Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94376| 題名: | 2005年香港反全球化示威之媒體再現：以台灣《中國時報》、香港《東方日報》為例 Media Representation of 2005 Hong Kong anti-globalization Protest : Case Studies on China Times & Oriental Daily News |
作者: | 蔡維鴻 Tsai, Eddie |
貢獻者: | 彭芸 蔡維鴻 Tsai,Eddie |
關鍵詞: | 反全球化 社會運動 媒體再現 新聞框架 論述分析 anti-globalization social movement media representation news frame discourse analysis |
日期: | 2007 | 上傳時間: | 6-May-2016 | 摘要: | 1990年代後期，以新自由主義（neoliberalism）為基調的全球化論述漸成為主流的經濟發展理論。然而，隨著新自由主義式全球化不斷推進，世界卻日益分化、貧富差距日益嚴重。因此，反全球化浪潮逐漸在全球各地迅速蔓延。\r\n\r\n 本研究由2005年香港反全球化示威出發，採用批判論述分析方法，以《中國時報》與《東方日報》為例，由低層次至高層次針對文本、論述實踐與社會文化實踐進行分析，藉以探究台港兩地主流報紙如何再現此一事件。\r\n文本分析將焦點置於兩報在語言層次上如何再現反全球化運動。研究結果發現，兩報共出現六種意識型態機制再現反全球化運動。除強化反全球化運動既定的刻板印象外，亦透過負面指謂與描繪將反全球化運動邊緣化於主流價值之外。總體來說，《東方日報》對反全球化運動之誤現不論是在數量上抑或程度上皆遠高於《中國時報》。\r\n\r\n 藉由論述實踐分析，將得以揭露隱匿於文本背後之框架與其意識型態歸屬。研究發現，反全球化人士於《中國時報》較常成為論述主角，其意見較得被完整呈現；《東方日報》則傾向突顯官方論述與發言。對於衝突事件，《中國時報》與《東方日報》兩報各自建構「民主人權」與「法律秩序」作為其召喚我群的共識假定。而在全球化爭議的論述形構上，《中國時報》文本的論述實踐運作呈現出「全球正義與民主框架」以及「傾保護政策框架」；《東方日報》文本的論述實踐運作則呈現「傾自由貿易框架」。\r\n\r\n 社會文化實踐分析旨在將文本置於社會文化脈絡中解讀，耙梳兩報論述實踐運作之社會文化意涵。本研究認為，肇因於兩地在政經脈絡發展以及媒體本身立場上的差異，《東方日報》論述實踐偏向常規式的社會性建構，有助於再製並維繫既存的新自由主義論述秩序；《中國時報》論述實踐則偏向創造式的社會性建構，有助於轉變既存的新自由主義論述秩序。 In the post-90s era, neoliberal globalization theories framed the mainstream philosophies of economic development. This progression however, was no solution to augmenting economic, social and political differences in the world and the widening gap between the deprived and wealthy. In fact, it might have sown the seeds for the waves of anti-globalization movements that ensued.\r\n \r\n This study exams the anti-globalization protest that broke out in Hong Kong during 2005 and, using the China Times and Oriental Daily News coverage as case studies, takes a bottom-up analysis approach at examining how the mainstream media in Taiwan and Hong Kong each represented the event.\r\n\r\n Textual analysis on the two media’s coverage drew attention to six different ideological mechanisms in their representation approaches. In addition to reinforcing the negative stereotypical connotations of anti-globalization, the movement is also further marginalized through the use of negative descriptivism and labels. On the whole, the frequency and magnitude of misrepresentation of the anti-globalization movement made by the Oriental Daily News is far greater than the China Times.\r\n\r\n Analysis of discourse practice unveils the hidden frames and ideology behind the text. Grievances of anti-globalization protestors are voiced by China Times, while authoritarian monologues frequent on the Oriental Daily News. In conflicting circumstances, the China Times appeals to a sense of “democracy and human rights”, while the Oriental Daily News calls on “law and order” as their slogans to assemble we-group consensus. In their discursive formation on the globalization issue, the China Times outlines global justice & democracy and protective policy frames; the Oriental Daily News on the other hand endorses pro-liberal trade frames.\r\n\r\n Analysis of sociocultural practice interprets the text within context of the social and cultural backgrounds. To sum up, due to differences in political and economic developments in Taiwan and Hong Kong and respective media predispositions, the Oriental Daily News discourse has a conventional socially constitutive function that maintains and reproduces the neoliberal orders of discourse; the China Times discourse has a creative socially constitutive function that endeavors to transform existing neoliberal regimes. |
