Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104640
題名: 論一帶一路做為跨區域主義的新典範之可能性
One Belt, One Road, and a New Paradigm of Interregionalism?
作者: 彭瑞肯
Episcopo, Erik
貢獻者: 袁易
Yuan, I
彭瑞肯
Erik Episcopo
關鍵詞: 一帶一路
跨區域主義
區域整合
One Belt, One Road
Interregionalism
Regionalism
TPP
APEC
日期: 2016
上傳時間: 7-Dec-2016
摘要: 一段時間以來,區域間主義學者一直暗示“新區域主義”的範式在解釋今天的區域間環境方面正在失去其相關性。因此,研究人員認為,一個新的區域間範式就在我們身上。進入中國的一帶一路,這一倡議的範圍和多維性遠超過任何過去或當前的區域間協議。本研究旨在研究“一帶一路”計劃,以了解它是否具有區域間範式轉變的作用,這將形成區域間對話的未來。為了做到這一點,本文回顧了關於Jurgen Ruland的區域間主義和Heiner Hanggi區域間類型學的功能理論的文獻,以構建一個比較分析。使用Ruland的功能 - 平衡,機構建設,合理化,議程設置,集體身份建設和促進發展 - 作為變量,“一帶一路”與亞太經合組織和TPP相比,兩個巨型區域都是“新區域主義 ``本文發現,“一帶一路”確實具有獨特的功能性質,使其與新的區域主義的情況分開。然而,必須承認,具有範式轉變的成分不能保證將發生. 因此,本文還評估了OBOR目前面臨的早期項目面臨的幾個挑戰。如果中國未能克服早期的政治,經濟,技術,環境和安全挑戰,未來的區域間協議不可能包含一帶一路的新功能概念。這項研究的一個主要限制是,仍然太早地判斷區域間對話是否將採用由OBOR提出的新功能和概念. 在未來五年,必須監測沿著帶和道路的發展。中國必須取得一些初步的成功,以激勵“一帶一路”成員充分參與這一倡議的信任。因此,我們必須繼續更新“一帶一路”的“功能記分卡”,以跟踪中國的主動行動是否已經履行了它所要做的功能。雖然宣布即將到來的“新古典主義區域主義”是暫時性的,本論文為我們提供了一個基礎,並進一步完善新的區域間主義範式的特點的起點。
For quite some time now interregionalism scholars have been hinting that the paradigm of ‘New Regionalism’ is losing its relevance in explaining today’s interregional environment. Therefore, researchers believe that a new interregional paradigm is upon us. Enter China’s One Belt One Road, an initiative whose scope and multidimensionality go well beyond any past or current interregional agreement before it. \nThis study seeks to examine the One Belt, One Road initiative to discover whether or not it has the makings of an interregional paradigm shift that will shape the future of interregional dialogues. In order to do so, this paper reviews the literature on Jurgen Ruland’s theory of the Functions of Interregionalism and Heiner Hanggi’s Interregional Typologies to construct a comparative analysis. Using Ruland’s functions – Balancing, Institution-Building, Rationalizing, Agenda-Setting, Collective-Identity Building, and Promotion of Development – as the variables, OBOR is compared with APEC and the TPP, two megaregions that are both archetypal examples of ‘New Regionalism’. This paper finds that OBOR does indeed possess distinctive functional qualities that set it apart from the cases of New Regionalism. However, it must be acknowledged that having the ingredients of a paradigm shift does not guarantee that one will take place. Other countries must ‘buy in’ to the new approaches that OBOR presents to interregional integration, which is far from a sure thing. Therefore, this paper also assesses several of the challenges that OBOR is currently facing with its early projects. If China fails to overcome the early political, economic, technical, environmental, and security challenges, it is unlikely that future interregional agreements will embrace the new functional concepts of OBOR. \nA major limit to this research is that it is still too early tell if the interregional dialogues will adopt the new functions and concepts set forth by OBOR. Over the next five years it will be essential to monitor the developments along the belt and road. It is imperative that China achieves some early success in order to galvanize the trust of OBOR members to fully engage in the initiative. Therefore, we must continue to update the OBOR’s ‘functional scorecard’ to keep track of whether China’s initiative has fulfilled the functions that it set out to do. While the proclamation of an impending ‘New Classical Regionalism’ is tentative, this thesis provides us with a starting point to build upon and further refine the characteristics of a new interregionalism paradigm.
