Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104002| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 朱斌妤<br>Pin-Yu Chu | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 霍達 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | 霍達 | zh_TW |
| dc.date | 2015 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-14T08:19:26Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-11-14T08:19:26Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-11-14T08:19:26Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G0101256001 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104002 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 公共行政學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 101256001 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 開放政府資料能帶來龐大的經濟效益以及達到透明治理的理念，已成為電子治理最重要的議題之一，各國政府如美國、英國、加拿大無不積極推動開放政府資料政策。我國行政院亦將政府資料開放列為第四階段電子化政府計畫的項目之一，中央機關與地方政府將分別建立開放資料平台，並要求將機關所擁有之資料逐步開放予社會大眾使用。在此背景下，財政部財政資訊中心預建置財政資訊共享服務平台，來達到資料開放政策的目標。本研究目的在於該平台的推動在實務上面臨了哪些困難，後續還有哪些地方需要克服，這樣的經驗能帶給其他行政機關哪些啟示。\n本研究首先整理國內外開放政府資料的文獻，其次介紹創新擴散理論，作為財政資訊中心推動財政資訊共享服務平台的階段基礎，並以訪談法蒐集相關資料。本研究最後以議題設定與配對階段、再定義/再建構階段、闡述階段及例行化階段為主軸，分別探討各階段的推動工作與困境。\n本研究發現，推動財政資訊共享服務平台的主要工作與困境包括溝通策略、法律規範、分工方式、業務單位的抗拒與資料的價值。財資中心在政策規劃面、組織管理面以及法律規範面仍有改進空間，包括改變同仁的觀念態度、提出明確的評估報告、團隊成員的代表性、訂定行政規則以及與相關單位共商修法議題。未來有意推動相關政策的機關，除了前述財資中心應該改進之處，尚須注意組織文化以及公民參與的部分，讓政策推動的阻力降至最低。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Open government data (OGD) can brings great economic benefit and promotes more openness in government, it has become one of the most important issues in e-Government around the world. An open data policy was enacted by the Executive Yuan at the end of 2013, both central and local governments should gradually release their possessed data to the public. In the context of open data policy, Fiscal Information Agency, MOF tries to establish an open data platform of Ministry of Finance. However, the open data policy in Taiwan is still in a stage of sprouting, it is an innovation policy and brand new notion to many governments, the objective of this research is to analyze what obstacles does Fiscal Information Agency, MOF meet when promoting the open data platform of Ministry of Finance, and how could this experience be learned.\n First of all, the research introduces the literatures about open data. Secondly, quoting the Innovation Diffusion Theory as the conceptual framework and conducting interviews. The analysis about the works and obstacles is individually based on the phase of agenda setting, matching, redefining/restructuring, clarifying and routinizing.\nThe results show the main work and obstacles including the strategy of communication, legal norms, division of labor, resistance of agency and the value of data. There are still areas of improvement for Fiscal Information Agency, MOF, such as changing the concept of colleagues, providing a tangible report about open data and the representativeness of group. The lessons from this study are expected to provide insights to the Taiwan government when it tries to engage the open data policy. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1\n1.1政府資料開放之趨勢 1\n1.2我國政府資料開放之現況 2\n1.3研究問題與研究目的 9\n第二章 文獻回顧 11\n2.1 政府資料開放 11\n2.1.1 開放政府資料之定義 11\n2.1.2 各國政府資料開放現狀 14\n2.1.3資料開放的相關研究 21\n2.2 創新擴散理論 25\n2.2.1創新的定義 25\n2.2.2創新擴散的要素 26\n2.2.3創新接受者的類別 30\n2.3組織內的創新 31\n2.3.1組織創新的類別 31\n2.3.2組織創新的過程 32\n2.3.4組織創新的研究面向 34\n2.4 影響政策擴散的因素 35\n2.4.1組織面向 36\n2.4.2環境面向 36\n2.4.3人員面向 38\n2.4.4解決問題面向 39\n2.4.5其他 39\n第三章 個案介紹 42\n3.1財政資訊之政策目標與願景 42\n3.2財政資訊業務推展概況 43\n3.3財政部財政資訊中心 47\n3.4財政資訊共享服務平台專案 49\n第四章 研究設計與方法 52\n4.1訪談法 52\n4.1.1訪談法的介紹 52\n4.1.2 訪談法的類型 53\n4.1.3訪談法的優點與缺點 53\n4.1.4訪談法於本研究中的適用性 55\n4.2研究範圍及對象 55\n4.3 訪談題綱 56\n第五章 訪談結果整理 60\n5.1議題設定與配對階段 60\n5.2再定義/再建構階段 61\n5.2.1法律規範 62\n5.2.2分工方式 64\n5.2.3同仁態度 66\n5.2.4資料彙整 68\n5.3闡述階段 70\n5.4例行化階段 71\n5.5溝通策略 71\n5.5.1垂直溝通 72\n5.5.2水平溝通 73\n5.6專案後續發展 75\n5.7小結 80\n5.7.1組織管理面 81\n5.7.2策略規劃面 82\n5.7.3法律規範面 83\n第六章 結論與建議 84\n6.1財政資訊共享服務平台推動過程整理 84\n1.議題設定與配對階段 84\n2.再定義/再建構階段 85\n3.闡述階段 85\n4.例行化階段 86\n5.溝通策略 86\n6.小結 86\n6.2實務建議 88\n6.3研究限制與後續建議 90\n參考文獻 92\n附錄：訪談整理 101 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 9186194 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101256001 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 開放政府資料 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 創新擴散理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Open Government Data | en_US |
| dc.subject | Innovation Diffusion Theory | en_US |
| dc.title | 創新擴散理論之應用─以財政部財政資訊共享服務平台為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Application of Innovation Diffusion Theory: A Case Study of Open Data Platform of Ministry of Finance | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | 王揮雄(2012)。文化部藝文資源整合與開放計畫─以藝文活動為例。研考雙月刊，36(4)，132-141。\n朱斌妤(2013)。政府資訊公開與加值運用之規劃與績效評估。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫申請，未出版。\n朱斌妤(2014)。政府資料開放績效評估。行政院國家科學委會專題研究計畫申請書，未出版。\n行政院研究發展考核委員會(2013a)。第四階段電子化政府計畫（101年至105年）（核定本）。臺北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。\n行政院研究發展考核委員會(2013b)。政府機關資訊通報第308期。臺北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。\n行政院研究發展考核委員會(2013c)。政府機關資訊通報第304期。臺北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。\n行政院研究發展考核委員會(2012)。政府資料開放加值應用研究分析書面報 告。臺北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。\n李仲彬(2013a)。政府創新的類型與分佈：我國地方政府 1999-2010 年間的觀察。公共行政學報，44，73-112。\n李仲彬(2013b)。影響地方政府創新產出量的因素。東吳政治學報，31(1)，105-160。\n李仲彬(2010)。影響全球電子治理發展的因素:以政策擴散理論為基礎的分析。公共行政學報，36，39-89。\n李再長、曾雅芬（譯）(2011)。組織理論與設計（十版）（R. L. Daft原著）。臺北：華泰。\n\n宋餘俠、李國田(2012)。政府部門資料加值推動策略與挑戰。研考雙月刊，36(4)，10-21。\n林巧敏(2011)。臺灣與美英兩國政府機關實務比較。大學圖書館，15(2)，78-98。\n林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究，13(2)，122-136。\n胡龍騰、張國偉(2010)，美國績效管理改革作法，研考雙月刊，34(3), 24-36。\n袁方（編）(2002)。社會研究方法。臺北：五南。\n財政部財政資訊中心(2015a)。財政巨量資料分析平台建置委外服務案建議書徵求文件。臺北市：財政部財政資訊中心。\n財政部財政資訊中心(2015b)。「推動電子發票，創造智慧好生活計畫」建置委外服務案─巨量分析服務功能上線審查。臺北市：財政部財政資訊中心。\n財政部財政資訊中心(2014)。財政資訊共享服務平台委外服務案建議書徵求文件。臺北市：財政部財政資訊中心。\n徐聯恩、郭靜怡(2012)。提升組織創新活力。臺北：高等教育文化事業。\n莊立民、陳志龍(2006)。建構組織創新擴散過程之研究─以媒體出版業為例。出版與管理研究，2，33-64。\n陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究（初版）。臺北：五南圖書公司。\n陳坤助(2013)。台灣App應用政府(開放)資料現況，2013年4月12日，取自http://pt.slideshare.net/KNYChen/app-18624877。\n陳舜伶、林珈宏、莊庭瑞(2012)。藏智於民：開放政府資料的原則與現況，臺北：中央研究院台灣創用CC計畫。\n陳冠利(2011)。組織動態創新能耐之研究。國立臺灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系博士論文，未出版，臺北。\n陳啟光、陳玉真、于長禧、蔡政和(2006)。政府機關之間為民服務創新作為擴散過程之探討。品質學報，13(3)，329-343。\n項靖、楊東謀(2012)。資訊分享與共榮：政府機關資料公開與加值應用。行政院研考會委託研究報告（編號：RDEC-RES-101002）。臺北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。\n項靖、楊東謀、羅晉(2014)。