參考文獻: | 中文部分\r\n\r\nBauman, Z. (2001).《全球化》，張君玫譯。台北：群學。\r\n\r\nBennett, T. (1982).〈媒體、「真實」、意義指陳〉，唐維敏譯。In Gurevitch, M., Bennet, T., Curran, J., & Woollacott, J. (Eds.)《文化、社會與媒體：批判性觀點》，唐維敏等譯，頁413－443。台北：遠流。\r\n\r\nHeld, D. et al. (2004).《全球化衝擊：全球化對政治、經濟與文化的衝擊》，沈宗瑞等譯。台北：韋伯文化。\r\n\r\nHeld, D., & McGrew, A. (2005) .《全球化與反全球化》，林祐聖、葉欣怡譯。台北：弘智文化。\r\n\r\nMicklethwait, J., & Wooldridge, A. (2002).《完美大未來：全球化機遇與挑戰》，高仁君譯。台北：商周。\r\n\r\nMoore-Gilbert, B. (2004).《後殖民理論》，彭淮棟譯。台北：聯經。\r\n\r\nSaid, E. W. (1993).《文化與帝國主義》，蔡源林譯，。台北：立緒。\r\n\r\nSaid, E. W. (1997).《遮蔽的伊斯蘭》，閻紀宇譯。台北：立緒。\r\n\r\nThurow, L. C. (2003).《勇者致富—全球化：在拒絕與接受間》，蘇育琪等譯。台北︰時報文化。\r\n\r\nWaters, M. (1995).《全球化》，徐偉傑譯。台北︰弘智。\r\n\r\nWimmer, R. D. & Dominick, J. R. (2002).《大眾媒體研究》，黃振家等譯。台北：學富。\r\n\r\n王家憲（2004）。《全球化與後殖民文化消費—以台北雙年展為例》。南華大學美學與藝術管理研究所碩士論文。\r\n\r\n石之瑜（1995）。〈歐美後殖民主義眼中的國際關係與國家認同〉，《美歐月刊》，10：3，112－126。\r\n\r\n宋國誠（2004）。〈作為文化抵抗的傳播論述：關於傳播民主化的問題意識—一個後殖民批評的觀點〉，發表於世新大學傳研所93學年度專題講座與演講。網址：http://cc.shu.edu.tw/~gioc/download/940506speech.doc\r\n李少南（2003）。〈社會變遷與媒介發展〉，李少南（編），《香港傳媒新世紀》，頁3－16。香港：中文大學出版社。\r\n\r\n李金銓（2004）。《超越西方霸權》。香港：香港牛津大學。\r\n\r\n李英明（2003）。《全球化下的後殖民省思》。台北：生智。\r\n\r\n李隆生、鄧嘉宏（2006）。〈經濟全球化的來龍去脈和省思〉，《2006全球化暨國際企業研討會論文集》， 頁45－68。 台中縣：靜宜大學。\r\n\r\n杜祖基（2002）。〈從經濟全球化和亞洲金融危機看香港的經濟轉型〉，《科學學研究》，21：616－619。\r\n\r\n周桂田（2000年8月2日）。〈全球化與全球在地化—現代的弔詭〉，《中央日報》。\r\n\r\n林芳玫（1996）。《女性與媒體再現：女性主義與社會建構論的觀點》。台北：巨流。\r\n\r\n邱貴芬（1999）。〈「後殖民」的台灣演繹〉，論文原宣讀於「十年來台灣文化研究的回顧」研討會。1999年9月18~19日。取自http://ws.twl.ncku.edu.tw/hak-chia/k/khu-kui-hun/taioan-sitbin.htm\r\n\r\n洪哲男（2003）。〈全球化與全球社會運動─反全球化行動之研究〉，《玄奘社會科學學報》，1：391－417。\r\n\r\n姜飛（2003）。〈後殖民主義視野中的西方媒介〉，《新聞與傳播研究》。取自http://big5.china.com.cn/gate/big5/www.blog.china.com.cn/sp1/jiangfei/1139188142.shtml\r\n\r\n郁建興（2003）。《全球化︰一個批評性考察》。中國：浙江大學出版社。\r\n\r\n倪炎元（1999）。〈再現的政治：讀媒介對他者負面建構的策略〉，《新聞學研究》，58：85－111。\r\n\r\n倪炎元（2003）。《再現的政治：台灣報紙媒體對「他者」建構的論述分析》。台北：韋伯文化。\r\n\r\n許寶強（2002）。《資本主義不是什麼》。香港：香港牛津大學。\r\n\r\n翁秀琪（1998）。《大眾傳播理論與實證》。台北：三民書局。\r\n\r\n翁秀琪（1998）。〈批判語言學、在地權力觀和新聞文本分析：宋楚瑜辭官事件中李宋會的新聞分析〉，《新聞學研究》，57：91－126。\r\n\r\n馬傑偉（2003）。〈權力、媒體與文化〉，李少南（編），《香港傳媒新世紀》，頁197－212。香港：中文大學出版社。\r\n\r\n陳光興（2001）。〈911事件後美國想像的轉化〉。《讀書》，11：24－30。\r\n\r\n陳光興（2003）。〈在全球反戰聲浪下反思台灣主體性中的美國〉，馮建三（編），《戰爭沒有發生？2003年英美出兵伊拉克評論與紀實》，頁195－202。台北：台灣社會研究季刊社。\r\n\r\n陳光興（2004）。〈嗆聲自身─民主運動與美國帝國主義〉，《台灣社會研究》，55：243－251。\r\n\r\n陳雪雲（1980）。《我國新聞媒体建構社會現實之研究－以社會運動報導為例》。國立政治大學新聞研究所博士論文。\r\n\r\n陳曉明（1995）。〈「後東方觀點」—穿越後殖民化的歷史表象〉，張京媛（編），《後殖民理論與文化認同》，頁233－246。台北：麥田。\r\n\r\n陳憶寧（2003）。〈當天然災難可能成為政治災難：策略框架效果再探〉，《中華傳播學刊》，3：3－35。\r\n\r\n陳韻如（1993）。《新聞事件的意義建構與受眾認知關係之研究－從受眾推論看新聞框架之影響》。國立政治大學新聞研究所博士論文。\r\n\r\n黃智誠、李少南（2003）。〈香港的政治傳播研究〉，《新聞學研究》，74：1－17。\r\n\r\n劉念夏（2002）。〈民意調查與民意產製：一個框架理論的觀點〉，《新聞學研究》，72：173－205。\r\n\r\n劉俊良（2005）。《反全球化論述：對現代性與實證國際關係理論之反思》。國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文。\r\n\r\n游祥洲（2002）。〈論全球化，一條未定的道路〉，「第四屆中華國際佛學會議」論文。台北：法鼓山中華佛學研究所。\r\n\r\n彭芸（1998）。《國際傳播新焦點—媒介全球化、區域化與本土化》。台北：風雲論壇。\r\n\r\n張錦華（1994）。《傳播批判理論》。台北：黎明書局。\r\n\r\n張錦華（2004）。