Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: 臺灣學者於學術全球化時代,對國內期刊看法與經驗之質性研究
Authors: 謝思蕾
Contributors: 外文中心
Keywords: 學術出版;國內期刊;全球化;多語言學者;高等教育
scholarly publishing;national journals;globalization;multilingual scholars;higher education
Date: 2016
Issue Date: 2017-05-17 15:34:09 (UTC+8)
Abstract: 本份研究內容為:14 位具有人文及社會科學背景的作者,參與編纂五本以台灣為基地的中型英文期刊 (TBEMJ)。於台灣多所大學任職的多語教職人員,以面對面訪談的方式,就其自身的發表經驗及各自履歷進行討論,並同時研究相關的機構性政策文件。本研究歸納出研究人員選擇發表於 TBEMJ 的九個原因:遭「國際」期刊拒絕、期刊領域、引文索引、會議論文集或特殊議題、與學生共同發表、時間壓力、支持期刊、發表語言,以及博士候選人必要條件。篇幅和規模的觀念是參與者經驗討論的主要方向,顯示出人們對引用順序的觀感,引用順序不完全取決於發表地點,還涉及引文索引和其他文獻指標。研究結果顯示,「國內」期刊所發揮的作用其實要大得多,並非如 Lee 和 Lee (2013) 所稱,只是個專門接收遭到「國際」指標性期刊拒絕的論文的「手稿墳墓」而已,表示「國內」期刊十分值得投資。然而,儘管發表地方性研究知識,但無法確定其流傳或利用範圍。雖然影響因素 (IF) 等評估指標仍具爭議,但倘若 TBEM ISI 期刊的 IF 提高,則可能有助於獲得更多機構支持。
This study reports on 14 authors’ participation in the production of five Taiwan-based English medium journals (TBEMJs) from humanities and social sciences disciplines. Multilingual faculty at Taiwanese universities discussed their publishing experiences and referred to their curriculum vitae during face-to-face interviews. Relevant institutional policy documents were also studied. Nine reasons researchers published in TBEMJs were found: rejection from “international” journals, journal scope, citation index, conference proceedings or special issue, publishing with students, time pressure, to support the journal, language of publication, and doctorate candidacy requirement. Notions of space and scale frame discussion of
participants’ experiences demonstrating perceptions of indexical order, not necessarily based on location of
publication, but citation index and other bibliographic metrics. Results show that “national” journals function as more than what Lee and Lee (2013) refer to as“manuscript graveyards” for “international” indexed journal rejections, indicating that investment in“national” journals is worthwhile. However, while local knowledge is being published, it is not clear how far it is distributed or utilized. Although metrics such as impact factor (IF) are controversial, if the TBEM ISI journals’IFs rise, this may encourage more institutional support.
Relation: MOST 104-2410-H-004-125
Data Type: report
Appears in Collections:[外文中心] 國科會研究計畫

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
104-2410-H-004-125.pdf959KbAdobe PDF356View/Open

All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing