Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Estimating the Latent Trait From Likert-Type Data: A Comparison of Factor Analysis, Item Response Theory, and Multidimensional Scaling
Authors: 詹志禹
Chan, Jason C.
Contributors: 教育系
Date: 1996-05
Issue Date: 2016-12-09 11:19:02 (UTC+8)
Abstract: 本研究比較三個統計模式從李克特式(Likert-Type)資料中估計單向度潛在特質的能力,這三個模式是「植基於多序類相關(polychoric correlations)的因素分析」(FA-PL),「試題反應理論中的漸變反應模式」(IRT-GRM),以及「加權多維展開法」(WMDU)。一般常用的方法(SSI)--分派連續性整數給李克特式量尺中的一個反應類別(如「非常同意」),再將每一題得分加總--則做為比較的基準線。本研究為電腦模擬研究,操弄了樣本大小、測驗長度,以及試題反應分配的偏態程度等三個自變項,依變項則為回復潛在特質的真傎的正確性,結果發現:IRT-GRM表現得最好,最不受偏態的影響;FA-PL只有在試題反應分配為常態時,才能表現與IRT-GRM一樣好,而在試題反應分配為高度偏態時,甚至表現得比SSI差;最後,WMDU只有在試題反應分配為常態或輕微偏態時,才能表現得與SSI一樣好。本文也討論了這些發現對模式選擇的涵意。
Three statistical models were compared with one another in terms of the ability to recover a unidimensional latent trait from Likert-type data. They are factor analysis based on polychoric correlations (FA-PL), the graded response model in item response theory (IRT-GRM), and the weighted multidimensional unfolding (WMDU). The common procedure of summing up successive integers assigned to response categories (SSI) served as the base- line procedure. Sample size, test length, and skewness of item response distributions were manipulated in this simulation study. Generally speaking, IRT-GRM performed the best and was most robust against skewness. FA-PL were competitive with IRT-GRM only when item responses were normally distributed. It performed even worse than did SSI when item responses were highly skewed.WMDU might be a rival alternative to SSI only when item responses were normally distributed or moderately skewed and sample size was large for MDU models (e.g.. N=100).
Relation: 國立政治大學學報,72 part 1 ,299-320
Data Type: article
Appears in Collections:[第72期] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
72-299-320.pdf1682KbAdobe PDF516View/Open

All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing