Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/80251| 題名: | 從中間開始：論日常中的媒介使用 Beginning in the middle: Media use in everyday life |
作者: | 吳姿嫻 Wu, Tzu Hsien |
貢獻者: | 鍾蔚文 Chung, Wei Wen 吳姿嫻 Wu, Tzu Hsien |
關鍵詞: | 媒介使用 日常生活 塊莖 生成 media use everyday life rhizome becoming |
日期: | 2014 | 上傳時間: | 4-Jan-2016 | 摘要: | 受益德勒茲（Deleuze）的「塊莖」（Rhizome）觀點之啟發，本研究 重新思索如何看待日常中的媒介使用。「使用」之所以複雜，關係到「日 常」有其尋常與變動之處；然而，尋常與變動背後所反映的，是不斷「生 成」（becoming）的狀態，生成中保有變動、聚合、再變動、又聚合，故 從「使用」出發，主張媒介、使用者與脈絡為媒介使用中不可或缺且不 可分割的重要環節，並從「變」著手，以追索媒介使用中的「生成」，初 探媒介使用裡「變中有序」的轉化，勾勒媒介使用中那些交引纏繞在一 起的經驗之流，探究日常生活中媒介使用的生成情況。\n\n本研究發現，透過捕捉生成過程，除了更能突顯媒介、使用者、脈 絡從來不是單獨運作之外，更能有助於收攏媒介使用的諸多組合關係及 其痕跡。更有趣的是，即使是習以為常的媒介使用，一旦有任何些微變 動，則媒介使用底下那些潛伏的影響因子便順勢萌生，轉化原先的使用， 促成行為上或意義上再次開展出不同的組合與張力關係。循此，本研究 一方面深入描繪使用者之所思、為何為，另一方面亦窺見無中生有的媒 介使用。 | 參考文獻: | 丁興祥、張慈宜、賴誠斌等譯（2002）。《生命史與心理傳記學——理論與方法的探討》。台北：遠流。（原書Runyan, W. [1982]. Life histories and psychobiography.）\n也斯（1996）。《越界書簡》。香港：青文書屋。\n中央社（2013/01/15）。〈導航出錯 比利時婦開車逾千哩〉。取自：http://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%B0%8E%E8%88%AA%E5%87%BA%E9%8C%AF-%E6%AF%94%E5%88%A9%E6%99%82%E5%A9%A6%E9%96%8B%E8%BB%8A%E9%80%BE%E5%8D%83%E5%93%A9-144409386.html\n今日新聞網NOWnews.com（2012年5月8日）。〈知名「Instagram」照相軟體 從虛擬變實體概念相機！〉，取自http://www.nownews.com/2012/05/08/91-2811746.htm\n方怡潔、郭彥君譯（2009）。《後事實追尋：兩個國家、四個十年、一位人類學家》。台北：群學。（原書Geertz, C. [1995]. After the fact: Two countries, Four decades, one anthropologist.）\n王志弘（2002）。〈技術中介的人與自我：網際空間、分身組態與記憶裝置〉，《資訊社會研究》，3: 1-24。\n王彩鸝（2011/05/18）。手機沒帶、沒電、沒接 9成青少年焦慮。NOWnews 今日新聞網。取自：http://mag.udn.com/mag/life/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=319280\n王嵩音譯（1993）。《傳播研究里程碑》。台北：遠流。（原書Lowery, S. A., & DeFleur, M. L. [1988]. Milestones in Mass Communication Research: Media Effects.）\n宅宅新聞（2013年8月23日）。〈超復古《Instagram社交拍立得》實機曝光 2014年初正式開賣～〉，取自http://news.gamme.com.tw/557143\n朱光明等譯（2007）。《如何做質的研究》。北京：中國輕工業出版社。（原書Hatch, A. [2002]. Doing qualitative research in education settings.）\n朱華瑄（2007）。《從部落格的物質形式看部落客的自我技藝實作》。清華大學社會所碩士論文。\n何定照、高瑟濡（2007）。《液態之愛：論人際紐帶的脆弱》，台北：商周出版。（原書Bauman. Z. [2003]. Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds.）\n吳芝儀（2005）。〈敘事研究的方法論探討〉。收錄於齊力、林本炫（編），《質性研究方法與資料分析》（頁145-188）。嘉義：南華大學教育社會學研究所。\n吳姿嫻（2007）。《MSN與日常生活》。世新大學公共傳播暨廣告學系所碩士論文。\n吳姿嫻（2011）。〈論「新媒介科技迷」〉，《中華傳播學刊》，19: 97-146。\n李宗薇（2012）。〈數位教學理論：網路與新科技對教育的衝擊〉，引自：http://phpsrv.nutn.edu.tw/~tald/act.php?act=view&id=6&no=60\n周世箴譯（2006）。《我們賴以生存的譬喻》。台北：聯經。（原書Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. [1980]. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.）\n周群英譯（2005）。《日常生活與文化理論》台北：韋伯。（原書Highmore, B. [2004]. Everyday life and cultural theory: An introduction. New York: Routledge.）\n林文源（2008）。〈飄移之作之方法論：初論〉。收錄於周平、蔡政宏（編），《日常生活的質性研究》（頁193-220）。嘉義：南華大學教育社會學研究所。\n林東泰（1999）。《大眾傳播理論》。台北：師大書苑。\n柯裕棻（2003/12/19），〈自己的房間〉（三少四壯集），《中國時報》人間副刊。\n高穎超（2007）。〈做兵「轉大人」：田野邂逅的能與不能〉。收錄於謝國雄（編）《以身為度如是我做：田野工作的教與學》（頁93-121）。臺北：群學。\n梅干（2013/04/05）。（我的智障型手機與我的智慧型生活〉，梅問題教學網。取自http://www.minwt.com/ios/7537.html\n畢恆達（2000）。〈家的意義〉，《應用心理研究》，8: 55-56。\n陳世敏譯（1994）。《美國大眾傳播思潮：從摩斯到麥克魯漢》，台北：遠流。（原書Czitrom, D. [1982]. Media and American mind: From Morse to McLuhan. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.）\n陳玉箴譯（2003）。《媒介概念十六講》。台北：韋伯。（原書Silverstone, R. [1999]. Why study the media? London: Sage.）\n陳惠萍（2012）。〈Chapter 9性別與智慧住家：女性主義的科技研究〉。收錄於周素卿、劉佩玲（編），《智慧生活家科技》（頁204-225）。台北：台灣大學智慧生活科技整合與創新研究中心。\n陶振超（2011a）。〈媒介訊息如何獲得注意力：突出或相關？認知取徑媒體研究之觀點〉，《新聞學研究》，107: 245-290。\n陶振超（2011b）。〈脈絡在媒介訊息處理中所扮演的角色：認知與情境觀點〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，1(2): 37-47.\n麥永雄（2007a）。〈光滑空間與塊莖思維:德勒茲的數字媒介詩學〉，《文藝研究》，1: 75-84。取自：http://www.xqnwh.com/2011/0816/4315.html\n麥永雄（2007b）。《德勒茲與當代性─西方後結構主義思潮研究》。桂林：廣西師範大學出版社。\n馮建三譯（1995）。《電視、觀眾與文化研究》。