〈論置入性行銷所造成的政商糾葛、新聞專業淪落〉，《曾虛白新聞獎卅週年-當前新聞生態的挑戰與出路研討會論文集》，頁129－133。臺北市 : 曾虛白先生新聞獎基金。\r\n\r\n張京媛（1995）。〈前言〉，張京媛（編），《後殖民理論與文化認同》，頁9－32。台北：麥田。\r\n\r\n葉維廉（1995）。〈殖民主義‧文化工業與消費欲望〉，張京媛（編），《後殖民理論與文化認同》，頁123－151。台北：麥田。\r\n\r\n趙剛（2005）。《知識之錨—當代社會理論的重建》。廣西：廣西師範大學。\r\n\r\n臧國仁（1999）。《新聞媒體與消息來源—媒介框架與真實建構之論述》。台北：三民。\r\n\r\n蔡源林（2002）。〈當代『伊斯蘭』再現的文化省思〉《文化研究月報》，網路版第十八期。取自：http://hermes.hrc.ntu.edu.tw/csa/journal/18/journal_park126.htm\r\n\r\n鍾蔚文、臧國仁、陳憶寧、柏松齡、王昭敏（1996）。〈框架理論的再探〉，翁秀琪、馮建三（編）《政大新聞教育六十年慶論文集》，頁181－223。台北：國立政治大學新聞系。\r\n\r\n顏瑞宏（2004）。《台灣主流報紙建構反戰運動意義之研究－以二○○三年美伊戰爭為例》。政治作戰學校新聞研究所碩士論文。\r\n\r\n瞿宛文（2003）。《全球化下的台灣經濟》。台北：唐山。\r\n\r\n羅世宏（1994）。《後蔣經國時代的國家、大眾媒介與反對運動：國家認同議題的媒介框架分析》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\r\n\r\n英文部分\r\n\r\nAkhavan-Majid, R., & Ramaprasad, J. (1998). Framing and ideology: A comparative analysis of U.S. and Chinese newspaper coverage of the Fourth United Nations Conference on Women and the NGO Forum. MassCommunication and Society, 1:2/3, 131-152.\r\n\r\nAlthusser, L. (1971). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. London: New Left Books.\r\n\r\nArpan, L. M., Baker, K., Lee, Y., Jung, T., Lorusso, L., & Smith, J. (2006). News coverage of social protests and the effects of photographs and prior attitudes. Mass Communication and Society, 9:1, 1-20.\r\n\r\nArtner, A. (2004). Anti-Globalization Movements: The Developments in Asia. Contemporary Politics, 10:3-4, 243-256. \r\n\r\nAyres, J. (2004). Framing Collective Action against Neoliberalism: The Case of the ‘Anti-Capitalist’ Movement. Journal of World-Systems Research, 10:1, 11-34.\r\n\r\nBennett, W., Pickard, V., Iozzi, D., Schroeder, C., Lagos, T., & Caswell, C. (2004). Managing the Public Sphere: Journalistic Construction of the Great Globalization Debate. Journal of Communication, 54:3, 437-455.\r\n\r\nBeyeler, M & Hübscher, E. (2003). Public opinion, media and protest against the World Economic Forum. Online, Available at: http://www.afsp.msh-paris.fr/activite/groupe/germm/collgermm03txt/germm03beyeler.pdf\r\n\r\nBerkowitz, D. (2005). Suicide bombers as women warriors: Making news stories through mythical archetypes. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 82:3, 607-622.\r\n\r\nBenford, R. D. & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.\r\n\r\nBlommaert, J. & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 447-466.\r\n\r\nBoyle, M. P., McCluskey, M. R., McLeod, D. M., & Stein, S. E. (2005). Newspapers and Protest: An Examination of Protest Coverage from 1960 to 1999. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82:3, 638-653.\r\n\r\nBronstein, C. (2005). Representing the Third Wave: Mainstream Print Media Framing of a New Feminist Movement. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82:4, 783-803.\r\nButtel, F. H. (2003). Some Observations on the Anti-globalization Movement. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38:1, 95-116.\r\n\r\nButtel, F. H. & Gould, K. A. (2004). Global Social Movement(s) at the Crossroads: Some Observations on the Trajectory of the Anti-corporate Globalization Movement. Journal of World Systems Research, 10:1, 37-66.\r\n\r\nCarragee, K. M. (1991). News and Ideology. Journalism Monographs, 128, 1-30.