Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/106989
題名: 「非人會說話嗎?」:台灣的生態政治與動保行動
"Can the Nonhuman Speak?" Eco-politics and the Animal Protection Movement in Taiwan
作者: 宋芝蘭
Gina, Gina G. Song-Lopez
貢獻者: 湯京平
Tang, Ching-Ping
宋芝蘭
Gina G. Song-Lopez
關鍵詞: 動物保護
動物權
Animal Protection
Animal Rights
日期: 2016
上傳時間: 1-三月-2017
摘要: The title of this thesis is a reference to Spivak’s famous essay: Can the Subaltern Speak?2 By introducing the concept of the nonhuman in the context of this question, this action seeks to highlight the characteristic silence surrounding the inclusion of nature and animals in mainstream socio-political discussions. In the East Asian context this rings true due to the relatively limited scholarship on animal advocacy dynamics in the region. Taiwan is one such example where in spite of its increasing visibility and effectiveness, the animal protection movement has received little attention in relation to its growing influence in the eco-political landscape of the country. This thesis examines the emergence of animal protection rationales in Taiwan as an example of a ‘New Social Movement’ (NSM), and explores the mobilization dynamics employed by animal advocacy groups engaged in the transformation of socio-natural relationships. For this purpose, this thesis applies Jürgen Habermas’ ‘system-lifeworld’ framework as advanced in his work on NSMs based on The Theory of Communicative Action. The findings indicate that animal protection consciousness in Taiwan arose from a new area of conflicts in the socio-natural space due to economic industrialization. At the same time, the convergence of Buddhist Modernism and Animal Ethics has resulted in the emergence of distinctive identities based on animal protection, and more recently the spread of veganism in the country. Counter institutions established from these processes of communicative action play a central role in advancing new discourses to address human-nonhuman interests. Therefore, the Animal Protection Movement in Taiwan is an increasingly prominent element in the eco-political landscape of the country. Future inquiry should pay closer attention to such developments in the East Asian context. Here, insights from the case of Taiwan’s animal advocacy provide a relevant starting point.
參考文獻: Agoramoorthy, G., & Hsu, M. J. (2007). Ritual releasing of wild animals threatens island\n\necology. Human Ecology, 35(2), 251-254.\n\nAnimals and Society Institute. (2017). Animal Protection Laws by Country. Retrieved from http://www.animalsandsociety.org/resources/animal-protection-laws-by-country/\n\nAnimal Protection Association of the Republic of China (APA). (2007). 成立沿革 [History]. Retrieved from http://www.apatw.org/News_show.asp?id=17\n\nAsdal, K. (2003). The Problematic Nature of Nature: The Post‐constructivist Challenge to\n\nEnvironmental History. History and Theory, 42(4), 60-74.\n\nBradley, T. and King, R. (2012). The Dog Economy Is Global - but What Is the World`s True\n\nCanine Capital?. The Atlantic. Retrieved December 15, 2015, from http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/11/the-dog-economy-is-global-but-what-is-the-worlds-true-canine-capital/265155/\n\nBuechler, S. M. (1995). New social movement theories. The Sociological Quarterly, 36(3), 441-\n\n464.\n\nCai, X. Y. (2009). Discussing the Development and Practice of Local Animal Welfare with the\n\nLegislation and Evolvement of Animal Protection Law-Regard Dog and Cat as the Illustrations. (Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan). Airity Library Database.\n\nCanel, Eduardo. (1997). New social movement theory and resource mobilization theory: The\n\nneed for integration. In W.K. Carroll (Ed.), Organizing dissent: contemporary social movements in theory and practice (pp. 22-53). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.