| dc.contributor | 哲學系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 汪文聖 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Wang, Wen-Sheng | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2016-01 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 7-Jul-2016 15:55:44 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 7-Jul-2016 15:55:44 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 7-Jul-2016 15:55:44 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98767 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文始於討論胡塞爾的《邏輯研究》的〈第一研究〉對「記號」與「信號」的區分，有關問題將涉及到〈第六研究〉。接著對海德格在《存有與時間》第十七節「指涉與記號」（Verweisung und Zeichcn）做闡釋，並延伸到其〈藝術作品的起源〉視記號為一種象徵的另一種觀點。但這裡的記號根本即是胡塞爾所說的信號。海德格所謂的記號能向更深邃涵義去指引，胡塞爾以記號能清楚明白表達意義，二者的立場因此有所不同。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This article begins with the discussion of Husserl`s differentiation of sig n and indication in his ＂First Investigation＂ of Logical Investigations, referring to the ＂Six Investigation＂ regarding some issues. Then the theme of ＂References and Signs＂ in the §17 of Heidegger`s Being and Time will be explicated. extending to ＂The Origin of the, ＂work of Art,＂ where the sign is viewed as a symbol. However. what the sign is meant by Heidegger in origin means the indication by Husserl The so-called sign by Heidegger can indicate a more profound meaning; sign by Husserl can clearly and distinctly express meanings, therefore their posit ions are different. | |
| dc.format.extent | 1934850 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 哲學與文化月刊, 43(1), 123-137 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 胡塞爾;海德格;現象學;記號;信號 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Husserl;Heidegger;Phenomenology;Sign;Indication | |
| dc.title (題名) | 對生命反思所表現的「記號」與「信號」 ─ 胡塞爾與海德格的差異 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
