Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115772| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 嚴震生 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yen, Chen-Shen | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | 李政政 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Li, Cheng-Cheng | en_US |
| dc.creator | 李政政 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | Li, Cheng-Cheng | en_US |
| dc.date | 2018 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-02T04:01:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-02-02T04:01:16Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-02-02T04:01:16Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G1049260041 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115772 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國際研究英語碩士學位學程 (IMPIS) | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 104926004 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 臺灣礦業採掘有關的政治環境衝突往往被概念化為治理問題。也就是說，治理政策產生的衝突，是由於礦業採掘活動中「收益分配、政治參與、透明度和原住民社區的就業機會」等四個指標。然而，在治理層面忽略了原住民族長期受到邊緣化的歷史過程以及持續接受殖民的統治的治理模式，因此本文的主要論述是， 礦業採掘活動有關的政治環境衝突並非源自 “治理” 問題， 而更重要的是，此問題本身超越了現行的政治體制架構，因為國家、礦業採掘公司、原住民部落之間在土地議題上顯現出不同的本質觀點，雙方在政治體制的範圍上，以及文化、社會體系上，兩者皆沒有共同之處，而基於這一論點，本研究將對於南澳泰雅族人土地議題的奮鬥案立加以研究。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Political-environmental conflicts related to extractive industries in Taiwan tend to be conceptualized as problems of governance. These conflicts are generated from ill-designed policies that manage the distribution of revenues from extractive industries, formal political participation, transparency and employment opportunities for the indigenous community. The governance approach, however, does not take into account the history of marginalization and resistance of indigenous groups, or the permanence of colonial patterns of domination in Taiwan. The main argument of this paper is that the political-environmental conflicts related to extractive activities do not derive from problems of ‘governance’, but more significantly, they emerge as a consequence of divergences that transcend the current institutional framework. The different political ontologies among state, corporate, and the indigenous community over land revealed, each party operates within institutional parameters and socio-cultural systems which have nothing in common. This argument will be developed in the case study of the Atayal people’s territorial struggles in Nan’ao, Taiwan. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents \nAcknowledgements\nAbstract\nCHAPTER 1- INTRODUCTION 1\n1.1 MOTIVATION 1\n1.2 PURPOSE 3\n1.3 RESEARCH QUESTIONS, HYPOTHESE 8\n1.4 METHODOLOGY 12\nCHAPTER 2- THEORETICAL FRAMWORK 23\n2.1 OVERVIEW 23\n2.2 LITERATURE REVIEW 25\n2.2.1 Extractive Governance Discourse 25\n2.2.2 Political-environmental Conflicts as Problem of Governance 26\n2.2.3 The Sustainable Juruti Model and Multi-institutional Governance Partnership 28\n2.3 THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES 32\nCHAPTER 3- CONFIGURATION OF IDENTITY 36\n3.1 ATAYAL PEOPLE IN TAIWAN 36\n3.2 OVERVIEW OF NAN’AO RIVER BASIN 38\n3.3 KLESAN: FORMATION OF ATAYAL IDENTIY IN NAN’AO 40\n3.4 RIVER ALLIANCE: POLITICAL ALLIANCE ABOVE THE LEVEL OF COMMUNITY 42\n3.5 GAGA: ATAYAL JUSTICE AND GOVERNANCE SYSTEM 44\nCHAPTER 4- THE PROLONGED COLONIZATION 49\n4.1 PLACE AND DISPLACEMENT: THE TRANSFORMATION OF COLLECTIVITY 49\n4.2 THE HISOTRY OF LAND POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT 52\n4.2.1 JAPANESE PERIOD (1895-1945): THE IMPLMENTATION OF MODERN STATE SYSTEM 52\n4.2.2 CHINESE NATIONALIST PARTY RULING PERIEOD: A BANKRUPT MOUNTAIN ECONOMY 56\nCHAPTER 5- UNDERSTANDING ATAYAL RESISTANCE TO EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES: THE MEMORIES