Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100456
題名: 中國三聚氰胺事件對乳製品產業之影響
The Impact of China’s Melamine Incident on the Dairy Industry
作者: 林孟蓉
貢獻者: 胡偉民
林孟蓉
關鍵詞: 中國乳製品產業
三聚氰胺事件
差異中之差異法
China’s Dairy Industry
Melamine Incidence
Difference-in-Difference
日期: 2016
上傳時間: 22-Aug-2016
摘要: 先前文獻在探討有關三聚氰胺事件時多為分析食安事件之影響因素、政府對於食品安全法規定訂之不足以及探討食安事件對於股價變動之影響。而本研究欲藉由公司財務指的變化來探討食安事件對乳製品產業之影響,因此利用差異中之差異(Difference in Difference, DID)方法,探討在食安事件發生後被爆出有參入三聚氰胺之毒奶粉公司相對於未出問題之奶類公司及豆類公司,其營業收入,營業成本及利潤等三項財務指標為相對上升或相對下降之趨勢。因此將樣本分類為三組,一組以毒奶粉公司作為實驗組,其他兩組以為未出問題奶類公司以及豆類公司作為控制組。\n本文以2001年至2011年中國規模以上上市以及非上市公司之追蹤資料(Panel Data)進行分析。實證結果指出,毒奶粉公司相對於未出問題公司在食安事件之後,其營業收入為相對增加,營業成本亦相對增加,而利潤則為相對減少。雖然營業收入之估計結果與預期不相符,但是本研究認為可能與毒奶粉公司在樣本資料當中原先就佔有較高之市場佔有率有關。營業成本之增加,本研究認為與事件發生後法規及監管成本之增加有正向關聯。利潤減少之實證結果與預期相符,說明毒奶粉公司在三聚氰胺事件下,就實證結果而言公司會有虧損之情況發生,代表食安事件對乳製品產業有負面之影響。
Most of the previous researches of the Melamine Incident focused on analyzing the impact on food safety event, the shortage of the governmental food legislation, and the discussion about the food scandal effect on the enterprises’ stock prices. In this paper, we used the variation of the company’s financial indicator in income statement to observe the impact of the food scandal on the dairy industry. In order to do so, we used the method called “Difference-in-Difference” to estimate the impact on the operating revenues, operating costs and profits of the scandal companies after the food safety scandal broke in 2008. In this study, we set our sample into three groups, the group of the scandal dairy companies as the experimental group, while the group of non-scandal dairy companies and the group of beans companies as the control group.\nThe panel data we used in this paper included listed and unlisted companies in China from 2001 to 2011. The empirical results indicated that after the scandal, in contrast to the non-scandal companies, the operating revenues and the operating costs of the scandal companies were both higher, and the profits were lower. The empirical results of the operating revenues didn`t meet the expectation of this paper, we supposed the reason was that the scandal companies had much higher market share comparing to the non-scandal companies. In our opinion, the increase of the operating costs was due to the newly released regulations and supervision costs. At the same time, the decrease of the profits was consistent with our expectation. It meant that after the Melamine incident, the scandal companies would suffered financial losses which proved that the food scandal event would have negative impact on the dairy industry.
參考文獻: 一、中文部分\n李盾,(2005)。基於產業組織理論的中國乳製品企業成長模式研究,內蒙古大學,企業管理研究所碩士論文。\n林中躍等人,(2009)。三聚氰胺醜聞對乳製品企業股價影響研究。《應對突發事件的應急互助契約問題研究》。國家自然科學基金項目計畫。\n邱雯雯,(2010)。中國食品安全制度的發展與挑戰:以毒奶粉事件為例。南華大學,國際暨大陸事務學系亞太研究所碩士論文。\n唐澤瀛,(2008)。我國食品安全所面臨的問題和對策—由「三鹿」奶粉事件所引起的思考談起。《金卡工程—經濟與法》,第9期,頁63-63。\n章薪薪,(2014)。食品安全事件對乳製品產業的影響及其溢出效應之研究。浙江財經大學,企業管理研究所碩士論文。\n陳學美、薛全忠,(2012)。我國食品安全存在的問題及對策。《農業經濟展望》,第7期。\n陶浪,(2009)。後三聚氰胺時代中國乳制品企業後向一體化模式的選擇研究。內蒙古大學,企業管理研究所碩士論文。\n隋洪明,(2009)。我國食品安全制度檢討與重構—以《食品安全法》頒布為背景。《法學論壇》,第24卷第3期。\n塹明、楊波、趙敏,(2015)。食品安全事件對我國乳製品產業的衝擊影響與恢復研究—以三聚氰胺等事件為例。《商業經濟與管理》,第12期。\n管培銘,(2015)。食安事件對食品業股價之研究。國立交通大學,管理科學研究所碩士論文。\n劉成果,(2008)。《中國奶業年鑑》。中國農業出版社。\n劉呈慶、孫曰瑤、龍文軍,(2009)。乳製品企業擴張與三聚氰胺汙染。《經濟管理》,第10期,頁165-173。\n劉呈慶、孫曰瑤、龍文軍、白楊,(2009)。競爭、管理與規制:乳製品企業三聚氰胺影響因素的實證分析。《管理世界月刊》,第12期,頁67-78。\n二、英文部分\nAngrist, J. D. (2015). Mastering Metrics-The Path from Cause to Effect. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 133-153.\nCard, D. and Sullivan, D. G. (1998). Measuring the effect of Subsidized Training Programs on Movement in and out of employment. Econometrica, Vol. 56, No. 3, 497-530.\nChen, Chia-Wen and Wei-Min Hu (2015). Subsidizing Fuel Efficient Cars: Evidence from China’s Automobile Industry. Working Paper.\nChen, Gao (2011). Stock Market Response to The 2008 China Milk Scandal. New Jersey: Rutgers University. Graduate Program in Food and Business Economic.\nCrafton, S. M., George E. Hoffer and Robert J. Reilly. (1981). Testing the Impact of Recalls on the Demand for Automobiles. Economic Inquiry, Vol. XIX, 694-703.\nEissa, N. (1995). Taxation and Labor Supply of Married Women: The Tax Reform Act of 1986 as Natural Experiment. NBER Working Paper, 5023.\nEissa, N. and J. B. Liebman (1996). Labor supply response to earned income tax credit. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 111, No. 2, 605-637.\nEllwood, D.T. (2000). The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit and Social Policy Reforms on Work, Marriage and Living Arrangements. National Tax Journal, Vol. 53, No. 4, 1063-1106.\nFuller, F., J. Huang, H. Ma and S. Rozelle (2006). Got Milk? The Rapid Rise of China’s Dairy Sector and its Future Prospects. Food Policy, Vol. 31, issue 3, 201-215.\nHarris, M. and A. Raviv (1990). Capital Structure and the information role of debt. Journal of Finance, Vol.45, 321-349.\nHenson, S. and J. Caswell (1999). Food Safety Regulation: An Overview of Contemporary Issues. Food Policy, Vol. 24, No.6, 589-603.\nHolmes, A.W. (1986). Consumer protection and the food industries. In: Burns J, Swinbank A, editors. Food policy issues and the food industries. Food Economics Study, No. 3. Reading (UK): University of Reading, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, 103–104.\nJohn, T.A. (1993) Accounting Measures of Corporate Liquidity, Leverage, and Costs of Financial Distress. Financial Management, Vol. 22, 91-100.\nLechner, M. (2010). The Estimation of Casual Effects by Difference in Difference Methods. Econometrics, Vol. 4, No. 3, 165-224.\nLu, Xiaojing. (2011). The Cause and Effect Analysis of the Melamine Incident in China. Asian Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, 176-185.\nMoore (2005) Econometric Approaches to Causal Inference: Difference-in-Difference and Instrumental Variables. Department of Government, Harvard University.\nPei, Xiao-fang, A. Tandon and A. Alldrick (2011). The China Melamine Milk Scandal and its Implications for food safety regulation. Food Policy, Vol. 36, 412-420.\nQian, G., X. Guo, J. Guo and J. Wu (2011). China’s dairy crisis: impacts, causes and policy implications for a sustainable dairy industry. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. Vol. 18, No. 5, 434-441\nRajan, R. and L. Zingales (1995). What do we know about optimal capital structure? Some evidence from international data. Journal of Finance, Vol. 50, 1421-1460.\nRobert, C. Feenstra, Zhiyuan Li and Miaojie Yu. (2011). Exports and Credit Constraints Under Incomplete Information: Theory and Evidence from China. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Papers 16940.\nSockett, P. (1993). Social and economic aspects of food-borne disease. Food Policy. Vol. 18, No. 2, 110-119.\nStarbird, S. A. (2005). “Moral Hazard, Inspection Policy, and Food Safety”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 87, No. 1, 15-27.\nTam, Waikeung and Dali Yang (2005). Food Safety and the Development of Regulatory Institutions in China. Asian Perspective, Vol.29, No.4, 5-36.\nTorabzadeh, Khalil M. and Dan Davidson (1989). The effect of the Recent Insider-Trading Scandal on Stock Prices of Securities Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 8, No. 4, 299-303.\nVilla, J. M. (2012) Simplifying the Estimation of Difference in Differences Treatment Effects with Stata. Brooks World Poverty Institute, University of Manchester.\nWarner, J. (1977). Bankruptcy Costs: Some Evidence. Journal of Finance Vol. 32, 337-347.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
103255017
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103255017
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
501701.pdf1.32 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.