\n\nCastells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons\n\nChang, D. (2016, June 20). The New Vegan Movement in Taiwan. Ketagalan Media. Retrieved from http://www.ketagalanmedia.com/2016/06/20/the-new-vegan-movement-in-taiwan/\n\nChang, L. H. C. T. W., Fei, M. C. T. C. Y., and Chiang, I. T. (2013). Implications of Cat\n\nOwnership Statistics and Social Changes: A Longitudinal Study in Taiwan from 2001 to 2009. Thai Journal of Veterinary Medicidine, 43(2), 301-306.\n\nChang, M. K. (1997). Civil Society, Resource Mobilization, and New Social Movements\n\nTheoretical Implications for the Study of Social Movements in Taiwan. Chinese Sociology & Anthropology, 29(4), 7-41.\n\nChemnick, J. (2016, November 10). Could Trump Simply Withdraw U.S. from Paris Climate Agreement?. Scientific American. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/could-trump-simply-withdraw-u-s-from-paris-climate-agreement/\n\nChen, J. (2010). Transnational environmental movement: Impacts on the green civil society in\n\nChina. Journal of Contemporary China, 19(65), 503-523.\n\nChen, W.H. (2015, September 13). Officials find 349 dogs at illegal puppy farm in Taipei. Taipei\n\nTimes. Retrieved from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2015/09/13/2003627591\n\nChen, W.H. (2016, August 9). First party dedicated to animal rights launched. Taipei Times.\n\nRetrieved from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2016/08/09/2003652757\n\nChen, W.H. and Pan, J. (2016, August 17). Chaos as cat-death trial begins. Taipei Times.\n\nRetrieved from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2016/08/17/2003653294\n\nCheng, W. Y. (2013). Buddhist Modernism and Animal Welfare in Taiwan. Journal of Dharma\n\nSeals, (3), 1-13.\n\nCherry, E. (2006). Veganism as a cultural movement: A relational approach. Social Movement\n\nStudies, 5(2), 155-170.\n\nCheung, H. (2015, October 21). A vegantastic honor. Taipei Times. Retrieved from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2015/10/21/2003630551\n\nChung, J. (2017, February 2). Taiwan ranks ahead of the US in freedom report. Taipei Times. Retrieved from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2017/02/02/2003664178\n\nChung, O. (2014). Building an Animal-Friendly Environment. Taiwan Info. Retrieved from http://taiwaninfo.nat.gov.tw/fp.asp?xItem=217471&CtNode=124&mp=4\n\nClifton, M. (2015, September 27). Taiwan adopts plan to become no-kill nation by 2017. Animals 24-7. Retrieved from http://www.animals24-7.org/2015/01/25/taiwan-adopts-plan-to-become-no-kill-nation-by-2017/\n\nCoelho, S. (2013). Dolphins gain unprecedented protection in India. The Forum on Religion and Ecology at Yale. Retrieved from http://fore.yale.edu/news/item/dolphins-gain-unprecedented-protection-in-india/\n\nConnolly, K. (2002, June 22). German animals given legal rights. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/jun/22/germany.animalwelfare\n\nCouncil of Agriculture (COA). (2008a). Animal Protection Information. Retrieved from http://animal.coa.gov.tw/html/\n\nCouncil of Agriculture (COA). (2013). National Platform for Pet Adoption. Retrieved from http://animal-adoption.coa.gov.tw/\n\nCouncil of Agriculture (COA). (2016). Strengthen Animal Protection and Improve Animal\n\nWelfare. Retrieved December 11, 2015, from http://eng.coa.gov.tw/programs.php?id=2502300\n\nDahl, R. A. (1978). Pluralism revisited. Comparative Politics, 10(2), 191-203.\n\nDeGrazia, David. (2006). On the question of personhood beyond homo sapiens. In P. Singer,\n\n(Ed.), In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave. Blackwell. Malden/Oxford\n\nDotson, M. J., & Hyatt, E. M. (2008). Understanding dog–human companionship. Journal of\n\nBusiness Research, 61(5), 457-466.\n\nDrenthen, M. (2017). Environmental hermeneutics and the meaning of nature. In A. Thompson\n\nand S. Gardiner, (Eds.) Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics (pp. 162-173). New York: Oxford University Press.\n\nEdwards, G. (2004). Habermas and social movements: what`s ‘new’?. The Sociological\n\nReview, 52(s1), 113-130.\n\nEmel, J. and J. Wolch. (1998). Witnessing the Animal Moment. In, Jennifer Wolch and Jody\n\nEmel (eds.), Animal Geographies: Place, Politics, and Identity in the Nature-Culture Borderlands (pp. 1-23). London: Verso.\n\nEttoday. (2013, January 4). Hǎi tāo fàngshēng rě zhēngyì zhèng yán fǎshī: Hù shēng bìng bùshì\n\nwúwèi fàngshēng [Haitiao Master mercy releases provoke controversy]. Retrieved from: http://www.ettoday.net/news/20130104/148591.htm\n\nEuropean Animal Research Association (EARA). (2016). Dutch Parliament passes motion to phase out non-human primate research. Retrieved from http://eara.eu/en/dutch-parliament-passes-motion-to-phase-out-nhp-research/\n\nFan, M. F. (2008). Environmental citizenship and sustainable development: the case of waste\n\nfacility siting in Taiwan. Sustainable development, 16(6), 381-389.\n\nFan, M. F. (2012). Justice, community knowledge, and waste facility siting in Taiwan. Public\n\nUnderstanding of Science, 21(4), 418-431.\n\nFan, M. F. (2012). Justice, community knowledge, and waste facility siting in Taiwan. Public\n\nUnderstanding of Science, 21(4), 418-431\nFell, Dafydd. 2012. Government and Politics in Taiwan. New York: Routledge.\n\nFocus Taiwan. (2016, August 16). Trial of student cat killer begins. Retrieved from http://focustaiwan.tw/news/asoc/201608160009.aspx\n\nFrancione, G. L. (2009). Animals as persons: Essays on the abolition of animal exploitation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.\n\nGardiner, S. M., & Thompson, A. (Eds.). (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Environmental\n\nEthics. Oxford University Press. NY\n\nGillespie, K., & Collard, R. C. (Eds.). (2015). Critical Animal Geographies: Politics,\n\nIntersections and Hierarchies in a Multispecies World. New York: Routledge.\n\nGiraud, E. (2015). Practice as Theory: learning from food activism and performative protest. In\n\nK. Gillespie and R. Collard (Eds.), Critical Animal Geographies: Politics, Intersections and Hierarchies in a Multispecies World. New York: Routledge.\n\nGlendinning, L. (2008, June 26). Spanish parliament approves `human rights` for apes. The\n\nGuardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/jun/26/humanrights.animalwelfare\n\nGreenwood, A. (2015, April 21). Did A Court Just Recognize Chimpanzees As ‘Legal Persons’?\n\nIt Depends Who You Ask. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/21/chimpanzee-personhood_n_7107490.html\n\nGodlovitch, S., Godlovitch, R., & Harris, J. (1971). Animals, men and morals: An enquiry into\n\nthe maltreatment of non-humans.. New York: Tablinger.\n\nGrano, Simona (2014), Change and Continuities: Taiwan’s Post-2008 Environmental Policies.\n\nJournal of Current Chinese Affairs, 43(3), 129–159.\n\nGuither, H. D. (1998). Animal rights: History and scope of a radical social movement. Illinois:\n\nSIU Press.\n\nHabermas, J. (1981). New social movements. Telos, 1981(49), 33-37.\n\nHabermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Vol. II. (T. McCarthy, Trans.).\n\nBoston: T. Beacon Press.\n\nHaenfler, R., Johnson, B., & Jones, E. (2012). Lifestyle movements: Exploring the intersection\n\nof lifestyle and social movements. Social Movement Studies, 11(1), 1-20\n\nHegedus, C. and Pennekaker, D.A. (2014, April 23). Animals Are Persons Too. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/23/opinion/animals-are-persons-too.html?_r=0\n\nHeld, David. (1996). Models of democracy (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.