Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/106384| 題名: | 台灣群眾資助新聞產製過程之研究 The production process of crowdfunding journalism in Taiwan |
作者: | 陳品君 Chen, Pin Chun |
貢獻者: | 劉昌德 Liu, Chang De 陳品君 Chen, Pin Chun |
關鍵詞: | 群眾資助新聞 參與式新聞 參與式新聞 新聞產製 新聞消費 Crowdfunding journalism Participatory journalism Entrepreneurial journalism News production News consumption |
日期: | 2016 | 上傳時間: | 8-Feb-2017 | 摘要: | 本研究透過內容分析法和深度訪談法探討台灣新聞集資發展的發展概況，包含新聞內容產製者如何執行集資計畫，以及對新聞業和記者工作型態有何影響或變化。\n\n研究結果顯示，在所有新聞集資提案中，提案數量最多的發起方類別是公民記者／團體，但他們大多自行摸索如何產製新聞，需要更多資源和專業後援以提升作品質量。傳播科系學生則透過新聞集資計畫實踐所學，新聞集資提案如同一小型創業，當前創業新聞學成為一股趨勢，未來學校教育除提供相關技能以及商業知識外，也應該引導學生探討專業倫理問題。傳統商業新聞媒體則是還沒將集資視為產製過程中的財物來源之一，尚未積極涉及新聞集資領域。\n\n五年來的新聞集資圖像包含因社會運動熱潮推向高峰；另外至少有三成提案的發起方甘冒於更大的風險到國外取材；新聞集資也是長期追蹤議題、報導主流媒體忽視議題的可行管道。這些特點使得整體新聞集資題材更加多樣。\n\n深度訪談八位新聞集資計畫的提案者。分析結果顯示，提案者寧願身兼多職或多工擁抱產製中的種種限制和不確定性，圖的是報導自由度以及更多時間追蹤議題並與受訪對象互動。提案者的產製運作情形因集資平台營運模式的不同有所差異。國內目前有兩家新聞集資平台：weReport、SOS。前者採非營利型、一次性集資，定位偏向提供「種子資金」育成入門報導者；後者採用營利型、持續訂閱集資，希望成為寫作者固定營收源，運作策略上強調個人品牌以及內容獨特性。\n\n關於提案方和資助方之間的互動，新聞產製過程中的主導權多落在提案者或報導者手中，社群參與情形如啦啦隊的支持角色，積極的新聞協作功能不易實現。至於平台方和資助者的關係，雖然平台方在集資期間對於提案者的資訊揭露下了不少功夫，可惜多數平台並不追蹤計畫後續執行情形，僅由提案方自發維持。\n\n本研究建議群眾資助新聞的轉型應朝向長期發展。除了關注社群形成以及產製過程經驗的累積，不可忽視的著力點還有「將新聞需求人口轉變為消費人口」。而無論新聞集資如何演變，至少得保持過程中的開放與透明特性。 This study based on content analysis and in-depth interviews, explored the development of crowdfunding journalism, including how news content producers implement crowdfunding projects and how this emerging model influences or changes journalism and journalists’ work.\n\nThe results revealed that citizen journalists constitute the largest proportion of crowdfunders of crowdfunding journalism projects. Citizen journalists continually explore news production independently and require more resources and professional support to raise the quality of their work. Communication students apply what they have learned by pitching projects, just like a micro start-up. Currently, entrepreneurial journalism has become a trend. In addition to providing skill training and teaching business knowledge, schools should lead students to discuss professional ethics issues. Traditional news media do not consider crowdfunding as a financing source and are not actively involved in this field.\n\nOver the past 5 years, crowdfunding journalism has peaked because of social movements. Crowdfunders of at least 30% of project seem willing to endure risky conditions abroad to gather news. Crowdfunding journalism is also an option for reporters who would like to follow a particular issue for a long time. All of these features increase the diversity of the overall subjects of crowdfunding news.\n\nIn-depth interviews were conducted with eight crowdfunders. The crowdfunders revealed that they would rather take on multiple roles, undertake multiple tasks or stand the various constraints and uncertainty during the news production, in order to have the freedom of the press and much more time to track the issues and interact with their interviewees. Crowdfunders’ production practices varied from diverse business models of crowdfunding platforms. Two crowdfunding journalism platforms are available in Taiwan: weReport and SOS. weReport adopts a nonprofit, one-time funding model, and prefers to provide “seed money” for new entrants. SOS adopts a profit-based subscription model in the hope of providing writers stable funding; the business strategy of SOS emphasizes individual brands and content uniqueness.\n\nCrowdfunders or reporters usually take the initiative in news production, compared with donors. Community participation plays a supporting role, but active news collaboration from communities is not easy to achieve. Regarding the relationship between platforms and donors, although platforms endeavor to maintain information transparency, most platforms do not follow up, depending on crowdfunders` self-discipline.