Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114279| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 何萬順 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Her, One-Soon | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳佳琪 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chen, Chia-Chi | en_US |
| dc.creator | 陳佳琪 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | Chen, Chia-Chi | en_US |
| dc.date | 2017 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-01T06:14:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-11-01T06:14:14Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-11-01T06:14:14Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G0103555012 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114279 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 103555012 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 中文為一分類詞語言，其中包含了分類詞與量詞。分類詞與量詞 [數詞+ 分類詞/量詞+ 名詞]中佔據相同的位置，在句法上屬於同一個類別，但在語意的結構上分歧（何萬順, 2012b）；但是，前人的研究對於分類詞與量詞的界定標準卻不清楚，便造成了中文的分類詞的數量可以有數十到數百個之間的差異；何萬順（2012a）自數學的觀點，提出了在名詞的結構中，數詞和分類詞及量詞形成了乘數與被乘數的關係，而分類詞與量詞則扮演了被乘數的腳色；此外，分類詞的數值則必然是「1」，而量詞的數值則可為任何數值，且不一定為「1」。因此，本文將援用何萬順（2012a）之理論，以心理語言學的方式鑑別中文的分類詞與量詞在數值上的區分實益。本文將測試分類詞與MW1之間的差異已證實對中文為母語者而言，分類詞與量詞確實存在著數值上的差異，且由於此數值上的差異，將導致受試者在反應速度上亦呈現差異性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Chinese is a classifier language which requires classifiers and measure words to quantify nouns. Classifiers and measure words converge at syntactic level that they both occupy the same position in [Num+ C/M+ Noun] and belong to the same category, but they diverge semantically (Her, 2012b). However, previous studies did not provide a clear criterion to differentiate classifiers from measure words; as a result, the inventory of classifiers could range from several dozens to hundreds. Her(2012a) proposed that numerals and C/Ms formed as multiplicative relation from mathematical perspective; moreover, the mathematical value of classifier is necessarily ‘one’ while measure word is anything other than ‘one’. Therefore, the present study is based on Her’s theory and examines the mathematical interpretation of classifiers and measure words. The experiment will be conducted in the present study to examine the difference between C and MW1. We hypothesize that the mathematical difference exists between C and MW1 to Chinese native speakers and they will react to stimuli differently according to the value denoted by C or MW1. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．1\n第二章 文獻回顧．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．5\n第一節 名詞可數／不可數．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．6\n第二節 中文分類詞與量詞之語義區別．．．．．．．．．．．．．9\n第三節 中文分類詞與量詞之句法區別．．．．．．．．．．．．．．19\n一、形容詞修飾檢驗法．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．19\n二、「的」插入檢驗法 （de-insertion）．．．．．．．．．．．23\n三、中性分類詞「個」替換檢驗法（general ge-substitution）．26\n第四節 中文分類詞和量詞的數學意涵．．．．．．．．．．．．．．27\n第五節 心理語言學對中文分類詞及量詞的研究．．．．．．．．．．23\n第三章 實驗方法．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．36\n第一節 實驗前測．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．37\n一、實驗受試者．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．38\n二、實驗材料．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．38\n三、實驗流程．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．41\n四、前測結果．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．41\n第二節 正式實驗．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．44\n一、實驗受試者．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．45\n二、實驗材料．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．46\n三、實驗流程．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．48\n第四章 實驗結果與分析．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．51\n第一節 分類詞與M1之實驗結果．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．51\n第二節 討論．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．56\n第五章 結論．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．60\n第一節 結語．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．60\n第二節 心得．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．63\n參考文獻．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．64\n附錄一．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．71\n附錄二．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．74 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 1312331 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103555012 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 分類詞 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 量詞 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 促發效應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Classifiers | en_US |
| dc.subject | Measure words | en_US |
| dc.subject | Priming effect | en_US |
| dc.title | 中文分類詞與量詞之數學意涵 : 心理語言學的實證 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Mathematical Interpretation of Chinese Classifiers and Measure Words: Evidence from Psychological Experiments | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | Borer, H. (2005). In name only (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press on Demand. \nCappelletti, M., Butterworth, B., & Kopelman, M. (2006). The understanding of quantifiers in semantic dementia: A single-case study. Neurocase, 12(3), 136-145.\nChao, Y. R. (1965). A grammar of spoken Chinese. University of California Press.\nCheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R. (1998). Yi-wan tang, yi-ge tang: Classifiers and massifiers. Tsing Hua journal of Chinese studies, 28(3), 385-412.\nChien, Y. C., Lust, B., & Chiang, C. P. (2003). Chinese children`s comprehension of count-classifiers and mass-classifiers. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 12(2), 91-120. \nChierchia, G. (1998). Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. Events and grammar, 70, 53-103. \nCipolotti, L., Butterworth, B., & Denes, G. (1991). A specific deficit for numbers in a case of dense acalculia. Brain, 114(6), 2619-2637. \nCui, J., Yu, X., Yang, H., Chen, C., Liang, P., & Zhou, X. (2013). Neural correlates of quantity processing of numeral classifiers. Neuropsychology,27(5), 583.\nDehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371.