Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104084
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Sullivan , Jonathan;Gudrun, Seiler-Holmer | |
dc.date | 2011-09 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-18T03:51:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-11-18T03:51:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-11-18T03:51:41Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104084 | - |
dc.description.abstract | There are legitimate concerns about the health and sustainability of the Taiwan Studies field. However our understanding of the contours of the field, indeed our understanding of what Taiwan studies mean, is limited. Using newly collected empirical data on research output and a survey of the attitudes of Taiwan scholars in the west and in Taiwan this article provides a starting point for mapping the field. The article finds that, while generally buoyant, Taiwan studies face several divisions, for example between western and Taiwan-based scholars, between English and Chinese language research and between area specialists and disciplinary specialists. These divisions contribute to a research field that, as we show empirically, is relatively low on collaboration, is dominated by political science, and is disseminated in lower impact journals. The article concludes with some suggestions for addressing these problems. | |
dc.relation | Issues & Studies,47(3),1-28 | |
dc.subject | Taiwan studies ; state of the field ; research output ; scholarly attitudes ; divisions | |
dc.title | Mapping the Taiwan Studies Field | |
dc.type | article | |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.openairetype | article | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
Appears in Collections: | 期刊論文 |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.