\n\nThis study suggests that the transformation of crowdfunding journalism will move toward long-term development. In addition to focusing on community building and accumulating news production experience, the issue of “turning the news-demanding population into a news-consuming population” must not be overlooked. However, regardless of how crowdfunding journalism develops, the process should remain open and transparent. |
參考文獻: | flyingV（無日期）。〈flyingV簡介〉。上網日期：2015年11月4日，取自https://www.flyingv.cc/faq/flyingV\nFuudai（無日期）。〈新手引導〉。上網日期：2015年12月2日，取自http://www.fuudai.com/help.php\nPeoPo（2007）。〈關於PeoPo〉。上網日期：2015年10月19日，取自http://www.peopo.org/events/about/\nSOS新聞募資平台（2015a）。〈自己的記者自己找 ｜ 八仙樂園塵爆調查報導〉。上網日期：2015年10月29日，取自http://findreporters.sosreader.com/\nSOS新聞募資平台（2015b）。〈2016總統大選報導募資大調查〉。上網日期：2015年10月29日，取自http://sosreader.com/president/\nwenz 問紙（2015）。〈年輕人懂什麼？問紙：打破世代資訊隔閡的夾報實驗〉。上網日期：2015年10月29日，取自http://www.flyingv.cc/project/4676\nweReport（無日期）。〈關於「weReport 調查報導公眾委製平台」〉。上網日期：2016年9月25日，取自https://annual-report.crowdwatch.tw/2015\nweReport（無日期a）。〈weReport 調查報導公眾委製平台〉。上網日期：2015年10月28日，取自http://we-report.org/\nweReport（無日期b）。〈如何發起提案〉。上網日期：2015年10月18日，取自http://we-report.org/page/100\nweReport（無日期c）。〈關於「優質新聞發展協會」〉。上網日期：2016年9月25日，取自http://we-report.org/page/99\n天下雜誌（2015）。〈林弘全：群眾募資，就是「標會 2.0」〉。上網日期：2015年11月9日，取自http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5069495\n台灣創用CC計畫（無日期）。〈創用CC授權條款〉。上網日期：2016年4月10日，取自http://creativecommons.tw/license\n何旭初（2007）。〈市場導向新聞學之思維與運作：《蘋果日報》個案分析〉。《中華傳播學刊》，11：243-273。\n貝殼放大（2015）。〈台灣群眾集資報告：2011-2015回顧 & 2016 趨勢分析〉。上網日期：2016年9月5日，取自https://annual-report.crowdwatch.tw/2015\n周文茵（2010）。〈微型投資自營模式：以Spot.Us新聞報導媒合網站為例〉。上網日期：2015年10月15日，取自http://creativecommons.tw/blog/20100414\n周文茵（無日期）。〈媒體近用與公眾授權〉。上網日期：2015年11月4日，取自http://creativecommons.tw/in-depth/1021\n林麗雲（2012）。〈台灣「公眾委製新聞」傳布之初探：以 weReport 為例〉，胡元輝（編），《公眾委製新聞的時代來臨──weReport 調查報導平台的意義與展望》，頁 27-46。台北：優質新聞發展協會。\n邵慶平（2013）。〈文創產業籌資與群眾集資〉，《月旦法學教室》，123，77-84。\n施尚文（2013）。《網路集資網站發展策略─以Kickstarter、FlyingV和嘖嘖網為例》。臺灣大學國際企業學研究所學位論文。\n科技濃湯（2014）。〈[網二] 20140114 群眾募資時代的公益勸募？〉。上網日期：2015年10月13日，取自https://techsoup-taiwan.org.tw/node/4640\n胡元輝（2012a）。〈人人都可以重建新聞業──weReport在台灣媒改運動中的定位與挑戰〉，《司法改革》，89：50-53。\n胡元輝（2012b）。〈群眾資助新聞業：從資訊協作到經濟協作的公民參與〉，胡元輝（編），《公眾委製新聞的時代來臨──weReport 調查報導網站的意義與展望》，頁 77-116。台北：優質新聞發展協會。\n胡元輝（2012c）。〈網路再造調查報導新契機？──美國新興非營利新聞組織經營模式的探討〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，2(2)：67-99。 \n胡元輝（2012d）。〈新聞作為一種對話─台灣發展非營利性「協作新聞」之經驗與挑戰〉，《新聞學研究》，112：31-76。\n胡元輝（2014）。〈《Spot.us》宣布暫停接受提案與捐款〉。上網日期：2015年10月2日，取自http://we-report.org/news/9256\n胡元輝、羅世宏（2012）。〈開創優質新聞業的人人時代：weReport 的創設及其意義〉，胡元輝（編），《公眾委製新聞的時代來臨──weReport 調查報導平台的意義與展望》，頁 7-26。台北：優質新聞發展協會。\n胡元輝、羅世宏（2014）。〈”人人時代”的新聞突圍──weReport的創設及其意義〉，《南方傳媒研究》，41：64-70。\n張 磊譯（2004）。《市場新聞業：公民自行小心？》，北京：新華。（原書McManus, J. [1994]. Market-driven journalism: Let the citizen beware? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.）\n張卿卿、陶振超、杜素豪 （2014）。《台灣傳播調查資料庫第一期第三次調查計畫執行報告》（編號：NSC100-2420-H-004-049-SS3）。台北市：行政院國家科學委員會。\n張耀仁（2002）。〈市場導向新聞學研究---以台灣三家無線電視台晚間新聞娛樂新聞為例〉，《新聞學研究》，91：59-90。\n郭姵君（2010）。〈從組織雇員到獨立記者：三位新聞工作者的專業意理形塑與實踐〉。台灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n郭澤德（2014）。〈眾籌新聞：從“組織化”到“社會化”的新聞生產模式創新〉，《中國出版》，7：50-53。\n陳中小路、劉韻珊（2013）。〈「新聞眾籌」的中國實驗〉。上網日期：2015年10月16日，取自http://www.infzm.com/content/96452\n陳宜欣（2015）。〈新聞群眾募資平台的實踐：以weReport 為例〉。中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。\n陳順孝（2009）。〈台灣網路公民媒體的發展與挑戰〉，陳世敏 （編），《台灣傳媒的再解構》頁239-276。台北：巨流。\n陳順孝（2014）。