Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110697
題名: 專科護理師從事醫療業務的法律爭議
Legal disputes of medical practice performed by nurse practitioners
作者: 陳修聖
Chen, Shiou-Sheng
貢獻者: 李聖傑
Lee, Sheng-Chieh
陳修聖
Chen, Shiou-Sheng
關鍵詞: 專科護理師
醫療業務
法律爭議
Nurse practitioners
Medical practice
Legal disputes
日期: 2017
上傳時間: 3-Jul-2017
摘要: 目前在台灣,專科護理師參與醫療處置過程的一部分已經是一個必然的趨勢。雖然目前已針對專科護理師相關的法規做了修正,但是在實務上還是有許多需要克服的問題。修法後雖然對專科護理師的執業範圍包含非侵入性和侵入性醫療行為有了較明確的規範,專科護理師臨床執業面臨的困境還是存在。出現醫療爭議時,醫師、專科護理師、其他醫事人員及醫院的法律責任仍然有許多模糊地帶。專科護理師相關法規修法後,衛生局及醫療機構之因應準備仍有改善的空間。\n本研究採用案例分析法依照案例事實、法院見解和爭點問題,討論一個發生在民國95年12月有關專科護理師與醫師的醫療爭議訴訟案件。本醫療糾紛個案是台灣專科護理師正式甄審後,發生的第一件專科護理師被起訴的醫療糾紛案件。\n被告因業務過失致死案件,經檢察官提起公訴判決主文如下:主治醫師從事業務之人,因業務上之過失致人於死,處有期徒刑壹年,減為有期徒刑陸月,緩刑貳年。專科護理師從事業務之人,因業務上之過失致人於死,處有期徒刑陸月,減為有期徒刑參月,緩刑貳年。本案例經由臺灣臺北地方法院刑事判決98年度醫訴字第6號,臺灣高等法院刑事判決民國100年度醫上訴字第7號,目前檢察官上訴中。\n台灣專科護理師法規未來修正的方向,需更進一步明訂專科護理師的執業範圍以符合法律明確性原則。醫師指示合法化,使醫療輔助行為之定義更明確。建立專科護理師專業能力標準與提升及評估專科護理師執業品質,加強專科護理師的訓練以及訂立專科護理師訓練醫院更完善的認證標準與訓練醫院評鑑制度。有關衛生福利部最近要制定的醫師助理法,其工作範圍與專科護理師有很多重疊之處,引進醫師助理可能造成的衝擊。制定合理的專科護理師的護病比,明定專科護理師是否可以值班?專科護理師是否可以採輪班,以符合勞基法一例一休的規定。我們仍然有很多可以改善的地方,希望有更明確的法律規範,讓合格的專科護理師加入醫療團隊的運作,提高專科護理師的專業能力藉以提升醫療服務品質。不要讓專科護理師面臨或甚至觸法的危險,最終有可能變成密醫,對於台灣的醫療會有很大的衝擊及影響。
The participation of nurse practitioners in medical practice is a must in Taiwan now. Although amendment of law about the clinical practice for nurse practitioners was made, there are still some issues which should be further evaluated. The scope of medical practice for nurse practitioners includes invasive and non-invasive medical procedures, which were defined more clearly in the revised articles, but some ambiguous situations still persist. The juridical responsibility of doctors and nurse practitioners for medical disputes remains unclear. There is lots of space of improvement which bureau of Health and hospitals can do after the revision of related law for nurse practitioners. \nThe method of this research is a case study including case facts, the decision of the court and the issue of disputes. This is a medical dispute regarding doctors and a nurse practitioner, which occurred in December, 2006.This is the first medical dispute happening in Taiwan after the establishment of official examination for nurse practitioners.\nThe defendants were accused for guilty because of causing death of a patient due to professional negligence. The verdict of the superior criminal court in Taiwan in 2011 after public prosecution was as follows. The attending physician was sentenced for one year, reduced to six months and probated for 2 years because of causing death of a patient due to professional negligence. The nurse practitioner was sentenced for six months, reduced to three months and probated for 2 years because of causing death of a patient due to professional negligence. \nThe future amendment for the law regarding nurse practitioners is as follows: first, to enact the specific scope of medical practice for nurse practitioners according to the law; second, to legalize the directions from doctors; third, to specify the definition of assisted medical practice performed by nurse practitioners; fourth, to establish the standard for evaluating the ability of nurse practitioners; fifth, to elevate and evaluate the quality of medical service from nurse practitioners; sixth, how to strengthen the training programs of nurse practitioners, to build the verification standard of hospitals which can train nurse practitioners and improve the system of accreditation; seventh, to create rational ratio of nurse practitioners to patients; eighth, to clarify whether nurse practitioners can be on duty and in shifts in the hospital according to the law. In addition, the impact for nurse practitioners by introducing physician assistant to medical service suggested by Bureau of Health is high because there is lots of overlap of medical practice between the two professionals. We hope that the participation of verified nurse practitioners under the regulation of specific law can improve the quality of medical service, otherwise, we are afraid that nurse practitioners may break the law, become fake doctors and be sentenced, which will cause great impact and bad influence of medical service in Taiwan.