OF THE ATAYAL PEOPLE 61\n5.1 THE FIRST CONTACT OF THE MINING INDUSTRY 61\n5.2 DESIRABILITY OF INDUSTRIALIZATION AND THE INEVITABLITY OF PROGRESS 66\n5.3 THE CONSERVATION FOREST IS NOT CONSERVED 70\n5.4 LAND AND RESOURCE RIGHT: THE CONTEMPOARY LAND USE IN NAN’AO RIVER BASIN 73\nCHAPTER 6- BEYOND EXTRACTIVE GOVERNANCE: THE EMERGENCE OF INDIGENOUS POLITICAL ONTOLOGIES 82\n6.1 INDIGENOUS POLITICAL ONTOLOGIES 82\n6.2 PUBLIC GOVERNANCE: TOWARDS NEW POLITICAL THINKING 88\n6.2.1 Contemporary Group-specific Entitlement Accounts in Political Theory 89\n6.2.2 Self-determination and Sovereignty 91\n6.2.3 In Summary 93\nCHAPTER 7- CONCLUSION 94\nReferences 96\nAPPENDICES 102 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 14275108 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1049260041 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 泰雅族人 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政治治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 礦業活動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政治本體論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 衝突 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Atayal people | en_US |
| dc.subject | Governance | en_US |
| dc.subject | Extractive activity | en_US |
| dc.subject | Political ontology | en_US |
| dc.subject | Conflict | en_US |
| dc.title | 南澳溪流域的礦場治理政治：泰雅族人政治與環境的掙扎 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Politics of Extractive Governance in Nan’ao River Basin : The Atayal People and Their Political-environmental Struggles | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | Abdala, Fabio. “Sustainable Juruti Model: Pluralist Governance, Mining, and Local Development in the Amazon Region.” Governance Ecosystems: CSR in the Latin American Mining Sector, Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, pp. 233–244.\nAcuña, Roger Merino. “The Politics of Extractive Governance: Indigenous Peoples and Socio-environmental Conflicts.” The Extractive Industries and Society 2.1 (2015): 85-92. Web.\nAltman , Jon. “Indigenous Rights, Mining Corporations, and the Australian State.” The Politics of Resource Extraction: Indigenous Peoples, Multinational Corporations and the State, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, pp. 46-74.\nArksey, Hilary, and Peter T. Knight. “Interviewing for Social Scientists an Introductory Resource with Examples.” SAGE, 1999.\nBellwood, Peter. “The Austronesian Dispersal and the Origin of Languages.” Scientific American 265.1, 1991. Web.\nBodley, John H. Victims of Progress. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1975. Print.\nBoon, Jan. “The Role of Governments in CSR.” Governance Ecosystems: CSR in the Latin American Mining Sector, Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, 64-83. Print.\nBrown, Melissa J. Is Taiwan Chinese? The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities. Berkeley: U of California, 2008. Print.\nBrown, Michael De La. “Sovereignty`s Betrayal.” Indigenous Experience Today. Oxford: Berg, 2007. 171-96. Print.\nCameron, Robert. “Community and Government Effects on Mining CSR in Bolivia: the Case of Apex and Empress Huanuni.” Governance Ecosystems: CSR in the Latin American Mining Sector, Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, pp. 170–186.\nChen, Wen-Xiang (陳文祥). “Nanhu jishi- Yilan dazhuoshuixiliuyu tanchazuji” (南湖記事-宜蘭大濁水溪流域探查足跡). YuShan, 1999. Print. \nChartrand, Paul. “Aboriginal Peoples in Canada: Aspirations for Distributive Justice as Distinct People’s in P. Havemann (ed.).” Indigenous People’s Rights: In Australia, Canada and New Zealand. Aukland: Oxford University Press: pp. 88-107. 1999. Print. \nChi, Chun-Chieh. “Indigenous Movements and Multicultural Taiwan.” Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Taiwan. New York, NY: Routledge, 2016. 268-79. Print.\nClifford, James. The Predicament of Culture Twentieth-century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1988. Print.\nCoumans, Catherine. “Whose Development? Mining, Local Resistance, and Development Agendas.” Governance Ecosystems: CSR in the Latin American Mining Sector. Place of Publication Not Identified: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 114-32. Print.\nCouncil of Agriculture. “Senlin Fa” (森林法, The Forestry Act). Xingzhengyuan Nongye weiyuanhui- Yinyi Fagui Neirong (行政院農業委員會—英譯法規內容, Council of Agriculture- English Version), 2015. Web. 11 Jan. 2018.\nCouncil of Agriculture. “Baoanlin Jingying Zhunze” (保安林經營準則, Regulations for Conservation Forest Managements.” (森林法, The Forestry Act). Xingzhengyuan Nongye weiyuanhui- Yinyi Fagui Neirong (行政院農業委員會—英譯法規內容, Council of Agriculture- English Version), 2013. Web. 11 Jan. 2018.\nCrovetto, Patricia Urteaga. “The Broker State and the ‘Inevitability’ of Progress: The Camisea Project and Indigenous Peoples in Peru.” The Politics of Resource Extraction: Indigenous Peoples, Multinational Corporations and the State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. 103-28. Print.\nDavis, Megan. “Identity, Power, and Rights: The State, International Institutions, and Indigenous Peoples in Canada.” The Politics of Resource Extraction: Indigenous Peoples, Multinational Corporations and the State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 230-52. Print.\nDodds, Susan. “On the Plurality of Interests: Aboriginal Self-government and Land Rights.” Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. By John Bern. London: Cambridge UP, 2000. 163-79. Print.\nDurand, Anahi. “No Man`s Lands: Extractive Activity, Territory, and Social Unrest in Peruvian Amazon: The Cenepa River.” Commercial Pressure on Land, 2011. Print.\nGood Practice Guide Indigenous Peoples and Mining (2015): n. pag. International Council and Mining (ICMM), 2015. Web. 1 Dec. 2017.\nHarvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Brantford, Ontario: W. Ross MacDonald School Resource Services Library, 2014. Print.\nHeitay, Bayang (黑帶巴彥). “Taiya Rende Shenghuo Xingtai Tanyuan: Yige Taiyaren de Xianshen Shuofa” (泰雅人的生活型態探源—一個泰雅人的現身說法, A Probe into the Life Style of Atayal—the Personal Example of an Atayal). Hsinchuxian wenhuaju (新竹縣文化局, Cultural Affairs Bureau, Hsinchu County), n.d, 2002. Print.\nInternational, EarthRights, Racimos De Ungurahui, and Amazon Watch. "A LEGACY OF STRUGGLE." The Black Scholar 35.1, 2005: THE POPULAR STRUGGLE (2005): 37. Apr. 2007. Web.\nIsak, Afo (以撒克．阿復). “Ameizu de Zhuquan—Zhuquan Yundong yu Ameizu shehui gaizao Gongcheng” (阿美族的主權--主權運動與阿美族社會改造工程, Amis Sovereignty: The Social Movement and the Social Reengineering ). Taiwan Yuanzhuminzu Yanjiu Xuebao (台灣原住民研究學報, Journal of the Taiwan Indigenous Studies Association ) 3, no. 1: 37-65, 2013. Print. \nKirsch, Stuart. “Lost Worlds: Environment Disaster, “Culture Loss” and the Law.” Current Anthropology, 2001. Print.\nKuan, Da-Wei (官大偉). “Shenme chuantong? Sheide lingyu? Cong taiyazu maliguangliouyu de chuantong lingyu jingyan tankongjian zhishi de zhuanyi” (什麼傳統？誰的領域？從泰雅族馬里光流域的傳統領域經驗談空間知識的轉譯, What Tradition? Whose Territory? A Critical Review to the Indigenous Traditional Territory Survey and the Translation of Spatial Knowledge in Marqwang Case, Taiwan). Kaogu renlei xuekan (考古人類學刊, Journal of Archaeology and Anthropology) no. 69: 109~42, 2008. Print. \nKuan, Da-Wei (官大偉). “Yuanzhuminzu tudiquam de tiaozhan: cong yige dangdai baoliudi jiaoyi tanqi”(原住民族土地權的挑戰：從一個當代保留地交易的區域研究談起, Challenges for the Realization of Indigenous Land Rights in Contemporary Taiwan: A Regional Study of Indigenous Reserved Land Trade between Indigenous and Non-indigenous People). Kaogu renlei xuekan (考古人類學刊, Journal of Archaeology and Anthropology) no. 80: 7~52, 2014. Print. \nKuan, Da-Wei. “Transitional Justice and Indigenous Land Rights: The Experience of Indigenous Peoples’ Struggle in Taiwan.” Bilateral Conference (Taiwan and Austria) for Justice and Injustice Problems in Transitional Societies (n.d.): n. pag. 2014.Print.