〈記者獨立之路：臺灣獨立記者的維生策略與互助機制〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，4(2): 25-54。\n陶芳芳（1999）。《從政治控制到市場機制─台灣報業發行之變遷》。政治大學新聞學研究所碩士論文。\n創市際市場研究顧問股份有限公司（2015）。新聞資訊網站調查與台灣新聞資訊相關網站使用概況。上網日期：2016年9月20日，取自http://www.ixresearch.com/reports/%E5%89%B5%E5%B8%82%E9%9A%9B%E9%9B%99%E9%80%B1%E5%88%8A%E7%AC%AC%E5%9B%9B%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E6%9C%9F-20150615/\n曾慶香、王超慧（2014）。〈眾籌新聞：變革新聞生產的權力結構〉，《國際新聞界》，36(11): 81-92。\n馮建三（2015）。〈公共政策與（新）媒介財政〉，《傳播文化與政治》，1：101-141。\n馮國昌（2014）。〈【Law and Web 專欄】看門道、看熱鬧？群眾募資的法律觀察（上）〉。上網日期：2015年10月19日，取自https://www.newunion.tw/frontNewsDetails.do?id=133\n黃 超（2014）。〈新媒體時代新聞眾籌在中國的發展與對策〉，《互聯網天地》，7：27-33。\n新聞e論壇（2014）。《街頭守門人》。台北：衛城出版社。\n嘖 嘖（無日期）。〈常見問答〉。上網日期：2015年12月2日，取自https://www.zeczec.com/faq\n劉思揚（2015）。〈眾籌新聞在公共傳播中的呈現特徵與邊界〉，《青年記者》，9：64。\n黎家興（2015）。〈群眾募資平台如何管制？〉。上網日期：2016年3月18日，取自http://genestrate.org/?p=87\n戴定國（2005）。《新聞編輯與標題寫作》。台北：五南。\n顏向瑜（2015）。〈台灣群眾幕資平台發展現況〉。上網日期：2015年11月18日，取自http://mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/reports/reportdetail2.asp?sesd=51380003&docid=CDOC20150326001&doctype=RC&cate=&smode=1&countrypno=\n羅世宏（2012a）。〈台灣的優質新聞巴萊需要天使──從構想到實踐〉，《司法改革》，89：46-49。\n羅世宏（2012b）。〈打造公共新聞的價值與模式〉。《台大新聞論壇》，11：99-114。\n蘇鑰機（2003）。〈市場導向下的新聞傳媒〉，李少南（編）《香港傳媒新世紀》，頁 99-124。香港：中文大學出版社。\nAgrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2010). The geography of crowdfunding, (NBER Working Paper No. 16820). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.\nAitamurto, T. (2011). The impact of crowdfunding on journalism: Case study of Spot.Us, a platform for community-funded reporting. Journalism Practice, 5(4), 429-445.\nAitamurto, T. (2015). The role of crowdfunding as a business model in journalism: A five-layered model of value creation. In L. Bennett, B. Chin, & B. Jones (Eds.), Crowdfunding the future: Media Industries, ethics, and digital society (pp.189-205). London, UK: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.\nAndreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2004). Public goods experiments without confidentiality: A glimpse into fund-raising. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1605-1623.\nBelleflamme, P., Lambert, T., and Schwienbacher, A. (2010). Crowdfunding: An industrial organization perspective. Retrieved from September 1, 2015, from http://economix.fr/pdf/workshops/2010_dbm/Belleflamme_al.pdf\nBelleflamme, P., Lambert, T., and Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd, Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 585-609.\nCarvajal, M., García-Avilés, J. A. & González, J. L. (2012). Crowdfunding and non-profit media: The emergence of new models for public interest journalism. Journalism Practice, 6(5-6), 638-647.\nClausen, L. (2003). Global news production. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press\nCohn, D. & Peters, J. (2011). Handbook for community¬-funded reporting. Retrieved June 22, 2015, from https://www.rjionline.org/sites/default/files/cohn-handbook_for_community-funded_reporting.pdf\nCohn, D. (2010). Micro-payments vs. crowd funding. Retrieved October 3, 2015, from http://blog.digidave.org/2010/01/micro-payments-vs-crowd-funding\nCumming, D. J., Leboeuf, G., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014.06). Crowdfunding models: Keep-it-all vs. all-or-nothing. Paper presented at annual meeting of the December International Paris Finance Meeting, Paris, France.\nCumming, D.J. & Johan, S.A. (2009). Venture capital and private equity contracting: An international perspective. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Science Academic Press.\nDavies, R. (2014). Civic crowdfunding: Participatory communities, entrepreneurs and the political economy of place. Unpublished master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.