Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: 公共建設委外型研究案之智慧財產管理探討
Other Titles: Intellectual Property Management of Infrastructure Related Publicfunded Research
Authors: 高千雯;陳其華;沈麗琴;陶治中;黃鳳梅;吳東凌;洪銘揚
Kao, Chien-Wen;Chen, Chi-Hwa;Shen, Le-Chin;Tao, Chi-Chung;Huang, Feng-Mei;Wu, Tung-Ling;Hong, Ming-Yang
Keywords: 智慧財產管理;委外型研究案;智慧財產歸屬;政府採購案;既有智慧財產
Intellectual Property Management;Public-funded Research;Ownership of Intellectual Property;Government Procurement;Background Intellectual Property
Date: 2013-06
Issue Date: 2016-08-31 17:10:45 (UTC+8)
Abstract: 行政院轄下各部會在「科學技術基本法」與「政府科學技術研究發展成果歸屬及運用辦法」公布施行後,陸續訂定各部會及其所屬機關之成果歸屬及運用辦法,自此政府出資、委託或補助研究計畫之研究成果歸屬便有了法源依據,衍生收益之分配及歸屬後之智慧財產管理亦有相應之依循方向。此一發展由法規層面來看,初步已滿足各公部門出資研究計畫之所有智慧財產相關需求,然而實際上在執行層面,還需補充相關配套措施,尤其是為滿足各機關公共建設業務需求而進行之委外研究案,因為該研究成果亦可能同時有促進產業發展的商品化可能性,相關衍生議題將無法直接套用在現行規範上獲得充分的適用。因此,本研究嘗試以公部門委託研究案為標的,由國內各部會之成果運用及歸屬辦法分析,了解各部會在規範上的差異,與可能衍生之問題,進而以政府採購主管單位-行政院採購暨公共工程委員會制定之「政府採購契約要項」與「勞務採購契約範本」,以及各政府機關之委外研究合約進行分析,以了解現行契約中與智慧財產相關規範之完備程度。最後,再由文獻中探討國外公部門之委外研究智慧財產管理措施,與前述分析結果比較,據以提出可供國內公部門參考之委外研究智慧財產管理措施與契約補充建議。
After the enforcement of "Fundamental Science and Technology Act" and "Government Scientific and Technological Research and Development Results Ownership and Utilization Regulations", many Ministries of Executive Yuan enacted their own "Scientific and Technological Research and Development Results Ownership and Utilization Regulations" one after the other. Since then, the ownership of results of research projects funded by the government has regulations to obey and the distribution of derivative income also has guidance to follow. It seems this evolution has fulfilled the intellectual property related needs of research project funded by public sectors. However when we examine the practical utilization situation of public research results, we still can find that the current regulations are insufficient from the execution aspect. When the research and development results are likely to be used in infrastructure construction and also have commercialization possibilities, present regulations may result in some difficulties in research results' utilization. Therefore, we try to use public funded research project as our research target, first analyzing "Scientific and Technological Research and Development Results Ownership and Utilization Regulations" of the Ministries of Executive Yuan to find the difference among regulations and the problems could occur. And second, analyzing "Essential Requirements for Procurement Contracts" and "Labor Services Procuring Contract Example" promulgated by Public Construction Commission of Executive Yuan, and the labor services procuring contracts promulgated by Ministries of Executive Yuan to see if there're still some complementary measures need to be added. And the last, we search for other countries' labor services procuring contracts, and compare them with previous results. Then we will propose our suggestions according to the analyzed results.
Relation: 政大智慧財產評論, 11(1), 135-179
NCCU Intellectual Property Review
Data Type: article
Appears in Collections:[智慧財產評論] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat

All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing