Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110845
題名: 非典型住宅自動估價系統探討-增建建物之應用
Automated valuation model of atypical housing – an application of buildings with additions
作者: 潘昱至
Pan, Yu Zhi
貢獻者: 張金鶚<br>江穎慧
Chang, Chin Oh<br>Chiang, Ying Hui
潘昱至
Pan, Yu Zhi
關鍵詞: 住宅增建
住宅效用
違章建築
拆除風險
自動估價
Housing addition
Housing utility
Illegal construction
Risk of tearing
Automated valuation model
日期: 2017
上傳時間: 11-Jul-2017
摘要: 增建增加房屋使用面積,提升消費者邊際效用;然而,增建本身卻亦隱含將面對被舉報拆除之風險。本文以消費者之效用與風險兩個角度切入,試圖探討增建對於住宅價格之影響。根據臺北市住宅交易案例資料,本文建立增建效用與風險模型,結果顯示增建確實能提升效用並增加不動產價值。當建物原有面積越大,效用呈現邊際遞減趨勢,增建邊際價格越低;新違建之住宅面臨較大之拆除風險,故增建邊際價格低於既存違建者;大樓增建價格普遍高於公寓增建,反映大樓增建能帶來更高效用;中低價位住戶受限於經濟預算而採用增建,故增建於中低價位住宅下相對效用較高。同時考量效用與風險的情況下,本文發現含既存違建大樓的價格約高於未含任何增建大樓價格5.6%,含既存違建公寓的價格約高於未含任何增建公寓價格1.9%。由於增建效用大於風險,為住戶提供經濟誘因,導致台灣住宅增建頻繁且持續增加。最後,本文進一步將增建住宅應用於自動估價系統,以拓展自動估價系統適用對象,突破以往估價標的僅限於未增建住宅之限制。
  Additions enhanced consumers’ utility with area expanding, while they also involved higher risks of demolishment. The purpose of the study was to estimate the effect of additions on housing price from perspectives of utility and risks. According to the transaction cases in Taipei City, it revealed that additions enhanced utility and had a positive effect on hosing price. As original housing area was larger, the marginal price of additions was lower. Resulted from higher risks of demolishment, the marginal price of additions built after 1994 was lower. The price of additions, either in buildings or in low-price housing, was higher. Besides, considering of utility and risk, this study found the price premium of buildings with additions at higher risks was 5.6%, and one of apartments with additions at higher risks was 1.9%. Housing additions, increasing utility more than risks, provided an economic incentive, and that was why housing additions occurred frequently and continually in Taipei. Finally, this paper built an automated valuation model to develop subject properties and comparable properties those included additions.
參考文獻: 內政部營建署,2017年1月份,「違章建築拆除案件統計」,『營建統計月報表』,取用日期:2017年3月1日。\n江穎慧,2009,「不動產自動估價與估價師個別估價之比較—以比較法之案例選取、權重調整與估值三階段差異分析」,『住宅學報』,18(1):39-6。\n宋鴻麒、曾亮、孫振義、王韡儒,(2010),臺灣住宅空間增建行為之調查,「空間設計學報」,9:1-16。\n李永山、李惠玲,2013,「結合群集分析與關聯規則於違章建築管理之研究」,『資訊管理展望』,15(1/2):1-17。\n李宗霖,2008,「高雄市違章建築管理之研究」,國立中山大學高階公共政策碩士學程碩士論文:高雄。\n李泓見、張金鶚、花敬群,2006,「臺北都會區不同住宅類型價差之研究」,『臺灣土地研究』,9(1):63-87。\n李春長、游淑滿、張維倫,2012,「公共設施、環境品質與不動產景氣對住宅價格影響之研究─兼論不動產景氣之調節效果」,『住宅學報』,21(1):67-87。\n杜功仁,2002,「台灣住宅整建需求之特性」,『建築學報』,39:87-100。\n沈育生、林秋瑾,2012,「不同人工神經網路架構在不動產大量估價之應用與比較」,『臺灣土地研究』,15(1):1-29。\n林韋宏、彭建文、林子欽,2003,「住宅屬性對空屋形成機率影響之研究-以臺北市為例」,『住宅學報』,12(2):91-107。\n林庭毅,2005,「臺灣都市違章建築處理模式之研究-以臺北市為例」,國立臺灣科技大學建築系碩士論文:臺北。\n林祖嘉、馬毓駿,2007,「特徵方程式大量估價法在臺灣不動產市場之應用」,『住宅學報』,16(2):1-22。\n林祖嘉、馬毓駿,2012,「貝氏多層次模型在臺灣不動產市場估價之應用-以臺北市住宅建物為例」,『住宅學報』,21(1):1-18。\n林祖嘉、黃麗蓉,2014,「嫌惡性風水對商用不動產價格影響之研究」,『住宅學報』,23(1):51-72。\n洪子茵、張金鶚,(2002),「台北市集合住宅管理維護模式之研究」,『都市與計劃』,29(3):421-444。