參考文獻: Books\n\nAcharya, Amitav. “Theoretical Perspectives of International Relations in Asia.” in David Schambaugh and Michael Yahuda eds., International Relations of Asia, 57-82, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2008.\n\nBaert, Francis., Scaramagli, Tiziana., and Soderbaum, Fredrik. Intersecting Interregionalism. Regions Global Governance and the EU. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.\n\nBuszynski, Leszek. Asia Pacific security: Values and identity. London: Routledge, 2004.\n\nDoidge, Matthew. The European Union and Interregionalism: Patterns of Engagement, Farnham: Ashgate, 2011.\n\nFrost, Ellen. Asia`s New Regionalism. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2008. \n\nGriffiths, Martin. Encyclopedia of International Relations and Global Politics, London: Routledge, 2013.\n\nHänggi, Heiner. “Interregionalism as a Multifaceted Phenomenon: In Search of a Typology.” In Heiner Hänggi, Ralf Roloff, and Jurgen Rüland eds., Interregionalism and International Relations, 31-62. London: Routledge, 2006.\n\nHänggi, Heiner. “Regionalism through Interregionalism: East Asia and ASEM.” In Liu Fu-Kuo and Philippe Régnier eds., Regionalism in East Asia: Paradigm Shifting?, 197-219. London: Routledge, 2000.\n\nHeseltine, Colin. “Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation: Institutional Evolution and the Factors Driving Ongoing Change.” In Michael Wesley ed., The Regional Organizations of the Asia-Pacific, 60-75. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003.\n\nHettne, Bjorn. “Regional Actorship: a comparative approach to interregionalism.” In Francis Baert, Tiziana Scaramagli, and Fredrik Soderbaum eds., Intersecting Interregionalism: Regions Global Governance and the EU, 55-70. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.\n\nHeywood, Andrew. Key Concepts in Politics and International Relations, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian, 2015.\n\nHiggott, Richard. “Towards a Conceptual Understanding of Regionalism: A historical perspective.” In Zainal Mantah, Lluis Ferrer, Narcis Serra and Jaume Gine eds., Regionalism in Asia and Europe and Implications for Asia-Europe Relations, 1-23. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona: Asia-Europe Foundation: 2002.\n\nLombaerde, Philippe., Söderbaum, Fredrik., and Wunderlich Jens-Uwe. “Interregionalism.” In Knud Erik Jørgensen, Åsne Kalland Aarstad, Edith Drieskens, Katie Laatikainen, and Ben Tonra eds., The SAGE handbook of European foreign policy, 750-765. London (UK): Sage, 2015. \n\nMaull, Hans., and Okfen, Nuria. “Comparing Interregionalism: The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and the Asia-Europe Meeting.” In Heiner Hanggi, Ralf Roloff, and Jurgen Ruland eds., Interregionalism and International Relations, 217-233. London: Routledge, 2006.\n\nRavenhill, John. “Regionalism and state capacity in East Asia.” In Ian Marsh ed., Democratisation, Governance and Regionalism in East and Southeast Asia: A Comparative Study, 177-203. London: Routledge, 2006.\n\nRuland, Jurgen. “Asian Regionalism Five Years after the 1997/98 Financial Crisis: A Case of ‘Cooperative Realism’?” In Christopher Dent ed., Asia-Pacific Economic and Security Cooperation: New Regional Agendas, 53-71. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.\n\nRüland, Jurgen. “Interregionalism: an unfinished agenda.” In Heinner Hänggi, Ralf Roloff, and Jurgen Rüland eds., Interregionalism and International Relations, 295-313. London: Routledge, 2006.\n\nTelo, Mario. European Union and New Regionalism: Regional actors and global governance in a post-hegemonic era. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.\n\nTsardanidis, Charalambos. “Interregionalism: a comparative analysis of ASEM and FEALAC.” In Jorn Dosch and Olaf Jacob eds., Asia and Latin America: Political, Economic, and Multilateral Relations, 218-237. London: Routledge, 2010.\n\nYamazawa, Ippei. APEC: New Agenda in Its Third Decade. Singapore: ISEAS, 2012.\n\n\nJournal Articles\n\nAcharya, Amitav. “Comparative Regionalism: A Field Whose Time has Come?” The International Spectator 47, no. 1 (2012): 3-15.