政府開放資料加值營運模式之研究。行政院國家發展委員會委託研究報告（編號：RDEC-MIS-102-002）。臺北市：行政院國家發展委員會。\n張善政(2014)。政府與產業攜手共創施政透明與產業發展新紀元，2014年3月29日，取自http://www.opendata4tw.org.tw/article_detail.php?id=2&aid=2。\n張佑丞(2013)。政府開放資料(Open Data)加值應用之趨勢，2013年12月27日，取自http://mymkc.com/articles/contents.aspx?ArticleID=21822。\n張家生(2012)，從臺北市看政府公開資料（Open Data），研考雙月刊，36(4), 61-69。\n張銘志(2008)。以創新擴散理論分析RFID系統的導入─以鋼鐵廠為例。國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文，未出版，高雄。\n彭啟明(2014)。天氣/氣候─從開放資料走向大數據的新時代，2014年11月20日，取自：http://www.art.ntou.edu.tw/masters/download/10301/11.20.pdf。\n溫金豐(2012)。組織理論與管理（三版）。臺北：華泰。\n管倖生（編）(2010)。設計研究方法。新北：全華。\n廖洲棚、陳敦源、蕭乃沂、廖興中(2014)。運用巨量資料實踐良善治理：網路民意導入政府決策分析之可行性研究。行政院國家發展委員會委託研究報告（編號：RDEC-MIS-102-003）。臺北市：行政院國家發展委員會。\n潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究：理論與應用。臺北：心理。\n蔡啟通(1997)。組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織新之關係。國立臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北。\n錢鉦津(2013)。政府資訊開放的資料品質與測試概念（下篇），品質月刊，49(6)，15-20。\n簡宏偉(2014)。資料開放現況與展望。臺北市：行政院國家發展委員會。\n謝秀琪(2013)。澳洲政府的資訊策與整合應用─以民眾信賴及鼓勵創新為目標\n服。高雄市政府公務出國報告書。\n蕭乃沂、陳敦源、廖洲棚(2015)。政府應用巨量資料精進公共服務與政策分析之可行性研究。行政院國家發展委員會委託研究報告（編號：NDC-MIS-103-003）。臺北市：行政院國家發展委員會。\n蕭景燈(2012)。資料開放發展現況與展望。研考雙月刊，36(4)，22-38。\nAmabile, T. M. (1998). How to Kill Creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 76-87.\nBaybeck, B., Berry, W. D. & Siegel, D.A. (2011). A Strategic Theory of Policy Diffusion via Intergovernmental Competition, The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 232-247.\nBiesenbender, S. & Tosun, J. (2013). Domestic Politics and The Diffusion of International Policy Innovations: How Does Accommodation Happen, Global Environmental Change, 29, 424-433.\nBorins, Sandford. (2002). Leadership and Innovation in the Public Sector. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 23(8): 467-475.\nBurgess, B. H. (1989). Industrial Organization. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.\nCrane, H. (2013). Public Sector Staff Know Open Data Matters But Fail to Get Government Plan. Retrieved April 15, 2014, from http://tinyurl.com/jwhjwsr\nDaft, R. L. (1989). Organization Theory and Design. St. Paul, Minnesota: West.\nDamanpour, F. (1988). Innovation Type, Radicalness, and the Adoption Process.\nCommunication Research, 15, 545-567.\nDamanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1990). The Adoption of Innovation Overtime: Structural Characteristics and Performance of Organizations. The Annual Meeting of the Decision Science Institute, San Diego, CA.\nDamanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.\nDavies, T. (2013). Open Data Barometer. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://www.opendataresearch.org/project/2013/odb\nDavies , T. (2014) Open Data in Developing Countries: Emerging Insights from Phase I. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://tinyurl.com/p2sbr6b\nDobrin, D. (2013). Analysis of ‘Open Data’ Survey Commissioned to Support the Shakespeare Review into Public Sector Information. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://tinyurl.com/nj3kex7 \nDolowitz, D. & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy Making. Governance, 13(1), 5-24.\nDougherty, D., & Bowman, E. H. (1995). The Effect of Organizational Downsizing on Product Innovation. California Management Review, 37(4), 28-44.