DSpace Collection:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/2021
2024-03-26T02:58:29Z災害應變時政府優先使用傳播媒體機制之研究
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81070
題名: 災害應變時政府優先使用傳播媒體機制之研究
摘要: 為瞭解國內發生災害時政府使用傳播媒體之概況,本研究擬將先蒐集美國、日本於災害應變時政府所使用傳播媒體協助應變之情況作為參考資料,並對目前國內法令規定及運作進行分析及檢討,本研究所欲探討之主題包括下列各項: (一)蒐集美國、日本於災害應變時,政府使用傳播媒體協助應變之情形。 (二)對國內目前法令規定及運作情形進行檢討與分析。 (三)提出政府優先使用傳播媒體協助災害應變之標準作業流程及配合執行之法令規定,包括:優先使用頻道、時段、調用SNG車、發佈新聞、更正新聞等機制以及政府優先使用傳播媒體。 (四)提出費用給付之標準與建議。; It has been indicated in risk communication literature that the mass media operate as a social amplification of risk, and that how the governments use the media determine the success of combating the risks. In Taiwan, several severe disasters, such as the 921 Earthquake, Na-Li Typhoon, and the SARS outbreak, have showed that the media’s over-exaggerated coverage of disasters disturbed the society and put obstacles in the way of disaster control. Taiwan’s government needs to learn how to use the media more effectively in disseminating risk information in order to decrease the harms in the future diseases. Based on the regulation of the ‘‘Disaster Prevention and Protection Act’’ under Article 31 subparagraph 1: The commander of the emergency operation center may, subject to the extent necessary for disaster response, make the following disposal or injunction:having the top priority to use the media and communication equipment to collect and broadcast the disaster situation and related information of emergency response .This study developed a working framework for privileging the government to use the mass media during the emergent disasters for risk communications. Multiple research methods were applied in the study, including regulations review from the United States, Japan, and Singapore, the in-dept interviews with senior managers of the media organizations, and the focus-group interviews with scholars, government officials and the media representatives. In results, the study presented to the Center for Disaster Response a Standard Operational Process (SOP) model and the enforcement rules regarding the priority use of the media during the emergent disasters. Future directions such as recruiting the Taiwan broadcasting system and the new media as the members of the Nation’s disaster prevention organizations, employing the Public Radio Channels, and developing the Emergency Alert System…etc. are also suggested in the study.2016-02-02T06:50:31Z補助人文及社會科學研究圖書計畫規劃主題:全球化研究及其對台灣之影響(II)
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56362
題名: 補助人文及社會科學研究圖書計畫規劃主題:全球化研究及其對台灣之影響(II)2012-12-04T06:52:40Z近年來中國大陸地方財政與經濟發展關係之研究(三年期研究計畫)(II)
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56361
題名: 近年來中國大陸地方財政與經濟發展關係之研究(三年期研究計畫)(II)2012-12-04T06:52:34Z台灣、俄羅斯與中國現代化之比較-政治、社會與經濟層面之分析(III)
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56360
題名: 台灣、俄羅斯與中國現代化之比較-政治、社會與經濟層面之分析(III)
摘要: 現代化是一個從社會學借來的辭彙,其原先指涉從原始的社會變成現代化工業社會的過程,中間包括更為分化與複雜的社會結構。有些現代化理論者認為,在經濟高度發展之下,只有民主體制可以提供政權合法性。杭廷頓《第三波》一書對於民主轉型前威權體制的分類,台灣、俄國與中國皆屬於一黨專制體制的類型,台灣與俄國民主轉型啟動時間幾乎在一九九○年代同步進行,但發展狀況完全不同,反觀中國卻威權體制依舊。然而,從另外一個角度來看,台灣在兩千年政黨輪替以後,經濟不再快速發展,但中國卻是全世界經濟發展最快的國家之一,而俄國在九○年代民主轉型初期階段經濟發展停滯,甚至於倒退,但在這幾年普亭總統領導之下,雖然自由程度倒退,但經濟發展快速穩健,而被列為全世界所謂的金磚四國之一。因此,台灣、俄國與中國的現代化歷程,尤其是政治、經濟、社會層面,?得進一步作深入的比較分析。; Modernization, borrowed from sociology, refers to the process that a society transforms into an industrial society from an original one. Such modernization involves much more diverse and complicated social structural changes in the transformation process. Some of modernization theorists propose that only democracy can provide the legal basis for owning the political state power under a highly developed economy. 」 The Third Wave 「by Samuel P. Huntington states that all the authority institutions for Taiwan, Russia and China before the democratic transformation can be classified as the one-party rule systems. While both Taiwan and Russia started a democratic transformation nearly almost at the same time of 1990s, they have developed into completely different patterns. However, China has still remained as a one-party rule state till now. From another view, Taiwan』s economy has no longer grown swiftly since the year of 2000 when a change in the ruling party occurred. Contradictory, China with one-party rule system is one of the most currently growing economies in the world. Although the Russia』s economy was once backward at the first beginning of democratic transformation, it has been steadily growing under the leadership of Russian President Putin even at the cost of freedom. Russia is one of the so-called Bricks states. Hence, this research attempts to investigate the modernization process in Taiwan, Russia and China, particularly focusing on its further impacts on political issues, economic development and social status via comparative studies.2012-12-04T06:52:30Z