\n\nAggarwal, Vinod. “Mega-FTAs and the Trade-Security Nexus: The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP),” Asia Pacific Issues no. 123, (2016), 1-8.\n\nChen, Zhimen. “NATO, APEC, and ASEM: triadic interregionalism and global order.” Asia Europe Journal 47, no. 3, (2005): 361-378. \n\nCheng, Tun-Jen. “APEC and the Asian financial crisis: A lost opportunity for institution-building.” Asian Journal of Political Science 6, no. 2 (1998): 21-32.\n\nDent, Christopher. “From inter-regionalism to trans-regionalism? Future challenges for ASEM.” Asia Europe Journal 1, (2003): 223-235.\n\nElsig, Manfred. “The EU’s Choice of Regulatory Venues for Trade Negotiations: A Tale of Agency Power?” Journal of Common Market Studies 45, no. 4 (2007): 927-948.\n\nFallon, Theresa. “The New Silk Road: Xi Jinping’s Grand Strategy for Eurasia,” American Foreign Policy Interests 37, no 3, (2015): 140-147. \n\nHaggai, Kanenga. “One Belt One Road Strategy in China and Economic Development in the Concerning Countries.” World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 2, no. 1, (2016): 10-14.\n\nHettne, Bjorn. “Beyond the New Regionalism.” New Political Economy 10, no. 4, (2005), 543-571.\n\nHsieh, Pasha. “Reassessing APEC’s Role as a Trans-Regional Economic Architecture: Legal and Policy Dimensions.” Journal of International Economic Law 16, no. 1, (2013): 119-158.\n\nHu, Weixing. “Building Asia-Pacific Regional Institution: the Role of APEC,” Social and Behavioral Sciences 77, no. 22, (2013): 65-73.\n\nKolpakova, Tatyana., Kuchinskaya, Tatiana. “China`s "New Regionalism" as a Mechanism to Strengthen the Influence of China in the Global Integration Processes: An Example of Eurasian Economic Union.” International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 5, no. 2 (2015): 109-115.\n\nLow, Linda. “Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC): The First Decade/ Trade Liberalization and APEC.” Journal of Southeast Asian Economies 22, no. 2 (2005): 51.\n\nMilner, Anthony. “Analyzing Asian regionalism: what is an `architectural perspective`?” Australian Journal of International Affairs 65, no. 1 (2011): 109-126.\n\nNorkevicius, Mindaugas. “Regional Institutionalism in Southeast Asia,” Societal Studies 6, no. 1 (2014): 99-113.\n\nSzczudlik, Justyna. “Regionalism in East Asia: A bumpy road to Asian integration,” PISM Policy Papers 64, no. 16 (2013): 1-7.\n\nZhang, Yunling. “China and its neighbourhood: transformation, challenges and grand strategy,” International Affairs 92, no. 4 (2016): 835-848.\n\nZhang, Feng. “China as a Global Force,” Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 3, no. 1 (2016): 120-128.\n\n\nOfficial Documents\n\n“APEC Economic and Technical Cooperation.” APEC Publications, no. 213-SE-05.2, 3. June 16, 2016. \n\n“APEC Statement on the Uruguay Round.” 1992 Ministerial Meeting Papers, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. September 10, 1992.\n\n “APEC Project Funding Sources.” APEC Project Session 2, 2016. http://www.apec.org/Projects/Funding-Sources.aspx.\n\n“Learning From Experience: The First APIAN Policy Report,” Singapore APEC Study Center, (2000), 1-37. http://www.apec.org.au/docs/APIAN_text.pdf.\n\n“Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Corridor Performance Measurement and Monitoring: A Forward-Looking Retrospective.” Asian Development Bank. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO, (2014). http://hdl.handle.net/11540/4085.\n\n“AIIB`s Board of Directors Approves $509 M Financing for its First 4 Projects: Power, Transport and Urban: Investments span South, Southeast and Central Asia,” Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, June 24, 2016.\n\n “Articles of Agreement,” Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, Signed on June 29, 2015, Retrieved April 28, 2016, from http://www.aiib.org/uploadfile/2015/0814/20150814022158430.pdf\n\nCentral Asia Regional Economic Cooperation, “Corridor Performance Measurement & Monitoring,” Asian Development Bank, Annual Report 2014.\n\nNew Zealand House of Representatives, “International Treaty Examination of the AIIB, Articles of Agreement, and Final Text,” Report of the Foreign Affairs, Defense and Trade Committee, August 21, 2015.