Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112410
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor蕭代基zh_TW
dc.contributor.author詹偉志zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChan, Wei-Chihen_US
dc.creator詹偉志zh_TW
dc.creatorChan, Wei-Chihen_US
dc.date2017en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-31T04:22:28Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-31T04:22:28Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-31T04:22:28Z-
dc.identifierG0104258002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112410-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description經濟學系zh_TW
dc.description104258002zh_TW
dc.description.abstract我國倡議綠色稅制改革已歷三十餘年,迄今仍未能實施綠色稅制改革。本研究之目的在於探討台灣實施綠色稅制改革對於所得分配之影響效果,同時觀察我國是否存在實施綠色稅制改革之兩大障礙:國際競爭力及所得分配問題。\n\n首先,本研究在「稅收中立」原則下,設計我國可行之綠色稅制改革,包括徵稅與支出兩方面。在徵收面,參考蕭代基等(2009)及行政院版最終決議之單位稅額NT$ 750/tCO2e,估計能源及環境稅稅收;在支出面有兩項方案,(一)參考美國氣候領導力委員會(Climate Leadership Council, 2017),將稅收全數均分於全民;(二)參考蕭代基等(2009),將稅收用於補貼低收入戶、大眾運輸及改善財政收支。其次,應用「投入產出模型」於民國100年行政院主計總處之「產業關聯表」與民國104年「家庭收支調查報告」,估計實施綠色稅制改革對生產者與消費者之價格波動、所得分配及二氧化碳減量等效果。\n\n實證結果顯示,本研究設計之兩項綠色稅制改革方案皆能在「稅收中立」原則下,改善所得分配不均問題及減少二氧化碳排放量,且生產者與消費者價格上漲幅度不大,對國際競爭力之影響小。可同時達到環境保護、經濟效率、社會公平之目標,也可以達到改善財政收支、降低累積未償債餘額的財政永續效果。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBased on the principle of tax neutrality, this research proposes a Taiwan Green Tax Reform with two versions in its expenditure side. First version is to return all green tax revenue to every citizen evenly. Second version is to use all green tax revenue to subsidize low-income households and public transportation and to reduce fiscal deficits.\n\nThen, we apply the Input-Output Analysis to calculate producer and consumer price effects of the reform using the Taiwanese Input Output Table in 2011 and the 2015 Report on the Survey of Family Income & Expenditure. \n\nFinally, we examine the effects of the reform on income distributional in terms of the Gini coefficient and its effects on international competitiveness.\n\nThis research finds that the reform is able to improve income equity, environmental protection, economic efficiency and fiscal sustainability simultaneously, and have a minor impact on international competitiveness.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究動機及目的 1\n第二節 研究方法及範圍 12\n第三節 研究架構 12\n第二章 文獻回顧 13\n第一節 雙重紅利 14\n第二節 租稅之所得分配效果 16\n第三節 衡量所得分配效果之方法 19\n第三章 稅制設計 22\n第一節 能源及環境稅的架構介紹 22\n第二節 各類稅額之訂定 23\n第三節 稅收用途 37\n第四章 研究方法 39\n第一節 投入產出分析 39\n第二節 衡量所得分配 42\n第五章 資料來源及其處理方式 45\n第一節 產業部門分類 45\n第二節 生產者與消費者價格轉換矩陣 48\n第三節 家庭收支調查 52\n第六章 實證結果 53\n第一節 能源及環境稅稅收效果 53\n第二節 所得分配效果 59\n第三節 國際競爭力效果 63\n第四節 二氧化碳減量效果 68\n第五節 大眾運輸效果 70\n第六節 財政收支效果 72\n第七章 結論與未來研究方向 74\n第一節 結論 74\n第二節 未來研究方向 75\n參考文獻 78\n中文 78\n英文 80\n附錄一 補貼大眾運輸 85\n第一節 汽車客運營運現況 85\n第二節 汽車客運補貼方式 88\n第三節 偏遠地區定義 89\n第四節 偏遠地區補貼作業 91\n第五節 台中市免費公車計畫 93\n\n表目錄\n表1-1-1 各國綠色稅制改革方案 2\n表3-2-1 各能源二氧化碳排放係數 24\n表3-2-2 各能源溫室氣體環境稅之單位稅額表 25\n表3-2-3 各能源需求彈性值 26\n表3-2-4 2017年2月台日韓油品稅後價格 27\n表3-2-5 各能源能源稅之單位稅額表 30\n表3-2-6 模型變數定義 32\n表3-2-7 各能源稅前消費量 34\n表3-2-8 各能源稅前價格 35\n表3-2-9 各能源稅後消費量 36\n表5-1-1 產業關聯表產業部門分類 46\n表5-2-1 生產者與消費者價格轉換矩陣部門分類 48\n表5-2-2 生產者與消費者價格轉換矩陣 49\n表6-1-1 能源及環境稅之單位稅額合計表 54\n表6-1-2 能源及環境稅之每年淨調整稅額表 56\n表6-1-3 能源及環境稅稅收表 58\n表6-2-1 能源及環境稅稅收用途-所得補貼 60\n表6-3-1 生產者稅後價格波動表 64\n表6-3-2 消費者稅後價格波動表 67\n表6-4-1 能源及環境稅之二氧化碳減量效果(萬公噸CO2e) 69\n表6-5-1 能源及環境稅稅收用途-補貼大眾運輸 71\n表6-6-1 能源及環境稅稅收用途-改善財政收支 73\n附表1-1-1 歷年大眾運輸發展計畫 86\n附表1-3-1 全台偏遠地區 89\n附表1-3-2 偏遠地區公路汽車客運統計 90\n\n圖目錄\n圖1-1-1 台灣歷年吉尼係數比較 7\n圖1-1-2 1990年代台灣與鄰近國家之吉尼係數比較 8\n圖1-1-3 2000年代台灣與鄰近國家之吉尼係數比較 9\n圖1-1-4 2015年台灣與OECD國家之吉尼係數比較 11\n圖3-1-1 能源及環境稅架構 22\n圖4-2-1 羅倫茲曲線 43\n圖6-2-1 兩項所得分配方案之吉尼係數比較 60\n圖6-2-2 估計實施綠色稅制改革之吉尼係數比較 62\n附圖1-2-1 大眾運輸補貼方式 88zh_TW
