Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Other Titles:||The Development of Radical Remote Associates Test|
|Authors:||吳哲源;Wu, Jhe Yuan|
張雨霖;Chang, Yu Lin
陳學志;Chen, Hsueh Chih
remote association;radical remote associates test;insight thinking
|Issue Date:||2016-01-06 10:57:55 (UTC+8)|
|Abstract:||本研究擬發展《中文部件組字遠距聯想測驗》（Radical Remote Associates Test, RRAT）。測驗編製首先挑選出60組具有同樣的部件之三個衍生字組，編成預試題本計60題。接著以196名大學生進行預試，依項目分析結果挑選出30題做為正式試題，並區分為難度、鑑別度相近的甲、乙兩式題本（各15題）。其次甲式以173名、乙式以187名大學生進行正式施測及信效度研究。結果在信度方面，甲、乙兩版本內部一致性係數分別為.706與.685；在效度方面，兩版本皆與「中文遠距聯想測驗」、「中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」、「頓悟性問題測驗」有顯著正相關存在。另與「新編創造思考測驗」各指標皆無相關存在，顯示本測驗具有良好的聚斂效度與區辨效度。|
The purpose of this study was to develop “Radical Remote Associates Test” (RRAT). To develop RRAT, the researcher first formed a 60-item pretest by choosing sixty radicals and their three derivative characters, and deleted the same component of derivative characters. This pretest was administrated to 196 college students, and 30 items of the pretest were selected as formal scale according to the item analysis of preparing research. The researcher then divided these items into two versions, version A and B, with the same difficulty and discrimination, and each of them included 15 questions. Next, the formal scale, including version A and B, was distributed to college students, and 173 (version A) and 187 (version B) data were collected respectively. As to reliability, the coefficient of internal consistency of the two RRAT versions was .706 and .685 each. As to validity, each of the two versions of RRAT was significantly positively correlated with “Chinese Remote Associates Test”, “Chinese Word Remote Associates Test”, and “Insight Problems”. Besides, the two RRAT versions and all the index of “New Creativity Test” had no significant correlation, demonstrating the good Convergent validity and discriminant validity of RRAT.
|Appears in Collections:||[2014創新研究國際學術研討會] 會議論文|
Files in This Item:
All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.