\n\nHertwich, E. (2010). Assessing the environmental impacts of consumption and production:\n\npriority products and materials. UNEP/Earthprint.\n\nHerzog, H. (1993). “The movement is my life”: The psychology of animal rights activism.\n\nJournal of Social Issues, 49(1), 103-119.\n\nHerzog, H. and Foster, M. (2010). Some we love, some we hate, some we eat. New York: Harper\n\nHilton, I. (2016, November 22). China emerges as global climate leader in wake of Trump`s triumph. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/nov/22/donald-trump-success-helps-china-emerge-as-global-climate-leader\n\nHo, M. S. (2004). When a Taiwan`s Social Movement Meets the New Social Movement Theory:\n\nThe Case of Anti-Nuclear Movement. Education and Society, 7, 69-97.\n\nHo, M. S. (2010). Understanding the trajectory of social movements in Taiwan (1980-\n\n2010). Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 39(3), 3-22.\n\nHo, M. S. (2011). Environmental movement in democratizing Taiwan (1980–2004): A\n\npolitical opportunity structure perspective. In J. Broadbent and V. Brockman (eds.), East Asian Social Movements (pp. 283-314). New York: Springer\n\nHo, M. S. (2014). The Fukushima effect: explaining the resurgence of the anti-nuclear movement\n\nin Taiwan. Environmental Politics, 23(6), 965-983.\n\nHo, W. L. (2016). Ecofamilism: Women, Religion, and Environmental Protection in Taiwan. St,\n\nPetersburg, FL: Three Pine Press\n\nHo, Y. (2015, January 23). Xīnbǎn dòng bǎo fǎ dòng bǎo tuántǐ zěnme kàn? [How do Animal\n\nAdvocacy groups see the new Animal Protection Act?]. Taiwan Animal News. Retrieved from: http://www.tanews.org.tw/info/6685\n\nHo, Y. (2015b, January 23). Jīntiān jiēxiǎo dòng bǎo fǎ xiūzhèng ànguòle! [Animal Protection\n\nAct amendments passed today!]. Taiwan Animal News. Retrieved from http://www.tanews.org.tw/info/6676\n\nHsiao, H. H. M. (1990). The rise of environmental consciousness in Taiwan. Impact\n\nAssessment, 8(1-2), 217-231.\n\nHsiao, H. H. M. (1992). The Rise of Social Movements and Civil Protests. In T.J. Cheng and S.\n\nHaggard (eds.), Political Change in Taiwan (pp. 57–72). London: Lynn Rienner Publisher.\n\nHsiao, H. H. M. and H. Koo. (1997). The Middle Classes and Democratization. In L. Diamond\n\n(ed.), Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies (pp. 312–333) Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.\n\nHsiao, H. H. M. (1999). Environmental Movements in Taiwan. In Y. F. Lee and A. Y. So\n\n(Eds.), Asia`s environmental movements: comparative perspectives (pp. 31-54). New\n\nYork: ME Sharpe.\n\nHsiao, H. H. M. (2010). Social Movements in Taiwan: A Typological Analysis. In J.Broadbent\n\nand V. Brockman (eds.), East Asian Social Movements (pp. 283-314). New York: Springer.\n\nHsieh, W.H. Pan, J. (2014, July 2). Animal testing has to stop, group says. Taipei Times.\n\nRetrieved from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2014/07/02/2003594177\n\nHsu, J. (2014, December 29). Hippo Death Raises Weighty Questions About Taiwan’s Private\n\nZoos. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/12/29/hippo-death-weighs-heavily-on-taiwan-animal-rights-activists/\n\nHsu, S. H. (2005). Advocacy coalitions and policy change on nuclear power utilization in\n\nTaiwan. The Social Science Journal, 42(2), 215-229.\n\nHsu, Y., Liu Severinghaus, L., & Serpell, J. A. (2003). Dog keeping in Taiwan: its contribution\n\nto the problem of free-roaming dogs. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 6(1), 1-23.\n\nHuang, C. T., & Hwang, R. C. (2009). “Environmental Justices”: What we have learned from the\n\nTaiwanese environmental justice controversy. Environmental Justice, 2(3), 101-108.\n\nHuang, Chih-Tung. (2010). Shaping environmental “justices”. Thesis. (Master Thesis, University\n\nof Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom). Retrieved from Edinburgh Research Archive.