\nKuan, Da-Wei. “Multiculturalism and Indigenous Peoples a Critical Review of the Experience in Taiwan.” Multiculturalism in East Asia a Transnational Exploration of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. London: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2016. 203-20. Print.\nKymlicka, Will. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford U, 1995. Print.\nLefebvre, Henri. “The Production of Space.” Malden: Blackwell, 1991. Print.\nLindsay, Nicole Marie. “Systemic Causes, Systemic Solutions.” Governance Ecosystems: CSR in the Latin American Mining Sector. By Julia Sagebien. Place of Publication Not Identified: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 12-30. Print.\nLi Yi-Yuan (李亦園). “Nan’ao de Taiyaren shangxia”(南澳的泰雅人, Nanáo’s Atayal People, Volume One and Two), 1964. Print. \nMaaka, Roger, and Augie Fleras. “Engaging with Indigeneity: Tino Rangatiratanga in Aotearoa.” Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000. 89-109. Print.\nMabuchi, Tōichi (馬淵東一), and Nanjun Yang (楊南郡). “Taiwan Yuanzhuminzu Yidong yu Fenbu” (台灣原住民族移動與分佈, the Migration and Distribution of Indigenous People in Taiwan) Xinbeishi Yuanzhuminzu xingzhengju (新北市政府原住民族行政局, Indigenous Peoples Department of New Taipei City Government), Taipeishi Nantian, 2014. Print. \nMason, Michael. Environmental Democracy. New York: St. Martin`s, 1999. Print.\nMerlan, Frencesca. “Indigeneity as Relational Identity: The Construction of Australian Land Rights.” Indigenous Experience Today. Oxford: Berg, 2007. 100-25. Print.\nMikesell, Raymond F. Foreign Investment in Copper Mining: Case Studies of Mines in Peru and Papua New Guinea. Baltimore: Published for Resources for the Future, by the Johns Hopkins UP, 1975. Print.\nMinistry of Economic Affairs. “Kuanyefa” (礦業法, Mining Act). 2016. Web. 11 Jan. 2018.\nMitchell, Ronald B. International Politics and the Environment. London: SAGE, 2010. Print. \nMoody-Adams, Michele M. Fieldwork in Familiar Places: Morality, Culture, and Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1997. Print.\nMowna, Masaw (莫那馬紹).“Taiyazu de Shehuizuzhi” (泰雅族的社會組織, The Social Organization of Atayal) Siliciji Yixue ji Renwen Shehui Xueyuan, 1998. Print. \nOrtiga, Roldán Roque. Models for Recognizing Indigenous Land Rights in Latin American. Washington D. C.: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. N.p., 2004. Web. 11 Jan. 2018.\nPeng, Rui-jin (彭瑞金). “Suao Zhenzhi” (蘇澳鎮志, The Annnals of Suao Twonship). Yilanxian Suaozhen Gongsuo (宜蘭縣蘇澳鎮公所, Yilan County Suao Twonship), 2013. Print. \nRobins, Nicholas A. Mercury, Mining, and Empire: The Human and Ecological Cost of Colonial Silver Mining in the Andes. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2011. Print.\nRovillos, Raymundo D., and Victoria Tauli Corpuz. “Development, Power, and Identity Politics in the Philippines.” The Politics of Resource Extraction: Indigenous Peoples, Multinational Corporations and the State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 129-52. Print.\nSagebien, Julia, and Nicole Marie Lindsay. Governance Ecosystems: CSR in the Latin American Mining Sector. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. Print.\nSales, Daniel. “Identities in Conflict: The Aboriginal Question and the Politics of Recognition in Quebec.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 18.2 (1995): 277-314. Web. 10 May 2017.