\nEaston, J. (2015). Spot.us is going away, but its legacy inspires new chapters of crowdfunding playbook. Retrieved September 25, 2016, from https://www.publicinsightnetwork.org/2015/02/11/spot-us-is-going-away-but-itslegacy-inspires-new-chapters-of-crowdfunding-playbook/\nGarber, M. (2010). Support the journalist. Retrieved from September 20, 2015, from http://www.cjr.org/the_news_frontier/support_the_journalist.php/atom.xml?page=2\nGerber, E. M., & Hui, J. (2013). Crowdfunding: Motivations and deterrents for participation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(6), 34:1-34:32.\nGerber, E. M., Hui, J. S., & Kuo, P. Y. (2012). Crowdfunding: Why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle WA.\nGillmor, D. (2006). We the media: Grassroots journalism by the people, for the people. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.\nGiudici, G., Nava, R., Rossi Lamastra, C., & Verecondo, C. (2012). Crowdfunding: The new frontier for financing entrepreneurship? Retrieved August 27, 2015, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2157429_code174108.pdf?abstractid=2157429&mirid=1\nGlaeser, E. L., & Shleifer, A. (2001). Not-for-profit entrepreneurs. Journal of Public Economics, 81(1), 99-115.\nGobble, M. A. M. (2012). Everyone is a venture capitalist: The new age of crowdfunding. Research Technology Management, 4 (55), 4-7.\nGómez-Diago, G. (2015). Communication in crowdfunding online platforms. In N. Zagalo, & P. Branco (Eds.), Creativity in the digital age (pp. 171-190). London, UK: Springer. \nHemer, J. (2011). A snapshot on crowdfunding. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-wAssets/docs/p/de/arbpap_unternehmen_region/ap_r2_2011.pdf\nHowe, J. (2006.1.6). The rise of crowdsourcing, Wired, 14 (6). Retrieved April 26, 2015, from http://archive.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html\nHowe, J. (2009). Crowdsourcing: Why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. New York, NY.\nHui, J. S., Greenberg, M. D., Gerber, E. M. (2014). Understanding the role of community in crowdfunding work. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, New York, NY: 62-74.\nHunter, A. (2015). Crowdfunding independent and freelance journalism: Negotiating journalistic norms of autonomy and objectivity. New Media & Society, 17(2): 272-288.\nHunter, A. (2016). It`s like having a second full-time job: The labour and ethics of crowdfunding in journalism. Journalism Practice, 10(2): 217-232.\nJian, L. & Shin, J. (2015). Motivations behind donors’ contributions to crowdfunded journalism. Mass Communication and Society, 18, 165-185.\nJian, L., & Usher, N. (2014). Crowd-funded journalism. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 9(2), 155-170.\nKappel, T. (2009). Ex ante crowdfunding and the recording industry: A model for the U.S.? Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 29, 375-385.\nKasem, A. (2015). What`s news? Scenarios for the future of journalism. Retrieved June 26, 2015, from http://www.journalism2025.com/bundles/svdjui/documents/Scenarios-for-the-future-of-journalism.pdf\nKaye, J. & Quinn, S. (2010). Funding journalism in the digital age. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.\nKelly, K. (2008). 1,000 true fans. Retrieved October 7, 2015, from http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/03/1000_true_fans.php\nKickstarter. (2015). Kickstarter Stats. Retrieved May 27, 2015, from https://www.kickstarter.com/help/stats\nKickstarter. (n.d.). Our Rules. Retrieved October 18, 2015, from https://www.kickstarter.com/rules\nKleemann, F., Voß, G. G. & Rieder, K. (2008). Un(der)paid Innovators: The commercial utilization of consumer work through crowdsourcing. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 4 (1), 5-26.\nLambert, T. & Schwienbacher, A. (2010). An Empirical Analysis of Crowdfunding. Retrieved May 1, 2015 from http://www.crowdsourcing.org/document/an-empirical-analysis-ofcrowdfunding-/2458.\nLee, S. H., DeWester, D., & Park, S. R. (2008). Web 2.0 and opportunities for small businesses. Service Business, 2(4), 335-345.\nMarshall, J. (2011). Watergate’s legacy and the press: The investigative impulse. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.\nMarwell, G., & Oliver, P. (1993). The critical mass in collective action. Cambridge, UK: University Press.\nMcCarthy, M. (2012). Journalism that facilitates public discourse and engagement: An examination of crowdfunded reporting. Unpublished master’s thesis, California State University, Northridge, CA.\nMcChesney, R. W., & Nichols, J. (2010). The death and life of American journalism: The media revolution that will begin the world again. New York, NY: Nation Books.\nMcManus, J. (1994). Market-driven journalism: Let the citizen beware? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\nMeyer, P. (1987). Ethical journalism: A guide for students, practitioners, and consumers. New York, NY: Longman.\nMitchell, B. (2009). In money hunt, Spot.Us and Kiva.org make it personal. Retrieved May 26, 2015, from http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/business-news/newspay/93519/in-money-hunt-spot-us-and-kiva-org-make-it-personal/\nMollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study, Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16.\nNapoli, P. M. (2009). Navigating producer-consumer convergence: Media policy priorities in the era of user-generated and user-distributed content. Communications & Convergence Review, 1(1): 32-43.\nOlson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nOuting, S. (2009). What a persuasive-technology psychologist can tell us about paying for news online. Retrieved May 27, 2015, from http://www.editorandpublisher.com/Article/What-a-Persuasive-Technology-Psychologist-Can-Tell-Us-About-Paying-for-News-Online\nPicard, R. G. (1989). Media economics: Concepts and issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.\nPorlezza, C. & Splendore, S. (2016). Accountability and transparency of entrepreneurial journalism, Journalism Practice, 10(2): 196-216.\nSan Francisco Public Press. (2014). Pedal-powered news. Retrieved Octobers 9, 2015, from https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1835387987/pedal-powered-news\nSchwienbacher A., & Larralde, B. (2010). Crowdfunding of small entrepreneurial ventures. In D. Cumming (Ed.), The oxford handbook of entrepreneurial finance (pp. 369-391), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.\nSjøvaag, H. (2015). Introducing the paywall. Retrieved November 16, 2015, from http://www.tnr.com/article/goodbye-the-age-newspapers-hello-new-era-corruption\nSnyder, C. (2008). Spot.Us launches crowd-funded journalism project. Retrieved September 5, 2015, from http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2008/11/spotus-launches/\nVogt, N. & Mitchell, A. (2016). Crowdfunded Journalism: A small but growing addition to publicly driven journalism. Retrieved September 20, 2016, from http://www.journalism.org/2016/01/20/crowdfundedjournalism/ | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 廣播電視學系 1024530031 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1024530031 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003101.pdf | 13.27 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.