\r\n\r\nCarragee, K. M. & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54:2, 214-233.\r\n\r\nChomsky, N. (1997). The Passion for Free Markets: Exporting American Values Through the New World Trade Organization. Z Magazine, May. Online, Available at: http://www.zmag.org/zmag/articles/may97chomsky.html\r\n\r\nEntman, R.M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43:4, 51-58.\r\n\r\nFairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.\r\n\r\nFairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.\r\n\r\nFairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In Wodak R. & Meyer M. (Eds.), Methods in Critical Discourse Analysis, Sage, 121-138.\r\n\r\nGamson, W. (1990). The Strategy of Social Protest. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.\r\n\r\nGamson, W, A., & Lasch, K. E. (1983). The political culture of social welfare policy. In Spiro, S. E., & Yuchtman-Yaar, E. (Eds.), In Evaluating the Welfare State: Social and Political Perspectives (pp. 397-416). New York: Academic Press. \r\n\r\nGamson, W. A. & Wolfsfeld G. (1993). Movements and Media as Interacting Systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 114-125.\r\n \r\nGitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Beverly: University of California Press.\r\n\r\nHall, J. L. & Bettig, R. V. (2003). Taking it to the Streets: Mainstream Media Coverage of Anti-Global Capital Protests. Presented to the annual meeting of the International Communication Association. Online, Available at: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p112172_index.html\r\n\r\nHertog, J. K., & McLeod, D. M. (2001). A Multiperspectival Approach to Framing Analysis: A Field Guide. In Reese, D., Gandy, O. H., & Mahwah, E. G. (Eds.), In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and our Understanding of the Social World (pp. 139–162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\r\n\r\nHong, J. (1999). Globalization and Change in Taiwan: The Interplay of Political and Economic Forces. Asian Journal of Communication. 9:2, 39-59.\r\n\r\nKeohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2000). Globalization: What`s New,What`s Not (and So What). Foreign Policy, 118:Spring, 104-119.\r\n\r\nKim, S. T. (2004). Mapping an Economic Globalization News Paradigm: A Multi-National Comparative Analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81:3, 601-621.\r\n\r\nKobland, C. E., Du L., & Kwon J. (1992). Influence of Ideology in News Reporting: Case Study of New York Times` Coverage of Student Demonstrations in China and South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 2:2, 64-77.\r\n\r\nKruse, C. R., (2001), The Movement and the Media: Framing the Debate Over Animal Experimentation. Political Communication, 18, 67-87.\r\n\r\nLee, P. & Chu, L. (1998). Inherent dependence on power: the Hong Kong press in political transition. Media, Culture and Society. 20:1, 59-77.\r\n\r\nLuther, C. A., & Miller, M. M. (2005). Framing of the 2003 U.S.-Iraq War Demonstrations: An Analysis of News and Partisan Texts. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82:1, 78-96.\r\n\r\nLuther, C. A. & Zhou, X. (2005). Within the Boundaries of Politics: News Framing of SARS in China and the United States. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 82:4, 857-872.\r\n\r\nMejia-Vergnaud, A. (2004). Effects of globalization. Society Abroad, 41, 66-70.\r\n\r\nMander, J. (1996): The Downside of Globalization (What the Media Doesn`t Report). a speech given at the opening of the Global Teach-In 2, May 10-12, 1996. Online, Available at: www.nrec.org/synapse36/mander.html\r\n\r\nPan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55-76.\r\n\r\nPodobnik, B. & Reifer, T. (2004). The Globalization Protest Movement in Comparative Perspective. Journal of World-Systems Research, 10:1, 3-9.\r\n\r\nRojecki, A. (2005). Media Discourse on Globalization and Terror. Political Communication, 22:1, 63-81.\r\n \r\nReese, S. D. (2001). Prologue - Framing Public Life: A Bridging Model for Media Research. In Reese, D., Gandy, O. H., & Mahwah, E. G. (Eds.), In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and our Understanding of the Social World (pp. 7-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\r\n\r\nRyan, C., Carragee, K.M. & Meinhofer, W. (2001). Theory Into Practice: Framing, the News Media, and Collective Action. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 45, 175-182.\r\n\r\nShoemaker, P. J. (1984). Media treatment of deviant political groups. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 66-75, 82.\r\n\r\nSklair, L. (1999). Competing Conceptions of Globalization. Journal of World-Systems Research, 5:2, 141-159.\r\n\r\nSmith J. (2001). Behind the Anti-Globalization Label. Dissent, 48:4, 14-18.\r\n\r\nSolomon, W. (2000). More form than substance: Press coverage of the WTO protests in Seattle. Monthly Review, 52:1, 12-20.\r\n\r\nTankard, J. W. (2001). The Empirical Approach to the Study of Media Framing. In Reese, D., Gandy, O. H., & Mahwah, E. G. (Eds.), In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and our Understanding of the Social World (pp. 95-106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\r\n\r\nUndrahbuyan, B. (2005) . Media Framing and the Legitimization of Political Alignment: The Coverage of the WTO and the Protest. Presented to the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, May 26-30, 2005. Online, Available at: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p14076_index.html\r\n\r\nvan Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.\r\n\r\nWolfsfeld, G. (1984). Collective Political Action and Media Strategy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 28, 363-381.\r\n \r\nWolfsfeld, G. (1991). Media Protest, and Political Violence: A Transactional Analysis. Journalism Monograph, 127, 1-61.\r\n\r\nWolfsfeld, G. (1997). Media and Political Conflict News from the Middle East . NY:Cambridge.\r\n\r\nWodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about – a summary of its history, important and its developments. In Wodak R. & Meyer M. (Eds.), Methods in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 1-13). London: Sage.\r\n\r\nWodak, R. (2002). Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik, 36, 5-31. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 新聞學系 93451016 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093451016 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.