\nErbaugh, M. S. (1986). Taking stock: The development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children. Noun classes and categorization, 399-436.\nFang, F. (1985). An experiment on the use of classifiers by 4-to 6-year-olds. Acta Psychologica Sinica. \nFillmore, C. J. (2006). Frame semantics. Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings, 34, 373-400.\nGreenberg, J. H.. (1972). Numeral Classifiers and Substantival Number: Problems in the Genesis of a Linguistic Type. Working Papers on Language Universals 9. 1-39.\nHer, O. S. (2012a). Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: A mathematical perspective and implications. Lingua, 122(14), 1668-1691.\nHer, O. S. (2012b). Structure of Classifiers and Measure Words: A Lexical Functional Account*. Language and Linguistics, 13(6), 1211. \nHer, O. S. (2015). Two Sides of a Coin Named one: Unifying Plural Markers and Numeral Classifiers. Keynote speech presented at the International Conference on Applied Linguistics, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, May 30-31, 2015.\nHer, O. S., & Hsieh, C. T. (2010). On the semantic distinction between classifiers and measure words in Chinese. Language and linguistics, 11(3), 527-551.\nHer, O. S., & Lai, W. J. (2011, May). Classifiers: the many ways to profile ‘one’. In Chinese Lexical Semantics Workshop (pp. 3-5).\nHer, O. S.. & Lin, K. H (2015). On the Differentiation of Classifier and Measure Words. \nChina Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House, 52, 56-96.\nHsieh, M.-L. (2008). The internal structure of noun phrases in Chinese. Taipei city, Taiwan: Crane Publishing Co.\nHu, Q. (1993). The acquisition of Chinese classifiers by young mandarin-speaking\nchildren. Ph.D. Dissertation, Boston University.\nHuang, C. R., Chen, K. J., & Lai, C. X. (1995). Mandarin Chinese Classifier and Noun-Classifier Collocation Dictionary. Mandarin Daliy Press.\nHuang, C. R., & Ahrens, K. (2003). Individuals, kinds and events: classifier coercion of nouns. Language Sciences, 25(4), 353-373.\nIonin, T., & Matushansky, O. (2006). The composition of complex cardinals. Journal of Semantics, 23(4), 315-360.\nKuo, J. Y. C., & Sera, M. D. (2009). Classifier effects on human categorization: the role of shape classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 18(1), 1-19.\nKrifka, M. (1995). 11 COMMON NOUNS: A CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF CHINESE AND ENGLISH. The generic book, 398, University of Chicago Press.\nLakoff, G. (1986). Classifiers as a reflection of mind. Noun classes and categorization, 7, 13-51.\nLangacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford university press. \nLi, X. (2013). Numeral classifiers in Chinese: The syntax-semantics interface (Vol. 250). Walter de Gruyter.\nLi, C., & Thompson, S. (1981). A functional reference grammar of Mandarin Chinese. University of California Press.\nLi, P., Barner, D., & Huang, B. H. (2008). Classifiers as count syntax: Individuation and measurement in the acquisition of Mandarin Chinese. Language Learning and Development, 4(4), 249-290. \nLucy, J. A. (1992). Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis (Vol. 12). Cambridge University Press.\nLucy, J. A. (1996). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis (Vol. 13). Cambridge University Press.\nMeyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1975). Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. \nNotebaert, K., Pesenti, M., & Reynvoet, B. (2010). The neural origin of the priming distance effect: Distance‐dependent recovery of parietal activation using symbolic magnitudes. Human brain mapping, 31(5), 669-677.\nParis, M. C. (1981). Problèmes de syntaxe et de sémantique en linguistique chinoise (Vol. 20). (diffusion) Presses universitaires de France.\nPolk, T. A., Reed, C. L., Keenan, J. M., Hogarth, P., & Anderson, C. A. (2001). A dissociation between symbolic number knowledge and analogue magnitude information. Brain and Cognition, 47(3), 545-563.\nSchmitt, B. H., & Zhang, S. (1998). Language structure and categorization: A study of classifiers in consumer cognition, judgment, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 108-122.\nTai, J. H. (1994). Chinese classifier systems and human categorization. In honor of William S.-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change, 479-494.\nTai, J. H., & Chao, F. Y. (1994). A Semantic Study of the Classifier zhang. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association 29.3:67-78.\nTai, J., & Wang, L. (1990). A Semantic Study of the Classifier Tiao. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 25(1), 35-56.\nTang, C. C. J. (1990). A note on the DP analysis of the Chinese noun phrase. Linguistics, 28(2), 337-354.\nTang, C. C. (2005). Nouns or classifiers: a non-movement analysis of classifiers in Chinese. LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS-TAIPEI-, 6(3), 431. \nTulving, E., & Schacter, D. L.(1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247(4940), 301-306.\nUchida, N., & Imai, M. (1999). Heuristics in learning classifiers: The acquisition of the classifier system and its implications for the nature of lexical acquisition. Japanese Psychological Research, 41(1), 50-69.\nWei, W., Chen, C., Yang, T., Zhang, H., & Zhou, X. (2014). Dissociated neural correlates of quantity processing of quantifiers, numbers, and numerosities. Human brain mapping, 35(2), 444-454.\nYeung, A. (2005). An interface program for parameterization of classifiers in Chinese (Doctoral dissertation, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology).\nYeung, A., & Hoo, W. (2007). Multiplication basis of emergence of classifiers. Language and Linguistics, 8(4), 835-861.\nZhang, H. (2007). Numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 16(1), 43-59.\nZhang, N. N. (2009). Syntactic properties of numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. National Chung Cheng Univesity, Graduate Institute of Linguistics. | zh_TW |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 501201.pdf | 1.28 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.