\nSawyer, Suzana, and Edmund Terence, Gomez. The Politics of Resource Extraction: Indigenous Peoples, Multinational Corporations, and the State. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. Print.\nShih, Cheng-Feng (施正鋒), Wu, Pei-Ing (吳珮瑛). “Yuanzhuminzu de huanjing quan” (原住民族的環境權, Indigenous People’s Environmental Rights). Taiwan Yuanzhumin yanjiu luncong (台灣原住民研究論叢) first issue: 1-20, 2007. Print. \nShih, Cheng-Feng (施正鋒), Wu, Pei-Ing (吳珮瑛). “Yuanzhuminzu yu ziran ziyuan de gongguan” (原住民族與自然資源的共管, Indigenous Peoples and Natural Resources Co-management). Taiwan Yuanzhuminzu yanjiu jikan (台灣原住民族研究季刊 Taiwan Journal of Indigenous Studies) 1 no. 1 (Spring): 1-38, 2008. Print. \nShih, Cheng-Feng (施正鋒). “Jianada Kuibeike Sheng James Bay Cree Yuan zhymin de zizhi” (加拿大魁北克省James Bay Cree原住民族的自治, James Bay Cree Self-government in Quebec, Canada). Taiwan Yuan zhuminzu yanjiu Xuebao (台灣原住民族研究學報, Journal of the Taiwan Indigenous Studies Association) 4, no. 2 (Summer): 1-26, 2014. Print. \nSimon, Scott. “Scarred Landscapes and Tattooed Faces: Poverty, Identity and Land Conflict in a Taiwanese Indigenous Community.” Indigenous Peoples and Poverty: An International Perspective. London: Zed Books. N.p., 2005. Web. 04 Jan. 2018.\nSimon, Scott. “Making Natives: Japan and the Creation of Indigenous Formosa.” Japanese Taiwan : Colonial Rule and Its Contested Legacy (2006): n. pag. Web. 13 Sept. 2017. \nSimon, Scott. “Remembrance as Resistance: Social Memory and Social Movement on Indigenous Formosa.” 2006, 1-17. Web. 04 Jan. 2018.\nSimon, Scott. "Negotiating Power: Elections and the Constitution of Indigenous Taiwan." American Ethnologist. N.p., 2010. Web. 04 Jan. 2018.\nSimon, Scott. "Entrepreneurship and Indigenous Life-Worlds: Experiences from Taiwan." Www.reseaudialog.ca. Revue Internationale Sur I`Autochitonie, 2012. Web. 11 Aug. 2017.\nSimon, Scott, and Awi Mona. “Indigenous Rights and Wildlife Conservation: The Vernacularization of International Law on Taiwan.” Taiwan Rencyuan Syuekan (台灣人權學刊, Taiwan Human Right Journal) 3, no. 1 (June 2015): 3-31. Print. \nSmith, Linda Tuhiwai. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed, 1999. Print.\nTakekoshi, Yosaburo, Shimpei Goto, and George Barithwaite. Japanese Rule in Formosa. London: Longmans and Green, 1907. Print.\nTully, James. “Aboriginal Property and Western Theory: Recovering a Middle Ground | Social Philosophy and Policy.” Cambridge Core. Cambridge University Press, 01 June 1994. Web. 07 Jan. 2018.\nTully, James. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge U, 1995. Print.\nTully, James. “The Struggles of Indigenous Peoples for and of Freedom.” Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000. 36-59. Print.\nWang, Mei-Hsia. “The Reinvention of Ethnicity and Culture: A Comparative Study on the Atayal and the Truku in Taiwan.” Journal of Archaeology and Anthropology‧68:1-44‧2008. \nWei, Hwei-Lin (衛惠林), 何聯奎 (He, Lain-Kui).“ Taiwan Fengtu Zhi” (台灣風土志, The local Annals of Taiwan). Taiwan Zhonghua Shuju (台灣中華書局, Taiwan Chinese Bookstore), 2017. Print. \nWiebe, Sarah Marie. “Decolonizing Engagement? Creating a Sense of Community through Collaborative Filmmaking.” Studies in Social Justice 9.2 (2016): 244. Web. 13 June 2017.\nYap, Ko-hua. “Divide and Rule: Social Networks and Collective Relocations of Bunun and Pan-Atayal Tribes, 1931-1945.” Taiwan Historical Research 23.4 (2016): 123-72. Print.\nYoung, Iris Marion. “Hybrid Democracy: Iroquois Federalism and the Postcolonial Project.” Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. London: Cambridge UP, 2000. 237-53. Print. | zh_TW |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004101.pdf | 13.94 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.