Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112803
題名: 中國「一帶一路」倡議對「大湄公河次區域」發展的機會與挑戰:「地緣政治」與「地緣經濟」研究途徑
A Study on the potential effects of the “One Belt, One Road” Initiative in the Development of the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS): Geopolitical and geo-economic perspectives
作者: 郭佳勳
Kuo, Chia Hsun
貢獻者: 王定士
Wang, Ding Shu
郭佳勳
Kuo, Chia Hsun
關鍵詞: 一帶一路
大湄公河次區域
地緣政治
地緣經濟
One Belt, One Road
Greater Mekong Subregion
Geopolitics
Geo-economics
日期: 2017
上傳時間: 13-Sep-2017
摘要: 當今全球正面臨著政治、經濟、環境等多項議題的挑戰,國家為求發展及自身地位,致力於經貿或安全等面向之區域整合,惟國家間競爭行為亦從未稍歇。中國於2013年提出一帶一路倡議,企圖加強與歐亞大陸的連結,維持自身經濟發展領先地位,其中,中南半島因鄰接中國大陸,且具有重要戰略價值,是中國對外發展的首選,同時,該地區亦受到美、日、俄等強國重視。\n 前於1992年,亞洲開發銀行倡議大湄公河次區域合作計畫案,協助中南半島經貿發展與實質建設,中國在此機制下,與中南半島國家建立了豐富的合作經驗,亦提供了該區大量的資金與技術。隨著中國經濟實力不斷提升以及一帶一路的提出,中國持續加碼投資,欲掌握該區發展主導權並排除美日等勢力之意圖不言可喻。\n 惟經濟建設利多不僅為大湄公河次區域提供機會,亦將帶來些許挑戰,本研究整理一帶一路倡議對大湄公河次區域發展的機會與挑戰如下:\n1.中南半島五國面臨的利益與機會:帶來更多的資金與建設、區域貿易機制變得具體可行、帶來其他強國的投資或技術合作、啟動新興產業發展契機\n2.中南半島五國面臨的挑戰與威脅:過度依賴中國易受中方控制、介在強國間易不慎得罪某方、限縮政治決策上的主體性、開發對環保的影響\n3.中國面臨的利益與機會:獲取能源替代路徑、讓企業走出去以維持經濟成長表現、加強西部地區開發、平衡南海爭議、提升人民幣國際化\n4.中國面臨的挑戰與威脅:政治及資金方面的風險、當地種族或環保衝突、外國勢力挑戰
Today, the world is facing the challenges of politics, economic structure, climate change and so on. The countries endeavored to make integration in aspects of economy, trade and security while the competition among countries has never been in a rest. In 2013, China has proposed OBOR initiative in an attempt to strengthen ties with the Eurasian continent and to maintain its leading status in economic development. The Indochina Peninsula, due to the adjacency to China and important strategic value, was regarded as the first choice of going out by China. At the same time, this region has also been valued by other powers, such as the United States, Japan and Russia.\n In 1992, the Asian Development Bank initiated the Greater Mekong Subregion Cooperation Program to assist the economic and substantial development in the Indochina Peninsula. Under this mechanism, China has established a wealth of cooperation experience with the Indochina Peninsula countries and also offered lots of funds and technology. With the continuous enhancement in economy and the implementation of OBOR, China kept on increasing investment. The intentions of hoping to dominate this region and exclude the strength of the United States and Japan are very clear.\n China’s initiative may create opportunities for the region but may cause challenges as well. The potential effects of the OBOR in the development of the Greater Mekong Subregion are as follows:\n1. The interests and opportunities of the five countries in the Indochina Peninsula: more money and construction being brought, to make the regional trade mechanism feasible, to gain investment or technical cooperation from other powers and to activate the development of emerging industries.\n2. The challenge and threat of the five countries in the Indochina Peninsula: over-reliance on China leading to concession to China, being easy to offend certain side of the powers, to diminish the liberty of political decision-making and the impact on the environment.\n3. The interests and opportunities of China: to find out alternative transport route of energy, to let the enterprises go out and to maintain economic growth, to strengthen the development of the western region, to relieve the conflict in the South China Sea and to internationalize the RMB.\n4. The challenge and threat of China: political and financial risks, local race or environmental conflict and challenges from foreign powers.