dc.format.extent1591878 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104258002en_US
dc.subject綠色稅制改革zh_TW
dc.subject所得分配zh_TW
dc.subject雙重紅利zh_TW
dc.subject投入產出分析zh_TW
dc.subjectGreen tax reformen_US
dc.subjectIncome distributionen_US
dc.subjectDouble dividenden_US
dc.subjectInput-Output analysisen_US
dc.title台灣綠色稅制改革對所得重分配效果之影響zh_TW
dc.titleAn Income Distributional Analysis of Green Tax Reforms in Taiwanen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference中文\n1. OECD(1998),「綠色稅制改革-OECD最新環境報告」,蕭代基與葉淑琦(翻譯),台北:台灣地球日出版社。\n2. 于宗先與王金利(1999),《台灣泡沫經濟》,台北:聯經出版社。\n3. 王塗發(1986),「投入產出分析及其應用-台灣地區實證研究」,《台灣銀行季刊》,37(1),186-218。 \n4. 交通部運輸研究所,2015,「先進公共運輸系統整合資料庫加值應用與示範計畫」,台北:交通部運輸研究所。\n5. 朱澤民、郭迺鋒、楊浩彥、葉黛菱與王嘉齡(2001),「台灣地區綠稅稅制設計之研究」,朱澤民與郭迺鋒(主持),台北:行政院財政改革委員會。\n6. 行政院主計總處(2015),「104年家庭收支調查報告」,台北:主計總處。\n7. 行政院主計總處(2015),「民國100年產業關聯表編製報告」,台北:主計總處。\n8. 李駿謙(2004),「我國所得稅制度重分配效果之解析」,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。\n9. 林師模(1997),「課徵燃料稅對所得階層及城鄉福利影響之一般均衡分析」,《因應溫室效應之經濟工具及其經濟影響研討會論文集》,111-138,新竹:國立清華大學。\n10. 徐偉初(2014),「台灣租稅制度所得重分配效果之研究:2001-2011之個體模擬分析」,《財稅研究》,43(1),1-37。\n11. 徐鳳英(2015),「綠色租稅改革及所得分配之一般均衡分析」,中原大學國際經營與貿易研究所碩士論文。\n12. 陳小玲(2002),「我國石油稅制綠色改革」,國立台北大學資源管理研究所碩士論文。\n13. 陳宛君(2015),「以加拿大卑詩省碳稅為典範探討台灣施行碳稅政策之要點」,《台灣銀行季刊》,66(4),130-157。\n14. 陳添枝(2015),「1990年後台灣產業的發展-規模的迷思」,李誠、蕭代基、吳中書與王健全(主編),《于宗先院士及台灣經濟發展政策》,199-225,台北:中央研究院經濟研究所。\n15. 楊子菡與蘇漢邦(2002),「綠色租稅改革的租稅福利成本與結構效果」,《農業與經濟》,29,29-54。\n16. 溫麗琪、郭迺鋒與黃耀輝(2002),「空氣汙染防制費與相關賦稅之整合研究」,溫麗琪(主持),行政院環保署(委託),NSC-88-EPA-Z-170-002,台北:中華經濟研究院。\n17. 蕭代基、陳明真、陳筆、黃耀輝、洪志銘與黃德秀(2009),「綠色稅制之研究」,蕭代基(主持),財政部賦稅署(委託),PG9708-0118,台北:中華經濟研究院。\n18. 蘇漢邦(1999),「課徵碳稅對『總體經濟』與『所得分配』影響之一般均衡分析」,國立台灣大學農業經濟學研究所碩士論文。\n\n\n英文\n1. Aghion, P., A. Dechezlepretre, D. Hemous, R. Martin, and J. Van Reenen (2016), "Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry," Journal of Political Economy, 124(1), 1–51.\n2. Aldy, J. E., and W. A. Pizer (2015), "The Competitiveness Impacts of Climate Change Mitigation Policies," Journal of the Association of Environment and Resource Economists 2(4), 565–95.\n1. \n3. Altig, D., A. Auerbach, L. Kotlikoff, K. Smetters and J. Walliser (1997), "Simulating U.S. Tax Reform," National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 6248.\n4. Baker, J. A. Ⅲ, M. Feldstein, T. Halstesd, N. Gregory Mankiw, H. M. Paulson, Jr., G. P. Shultz, T. Stephenson and R. Walton (2017), "The Conservative Case for Carbon Dividends," Washington, D.C.: Climate Leadership Council.\n5. Bovenberg, A. L. and R. A. de Mooij (1994), "Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation," American Economic Review, 84, 1085-1089.\n6. Caspersen, E. and G. E. Metcalf (1994), "Is a Value Added Tax Regressive? Annual versus Lifetime Incidence Measures," National Tax Journal, 47(4), 731-46.