參考文獻: 教科書\n1. 林山田,刑法通論,元照,增訂10版,2008年1月。\n2. 黃丁全,醫事法,元照出版有限公司,2000年7月,出版一刷。\n3. 蘇嘉宏、吳秀玲,醫事護理法規概論,三民書局,2008年2月,修訂8版\n1刷,頁209。\n4. 劉文瑢編著,醫事法要義,合記圖書出版社,民國88年11月初版,頁159。 5. 黃丁全著,醫事法,月旦出版社股份有限公司,民國八十四年十一月版,\n頁 77。\n6. 曾育裕,醫護法規,五南圄書出版股份有限公司,2007年10月,4版,頁86。\n7. 李聖隆,醫護法規概論,華杏出版股份有限公司,2001年,5版,頁216。 \n8. 黃丁全,護理事故的理論與實例,永然文化出版股份有限公司,1999年8月,頁48。\n9. 蔡墩銘,醫事刑法要論,翰蘆圖書出版有限公司,2005年9月,2版,頁116–117。\n10. 林山田,刑法通論 (下),1977年。\n11. 黃榮堅,基礎刑法學 (上),元照,1977年,頁121。\n12. 廖正豪,過失犯論,三民書局,1993年,頁99。\n13. 蘇俊雄,刑法總論I,1995年,頁19。 \n14. 蔡墩銘,刑法精義,翰蘆,2000年,頁9。\n15. 黃榮堅,刑罰的極限,元照,2000年4月。\n16. 曾隆興,現代損害賠償法論五版,1985年6月再版,頁428。\n17. 莇立明,中井美雄,醫療過誤法,青林書院,1994年,頁186。\n專書\n1. 曾淑瑜,醫療過失與因果關係,翰蘆圖書,2007年10月再版。\n2. 施茂林,醫病關係與法律風險管理防範,五南圖書出版股份有限公司,2015年10月。\n3. 李伯璋、曾平杉,醫療紛爭在臨床醫學與法律實務的探討,新學林出版股份有限公司,2010年1月。\n4. 許玉秀,探索過失犯的結構,主觀與客觀之間,1977年。\n專書論文\n1. 李聖傑,過失犯罪行為的檢驗–評臺灣板橋地方法院92年矚訴字第1號刑事判決,民主‧人權‧正義–蘇俊雄教授七秩華誕祝壽論文集,元照,2005年 9月,頁110–129。\n2. 黃榮堅,從醫療疏失論過失概念,刑事法之基礎與界限–洪福曾教授紀念專輯,學林,2003年,頁251以下。\n碩士論文\n1. 黃芷鈴,密醫犯罪特徵之研究以地方法院判決書為例,國立台北大學犯罪研究所碩士論文,2010年,頁28。\n2. 徐朝威,發療輔助行為在法規範中之界定,東吳大學法律學系研究所碩士論文,2010年,頁177。\n3. 黃芷鈴,密醫犯罪特徵之研究–以地方法院判決書為例,國立台北大學犯罪研究所碩士論文,2010年,頁28。\n4. 林昶燁,從法益保護觀點論醫師法第二十八條密醫罪之立法與解釋,國立台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文,2009年,頁117。 \n5. 卓育璇,醫療分工與信賴原則–我國與德國法之比較,國立台灣大學法律學 院法律學系碩士論文,2008年6月,頁1 60。\n期刊\n1. 邱慧洳,蔡秀鸞,童恆新,專科護理師的新時代,護理雜誌,2017年,64(1),頁11–16。\n2. 蔡秀鸞,邱慧洳,專科護理師之執業現況與困境,醫療品質雜誌,2014年, 8(1),頁24–32。\n3. Kleinpell, RM, Hravnak M, Magdic KS, & Guttendorf J. The acute care nurse practitioner. In A. B. Harmric, C.M. Hanson, M. F. Tracy, & E. T. O’Grady (Eds), advanced practice nursing: An integrative approach (5th eds., pp. 429-425). St Louis, MO: Elsevier. \n4. Isselbacher, EM; Eagle KA, Zipes DP, et al. Diseases of the aorta. Braunwald. Heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine 5th. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1997: 1546–81. ISBN 0721656633.\n5. DeBakey ME, Henly WS, Cooley DA, Morris GC Jr, Crawford ES, Beall AC Jr. Surgical management of dissecting aneurysms of the aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1965–01, 49: 130–49. PMID 14261867.\n6. Daily PO, Trueblood HW, Stinson EB, Wuerflein RD, Shumway NE. Managementof acute aortic dissections. Ann Thorac Surg. 1970-09, 10 (3): 237–47. doi:10.1016/S0003–4975(10)65594–4. PMID 5458238.\n7. Antero-Lateral Thoracotomy with Partial Sternotomy for Retrograde DeBakey III Type Closing Aortic Dissection Accession number; 06A0069173 Author; SUESHIRO MASAFUMI, HAYASHI SAIHO, KOBAYASHI HIRONORI Journal Title; Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery Journal Code:Y0192A ISSN:0285-1474 VOL.35; NO.1; PAGE. 21-24 (2006)\n8. von Segesser LK, Killer I, Ziswiler M, et al. Dissection of the descending thoracic aorta extending into the ascending aorta. A therapeutic challenge. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1994-10, 108 (4): 755–61. PMID 7934113.\n9. Slater, E.; DeSanctis, RW. The clinical recognition of dissecting aortic aneurysm. The American Journal of Medicine. 1976, 60 (5): 625–33. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(76)90496-4. PMID 1020750.\n10. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Increased maternal cardiovascular mortality associated with pregnancy in women with Turner syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2006–11, 86 (5 Suppl): S127–8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.082. PMID 17055808.\n11. Kamalakannan D, Rosman HS, Eagle KA. Acute aortic dissection. Crit Care Clin. 2007-10, 23 (4): 779–800. vi. doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2007.07.002. PMID 17964363.\n12. Shimony A, Filion KB, Mottillo S, Dourian T, Eisenberg MJ. Meta-analysis of usefulness of d-dimer to diagnose acute aortic dissection.. The American journal of cardiology. 2011 Apr 15, 107 (8): 1227–34. PMID 21296332.\n13. von Kodolitsch Y, Nienaber C, Dieckmann C, Schwartz A, Hofmann T, Brekenfeld C, Nicolas V, Berger J, Meinertz T. Chest radiography for the diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome. Am J Med. 2004, 116 (2): 73–7. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.08.030. PMID 14715319.\n14. Suzuki T, Mehta RR, Ince H, Nagai R, Sakomura Y, Weber F, Sumiyoshi T, Bossone E, Trimarchi S, Cooper J, Smith D, Isselbacher E, Eagle K, Nienaber C. Clinical profiles and outcomes of acute type B aortic dissection in the current era: lessons from the International Registry of Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Circulation. 2003, 108 (Suppl 1): II312–7. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000087386.07204.09. PMID 12970252\n15. Nazari S, Salvi S, Aluffi A, Visconti E, Rescigno G, Buniva P. Prosthesis for aortic arch substitution. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997-11, 64 (5): 1339–44. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00991-0. PMID 9386701.\n16. Aluffi A, Berti A, Buniva P, Rescigno G, Nazari S. Improved device for sutureless aortic anastomosis applied in a case of cancer. Tex Heart Inst J. 2002, 29 (1): 56–9. PMC 101273. PMID 11995854.\n17. Stefano Nazari: Expandable device type III for easy and reliable approximation of dissection layers in sutureless aortic anastomosis. Ex vivo experimental study. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2010;10:161–164. doi:10.1510/icvts.2009.216291\n18. Jeng Wei, Chung-Yi Chang, Yi-Cheng Chuang, Sung-Hou Sue, Kuo-Chen Lee, David Tung (2009): A new vascular ring connector in surgery for aortic dissection. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 138: 674–7.\n19. Woo KM, Schneider JI. High-risk chief complaints I: chest pain--the big three. Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am.2009-11, 27(4): 685–712. doi:10.1016/j.emc.2009.07.007. PMID 19932401.\n20. 葛謹,台北市醫公會會刊,2012年,第56卷第1期,頁17–22。\n21. Tan SY. Medical Malpractice. New Jersey, World Scientific, 2006, page 21-27; Walston-Dunham B. Medical malpractice law and litigation. New York. Thomson Delmar Learning, 2006; 2–4.\n22. Hope T, Savulescu J, Henrick J. Medical ethics and law. Thre core curriculum. 2nd ed. Oxford. Churchill Livingstone, 2008; 49-54.; Mason JK, Laurie GT: Mason and McCall Smith’s Law and medical ethics. 7th ed. Oxford, 2008; 305–344.\n23. Jackson E. Medical law, text, cases, and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford, 2010; 103-140; Brazier M, Cave E. Medicine, patients and the law. 4th ed. Penguin Boo, 2007; 155–184.\n24. 葛謹,信賴原則,台灣高雄地方法院年度醫溯自地號刑事判決評釋,醫學法學,第16捲第2期,2009年5月,頁51。\n25. 王皇玉,整形美容,病人同意與醫療過失中之信賴原則,月旦法學雜誌,第127期,2005年5月,頁60–61。\n26. 吳俊穎、賴慧蓁、陳榮基,組織醫療行為的形式過失責任釐清,月旦法學雜誌,第202期,2012年3月,頁167–168。\n27. 張麗卿,信賴原則在醫療過失中之適用–以護士麻醉致死案為例,東海大學法學研究,第33期,2010年12月,頁77。\n28. 馬耀中,錯誤醫療行為之刑事責任-德國刑事政策之思考,月旦法學教室,第180期,2011年10月,頁105。\n29. 陳子平,醫療團隊與形式過失責任(下),月旦法學雜誌,第191期,2011年4月,頁160。 \n30. 馬耀中,醫師刑事責任之探討—以告知義務、因果關係與信賴原則為中心,軍法專刊,第57卷第6期,2011年12月,頁35。\n31. 蘇嘉瑞,信賴原則在醫療糾紛之類型化與法學實證研究,科技法學評論,第7捲第1期,頁257–278。\n32. 葛謹,遲來的解釋,台灣桃園地方法院八十八年度易字第二十二號刑事判決評釋,月旦法學雜誌,第176期, 2010年1月,頁293。\n33. 張麗卿,無期待可能性,月旦法學教室,第68 期,2008年6月,頁18-19。\n34. 蔡淑鳳、王秀紅,台灣專科護理師的政策制訂與發展,護理雜誌,第54卷第6期,2007年12月,頁6。\n35. 邱慧洳,論專科護理師的執業範圍與值班現象,法學論述,2016年,8月號,頁50–66。\n36. 邱慧洳,醫療分工,信賴原則與過失責任歸屬–以醫師與護理師間關係為例,法學論述, 2016年,11月號,頁77–90。\n37. 蔡拒修,違反醫師罪(密醫罪)修正條文析論,醫事法學,第10卷第1期,2002年3月,頁23。\n38. 張婷,李選,護理人員因應執行醫療輔助行為引發醫療糾紛之法治觀,醫事法學,第21卷第1期,2012年6月,頁 54。\n39. 王志嘉,淺談虛報醫療費用與刑事詐欺罪,軍法專刊,第57卷第27期,2011年4月,頁125。\n40. 曾育裕,醫師法制對醫師執業資格條件之法律分析,全國律師,第15卷第9期,2011年9月,頁89。 \n41. 張麗卿,實習醫師無照行醫的例外允許–與談: 遲來的解釋–台灣桃園地方法院八十八年度易字第二00二號刑事判決評釋,月旦法學雜誌,第176期,2009年12月,頁298。 \n42. 王紀軒,密醫罪或業務過失犯罪–以新時代診所為例,高大法學論叢,第6卷第2期,2011年3月,頁193。\n43. 郭吉助,論醫學法律上之醫療行為(一) 由法制面談起,法務通訊,第2379期,2008年2月,頁3。 \n44. 陳鋕雄,遠距醫療與醫師親自診察檢驗義務,中原財經法學,第22期,2009年6月,頁61–62。\n45. 王服清、戴鈞宏、李怡玲,不確定法律概念與法律明確性原則之解析以醫藥法下的醫療業務行為為中心,醫事法學,第17期,2010年6月,頁70 。\n46. 邱慧洳,依法律觀點論專科護理師之執業範圍,醫事法學,2012年12月,頁68,73。\n47. 郭吉助,論醫學法律上之醫療行為(二) 由法制面談起,法務通訊,第2380期,2008年3月,頁 4–5。 \n48. 蔡淑鳳、王秀紅,台灣專科護理師的政策制訂與發展,護理雜誌,第54卷第6期,2007年12月,頁5–10。\n49. 陳忠五,醫療行為與消費者保護法服務責任之適用領域,台灣台北地方法院八五年度訴字第五一二五號與台灣高等法院八十七年度上字第一五一號(馬偕紀念醫院肩難產案件)判決評釋,台灣本土法學雜誌,第7期,2000年2月,頁37。\n50. 翁文能,由社會的需求看專科護理師的角色,台灣醫界,第53期,2010年,頁26–27。\n51. 童恒新、蔡秀鸞、王采芷,台灣專科護理師職業現況調查,台灣醫學,第14卷第3期,2010年5月,頁264–271。\n52. 邱慧洳,依法律觀點論專科護理師之執業範圍,醫事法學, 2012年12月,頁65。\n53. 蔡振修,違反醫師罪-密醫罪修正條文析論,醫事法學,第10卷第1期,2002年3月,頁23。\n54. 張瑀玲、林欣欣,從美國急症執業護理師看台灣專科護理師之發展,長庚護理,第19期,2008年6月,頁212–217。\n55. 王曼溪、林文綾,專科護理師的養成與發展,護理雜誌,第54卷第2期,2007年12月,頁11–15。\n56. 唐婉如、葉青惠,專科護理師的養成與發展,護理雜誌,第54卷第2期,2007年4月,頁85–90。\n57. 魏倩雯、童恆新、林秋芬、孫吉珍、史曉寧,台灣北部地區醫院專科護理師自我角色知覺,護理雜誌,第58卷第2期,2011年4月,頁22–30。\n58. 易成、侯怡慧、馬素華、唐婉如、陳文哲,北部醫學中心專科護理師對自身角色的看法,護理雜誌,第55卷第3期,2008年6月,頁31–38。\n59. 郭吉助,醫事法律上之醫療行為(一)由法制面談起,法務通訊,2008年2月28日,第2379期,頁3–6。\n60. 郭吉助,醫事法律上之醫療行為(二)由法制面談起,法務通訊,2008年3月6日,第2380 期,頁3–5。\n61. 蔡振修,違反醫師罪(密醫罪)修正條文析論,醫事法學,第10卷第1期,2002年3月,頁23。\n62. Increasing the number of full-time RNs on staff per day by one, there were 9 percent fewer hospital-related deaths. In intensive care units, 16 percent fewer in surgical patients and 6 percent fewer in medical patients . Healthcare Risk Management, February, 2008.\n63. Patients cared for in hospitals with higher RN staffing levels were 68% less likely to acquire a preventable infection, according to a review of outcome data of 15,000 patients in 51 U.S. hospitals. Medical Care, June, 2007.\n64. Improved RN staffing ratios are associated with a reduction in hospital-related mortality, failure to rescue, and lengths of stay. Every additional patient assigned to an RN is associated with a 7% increase in the risk of hospital acquired pneumonia, a 53% increase in respiratory failure, and a 17% increase in medical complications. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, May, 2007.\n65. Patients hospitalized for heart attacks, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia are more likely to receive high quality care in hospitals with better RN staffing ratios. Archives of Internal Medicine, December 11/25, 2006.\n66. If all hospitals increased RN staffing to match the top 25% best staffed hospitals, more than 6,700 in-hospital patient deaths, and, overall 60,000 adverse outcomes could be avoided. The findings do not include the ancillary value to families of reduced morbidity, such as decreased pain and suffering and days lost from work, and huge economic savings for the hospitals. Health Affairs, January/February, 2006.\n67. Cancer surgery patients are safer in hospitals with better RN-to-patient ratios. A study of 1,300 Texas patients undergoing a common surgery for bladder cancer documented a cut in patient mortality rates of more than 50%.Hospitals with low volume on cancer procedures can match standards of high volume urban medical centers just by increasing their RN ratios. Cancer, Journal of the American Cancer Society, September, 2005.