參考文獻: English\n\nBBC (2016, Oct. 7). President Obama lifts Myanmar trade sanctions. Retrieved from: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-37592380 \nChina FTA Network (2015, Dec 2). Gao Hucheng Is Interviewed by the Xinhua News Agency on the Successful Signing of the China-ASEAN FTA Upgrading Protocol. Retrieved from: http://fta.mofcom.gov.cn/enarticle/chinadmen/endmnews/201512/29597_1.html \nChina-Britain Business Council (2015, Sep). One Belt One Road- A role for UK Companies in developing China`s new initiative- New Opportunities in China and beyond. Retrieved from: http://www.cbbc.org/cbbc/media/cbbc_media/One-Belt-One-Road-main-body.pdf\nCNBC (2015, June 25). Is AIIB the answer to Asia’s infrastructure needs? Retrieved from: http://www.cnbc.com/2015/06/25/is-aiib-the-answer-to-asias-infrastructure-needs.html \nCNN (2016, Oct. 20). In China, Duterte announces split with US: `America has lost`. Retrieved from: http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/20/asia/china-philippines-duterte-visit/\nDaw Chaw Chaw Sein. Myanmar’s Perspective of “One Belt, One Road”. Internal Document for Silk Road Forum 2015. Retrieved from: http://en.drc.gov.cn/DawChawChawSein.pdf\nEikenberry, Karl W.(Spring,1995). Does China Threaten Asia-Pacific Regional Stability. Parameters, 25(1).82-103.\nEmma V. Broomfield (2003). Perceptions of Danger: The China threat theory. Journal of Contemporary China, 12(35), 265-284.\nErnest Z. Bower (2012, Jul. 24). U.S. Moves to Strengthen ASEAN by Boosting the Lower Mekong Initiative. CSIS. Retrieved from: https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-moves-strengthen-asean-boosting-lower-mekong-initiative\nForbes Andrew (2007, Apr 26). Why Vietnam loves and hates China. Asia Times. Retrieved from: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/ID26Ae01.html\nFrances Martel (2016, Dec 23). Japan Prepares to Rival China with Record-Breaking Defense Budget. Breitbart. Retrieved from: http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/12/23/japan-record-defense-funding/ \nGlobal Times (2015, March 31). China maps out `One Belt, One Road` with action plan. Retrieved September 30, 2016, from: http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/914743.shtml\nGordon G. Chang (2015, Oct 6). TPP vs. RCEP: America and China Battle for Control of Pacific Trade. The National Interest. Retrieved from: http://nationalinterest.org/feature/tpp-vs-rcep-america-china-battle-control-pacific-trade-14021\nJagdish N. Bhagwati (1991). The World Trading System at Risk. Princeton: Princeton University Press, p.58.\nJanelle Retka (2016, Jun 27). Cambodia Positions Itself Along New Silk Road. The Cambodia Daily. Retrieved from: https://www.cambodiadaily.com/news/cambodia-positions-itself-along-new-silk-road-114629/\nKon Michael, Hsu Shu-Ming & Kung Long-Sheng (2016). Why Did China Take The One Belt And One Road (OBOR) Strategy and Initiate The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)? International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Research, 6(2), 39-53.