\n7. Claus, I., J. Martinez-Vazquez and V. Vulovic (2012), "Government Fiscal Policies and Redistribution in Asian Countries," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper, No. 12-13.\n8. Corbett, J. J., H. Wang and J. J. Winebrake (2009), "The Effectiveness and Costs of Speed Reductions on Emissions from International Shipping," Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(8), 593-598.\n9. Dechezlepretre, A., M. Sato (2017), "The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 0, 1–25.\n10. DeWitt, D. E., H. Dowlatabadi and R. J. Kopp (1991), "Who Bears the Burden of Energy Taxes?" Discussion Paper QE91-12, Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.\n11. Feenberg, D., A. Mitrusi and J. M. Poterba (1997), "Distributional Effects of Adopting a National Retail Sales Tax," Tax Policy and the Economy, 11, 49-89.\n12. Fullerton, D. and D. L. Rogers (1993), Who Bears the Lifetime Tax Burden? Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.\n13. Gale, W. G., S. Houser and J. K. Scholz (1996), "Distributional Effects of Fundamental Tax Reform," in H. Aaron and W. G. Gale, (ed.), Economic Effects of Fundamental Tax Reform, 281-320, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.\n14. Goulder, L. H. (1995), "Effects of Carbon Taxes in an Economy with Prior Tax Distortions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29(3), 271-297.\n15. Hamilton, K. and G. Cameron (1994), "Simulating the Distributional Effects of a Canadian Carbon Tax," Canadian Public Policy, 20(4), 385-399.\n16. Hamond, M. J., S. J. DeCanio, P. Duxbury, A. H. Sanstad and C. H. Stinson (1997), "Tax Waste," Challenge, 40(6), 53-62.\n17. Harberger, A. C. (1962), "The Incidence of the Corporation Income Tax," The Journal of Political Economy, 70(3), 215-240.\n18. Harrison, D., JR (1994), The Distributive Effects of Economic Instruments for Environmental Policy, Paris: OECD.\n19. Hassett, K. A., A. Mathur and G. E. Metcalf (2009), "The Incidence of a US Carbon Tax: A Lifetime and Regional Analysis," The Energy Journal, 30(2), 155-178.\n20. Heady, C. J., A. Markandya, W. Blyth, J. Collingwood, P. G. Taylor (2000), Study on the Relationship between Environmental/Energy Taxation and Employment Creation, Belgium: European Commission.\n21. Hicks, J. R. (1932), The Theory of Wages, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.\n22. IPCC (2006), 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, New York: IPCC.\n23. Jaffe, A. B., S. R. Peterson, P. R. Portney, and R. N. Stavins (1995), "Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of US Manufacturing: What does the Evidence Tell Us?" Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 132–63.\n24. Lee, D. R. and W. S. Misiolek (1986), "Substituting Pollution Taxation for General Taxation: Some Implications for Efficiency in Pollutions Taxation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 13(4), 338-347.\n25. Markandya, A. (2012), "Environmental Taxation: What We Learnt in the Last 30 Years?" in L. Castellucci and A. Markandya, (ed.), Environmental Taxes and Fiscal Reform, 9-56, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.