\n68. Cutting RN-to-patient ratios to 1:4 nationally could save as many as 72,000 lives annually, and is less costly than many other basic safety interventions common in hospitals, including clot-busting medications for heart attacks and PAP tests for cervical cancer. Medical Care, Journal of the American Public Health Association, August, 2005.\n69. Chances of a hospital patient surviving cardiac arrest are lower during the night shift because staffing is usually lower at night, even though cardiac arrest occurs at all times of day or night according to a report on 17,991cardiac cases from 250 hospitals. Annual meeting, American Heart Association, November, 2003.\n70. The Institutes of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences reports that “nurse staffing levels affect patient outcomes and safety.” Insufficient monitoring of patients, caused by poor working conditions and the assignment of too few RNs, increases the likelihood of patient deaths and injuries. IOM, November 4, 2003.\n71. Inadequate staffing precipitated one-fourth of all sentinel events — unexpected occurrences that led to patient deaths, injuries, or permanent loss of function — reported to JCAHO, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospital Organizations, from 1997 to 2002, JCAHO, August 7, 2002.\n72. Up to 20,000 patient deaths each year can be linked to preventable patient deaths. For each additional patient assigned to an RN the likelihood of death within 30 days increased by seven percent. Four additional patients increased the risk of death by 31% .Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), October 22, 2002.\n73. 林東茂,信賴原則適用範疇與界限,東海法律研究,第11期,1999年12月,頁134。\n74. 林東茂,過失犯罪,法學講座,第13期,2003年1月,頁14以下。\n75. 曾淑瑜,信賴原則在醫療過失中之適用,月旦法學雜誌,第28期,1997年9月,頁85。\n76. 陳怡安,醫療服務嚴格責任之解釋論–兼評「肩難產案」判決,法學叢刊,第一七二期,民國87年10月。\n77. 林欣柔、楊秀儀,告別馬偕肩難產事件?新醫療法第八十二條第二項評析,月旦法學雜誌,第112期,2004年9月,頁 25–26。\n78. 許政賢,臺灣消費者保護法的創新與挑戰–二十週年的反思,月旦民商法雜誌,第45期,2014年9月,頁38–55。 \n79. 許政賢,消費訴訟的表見證明,台灣法學雜誌,第191期, 2012年1月,頁187–191。\n80. 黃立,消費者保護法對醫療行為的適用,律師雜誌,第217期,1997年10月,頁74。\n81. 李聖隆,醫療衛生事務與消費者保護法的關係,律師通訊,第175期,1994年4月,頁17–18。\n82. 陳聰富,醫療法:第五講–醫療侵權之歸責原則(上),月旦法學教室,第75期,2009 年1月,頁91。
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
法學院碩士在職專班
102961005
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102961005
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
100501.pdf1.98 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.