\nLe Hong Hiep (2013, Aug 6). The US–Vietnam comprehensive partnership: key issues and implications. East Asia Forum. Retrieved from: http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2013/08/06/\nLola Caballero Laporta (2015, May 26). The Maritime Silk Road; China and The ASEAN. THE FINAL REPORT OF DEGREE IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND MARKETING. Retrieved from: http://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/handle/10230/24987/Caballero_2015.pdf?sequence=1\nLuttwak, E. N. (1990). From geopolitics to geo-economics: logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The National Interest, No.20, 17-23.\nMark Landler (2016, Sep 6). Obama Acknowledges Scars of America’s Shadow War in Laos. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/07/world/asia/obama-laos-bombs-war.html?_r=0 \nMichelle Mark (2017, Feb 11). Trump addresses North Korea missile test: `America stands behind Japan, its great ally, 100%`. Business Insider. Retrieved from: http://www.businessinsider.com/ap-south-korea-says-north-korea-test-fires-missile-into-sea-2017-2-2\nMom Chan Dara Soleil (2015, Dec 22). Cambodia Reconfirms Support for the One Belt, One Road Initiative. Agence Kampuchea Presse. Retrieved from: http://www.akp.gov.kh/?p=73898 \nNicholas Farrelly (2015, July 13). Can Myanmar benefit from China plan? Myanmar Times. Retrieved from: http://www.mmtimes.com/index.php/opinion/15460-can-myanmar-benefit-from-china-plan.html\nNicholas Trickett (2016, Dec 11). Can Russia ride China’s trade lead in Southeast Asia? Global Risk Insights. Retrieved from: http://globalriskinsights.com/2016/12/can-russia-ride-chinas-coattails-southeast-asia/\nNorman D Palmer (1991). The New Regionalism in Asia and the Pacific . Massachusetts: Lexington Books, pp.1-8.\nPrashanth Parameswaran (2016, Sep 21). China-Thailand Rail Project Back on Track With Cost Agreement. The Diplomat. Retrieved from: http://thediplomat.com/2016/09/china-thailand-rail-project-back-on-track-with-cost-agreement/\nRichard C. Paddock (2016, Sep 15). Obama’s Move to End Myanmar Sanctions Promises a Lift for Its Economy. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/16/world/asia/myanmar-sanctions-economy-us.html?_r=0 \nSteve Mollman (2016, Sep 22). Japan and China’s maritime tensions in the South China Sea are resurfacing World War II-era wounds. Quartz. Retrieved from: https://qz.com/932236/refugees-made-some-of-the-nicest-things-we-have/\nThe Economist (2013, Jun 1). Japan and South-East Asia Hand in hand. Retrieved from: http://www.economist.com/news/asia/21578714-shinzo-abe-has-compelling-diplomatic-well-economic-reasons-push-south-east-asia-hand\nThe Economist (2016, July 2). Our bulldozers, our rules - China’s foreign policy could reshape a good part of the world economy. Retrieved from: http://www.economist.com/news/china/21701505-chinas-foreign-policy-could-reshape-good-part-world-economy-our-bulldozers-our-rules\nThe Economist (2016, June 30). The AIIB- The infrastructure of power. Retrieved from: http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21701494-reasons-be-enthusiastic-about-chinas-answer-world-bank-infrastructure\nThe World Bank (2016, July1). New country classifications by income level. Retrieved October 3, from: http://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/new-country-classifications-2016\nWebsite of Mekong River Commission. 2017, March 7 Retrieved from: http://www.mrcmekong.org/mekong-basin/\nZeke J Miller (2014, May 23). U.S. Condemns Thai Takeover As a Coup, Leaving Aid in Question. TIME. Retrieved from: http://time.com/109601/us-thailand-coup/\nZhang Jianfeng (2016, Sep 8). Belt and Road initiative broadens prospect for China-Laos cooperation. CCTV English. Retrieved from: http://english.cctv.com/2016/09/08/ARTIhSdgfLCm2pweCNjG7uCh160908.shtml\nZheng B. (2005). China’s ‘Peaceful Rise’ to Great Power Status. Foreign Affairs, 84(5), 18-25.\n\n中文部分\n\nJoanne Chang (2016年6月),泛亞鐵路添變數?中國連結東南亞鐵路計畫在寮國受阻。 ASEAN PLUS 南洋誌,參照:https://aseanplusjournal.com/2016/06/06/\n山田周平(2016年3月),中國要將湄公河五國拉入本國經濟圈。日經中文網,參照:http://zh.cn.nikkei.com/politicsaeconomy/politicsasociety/18826-20160324.html\n中國外交部。中國參與大湄公河次區域經濟合作國家報告。2017年1月10日參照:http://www.mfa.gov.cn/chn//pds/ziliao/tytj/t419061.htm\n中國財政部。亞洲基礎設施協定。2016年10月12日參照:http://www.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/caizhengxinwen/201506/P020150629360882378045.pdf\n中國商務部。2015中國對外投資合作發展報告。2017年1月24日參照:fec.mofcom.gov.cn/article/tzhzcj/tzhz/upload/zgdwtzhzfzbg2015.pdf\n中國國家發展和改革委員會(2015年3月)。推動共建絲綢之路經濟帶和21世紀海上絲 綢之路 的願景與行動,參照:http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/gzdt/201503/t20150328_669091.html \n中國評論新聞網。亞投行助力“一帶一路”基礎設施建設,2016年6月17日參照:http://hk.crntt.com/crn-webapp/doc/docDetailCreate.jsp?coluid=7&kindid=0&docid=104270165&mdate=0617153555\n中華民國外交部官方網站,2016年11月29日參照:http://www.mofa.gov.tw/\n互動百科。中國參與大湄公河次區域經濟合作國家報告,2016年12月21日參照:http://www.baike.com/wiki/中国参与大湄公河次区域经济合作国家报告 \n天下雜誌(2015年12月)。今天 最「吸金」的東協經濟共同體誕生。2017年1月16日參照:http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5073562\n尹者江(2004),冷戰前後台灣地緣政治。國立政治大學外交研究所碩士論文。\n王能斌(2017年2月),「金色眼鏡蛇」聯合軍演明舉行 29國參與。青年日報,參照:http://news.gpwb.gov.tw/News/214350\n吳鵬翼(2013),東亞區域主義發展與中國的角色。龍華科技大學學報,No.33,pp91-113。\n宋成有(2015),戰後日本區域經濟合作構想的再審視。四川大學學報,5,pp26-36。\n宋國棟(2006),地緣經濟學芻議。平原大學學報,23(5),pp1 - 4。\n宋鎮照(2013年2月),美國重返亞洲的企圖與策略:霸權地位保衛戰。海峽評論,參照:https://www.haixia-info.com/articles/6360.html \n李建歡(2016年4月),越南新總理阮春福上任 中越關係、經濟改革成挑戰。The News Lens 關鍵評論,參照:https://www.thenewslens.com/article/27288\n李晨陽&宋少軍(2016),緬甸對”一帶一路”的認知和反應。南洋問題研究,No.4,pp 20-30.\n李靜旻、徐斯勤(2008),一個中國、兩種威脅:美國與日本知識界的文化策略。東亞研究,39(2),pp73-103。\n杜巧霞與劉亮君(2013),歐巴馬政府貿易政策之調整、轉變與對我國之啟示。貿易政策論叢,20,pp1-34。\n每日頭條(2016年9月23日),使越南成為東南亞的小霸王,蘇聯究竟為何要這麼做?參照:https://kknews.cc/zh-tw/history/y52a6k.html\n沈彩雲(2007),普丁時期俄羅斯與東南亞關係之研究。國立政治大學俄羅斯研究所碩士論文。\n沈默(1979):現代地緣政治–理論與實施。台北:三民書局,頁18。\n周禮順(2003),東南亞區域安全之研究。國立政治大學外交學系戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班論文。\n東南亞研究學院。Wikiversity,2016年11月15日參照:https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/School:%E6%9D%B1%E5%8D%97%E4%BA%9E%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6\n林庭瑤(2016年7月),馬國邀中國大陸 合建麻六甲港口。