\n26. McGuire, M. C. (1982), "Regulation, Factor Rewards, and International Trade," Journal of Public Economics, 17(3), 335–54.\n27. Metcalf, G. E. (1993), "The Lifetime Incidence of State and Local Taxes: Measuring Changes During the 1980’s," National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 4252.\n28. Metcalf, G. E. (1994), "Lifecycle vs. Annual Perspectives on the Incidence of a Value Added Tax," Tax Policy and the Economy, 8, 45-64.\n29. Metcalf, G. E. (1999), "A Distributional Analysis of Green Tax Reforms," National Tax Journal, 52(4), 655-681.\n30. Mohr, R. D. (2002), "Technical Change, External Economies, and the Porter Hypothesis," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43(1), 158–68.\n31. OECD (1997), Environmental Taxes and Green Tax Reform, Paris: OECD.\n32. OECD (2000), Tax Burdens: Alternative Measures, Paris: OECD.\n33. OECD (2001), Environmentally Related Taxes in OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.\n34. Pearce, D. (1991), "The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming," The Economic Journal, 101(407), 938-948.\n35. Pearson, M. (1991), The European Carbon Tax: An Assessment of the European Commission`s Proposals, London: The Institute for Fiscal Studies.\n36. Pechman, J. (1985), Who Paid the Taxes 1966-1985, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.\n37. Pechman, J. A. and B. A. Okner (1974), Who Bears the Tax Burden? Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.\n38. Pigou, A. C. (1920), The Economics of Welfare 3th, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.\n39. Pigou, A. C. (1932), The Economics of Welfare 4th, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.\n40. Plotnick, R. (1981), "A Measure of Horizontal Inequality," The Review of Economics and Statistics, 63(2), 283-288.\n41. Porter, M. E., and C. van der Linde (1995), "Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate," Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–34.\n42. Poterba, J. M. (1989), "Lifetime Incidence and the Distributional Burden of Excise Taxes," American Economic Review, 79(2), 325-330.\n43. Poterba, J. M. (1991a), "Is the Gasoline Tax Regressive?" Tax Policy and the Economy, (5), 145-164.\n44. Poterba, J. M. (1991b), "Tax Policy to Combat Global Warming: On Designing a Carbon Tax," National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 3649\n45. Sato, M., and A. Dechezlepretre (2015), "Asymmetric Industrial Energy Prices and International Trade," Energy Economics, 52, S130–41.\n46. Siedman, L. S. (2009), Public Finance, New York: McGraw-Hill.\n47. Terkla, D. (1984), "The Efficiency Value of Effluent Tax Revenues," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 11(2), 107-123.\n48. Tullock, G. (1967), "Excess Benefit," Water Resources Research, 3(2), 643-644.\n49. Walls, M. and J. Hanson (1996), "Distributional Impact of an Environmental Tax Shift: The Case of Motor Vehicle Emissions Taxes," Discussion Paper, 96-11, Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.\n50. Williams, R. C. Ⅲ (2016), "Environmental Taxation," National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 22303.zh_TW
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
800201.pdf1.55 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.