\nDrucker, P. (1998). The Future That Has Already Happened. The Futurist, 32(8), 16-18.\nElena, S., Aquilino, N. & Riviére, A. P. (2014). Emerging Impacts in Open Data in the Judiciary Branches in Argentina, Chile and Uruguay. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://www.opendataresearch.org/project/2013/cippec\nEvans, M. (2009). Policy Transfer in Critical Perspective. Policy Studies, 30(3), 243-268.\nGraham, E. R., Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2013). The Diffusion of Policy Diffusion Research in Political. British Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 673-701.\nGrover, V., & Goslar, M. D. (1993). The Initiation, Adoption and Implementation of\nTelecommunications Technologies in U.S. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(1), Summer, 41-163.\nHage, J. (1980). Theories of Organizations: Form, Process, and Transformation. New York: Wiley.\nHeiden, N. V. D. & Strebel, F. (2012). What about Non-Diffusion? The Effect of Competitiveness in Policy-Comparative Diffusion Research, Policy Sciences, 45, 345-358.\nHsieh, J. Y. (2011). A Multilevel Growth Assessment of the Diffusion of Management Innovation Nested in State Levels: The Case of US Local Economic Development Programs, Innovation: Management, policy & practice, 13, 2-19.\nHuijboom, N. & Broek, T. V. D. (2011). Open Data: An International Comparison of Strategies. European Journal of ePractice, 12, 1-13.\nHull, F., & Hage, J. (1982). Organization for Innovation: Beyond Burns and Stalker’s Organic Type. Sociology, 16, 564-577.\nJohannessen, J. A., & Dolva, J. O. (1994). Competence and Innovation: Identifying Critical Innovation Factors. Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Change, 3(3), 209-222.\nKamensky, John M. (2010). Obama`s Performance Revolution: Changing How Government Works. Retrieved March 28, 2014, from http://tinyurl.com/kc6jg8t\nKarch, A. (2007). Emerging Issues and Future Directions in State Policy Diffusion Research. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 7(1), 54-80.\nKelm, K. M., Narayanan, V. K., & Pinches, G. E. (1995). Shareholder Value Creation During R&D Innovation and Commercialization Stages. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 770-786.\nKim, D. R. (2013). Local Government Policy Diffusion in a Decentralised System: Childbirth Support Policy in South Korea. Local Government Studies, 39(4), 582-599.\nKimberly, J. R. (1986). The Organizational Context of Technological Innovation, In D.D. Davis (Eds.), Managing Technological Innovation. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.\nKing, N., & Anderson, N. (2002). Managing Innovation and Change: A Critical Guide for Organizations. London: Thompson.\nKochhar, R., & David, P. (1996). Institutional Investors and Firm Innovation: A Test of Competing Hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 73-84.\nManyika, J., Chui, M., Groves, P., Farrell, D., Kuiken, S. V. & Doshi, E. A. (2013). Open Data: Unlocking Innovation and Performance with Liquid Information. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://tinyurl.com/kj93vku\nMarsden, G., Frick, K.T., May, A.D. & Deakin, E. (2011). How Do Cities Approach Policy Innovation and Policy Learning? A Study of 30 Policies in Northern Europe and North America. Transport Policy, 18, 501-512.