聯合新聞網,參照:https://udn.com/news/story/9500/1809284\n姜書益(2012年11月13日),談中國大陸與周邊鄰國的水資源衝突問題。台北論壇,參照:http://140.119.184.164/view/22.php\n段進軍、陸大道(1999),論大國東亞地緣經濟戰略與東亞地區經濟合作。經濟地理,19(2),pp22-26。\n香港文匯報(2016年5月)。中國-中南半島經濟走廊。2017年1月16日參照:http://paper.wenweipo.com/2016/05/27/CH1605270009.htm\n香港貿易發展局(2015年10月),東盟:「一帶一路」發展關鍵。商貿全接觸。2017年1月16日參照:http://hkmb.hktdc.com/tc/1X0A3UUO\n香港貿易發展局。關於一帶一路,2016年10月24日參照:http://beltandroad.hktdc.com/tc/about-the-belt-and-road-initiative/about-the-belt-and-road-initiative.aspx\n袁新濤(2014),絲綢之路經濟帶建設和21世紀海上絲綢之路建設的國家戰略分析。東南亞縱橫,No.8,pp3-8。\n國際日報(2015年6月4日)。寮國官員:”一帶一路”助寮國轉為”陸聯國”。參照:http://www.chinesetoday.com/big/article/1006632\n張銀銀(2016年8月),中日分別拿下一條泰國高鐵項目,博弈再升級。壹讀,參照:https://read01.com/zxdRzL.html\n章軻(2014年9月),報告:推進大湄公河次區域人民幣區域化。第一財經,參照:http://m.yicai.com/news/4023685.html\n陸以正(2006,Jan.),地緣經濟 主宰21世紀國際關係,國政評論,財團法人國家政策研究基金會,參照:http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/NS/095/NS-C-095-014.htm \n壹讀(2016年1月15日),上世紀越南不可能實現的—中南半島聯邦「夢」。參照:https://read01.com/kgzazM.html \n賀桂芬(2015年11月),等不及克拉地峽 中國自星手中奪下巴國大港。天下雜誌,http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5072405 \n黃嬿庭(2016年9月),各退一步 中泰鐵路合作案步入新階段。ASEAN PLUS 南洋誌,參照:https://aseanplusjournal.com/2016/09/22/aseanland0922/\n經濟部國際貿易局經貿資訊網。2017年3月8日參照:http://www.tpptrade.tw/intro1.aspx\n鉅亨網(2016年10月14日)。習近平亞洲行 首站柬埔寨 加快戰略對接推一帶一路。參照:http://news.cnyes.com/news/id/3575927\n鉅亨網(2016年10月24日)。泰國,處在十字路口的東盟大國。參照:http://news.cnyes.com/news/id/3586061\n廖采吟(2005),中國與東協合作之研究-以湄公河次區域合作為例。國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文。\n劉李峰(2004年6月),中國-東盟水果貿易現狀及展望,中國農村經濟,pp.61-64。\n劉海泉(2015年2月),一帶一路戰略的安全挑戰與中國的選擇。太平洋學報,23(2),pp72-79。\n劉益成(2016年1月),2015年兩岸經貿情勢回顧與2016年展望。兩岸經濟統計月報,No.273,pp3-1 to 3-7。\n劉莎莎(2016年12月18日),中泰鐵路明年初開建三年內完工 首段線路竟只建3.5公里。香港01網,參照:https://www.hk01.com/兩岸/60773/\n樓耀亮(2002),地緣政治與中國國防戰略。天津:天津人民出版社,頁8-9。\n範娥(2009年9月),中越關係分析:越南人眼裏的中國。BBC中文網,參照:http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/indepth/2009/09/090928_chinavietnam_relationship.shtml \n蔡東杰、洪銘德(2009),美中兩國在東南亞地區的軟權力構築與競爭。遠景基金會季刊,10(1),pp45-88。\n閱讀屋(2016年12月),中國—中南半島經濟走廊的建設進展、關鍵任務及推進策略。2017年1月16日參照:http://www.readhouse.net/articles/111738414/ \n霍娜(2016年5月),挺進東南亞 俄羅斯欲借中國東風?多維新聞,參照:http://global.dwnews.com/big5/news/2016-05-19/59740228.html\n簡紹琪(2015年4月),從死對頭到好夥伴 美國越南關係大躍進。風傳媒,參照:http://www.storm.mg/article/48124\n藍科銘(2011),大湄公河次區域經濟合作研究。新興市場,100-34,p.11。\n魏百谷,俄羅斯與東南亞國協的關係:政治熱,經濟冷。東協瞭望,2017年3月3日參照:http://www.aseancenter.org.tw/upload/files/outlook006-03.pdf\n嚴智宏,東南亞文化與社會。載於東南亞文化教學參考手冊。台北:教育部,頁79-116。\n蘋果日報(2016年7月26日),柬埔寨強力反對 東協避談譴責中國。參照:http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20160726/915432/\n蘋果日報(2016年8月18日)。開發皎漂特區 納一帶一路。參照:http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/international/art/20160818/19741111
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
103926006
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103926006
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
600601.pdf3.7 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.