\n張文愷、林柔孜,2014,「違章建築之權利移轉-以公示制度之本旨為出發」,『法令月刊』,65(3):97-115。\n張以智,2010,「新北市程序違章建築現況課題及改善策略研究」,國立臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所碩士論文:臺北。\n張永健,2015,「違章建築事實上處分權之理論建構」,『臺北大學法學論叢』,95:55-97。\n張怡文、江穎慧、張金鶚,2009,「分量迴歸在大量估價模型之應用-非典型住宅估價之改進」,『都市與計劃』,36(3):281-304。\n張欣民、陳奉瑤,2003,「自動估價系統(AVM)算不算是估價?」,『土地問題研究季刊』,2(2):72-77。\n張金鶚、高國峰、林秋瑾,2001,「臺北市合理房價-需求面分析」,『住宅學報』,10(1):51-66。\n張廖萬益,2013,「違章建築管理問題與對策之研究-以新北市為例」,國立中央大學土木工程學系碩士論文:桃園。\n梁仁旭,2015,「資本化率屋齡效果之比較分析」,『臺灣土地研究』,18(1): 83-113。\n梁仁旭、陳奉瑤,2014,『不動產估價』,第三版,臺北:中國地政研究所。\n陳奉瑤、楊依蓁,2007,「個別估價與大量估價之準確性分析」,『住宅學報』,16(2):67-84。\n陳淑美、張金鶚,2004,「家戶就業結構與通勤選擇之變遷分析─論1990年和2000年間臺北市的變化」,『都市與計劃』,31(4):295-312。\n彭建文、楊宗憲,2007,「自動估價系統對不動產估價師之潛在衝擊分析」,『住宅學報』,16(1):79-98。\n曾喜鵬、薛立敏,2008,「家戶住宅消費調整選擇行為之研究-台灣地區擁屋家戶的實證分析」,『台灣土地研究』,11(2):105-125。\n曾鵬光、江哲銘、陳肇堯,2010,「違章建築現象分類與其對外部環境衝擊之研究-以台南市為例」,『住宅學報』,19(2):59-80。\n曾鵬光、陳佳欣,2012,「建蔽率與容積率管制誘發開發商建築違建現象之探討-台南市新建透天住宅之實證分析」,『住宅學報』,21(1):19-36。\n游適銘、張金鶚,2010,「成本法估價偏誤之探討-分量迴歸應用」,『住宅學報』,19(2):81-105。\n馮兆麟,(2011),建築物二次施工問題之研究-以新北市為例,國立臺北科技大學土木與防災研究所碩士論文,臺北。\n黃建中,2008,「臺北市頂樓違章建築處理探討及改善對策之研究-以市民觀點論述」,國立中央大學土木工程學系碩士論文:桃園。\n黃美娟,2005,「電腦輔助土地大量估價方法--應用統計方法估價之介紹與探討」,『土地問題研究季刊』,4(1):125-135。\n黃錦堂,2001,「臺北市違章建築處理法治之研究(期末報告)」,臺北市政府法規委員會委託研究計畫。\n楊宗憲,2003,「住宅市場之產品定位分析—建商推案行為之研究」,『住宅學報』,12(2):123-139。\n楊宗憲、蘇倖慧,(2011),「迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究」,『住宅學報』,20(2):61-80。\n廖仲仁、張金鶚,2006,「不對稱的仲介服務價格效果:分量迴歸法之檢驗」,『都市與計劃』,33(1):1-16。\n臺北市建築管理工程處, 2015年9月份,統計月報表,取用日期:2017年3月1日。\n謝崑滄,2006,「都市違章建築問題之探討-以高雄市為例」,國立中山大學中山學術研究所碩士論文:高雄。\n謝博明,2015,「住宅次市場界定及住宅價格空間分析:以新升格之台南市為例」,『住宅學報』,24(1):29-54。\n鍾起岱,2013,「臺灣新舊違章建築日劃分之研究」,『都市與計劃』,40(3):287-303頁。\n龔永香、江穎慧、張金鶚,2007,「客觀標準化不動產估價之可行性」,『住宅學報』,16(2):23-42。\nBaron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A., 1986, “The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research:Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182.\nBerry, M. J. A., and Linoff, G., 2004, Data Mining Techniques: For Marketing, Sales, and Customer Support, New York: John Wiley and Sons.\nCalhoun, C. A., 2001, “Property Valuation Methods and Aata in the United States”, Housing Finance International, 16(2): 12-23.\nEmmanuel, J., 1982, “The Value of Squatter Dwellings in Developing Countries”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 30(4): 739-752.\nFayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G. and Smyth, P., (1996), “From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in Databases”, AI Magazine, 17(3):37-54.\nFisher, D. J., 2002, “Real Time Valuation”, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 20(3): 213-222.\nFollainand, J. R. and Malpezzi, S., 1980, Dissecting Housing Value and Rent, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.\nGlower, M., Haurin, D. R. and Hendershott, P. H., 1998, “Selling Time and Selling Price: The Influence of Seller Motivation”, Real Estate Economics, 26(4): 719-740.