\n\nTrans-Pacific Partnership, “Chapter 21 Cooperation and Capacity Building,” Medium, November 15, 2015. https://medium.com/the-trans-pacific-partnership/cooperation-and-capacity-building-2ff9e401cd6d#.ayort983e.\n\nTrans-Pacific Partnership, “Chapter 23 Development,” Medium, November 15, 2015. https://medium.com/the-trans-pacific-partnership/development-a9869aa451c4#.co5kmpdfa.\n\nTrans-Pacific Partnership, “Chapter 27: Administrative and Institutional Provisions,” Medium, November 15, 2015. https://medium.com/the-trans-pacific-partnership/administrative-and-institutional-provisions-7e408703dcbf#.2lkkd6jcb.\n\nThe White House, Office of the Press Secretary. Statement by the President on the Trans-Pacific Partnership [Press release]. The White House, October 05, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/10/05/statement-president-trans-pacific-partnership.\n\nNews/Online Reports\n\nAhmad, Imtiaz. “Pak-China economic corridor problems over disputed Kashmir region.” Hindustan Times, January 11, 2016, http://www.hindustantimes.com/world/pak-china-economic-corridor-problems-over-disputed-kashmir-region/story-L7K0lbxpb6bsRFG9mulN7H.html.\n\nBermingham, Finbarr. “ADB will reform lending to assist poorer members.” Global Trade Review, May 06, 2015. http://www.gtreview.com/news/asia/adb-will-reform-lending-to-assist-poorer-members/.\n\nBlanchard, Ben. “China-backed bank says more than 30 countries await membership.” Reuters, March 25, 2016. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-aiib-idUSKCN0WR149.\n\nBlanchard, Ben. “Hungary first European country to sign up for China Silk Road plan.” Reuters, June 6, 2015. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-hungary-idUSKBN0ON01W20150607.\n\nBoone, Jon. “Chinese engineer and driver injured in Karachi separatist bombing.” The Guardian, May 30, 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/30/chinese-worker-driver-injured-karachi-bombing-claimed-separatists.\n\nCampanella, Miriam. “The AIIB will help fill the infrastructure finance gap.” East Asia Forum, April 9, 2015. http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2015/04/09/the-aiib-will-fill-the-infrastructurefinance-gap/.\n\nCampbell, Charlie. “China’s Xi Jinping Talks Up ‘One Belt, One Road’ as Keynote Project Fizzles.” Time, August 18, 2016. http://time.com/4457044/xi-jinping-one-belt-one-road-obor-south-china-sea-economic-trade-business/.\n\nChaichalearmmonkol, Nopparat. “Thailand Calls Off Deal for China to Finance Railway.” The Wall Street Journal, March 25, 2016. http://www.wsj.com/articles/thailand-calls-off-deal-for-china-to-finance-railway-1458899503.\n\nCheung, David. “One Belt, One Road: Collaboration Begins on the New Silk Road Trade Route,” Aconex, May 21, 2016. https://www.aconex.com/blogs/2016/05/one-belt-one-road-silk-road-trade-summit.html.\n\nChowdhurry, Debasish. “Pakistan happy to aid in China`s quest for land route to the west; India, not so much,” South China Morning Post, November 19, 2013. http://www.scmp.com/business/commodities/article/1359761/pakistan-happy-aid-chinas-quest-land-route-west-india-not-so.\n\nDollar, David. “China’s rise as a regional and global power: The AIIB and the ‘one belt, one road.” The Brookings Institution, July 15, 2015. https://www.brookings.edu/research/chinas-rise-as-a-regional-and-global-power-the-aiib-and-the-one-belt-one-road/.\n\nDomínguez, Gabriel. “How China is reshaping global development finance.” Deutsche Wells, November 19, 2014. http://www.dw.com/en/how-china-is-reshaping-global-development-finance/a-18072984.\n\nFerguson, Ian., McMinimy, Mark., Williams, Brock. “The Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) Negotiations and Issues for Congress.” Congressional Research Service, March 20, 2015. https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42694.pdf. \n\nHong, Brendon. “China’s Plans to Railroad the West (Literally).” The Daily Beast, July 13, 2016. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/07/13/china-s-plans-to-railroad-the-west-literally.html.\n\nHuang, Cary., and Chen, Andrea. “China to have 30 per cent stake, veto power under AIIB deal,” South China Morning Post, June 30, 2015. http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/1829342/aiib-deal-seals-chinas-big-stake-new-lender.