\n\nHumphrey, M., & Stears, M. (2006). Animal rights protest and the challenge to deliberative\n\ndemocracy. Economy and Society, 35(3), 400-422.\n\nJerolmack, C. (2003). Tracing the profile of animal rights supporters: A preliminary\n\ninvestigation. Society & Animals, 11(3), 245-263.\n\nJohnston, Hank, Enrique Laraña and Joseph R. Gusfield. (1994). New social movements: from\n\nideology to Identity. In E. Laraña, H. Johnston, and J. R. Gusfield (eds.), New Social Movements (pp. 185-208). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.\n\nKaohsiung City Animal Protection Office(KCAPO). (2016). Retrieved from http://livestock.kcg.gov.tw/index.aspx\n\nKaplan, S. (2017, February 17). Amid outcry, some animal welfare documents are restored to USDA website. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/animalia/wp/2017/02/17/amid-outcry-some-animal-welfare-documents-restored-to-usda-website/?utm_term=.b7c99d360e42\n\nKnott, K. (2016, December 5). China’s growing animal rights movement is making its voice heard. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from http://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/article/2050730/chinas-growing-animal-rights-movement-calling-change\n\nLam, S. P., & Wu, M. F. (2011). Predicting Taiwanese adoption website members’ intentions\n\nregarding on-line dog adoptions. African Journal of Business Management, 5(4), 1204-1210.\n\nLarson, C. (2008, June 2). China’s Emerging Environmental Movement. Yale Environment 360. Retrieved from http://e360.yale.edu/features/chinas_emerging_environmental_movement\n\nLi, P. J. (2006). The evolving animal rights and welfare debate in China: Political and social\n\nimpact analysis. Animals, ethics and trade: The challenge of animal sentience, 111-128.\n\nLi, P.T. (2016, September 9). Tuīdòng chǒngwù rù hùjí kěyǐ zěnme zuò? [How to implement the\n\npet-household registration system?]. Taiwan Animal News. Retrieved from http://www.tanews.org.tw/info/11226\n\nLin, C. C. (2015). The Animal Liberation and the Action of Life Protection: Discussion from the\n\nStandpoint of the Life Conservationist Association. Xuanzang Buddhist Studies, 23: 175-195.\n\nLin, H. J. (2015). Constructing issue network diagrams of animal protection in Taiwan: The case\n\nof the stray animal policy. (Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan). Airity Library Database.\n\nLin, Y. L. (2013). The Ideal and Reality of Farm Animal Welfare-Centering on an Examination\n\nAnalysis for the Legal System in R.O.C. (Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan). Airity Library Database.\n\nLee, W. (2016, December 27). Taipei named Asia’s most vegan-friendly city: PETA. Taiwan News. Retrieved from http://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3058749\n\nLowe, B. M., & Ginsberg, C. F. (2002). Animal rights as a post-citizenship movement. Society &\n\nAnimals, 10(2), 203-215.\n\nMcIntyre, S. (2015, May 17). Animals are now legally recognised as `sentient` beings in New\n\nZealand. The Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/animals-are-now-legally-recognised-as-sentient-beings-in-new-zealand-10256006.html\n\nMantzavinos, C. (2016). Hermeneutics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hermeneutics/#HermCirc\n\nMadarelli. C. (2014, February 21). Although Purebred Dogs Can Be Best in Show, Are They\n\nWorst in Health?. Scientific American. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/although-purebred-dogs-can-be-best-in-show-are-they-worst-in-health/\n\nMason, M. (1999). Environmental democracy. New York: Earthscan.\n\nMattlin, M. 2011. Politicized society: the long shadow of Taiwan`s one-party legacy.\n\nCopenhagen: NIAS Press.\n\nMcBeath, G. A., & Leng, T. K. (2006). Governance of biodiversity conservation in China and\n\nTaiwan. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.\n\nMcMahan, D. L. (2008). The making of Buddhist modernism. Oxford University Press.\n\nMeyer, D. S., & Tarrow, S. G. (1998). The social movement society: Contentious politics for a\n\nnew century. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.\n\nMeng, C T., Chang Y.F., Jeng, T. C., Chung, H. C., Chen, Y. L., Yao, C, S., and Kwong C. T.\n\n(2010). Surveys of dog populations in Taiwan from 1999 to 2009. Journal of the Chinese Society of Animal Science, 39(3), 175-188.\n\nMunro, L. (2005). Strategies, action repertoires and DIY activism in the animal rights movement.\n\nSocial Movement Studies, 4(1), 75-94.\n\nMunro, L. (2012). The animal rights movement in theory and practice: A review of the\n\nsociological literature. Sociology Compass, 6(2), 166-181.\n\nNational Development Council (NDC). (2016). Duǎnchéng mùbiāo: Tuīdòng biànlì chāo shāng\n\nbǎozhàng shū/sùshí shú shípǐn gōngyìng bǐlì guīfàn chángchéng: Hòuxù tuīdòng shū shí chǎnyè fā [Short-term goal: to increase the supply of vegan food in convenience stores, long-term: to promote the vegan industry]. Retrieved from https://join.gov.tw/idea/detail/6a9ab744-7fbd-45ce-a59f-a9c7c034997f\n\nNonhuman Rights Project. (n.d.). About the Project. Retrieved from http://www.nonhumanrightsproject.org/about-the-project-2/\n\nObar, J. A., Zube, P., & Lampe, C. (2012). Advocacy 2.0: An analysis of how advocacy groups\n\nin the United States perceive and use social media as tools for facilitating civic\n\nengagement and collective action. Journal of Information Policy, 2, 1-25.\n\nPacelle, W. (2017, February 15). Your Help Needed To Stop Congress From Sanctioning Cruelty To Wolves And Grizzly Bears On Refuges In Alaska. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/urgent-alert-your-help-needed-to-stop-congress-from_us_58a4c260e4b0b0e1e0e205de\n\nPendergrast, C. (2015). Environmental Concerns and the Mainstreaming of Veganism. In T.\n\nRaphaely and D. Marinova (Eds.), Impact of Meat Consumption on Health and Environmental Sustainability (pp. 106-123). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.\n\nPeng, S. J. L., Lee, L. Y. T., & Fei, A. C. Y. (2012). Shelter animal management and trends in\n\nTaiwan. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 15(4), 346-357.\n\nPichardo, N. A. (1997). New social movements: A critical review. Annual review of\n\nsociology, 23(1), 411-430.\n\nPhilion, S. (2010). The Impact of Social Movements on Taiwan’s Democracy. Journal of\n\nCurrent Chinese Affairs, 39(3), 149-163.\n\nRegan, T. (1986). The case for animal rights. Advances in Animal Welfare Science, 179-189.\n\nSpringer Netherlands.\n\nRegan, T. (2004) [1983]. The case for animal rights: Updated with a new Preface. Berkeley:\n\nUniversity of California Press.\n\nRigger, S. (1999). Politics in Taiwan: Voting for democracy. London: Routledge.\n\nSalter, C. (2015). The animal question and condition: intersectionality and Critical Animal\n\nStudies in the Asia-Pacific. Animal Studies Journal, 4(1), 1-11.\n\nSalter, L. (2003). Democracy, new social movements, and the internet. Cyberactivism: Online\n\nactivism in theory and practice, 117-144.\n\nSerpell, J. (1989). Pet-keeping and animal domestication: a reappraisal. The walking larder:\n\npatterns of domestication, pastoralism, and predation, 2, 10.\n\nSerpell, J. (2015). The Human-Animal Bond. In The Oxford Handbook of Animal Studies (ed) L.\n\nKalof. Oxford University Press.\n\nSeveringhaus, L. L., & Chi, L. (1999). Prayer animal release in Taiwan. Biological\n\nConservation, 89(3), 301-304.\n\nShapiro. M. (2010, September 21). Sea Shepherd`s Paul Watson: `You don`t watch whales die\n\nand hold signs and do nothing`. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/sep/21/sea-shepherd-paul-watson-whales\n\nShirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and\n\npolitical change. Foreign affairs, 28-41.\n\nSiebert, C. (2014, April 23). Should a Chimp Be Able to Sue Its Owner?. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/27/magazine/the-rights-of-man-and-beast.html\n\nSinger, P. (1982). The Oxford Vegetarians-A Personal Account. International Journal for the\n\nStudy of Animal Problems, 3: 6-9.\n\nSinger, P. (2002). Animal liberation. New York: Ecco.\n\nSkollerhorn, E. (1998). Habermas and nature: The theory of communicative action for studying\n\nenvironmental policy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41(5), 555-573. Chicago\n\nSneijder, P., & Te Molder, H. (2009). Normalizing ideological food choice and eating practices:\n\nIdentity work in online discussions on veganism. Appetite, 52(3), 621-630.\n\nSteinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T. D., Castel, V., & de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock`s long\n\nshadow: environmental issues and options. Food & Agriculture Organization.\n\nSunstein, C. R., and M. C. Nussbaum. (2004). Animal rights: Current debates and new\n\ndirections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\n\nTaichung City Animal Protection and Health Inspection Office. (20160. Retrieved December 10,\n\n2015, from http://english.animal.taichung.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=167681&ctNode=7573&mp=119121\n\nTaipei City Animal Protection Office. (2016). Retrieved December 10, 2015, from http://english.tcapo.gov.taipei/\n\nTaiwan Animal News. (2014, December 12). Jiā jiā quǎn shě shìjiàn jiē fánzhí chǎng hēimù [Jia\n\nJia Kennel expose reveals dark breeding conditions]. Retrieved from http://www.tanews.org.tw/info/6330\n\nTaiwan Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (TSPCA). (2015). Puppy Mill. Retrieved from http://www.spca.org.tw/370963385326684-blog-english/puppy-mill\n\nTaiwan Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals(TSPCA). (2016). Taiwan bans cosmetics animal testing. Retrieved from http://www.spca.org.tw/press-release-taiwan-bans-cosmetics-animal-testing.html\n\nTang, C. P., & Tang, S. Y. (2000). Democratizing bureaucracy: the political economy of\n\nenvironmental impact assessment and air pollution prevention fees in Taiwan. Comparative Politics, 81-99.\n\nTang, S. Y., & Tang, C. P. (1997). Democratization and environmental politics in Taiwan. Asian\n\nSurvey, 37(3), 281-294.\n\nTang, S. Y., & Tang, C. P. (1999). Democratization and the environment: entrepreneurial politics\n\nand interest representation in Taiwan. The China Quarterly, 158, 350-366.\n\nTang, S. Y., & Tang, C. P. (2004). Local governance and environmental conservation: gravel\n\npolitics and the preservation of an endangered bird species in Taiwan. Environment and Planning A, 36(1), 173-189.\n\nTaylor, N., & Signal, T. (2008). Throwing the Baby out with the Bathwater: Towards a\n\nSociology of the Human-Animal Abuse`Link`?. Sociological Research Online, 13(1), 2.\n\nTaylor, N., & Twine, R. (2014). The rise of critical animal studies: From the margins to the\n\ncentre (Vol. 125). New York: Routledge.\n\nTer, D. (2017, January 14). Move over beef noodle soup, vegans are taking Taipei by storm.\n\nTaipei Times. Retrieved from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2017/01/14/2003663059/2\n\nThe Ethics Centre. (2016). Animal rights should trump human interests: What’s the debate\n\nabout?. Retrieved from http://www.ethics.org.au/on-ethics/blog/march-2016/animal-rights-should-trump-human-interests-%E2%80%93-what\n\nThe Vegan Society. (2017). Definition of Veganism. Retrieved from https://www.vegansociety.com/go-vegan/definition-veganism\n\nThe Wall Street Journal. (2014, December 29). Hippo Death Raises Weighty Questions About Taiwan’s Private Zoos. http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/12/29/hippo-death-weighs-heavily-on-taiwan-animal-rights-activists/\n\nVan Buren, J. (1995). Critical environmental hermeneutics. Environmental Ethics, 17(3), 259-\n\n275.