Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/74411
題名: Comparison of the relative effectiveness of different kinds of reinforcers: A PEM approach
作者: Ma, Hsen-Hsing
馬信行
貢獻者: 教育系
關鍵詞: meta-analysis; positive reinforcement; single-case experiments
日期: 2009
上傳時間: 9-Apr-2015
摘要: The purpose of the present study was to apply the percentage of data points exceeding the median of baseline phase (PEM) approach for a meta-analysis of single-case experiments to compare the relative effectiveness of different kinds of reinforcers used in behavior modification. Altogether 153 studies were located, which produced 1091 effect sizes. The grand mean of the 153 PEM scores was 0.92. The main finding was that among the positive reinforcers, "activities" was the most effective (PEM score = 0.95) while "objects" and "edibles" were relatively less effective (PEM score = 0.85 and 0.83, respectively). The results of the present study are of importance in respect to the choice of reinforcer for use in intervention in behavior modification. (Contains 1 figure and 1 table.)
關聯: Behavior Analyst Today, 10(3), 398-427
資料類型: article
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0100680
Appears in Collections:期刊論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
398-427.pdf712.71 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.