\nHaurin, D., 1988, “The Duration of Marketing Time of Residential Housing”, AREUEA Journal, 16(4): 396-410.\nHo, D. C. W., Chau, K. W. and Yau, Y., 2008, “Evaluating Unauthorized Appendages in Private Apartment Building”, Building Research and Information, 36(6): 568-579.\nJud, G. D. and Frew, J. R., 1990, “Atypicality and the Natural Vacancy Rate Hypothesis”, AREUEA Journal, 18(3): 294-301.\nKapoor, M. and le Blanc, D., 2008, “Measuring risk on investment in informal (illegal) housing: Theory and evidence from Pune, India”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38(4): 311-329.\nKoenker, R. and Bassett, G. W., 1978, “Regression quantiles”, Econometrica, 46(1): 211-244.\nKoenker, R. and Bassett, G. W., 1982, “Robust Tests for Heteroscedasticity Based on Regression Quantiles”, Journal of Derivatives, 50(1): 43-62.\nKoenker, R. and Hallock, K. F., 2001, “Quantile regression”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4): 143-156.\nLai, L. W. C. and Ho, D. C. W., 2001, “Unauthorized Structures in High-rise High-density Environment”, Property Management, 19(2): 112-123.\nMatysiak, G. and Wang, P., 1995, “Commercial Property Market Prices and Valuation: Analyzing the Correspondence”, Journal of Property Research, 12(3): 181-20.\nRosen, S., 1974, “Hedonic Price and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition”, Journal of Political Economics, 82(1): 34-55.\nRossini, P., and Kershaw, P.,(2008), Automated Valuation Model Accuracy: Some Empirical Testing, 14th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Kuala Lumpur.\nSeek, N. H., (1983), Adjusting Housing Consumption: Improve or Move, Urban Studies , 20: 455-469.\nSirmans, G. S., Macpherson, D. A. and Zietz, E. N., 2005, “The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models”, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13(1): 3-44.\nValentine, L., 1999, “Automated Valuation Models Speed the Appraisal Process”, ABA Banking Journal, 91(1): 46-48.\nVanderford, S. E., Mimura, Y. and Sweaney, A. L., 2005, “A Hedonic Price Comparison of Manufactured and Site-Built Homes in the Non-Msa U.S.”, Journal of Real Estate Research, 27(1): 83-104.\nYau, Y., 2015, “The Value of Building Safety: A hedonic Price Approach”, Urbani Izziv, 26(1): 92-104.\nYiu, C. Y. and Yau, Y., 2005, “Exemption and illegality–the Dividing Line for Building Works in Hong Kong”, CIOB(HK) Quarterly Journal, October 2005: 16-19.\nYiu, C. Y., 2005, “Institutional Arrangement and Unauthorized Building Works in Hong Kong”, Structural Survey, 23(1): 22-29.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系
104257020
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104257020
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
702001.pdf1.79 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.