構之初探。高教評鑑,2(1),143-183。 \n臺灣大學(2014)。國立臺灣大學各學院國際交流參考指標。取自http://top100.ntu.edu.tw/documents.php\n蔡大立(2003)。台灣地區高等教育國際化現況之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,臺北縣。 \n蕭霖(2006)。大學國際化指標建構與運用之研究。臺北:國立教育資料館。\n戴曉霞(2002)。全球化及國家/市場關係之轉變:高等教育市場化之脈絡分析。臺北:高等教育出版社。\n戴曉霞(2004)。高等教育的國際化:亞太國家外國學生政策之比較分析。教育研究集刊,50(2),53-84。 \n戴曉霞、潘琇櫻(2006)。全球化或區域化?—主要地區及國家之外國學生來源分析。教育政策論壇,9(4),21-47。\n謝幸蓉(2006)。大學國際化指標建構之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。 \n\n貳、日文部分\n文部科學省(2013a)。トビタテ!留学JAPAN。取自http://www.mext.go.jp/\n ryugaku/\n文部科學省(2013b)。大学改革とグローバル人材育成に関する文部科学省の取組について。取自http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/\nkeizaisaisei/bunka/koyou/dai1/siryou5_1.pdf\n日經中文網(2012)。東京大學奮起直追推進國際化。取自http://zh.cn.nikkei.com/career/abroadstudy/2494-20120711.html\n東北大學(2012)。アジア共同学位開発プロジェクト。取自http://www.sed.\ntohoku.ac.jp/~ajp/news/index.html\n東京大學(2010)。東京大学国際化推進長期構想。取自http://www.u-tokyo.ac.jp/res02/pdf/longtermplan.pdf\n芦沢真五(2006)。指標策定プロセスとパイロット・スタディにむけて。載於古城紀雄(主編),「大学の国際化の評価指標策定に関する実証的研究」最終報告レポート(J110-J122頁)。大阪:大阪大學。\n\n參、英文部分\nAmerican Council on Education. (2012). Mapping internationalization on U.S. campuses:2012 edition. Retrieved from http://www.acenet.edu/\nnews-room/Pages/2012-Mapping-Internationalization-on-U-S--Campuses.aspx\nAerden, A. (2013). A guide to assessing the quality of internationalisation. Retrieved from European consortium for accreditation website: http://ecahe.eu/home/services/publications/a-guide-to-assessing\n-the-quality-of-internationalisation/\nAltbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Boston College: Center for International Higher Education.\nBeerkens, E., Brandenburg, U., Evers, N., van Gaalen, A., Leichsenring, H., & Zimmerman, V. (2010). Indicator projects on internationalisation: Approaches, methods and findings. Retrieved from http://www.nuffic.nl/\nen/library/indicator-projects-on-internationalisation.pdf\nBrandenburg, U., & De Wit, H. (2011). The end of internationalization. International Higher Education, 62, 15-17. \nBrandenburg, U., & Federkeil, G. (2007). How to measure internationality and internationalisation of higher education institutions!: Indicators and key figures. Gütersloh: Center for Higher Education Development.\nChen, S.J., & Hwang, C.L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.\nDe Wit, H. (2009). Measuring success in the internationalisation of higher education. Amsterdam: European Association for International Education. \nDe Wit, H. (2010). Internationalization of higher education in Europe and its assessment, trends and issues. Den Haag, Nederland: NVAO Nederlands-Vlaamse Accredietatieorganisatie. \nDe Wit, H. (2011). Globalization and internationalisation of higher education. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 8(2), 77-164. \nFrølich, N., Veiga, A., & de Dezembro, R. P. (2005). Competition, cooperation, consequences and choices: Internationalisation in higher education. Amsterdam: EAIE/EAIR Joint Seminar.\nHarman, G. (2004). New derictions in internationalizating higher education:\nAustralia’s development as an exportor of higher education services. Higher Education Policy, 17, 101-120. \nInternational Association of Universities. (2013). Towards a century of cooperation: Internationalization of higher education IAU statement. Retrieved from http://www.iau-hesd.net/sites/default/files/documents\n/internationalization_policy_statement_fr_0.pdf\nKnight, J. (1994). Internationalisation:Elements and checkpoints. Ottowa: Canadian Bureau for International Education(CBIE).\nKnight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of studies in international education, 8(1), 5-31. \nKnight, J. (2006). Internationalization: Concepts, complexities and challenges. In J. Forest & P. Altbach (Eds.), International handbook of higher education (pp. 207-228). Netherlands: Springer.\nKnight, J. (2008). Higher education in turmoil: The changing world of internationalisation. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.\nKnight, J. (1995). Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: Historical and conceptual perspectives. In H. De Wit (Ed.), Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: A comparative study of Australia, Canada, Europe and the United States of America (pp. 5-32). Amsterdam: EAIE.\nKnight, J., & De Wit, H. (1999). Quality and internationalisation in higher education. Paris: OECD.\nNAFSA: Association of International Educators. (2013). Internationalizing the campus 2013 profiles of success at colleges and universities. Retrieved from http://www.nafsa.org/_/File/_/itc2013.pdf\nPaige, R. M. (2005). Internationalization of higher education: Performance assessment and indicators. Nagoya Journal of Higher Education, 5, 99-122.\nQS World University Rankings. (2013). World University Rankings. Retrieved from http://www.iu.qs.com/university-rankings/rankings-indicators/\nReza, K., & Vassilis, S. M. (1988). Delphic hierarchy process (DHP): A \n methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphi method and \n analytical hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, \n 37(3), 347-354.\nRizvi., F. (2004). Debating globolization and education after September 11. Comparative Education, 40(2), 157-171. \nScholte, J. A. (2005). Globalization: A critical introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.\nScott, P. (2005). The global dimension: Internationalising higher education. Internationalization in Higher Education: European Responses to the Global Perspective. Amsterdam: European Association for International Education and the European Higher Education Society.\nTeichler, U. (2009). Internationalisation of higher education: European experiences. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(1), 93-106. \nThe Center for Higher Education Development. (2013). World University Rankings 2013-2014 methodology. Retrieved from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/methodology\nGaalen, V. A. (2009). Developing a tool for mapping internationalisation: a case study. In H. De Wit (Ed.), Measuring success in the internationalisation of higher education(pp. 77-92 ). Amsterdam: EAIE.\nWaters, M. (1995). Globalization. New York: Routledge.\nYang, R. (2002). University internationalization: Its meanings, rationales and implications. Intercultural Education, 13(1), 81-95.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
教育行政與政策研究所
101171008
103
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101171008
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
100801.pdf1.74 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.