台北：遠流。（原書Morley, D. [1992]. Television, audiences & cultural studies. London: Routledge.） \n黃月純（2001）。（生命史研究在成人教育上的應用〉，《成人教育學刊》，5：219-247。\n黃厚銘（2007）。〈導讀─液態之愛的流轉於凝固〉，收錄於《液態之愛：論人際紐帶的脆弱》（頁3-14）。台北：商周出版。\n楊仁達（2011）。〈大家一起看的電視—Social TV〉，《創新發現誌》，第 42期。取自：http://ideas.org.tw/magazine_article.php?f=20\n楊志弘、周金福譯（2001）。《大眾傳播理論：基礎、發展與未來》。台北：華泰。（原書Baran, S. J., & Davis, D. K. [2000]. Mass Communication theory: Foundations, ferment, and future.）。\n楊凱麟（2003）〈德勒茲「思想─影像」或「思想＝影像」之條件及問題性〉，《台大文史哲學報》，59：337-368。\n雷建軍（2007）。《視頻互動媒介》。中國：清華大學出版社。\n廖俊峰、陸敬互、傅立成（2012）。〈Chapter 6 多媒體娛樂、數位通訊與智慧客廳〉。收錄於周素卿、劉佩玲（編），《智慧生活家科技》（頁130-159）。台北：台灣大學智慧生活科技整合與創新研究中心。\n廖俊峰、陸敬互、傅立成（2012）。〈多媒體娛樂、數位通訊與智慧客廳〉。收錄於周素卿、劉佩玲（編），《智慧生活家科技》（頁130-159）。台北：台灣大學智慧生活科技整合與創新研究中心。\n劉建基譯（2003）。《關鍵詞─文化與社會的詞彙》。台北：巨流。（原書 R. Williams [1976]. Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. New York: Oxford University Press.）\n潘淑滿（2003）。《質性研究：理論與應用》。台北：心理。\n鄭明萱譯（2006）。《認識媒體：人的延伸》。台北：貓頭鷹。（原書McLuhan, M. [1964]. Understanding media: The extensions of men.）\n盧嵐蘭（2005）。《媒介消費－閱聽人與社會》。台北：揚智。\n賴彥如、周素卿（2012）。〈Chapter 7主食、情境感知與智慧廚房〉。收錄於周素卿、劉佩玲（編），《智慧生活家科技》（頁160-183）。台北：台灣大學智慧生活科技整合與創新研究中心。\n龍年出版社編輯委員會編譯（1976）。〈混雜的能量〉。收錄於《傳播怪物麥克魯漢》（頁107-115）。台北：龍年出版社。（原文McLuhan, M. [nd].）\n顏學誠（2008）。〈專家、物性、身體感：茶葉比賽中的社會秩序〉。收錄於余舜德（編）《體物入微：物與身體感的研究》（頁405-429）。新竹：清華大學出版社。\n羅世宏譯（2000）。《傳播理論：起源、方法與應用》。台北：五南。（原書Severin, W., & Tankard, J. W., Jr. [1998]. Communication theories: Origins, methods, and uses in the mass media; 4th ed.）。\n龔宜君（2013/05/20）。〈你的寫作風格是「凡骨還是廢物」？〉。取自：http://twstreetcorner.org/2013/05/20/gongyijun/\nAbercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audience: A sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: Sage.\nAng, I. (1995). Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodrama imagination. London: Methuen.\nAppadurai, A. (1995). Playing with modernity: The decolonization of Indian cricket. In C. A. Breckenridge (Ed.), Consuming modernity: Public culture in a south asian world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.\nBakardjieva, M. (2003). Virtual togetherness: An everyday-life perspective. Media, Culture & society, 25, 291-313.\nBakardjieva, M. (2005). Internet society: The Internet in everyday life. London : Sage.\nBaudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.\nBausinger, H. (1984). Media, technology and everyday life. Media, Culture and Society, 6, 343-351.\nBilton, N. (2013, September 1). Disruptions: More connected, yet more alone, The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/01/disruptions-more-connected-yet-more-alone/?_r=0\nBolter, J., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge Ma: The MIT Press.\nBruni, F.(2013, September 2).Traveling without seeing, The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/03/opinion/bruni-traveling-without-seeing.html?_r=0\nBull, M. (2004). To each their own bubble: Mobile space of sound in the city. In N. Couldry & A. McCarthy (Eds.), MediaSpace: Place, scale and culture in a media age (pp. 275-293). London: Routledge.\nCarey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. NY : Routledge.\nChee, S. A., Zaphiris, P., & Wilson, S. (2010). Computer games and sociocultural play: An activity theoretical perspective. Games and Culture. Retrieved July 2, 2010, from http://gac.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/03/16/1555412009360411.full.pdf+html\nde Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.\nDeleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.\nDeleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.\nDickey, S. (1997). Anthropology and its contributions to studies of mass media. International social science journal, 49, 413-427.