\n\nVan De Donk, W., Loader, B. D., Nixon, P. G., & Rucht, D. (Eds.). (2004). Cyberprotest: New\n\nmedia, citizens and social movements. Routledge.\n\nWaldau, P. (2010). Animal Rights: What Everyone Needs to Know?. Oxford: Oxford University\n\nPress.\n\nWang, Y.L. (2012). The Development and Central Role of the Life Conservationist Association\n\n(LCA) in Taiwan`s Animal Protection Movement`s History: 1992-1999. (Master Thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan). Retrieved from Airity Library Database.\n\nWei, K. (2014, December 30). Injured hippo dies, zoo owners fined NT$500,000. The China\n\nPost. Retrieved from http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/local/taichung/2014/12/30/425220/Injured-hippo.htm\n\nWeller, R. P. (2006). Discovering nature: globalization and environmental culture in China and\n\nTaiwan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\n\nWeng, H. Y., Kass, P. H., Hart, L. A., & Chomel, B. B. (2006a). Animal protection measures in\n\nTaiwan: Taiwanese attitudes toward the animal protection law and animal shelters. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 9(4), 315-326.\n\nWeng, H. Y., Kass, P. H., Hart, L. A., & Chomel, B. B. (2006b). Risk factors for unsuccessful\n\nog ownership: An epidemiologic study in Taiwan. Preventive veterinary medicine, 77(1), 82-95.\n\nWeeknight. 2016. Veganism: You are What You (Don’t) Eat. Issue 11.\n\nWhite, E. (2016, May 27). Is an animal welfare storm brewing in Taiwan?. The News Lens. Retrieved from https://international.thenewslens.com/article/40617\n\nWhitehead, L. (2007). Taiwan’s Democratization: A Critical Test for the International\n\nDimensions Perspective. Paper presented in International Conference on the After the Third Wave: Problems and Challenges for the New Democracies. August 13th -14th, 2007, Taipei: Taiwan.\n\nWillhoft, A.C. (2016, August 22). First Political Party Dedicated to Animal Protection Founded\n\nin Taiwan. The News Lens. Retrieved from https://international.thenewslens.com/article/47246\n\nWong, J. (2003). Deepening democracy in Taiwan. Pacific Affairs, 235-256.\n\nWu, H. R. (2010). The Rise and Construction of Stray Cat Protection Movement in Taiwan.\n\n(Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan). Airity Library Database.\n\nWu, P. H. (2010). The Theory and Practice of Animal Protection—An Observation of R.O.C.\n\nAnimal Protection Law. (Master Thesis, National Taipei University, Taipei, Taiwan). Airiti Library Database.\n\nXu, H.J. (2008). The Model of Animal Protections In Constitution: From the Perspective of\n\nRights. (Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan). Airity Library Database.\n\nXu. J. W. (2010). “One Animal, with Each Side Having Its Own Interpretation”: The Virtual\n\nImage and Substance of the Animal Protection Law System. (Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan). Airity Library Database.\n\nYang, D. K. (2011). Evolution of Animal Protection Legal system in Taiwan-Exploring the\n\nHistory of Controlling or Protecting Animal by Law. (Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan). Airity Library Database.\n\nYork, R., & Mancus, P. (2013). The invisible animal: Anthrozoology and macrosociology.\n\nSociological Theory, 31(1), 75-91.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
103926005
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1039260051
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
005101.pdf2.04 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.