\n\nInstitute for Energy Research, “China: World`s Largest Energy Consumer and Greenhouse Gas Emitter,” March 20, 2015. http://instituteforenergyresearch.org/analysis/china-worlds-largest-energy-consumer-and-greenhouse-gas-emitter/.\n\n“IRU - Euro-Asian road transport links - Reopening the Silk Road.” International Road Transport Union. http://www.iru-nelti.org/index/en_activities_index.\n\n“Jakarta-Bandung high-speed rail project stalls.” Nikkei Asian Review, July 28, 2016. http://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/International-Relations/Jakarta-Bandung-high-speed-rail-project-stalls?page=1.\n\nJohnson, Christopher. “President Xi Jinping’s ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative: A Practical Assessment of the Chinese Communist Party’s Roadmap for China’s Global Resurgence.” A Report of the CSIS Freeman Chair in China Studies, CSIS, March 28, 2016. https://www.csis.org/analysis/president-xi-jinping%E2%80%99s-belt-and-road-initiative. \n\nKhan, Sattar. "Gwadar – Pakistan`s impoverished colony or an economic hub?” Deutche Welle, August 14, 2016. http://www.dw.com/en/gwadar-pakistans-impoverished-colony-or-an-economic-hub/a-19185999.\n\nKurniawati, Dewi. "Indonesia’s Complicated Relations with China.” Asia Sentinal, August 5, 2016. http://www.asiasentinel.com/politics/indonesia-china-complicated-relations/.\n\nLeverett, Flynt., Leverett, Hilary., and Wu Bingbing. “China Looks West: What Is at Stake in Beijing’s ‘New Silk Road’ Project.” The World Financial Review, January 25, 2015. http://www.worldfinancialreview.com/?p=3388\n\nLi, Shangjing. “One Belt, One Road, Many Risks.” Asian Legal Business, December 18, 2015. http://www.legalbusinessonline.com/features/one-belt-one-road-many-risks/71290. \n\nLiang, Linlin. “China vows win-win cooperation between OBOR, Juncker plan.” Xinhua, February 18, 2016. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2016-02/18/c_135107691.htm.\n\nLin, Justin. “Infrastructure`s class of its own.” Economia, April 30, 2014. http://economia.icaew.com/opinion/april-2014/infrastructures-class-of-its-own.\n\nLiu, Fu-Kuo, “Asian Regionalism, Strategic Evolution, and U.S. Policy in Asia: Some Prospects for Cross-Strait Development.” Brookings Institution, June 11, 2008. https://www.brookings.edu/research/asian-regionalism-strategic-evolution-and-u-s-policy-in-asia-some-prospects-for-cross-strait-development/.\n\nMooney, Turloch. Southeast Asian infrastructure benefits heavily from One Belt One Road.” Fairplay, June 07, 2016. http://fairplay.ihs.com/ports/article/4269726/southeast-asian-infrastructure-benefits-heavily-from-one-belt-one-road.\n\nMorris, Scott. “Doing the Math on AIIB Governance.” Center For Global Development, July 02, 2015. http://www.cgdev.org/blog/doing-math-aiib-governance.\n\nMulakala, Anthea. “New Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank Breaks Ground: What You Need to Know.” The Asia Foundation, January 27, 2016. http://asiafoundation.org/2016/01/27/new-asian-infrastructure-and-investment-bank-breaks-ground-what-you-need-to-know/.\n\nMullins, Jeremy. “Imagining Dawei,” Myanmar Times, October 2, 2015. http://www.mmtimes.com/index.php/business/16802-imagining-dawei.html.\n\nMunoz, Begona. “It costs twice as much to export olive oil from Spain using China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ railway.” Quartz, May 18, 2016. http://qz.com/686816/the-view-from-spain-chinas-one-belt-one-road-railway-is-an-unnecessary-folly/.\n\n“One Belt, One Road - A role for UK companies in developing China’s new initiative,” China-Britain Council, October 15, 2015. http://china-trade-research.hktdc.com/business-news/article/One-Belt-One-Road/One-Belt-One-Road-A-role-for-UK-companies-in-developing-China-s-new-initiative/obor/en/1/1X000000/1X0A42O6.htm\n\nPaal, Douglas. “Why Congress Must Pass the TPP.” Carnegie Endowment For National Peace, June 17, 2015. http://carnegieendowment.org/2015/06/17/why-congress-must-pass-tpp/iaoh.\n\nPacific Basin Economic Council, “Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation.” Business Matters. http://www.businessmatters.info/apec.