\nFarman, J. (2011). Introduction: The pathways of locative media. In Mobile Interface Theory: Embodied Space and Locative Media(pp.1-15). New York: Routledge.\nFiske, J. (1989). Understanding popular culture. London: Routledge. \nGosling, V. K., & Crawford, G. (2010). Game scenes: Theorizing digital game audiences. Games and culture. Retrieved July 2, 2010, from http://gac.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/03/16/1555412010364979\nGripenberg, P. (2002). Living with IT: Uses and interpretations of computers in the home and family context, ECIS 2002: Gdańsk, Poland.\nHabib, L. (2001, June). Computers in the home: Domestic technology and the process of domestication. Paper presented at the 9th European Conference on Information Systems. Retrieved November 7, 2006, from http://csrc.lse.ac.uk/asp/aspecis/20010039.pdf\nHaddon, L. (2003). Domestication and mobile telephony. In J. Katz (Ed.), Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication technology (pp. 43-56). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.\nHaddon, L. (2006). The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The Information Society, 22, 195-203.\nHaddon, L. (2007). Roger Silverstone`s legacies: Domestication. New media & society, 9(1): 25-32.\nHeidegger, M. (1992). The question concerning technology. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Basic writings: Ten key essays (pp.307-341). San Francisco: Harprer.\nHirsch, E. (1992). The long term and the short term of domestic consumption: An ethnographic case study. In R. Silverstone, E. Hirsch (Eds.), Consuming technologies. London: Routledge.\nHirsch, E. (1998). New technologies and domestic consumption. In C. Geraghty & D. Lusted (Eds.), The television studies book (pp.158-174). London: Routledge.\nIdhe, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From Garden to Earth.\nJenkins, H. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans & participatory Culture. NY: Routledge.\nJenkins, H. (2006a). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.\nJenkins, H. (2006b). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Essays on participatory culture. New York & London: New York University Press.\nKatz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (Vol. III, pp. 19-32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.\nINSIDE（2013/03/21）。〈親愛的，我把我的 iPhone 閹割了！〉，取自：http://www.inside.com.tw/2013/03/21/distraction-free-iphone?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+inside-blog-taiwan+%28%E7%B6%B2%E8%B7%AF%E8%B6%A8%E5%8B%A2%E8%A1%8C%E9%8A%B7%E8%88%87%E9%96%8B%E7%99%BC%29（原文Knapp, J. [2013/03/14]. The distraction-free iPhone (or ‘Why I’m happier since I disabled Safari’). Retrieved from: https://medium.com/life-hacks/80f8d525b0d8）\nLarsen, B. S. (2000). Radio as ritual: An approach to everyday use of radio. Nordicom review, 21, 259-274.\nLatour, B. (2000/2004).〈直線進步或交引纏繞〉（Progress or Entanglement?），收錄於吳嘉苓、傅大為、雷祥麟（編）《科技渴望社會》（頁79-105）。台北：群學。\nMcLuhan, M. (1964/1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.\nMcLuhan, M. (1970). Culture is our business. McGraw-Hill Book Company.\nMcLuhan, M. (1995). The Medium is the Message. In E. McLuhan & F. Zingrone (Eds.), Essential McLuhan. Toronto: Anansi. \nMcLuhan, M. (2003). Understanding Me: Lectures and Interviews. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.\nMcLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q.(1968/1997). War and peace in the global village. San Francisco: Hardwired.\nMerleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception. (trans. By C. Smith) Routledge. Retrieved from https://wiki.brown.edu/confluence/download/attachments/73535007/Phenomenology+of+Perception.pdf\nMeyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behaviour. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.\nMorley, D. (1986). Family television. London: Routledge.\nMorley, D. (2000). Home territories: Media, mobility and identity. London and New York: Routledge. \nMorley, D. (2003). What’s ‘home’ got to do with it? European journal of cultural studies, 6, 435-458.\nMorley, D. (2007). Media, modernity and technology: The geography of the new. London: Routledge.\nMorley, D., & Silverstone, R. (1991). Communication and context: Ethnographic perspective on the media effect. In K. B. Jessen & N. W. Jankowski (Eds.), A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research (pp.149-162). NY & London: Routledge.\nNardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 35-52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.\nNoddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.\nPisters, P. (2008, May 25). Manifesto for a schizo-analysis of media culture. Retrieved from Masters of media http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2008/05/25/manifesto-for-a-schizo-analysis-of-media-culture/\nPoster, M. (2002). Everyday (virtual) life. New literary history, 33, 743-760.\nPress, A. (1992). Women watching television. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.\nRichardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage\nScannell, P. (1988). Radio times: The temporal arrangements of broadcasting in the modern world. In P. Drummond & R. Pateson (Eds.), Television and its audience: International research perspectives (pp. 15-29). London: British Film Institue.\nSilverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. London: Routledge. \nSilverstone, R. (2002). Complicity and collusion in the mediation of everyday life. New literary history, 33, 761-780.\nSilverstone, R., Hirsch, E., & Morley, D. (1992). Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of household. In R. Silverstone, E. Hirsch (Eds.), Consuming technologies (pp.15-31). London: Routledge.\nSotamaa, O. (2010). When the game is not enough: Motivations and practices among computer game modding culture. Games and Culture, 5(3), 256-277.\nSpigel, L. (2001). Media homes: Then and now. International journal of cultural studies, 4(4), 385-411.\nStiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time: The fault of epimetheus (Trans., R. Beardsworth & G. Collins). Stanford: Stanford University Press.\nTierny, W. G. (2000). Undaunted courage. Life history and the postmodern challenge. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage\nTurkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.\nUrry, J. (2002, May). Mobility and proximity. Sociology, 36(2), 255-274.\nVirilio, P. (1994). The Vision Machine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. \nVirilio, P. (1990). L`Inertie polaire. Paris: Christian Bourgois.\nWinocur, R. (2005). Radio and everyday life: Uses and meanings in the domestic sphere. Television New Media, 6(3), 319-332.\nYoshimi, S. (1999). Made in Japan: The cultural politics of “home electrification” in postwar Japan. Media, culture & society, 21, 149-171.\nZimmerman, H. T. (2004). A case study of a family’s digital technology use. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Sciences Table of Contents, California, 646-646. | 描述: | 博士 國立政治大學 新聞學系 96451504 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096451504 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 150401.pdf | 3.58 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.