Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98007
題名: 內線交易之犯罪所得概念
其他題名: The Concept of Illicit Proceeds from Insider Trading
作者: 薛智仁
Hsueh, Chih-Jen
關鍵詞: 內線交易; 資訊機會平等; 犯罪所得; 特殊獲利或避損機會; 連帶沒收主義; 共同正犯; 追徵; 台開案
Insider Trading; Equality of Information; Illicit Proceeds; Special Opportunity to Gain Profits or Avert Loss; Joint and Several Liability Principle; Co-defendant + Confiscation; Taiwan Land Development Corporation Case
日期: Oct-2012
上傳時間: 17-Jun-2016
摘要: 在二○○六年爆發台開案之後,內線交易之共同正犯之間應如何計算犯罪所得,涉及證券交易法第一七一條之適用問題,在實務及學說上極具爭議。對此爭議,本文先從沒收犯罪所得之任務在於修正不法財產之移動,主張應以系爭構成要件之規範目的作為犯罪所得之認定標準。依此,由於內線交易之不法核心在於破壞投資人之資訊機會平等,故內線交易之犯罪所得係「特殊之獲利或避損機會」,而不是買入之股票或賣出股票所得之價金。其次,本文基於沒收犯罪所得之修正不法財產移轉的任務,主張不應採行實務之連帶沒收主義,僅能以各共同正犯成員之實際犯罪所得,作為沒收追徵範圍及加重刑罰之適用標準。
The Taiwan Land Development Corporation insider trading case has generated controversy as to how to calculate illicit proceeds between co-defendants that involves the application of Article 171 of the Securities Exchange Act in practice and for academic purposes. This study looks into this controversy by first identifying that the goal for confiscating illicit proceeds is to adjust the transfer of illicit property, and thus arguing that the purpose of the elements of the crime in Article 171 should be the standard for concluding illicit proceeds. It follows that, as the main reason for criminalizing insider trading is that such conduct impairs the equality of information and opportunity for investors, the illicit proceeds from insider trading should be a special opportunity to gain profits or avert losses instead of the price for buying or selling stocks. Moreover, this study contends that the principle of joint and several liability should not apply since the goal for confiscating illicit proceeds is to adjust the transfer of illicit property. Therefore, this study further argues that the scope of confiscation and the criteria for aggravated penalty should be based on the actual illicit proceeds of a co-defendant.
關聯: 法學評論, 129,245-299頁
Chengchi law review
資料類型: article
Appears in Collections:期刊論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
129-4.pdf1.09 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.