\nMartin, M., Kaltenböck, M., Nagy, H. & Auer S. (2011). The Open Government Data Stakeholder Survey. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-739/paper_6.pdf\nMatisoff, D. C. & Edwards J. (2014). Kindred Spirits or Intergovernmental Competition? The Innovation and Diffusion of Energy Policies in the American States (1990–2008). Environmental Politics, 23(5), 795-817.\nMejabi, O. V., Azeez, A.L., Adedoyin, A. & Oluwaseyi, O. M. (2014). Case Study Report on Investigation of the Use of the Online National Budget of Nigeria. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://www.opendataresearch.org/project/2013/unilorin\nNegro, S. O., Alkemade, F. & Hekkert, M. P. (2012). Why Does Renewable Energy Diffuse So Slowly? A Review of Innovation System Problems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 3836-3846.\nObinger, H., Schmitt, C. & Starke, P. (2013). Policy Diffusion and Policy Transfer in Comparative Welfare State Research. Social Policy & Administration, 47(1), 111-129.\nOECD (2006). Digital broadband content: Public sector information and content. Retrieved April 11, 2014, form http://www.oecd.org/sti/36481524.pdf\nOpen Data Institute (2015). Open Data Roadmap for the UK 2015. Retrieved April 20, 2015, from http://theodi.org/roadmap-uk-2015\nRogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4thEd). New York: The Free\nPress.\nScott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.\nSrivastava, N., Aggarwal, V., Soni, A. Bhattacharjya, S., Nayak, B. P., Meenawat, H. & Gopalakrishnan, T. (2014). Open Government Data for Regulation of Energy Resources in India. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://www.opendataresearch.org/project/2013/teri\nThe National Archives (2014). UK Government Licensing Framework. Retrieved April 20, 2015, from http://tinyurl.com/mrhshyu\nTisn é, M. (2013). An “All-out Crazy Party”…of Data. Retrieved Oct 31, 2013, from http://hbr.org/special-collections/insight/scaling-social-impact/an-all-out-crazy-party-of-data\nTornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The Processes of Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Lexington Books.\nTushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. (1986). Organizing for Innovation. California Management Review, 28(3), 74-92.\nU.S. (2014). U.S. OPEN DATA ACTION PLAN. Retrieved April 20, 2015, from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/us_open_data_action_plan.pdf\nWei, M., Patadia, S., & Kammen, D.M. (2010). Putting Renewables and Energy Efficiency to Work: How Many Jobs Can the Clean Energy Industry Generate in the US? Energy Policy, 38(2), 919-931.\nWolfe, R.A. (1994). Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested\nResearch Directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 405-443.\nWoodman, R. W., Sawyer J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.\nYusuf, J. E. & Neill, K.A. (2013). State Energy-Based Economic Development Policies and Examples. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(3), 240-249. | zh_TW |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 600101.pdf | 8.97 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.