\n\nPhillips, Matthew. “The world has too many ships.” Quartz, March 17, 2016. http://qz.com/641855/the-world-has-too-many-ships/. \n\nPrimanita, Arientha.“Govt to tighten supervisions amid arrest of Chinese nationals.” The Jakarta Post, April 28, 2016. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/04/28/govt-to-tighten-supervisions-amid-arrest-of-chinese-nationals.html.\n\nRabena, Aaron. “China`s Counter-Pivot Response.” International Policy Digest, May 11, 2015. http://intpolicydigest.org/2015/05/11/china-s-counter-pivot-response/\n\nRajamoorthy, T. “The Origins and Evolution of the Trans-Pacific Partnership.” Third World Resurgence, July 1, 2013. http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-origins-and-evolution-of-the-trans-pacific-partnership-tpp/5357495.\n\n“Report: Reducing Supply Chain Barriers Could Increase Global GDP Up To 6 Times More Than Removing All Import Tariffs.” World Bank. January 22, 2013. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2013/01/23/report-reducing-supply-chain-barriers-could-increase-global-gdp-6-times-more-than-removing-all-import-tariffs.\n\nSantos, Lean. “AIIB nears completion but China`s `global leader` status remains in question.” Devex, June 30, 2015. http://www.tralac.org/news/article/7637-aiib-nears-completion-but-china-s-global-leader-status-remains-in-question.html\n\nSantos, Lean. “What to expect at the AIIB Annual Meeting in Beijing.” Devex, June 23, 2016. https://www.devex.com/news/what-to-expect-at-the-aiib-annual-meeting-in-beijing-88334.\n\nShahid, Usman. "Balochistan: The Troubled Heart of the CPEC.” The Diplomat, August 23, 2016. http://thediplomat.com/2016/08/balochistan-the-troubled-heart-of-the-cpec/.\n\n“Song for `One Belt, One Road` initiative promoted globally in 2016,” China.org, September 2, 2016, http://www.china.org.cn/arts/2016-09/02/content_39219376.htm.\n\nSusanty, Farida. “RI’s first high-speed railway may be costlier on design change.” The Jakarta Post, July 11, 2016. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/07/11/ri-s-first-high-speed-railway-may-be-costlier-design-change.html.\n\nSun, Yun. “Has China Lost Myanmar?” Foreign Policy, January 15, 2013. http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/01/15/has-china-lost-myanmar/.\n\nTiezzi, Shannon. “Chinese Company Wins Contract for Deep Sea Port in Myanmar.” The Diplomat, January 1, 2016. http://thediplomat.com/2016/01/chinese-company-wins-contract-for-deep-sea-port-in-myanmar/.\n\nTiezzi, Shannon. “The New Silk Road: China`s Marshall Plan?” The Diplomat, November 06, 2014. http://thediplomat.com/2014/11/the-new-silk-road-chinas-marshall-plan/.\n\nWang, Liwei. “The real reason behind China`s Silk Road Fund.” MarketWatch, November 10, 2014. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-real-reason-behind-chinas-silk-road-fund-2014-11-10.\n\nWang, Yan. “China`s `One belt, one road` vision to strengthen co-operation.” Central Banking, June 09, 2015. http://www.centralbanking.com/central-banking/feature/2411924/chinas-one-belt-one-road-vision-to-strengthen-co-operation#.\n\nWheeler, Simone. “CLSA and CITIC Securities assess One Belt One Road Implications for domestic and regional growth,” Credit Lyonnais Securities Asia, September 15, 2015.https://www.clsa.com/about-clsa/media-centre/2015-media-releases/clsa-and-citic-securities-assess-one-belt-one-road-implications-for-domestic-and-regional-growth.php.\n\nZhang, Yuzhe, “With New Funds, China Hits a Silk Road.” Caixin Online, December 3, 2014. http://english.caixin.com/2014-12-03/100758419.html.\n\nZhu, John. “Xi’s New Silk Road Plan.” HSBC Global Research, November 18, 2014. http://www.hktdc.com/resources/MI_Portal/Article/obor/2016/01/472885/1452136717914_XisNewSilkRoadPlan.PDF.\n\n\nWorking/Presentation Papers\n\nAggarwal, Vinod., Morrison, Charles., “APEC as an International Institution.” Working Paper presented at the Twenty-fifth Meeting of PAFTAD, Osaka, 1999. https://basc.berkeley.edu/pdf/articles/APEC%20as%20an%20International%20Institution%20with%20Morrison.pdf\n\nAkashi, Yoji. “An ASEAN Perspective on APEC.” The Helen Kelogg Institute for International Studies, Working Paper 240, 1997.