Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115474
題名: 創新創業市場與資源錯置:以創投投資電子產業研發效率為例
Resource Misallocation in New Ventures : The Case of Innovation Investment in ICT Industry
作者: 陳郁喬
Chen, Yu-Chiao
貢獻者: 李文傑<br>王信實
Lee, Wen-Chieh<br>Wang, Shinn-Shyr
陳郁喬
Chen, Yu-Chiao
關鍵詞: 創新創業
創業投資
研發投入
資源錯置
公開發行
New Venture
R&D Investment
Venture Capital
Resource Misallocation
日期: 2017
上傳時間: 3-Jan-2018
摘要: 隨著經濟全球化的發展,創新創業在國際競爭的地位越來越重要,創新不僅是國家經濟增長的動力,也是企業長期競爭力的關鍵。我國創業投資在電子產業快速發展進程中,扮演緩解新創企業融資障礙的重要角色。近期各項經濟數據均顯示,伴隨國家產業創新政策,電子新創企業在研發投入過程中有嚴重的資源錯置問題。本研究以台灣創投投資電子產業之研發效率為例,研究結果證實電子新創企業於首次公開發行期間具研發效率不足現象,主要原因為企業致力於美化財報,提高資本支出以利當期產出反應高財務績效,而抑制研發投入作為上市(櫃)經營策略。
Innovation activities have long been accredited by its crucial role to sustain continuous long-term economic growth. Recent studies nonetheless suggested severe problems of input misallocation associated with innovation investment. This research measures input misallocations of venture capital supported business and identified significant underinvestment of new ventures right before their initial public offerings (IPOs). This is because new ventures have the incentives to adjust the reported earnings by cutting the R&D investment that is supposed to cut the current expense but not to affect short-term operational performance in the market. Therefore, new ventures would typically incur underinvestment in innovation activities right before IPOs.
參考文獻: 王平、李文傑,(2012),「台灣經濟發展之過去現在與未來」,李誠(主編),《後ECFA時代的台灣經濟發展政策》,遠流出版,頁23-60。\n陳東升,(2003),「積體網路:台灣高科技產業的社會學分析」,台北:群學出版社。\nAcemoglu, D., Robinson, J. A., & Verdier, T. (2012). Can`t We All Be More Like Scandinavians?Asymmetric Growth and Institutions in an Interdependent World. NBER Working Paper, No. 18441. \nAspinwall, M., & Greenwood, J. (2013). Collective Action in The European Union: Interests and The New Politics of Associability. London: Routledge.\nBartelsman, E., Haltiwanger, J., & Scarpetta, S. (2013). Cross-Country Differences in Productivity: The Role of Allocation and Selection. The American Economic Review, 103(1), 305-334. \nBegg, I. (1999). Cities and Competitiveness. Urban Studies, 36(5-6), 795-809. \nBreusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253. \nBuera, F. J., Kaboski, J. P., & Shin, Y. (2011). Finance and Development: A Tale of Two Sectors. The American Economic Review, 101(5), 1964-2002. \nChan, L. K., Lakonishok, J., & Sougiannis, T. (2001). The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures. The Journal of Finance, 56(6), 2431-2456. \nGompers, P. A., Mukharlyamov, V., & Xuan, Y. (2016). The Cost of Friendship. Journal of Financial Economics, 119(3), 626-644. \nHall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools. NBER Working Paper, No. 8498. \nHall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others? The quarterly journal of economics, 114(1), 83-116. \nHausman, J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271. \nHopenhayn, H., & Rogerson, R. (1993). Job Turnover and Policy Evaluation: A General Equilibrium Analysis. Journal of political economy, 101(5), 915-938. \nHsieh, C. T., & Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India. The quarterly journal of economics, 124(4), 1403-1448. \nHsieh, C. T., & Klenow, P. J. (2014). The Life Cycle of Plants in India and Mexico. The quarterly journal of economics, 129(3), 1035-1084. \nHuang, G., & Song, F. M. (2005). The Financial and Operating Performance of China`s Newly Listed H-firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13(1), 53-80. \nJain, B. A., & Kini, O. (2008). The Impact of Strategic Investment Choices on Post-Issue Operating Performance and Survival of US IPO Firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35(3‐4), 459-490. \nJang, S. L., & Huang, G. G. (2005). Public R&D and Industrial Innovations at the Project Levels: An Exploration of Taiwans Public Research Projects. Contemporary Economic Policy, 23(4), 636-646. \nJohnson, P. (1986). New firms: An Economic Perspective. London: Allen and Unwin. \nLagos, R. (2006). A Model of TFP. The Review of Economic Studies, 73(4), 983-1007. \nLanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent Quality And Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation With Multiple Indicators. The Economic Journal, 114(495), 441-465. \nLerner, J. (2009). Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Have Failed--and What to Do About It. Princeton University Press.\nLucas , R. (1978). On the Size Distribution of Business Firms. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 508-523.\nMcConnell, J. J., & Muscarella, C. J. (1985). Corporate Capital Expenditure Decisions and the Market Value of the Firm. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(3), 399-422. \nMegginson, W. L., Nash, R. C., & Randenborgh, M. (1994). The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: An International Empirical Analysis. The Journal of Finance, 49(2), 403-452. \nMikkelson, W. H., Partch, M. M., & Shah, K. (1997). Ownership and Operating Performance of Companies that Go Public. Journal of Financial Economics, 44(3), 281-307. \nMundlak, Y. (1978). Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data. Econometrica, 46(1), 69-85. \nPrescott, E. C. (1998). Lawrence R. Klein lecture 1997: Needed: A theory of total factor productivity. International economic review, 39(3), 525-551. \nRavenscraft, D., & Scherer, F. M. (1982). The Lag Structure of Returns to Research and Development. Applied economics, 14(6), 603-620. \nRobinson, J. A., & Acemoglu, D. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown.\nRomer, P. M. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of political economy, 94(5), 1002-1037. \nSaxenian, A. (1999). Silicon Valley`s New Immigrant Entrepreneurs. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California. \nScherer, F. M. (1965). Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions. The American Economic Review, 55(5), 1097-1125. \nSchumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
104255023
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104255023
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
502301.pdf2.95 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.