\n\nArezki, Rabah., Bolton, Patrick., Peters, Sanjay., Samama, Frederic., Stiglitz, Joseph. “From Global Savings Glut to Financing Infrastructure; The Advent of Investment Platforms." International Monetary Fund, Working Papers 16/18, 2016.\n\nCallens, Stephane., Cherfi, Sofiane. “The Intensive Exchange Flows About a New Regionalism: OBOR.” Paper presented at the 9th International Management Conference, Bucharest, Romania, 2015. \n\nChhibber, Ajay. “China’s One Belt One Road Strategy: The New Financial Institutions and India’s Options The New Financial Institutions and India’s Options.” National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, Working Paper No. 15, 2015.\n\nFawcett, Louise. “The History and Concept of Regionalism.” European Society of International Law (ESIL) Conference Paper Series, no. 4 (2012).\n\nGilson, Julie. “Inter-Regionalism.” Paper presented at the ECPR Standing Group on International Relations. University of Turbin, 2007.\n\nHänggi, Heiner. “Interregionalism: empirical and theoretical perspectives.” Paper prepared for the workshop Dollars, Democracy and Trade: External Influence on Economic Integration in the Americas, May 18, 2000.\n\nHu, Richard. “Building Asia Pacific Regional Architecture: the challenges of hybrid regionalism.” Brookings Institution, Working Papers by CEAP Visiting Fellows, July 14, 2009. https://www.brookings.edu/research/building-asia-pacific-regional-architecture-the-challenge-of-hybrid-regionalism/.\n\nKnepper, Mathais. “The Interregional Relations Between the European Union and the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR).” Wilhems-Universitat, Munster, 2012.\n\nLai, Suet Yi. “Inter-regionalism of nation-states: Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) as a case-study”, (master`s thesis, University of Canterbury, 2012). http://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10092/9422/thesis_fulltext.pdf?sequence=3.\n\nLi, Lydia. “Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: An Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges.” Keck Center for International & Strategic Studies, Fellowship Papers, (2012). https://www.cmc.edu/sites/default/files/keck/student/LiY%20Fellowship%20Paper.pdf.\n\nMiura, Naohito. “East Asian Regionalism: An Unprecedented Window of Opportunity,” (master’s thesis, Pomona College, 2011).\n\nNovikov, Dmitry., and Pyatachkova, Anastasia. “Sino-American Rivalry in the Context of Asia-Pacific Economic Regionalism,” National Research University Higher School of Economics, no. 9, (2014), 1-22.\n\nOgita, Tatsushi. “Origins of Contrasting Views of APEC.” Institute of Developing Economies Working Paper Series 96/97, no. 5, 1997.\n\nSoderbaum, Frederik. “Early, Old, New and Comparative Regionlism: The Scholarly Development of the Field.” KFG Working Paper Series, No. 64, 2015.\n\nSpindler, Manuela. “New Regionalism and the Construction of Global Order.” Center for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization Working Paper No. 93/02, March 2002.\n\nValle, Valeria. “Interregionalism: A Case Study of the European Union and Mercosur.” Global Applied Research Network, Working Paper No: 51/08, (2008). http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/researchcentres/csgr/garnet/workingpapers/5108.pdf.\n\nVenkata, Krishnan. “Quasi- Interregionalism: A Case Study of EU - India Relations.” Paper presented in Young Researchers’ Conference, Jawaharlal Nehru University, (2012). http://www.academia.edu/4731354/Quasi-Interregionalism_A_Case_Study_of_EU_-India_Relations_Introduction.\n\nYe, Shulan. “China’s Regional Policy in East Asia and Its Characteristics.” China Policy Institute, Discussion Paper 66, (2010).\n\nZe, Shi. “One Road & One Belt” & New Thinking With Regard to Concepts and Practice.” 30th Anniversary Conference of the Schiller Institute. Lecture conducted from Frankfurt, Germany, October 18, 2014.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
103926033
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103926033
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
603301.pdf2.12 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
603302.pdf229.82 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
603303.pdf615.37 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.