Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115774
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor陳敦源zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChen, Don-Yunen_US
dc.contributor.author嚴蔓舸zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYen, Man-Koen_US
dc.creator嚴蔓舸zh_TW
dc.creatorYen, Man-Koen_US
dc.date2017en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-02T04:05:50Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-02T04:05:50Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-02T04:05:50Z-
dc.identifierG0104266006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115774-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程(IMES)zh_TW
dc.description104266006zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the effectiveness of the new regulations regarding CSR report on stock returns in Taiwan. The sample of corporations is divided into five groups depending on “compulsory or noncompulsory” and “voluntary or non-voluntary before the rules.” In the empirical study, “the enforcement date of the regulations (Part 1)” and “the filing date of CSR report (Part 2)” are two basis dates; we observe the difference of 180 transaction days before and after the basis date in both parts. The results are as follows. 1. With controlled relevant variables, the whole market increased 26.5% on stock return after the release of the rules. 2. Whether the new regulations are released or not and with controlled relevant variables, the compulsory firms (which are with higher customer awareness) have better stock performance than others; while the firms which are noncompulsory but volunteered to generate a CSR report did not show significant difference on stock performance; the firms that are noncompulsory and do not submit CSR report, however, perform significantly worse than others. 3. After the enforcement of the new CSR regulations, with controlled relevant variables, the companies which are compulsory but voluntary to file CSR report before the rules performs worse than before; the companies that are noncompulsory and do not file CSR report perform significantly better than before; while the new rules do not have significant influence on the other corporations. 4. Companies which have issued CSR report increase 11.11% on stock return after the issuance of CSR report of each company. 5. Companies that are compulsory and voluntary to submit CSR report before the rules shows better stock performance; while the issuance of CSR report does not make other corporations perform better.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAbstract I\r\nA Table of Contents II\r\nA Table of Contents–Tables III\r\nA Table of Contents–Figures IV\r\nI. Introduction 1\r\nII. Literature Review and Hypotheses Development 4\r\nIII. Data and Methodology 17\r\n1. Data Description 17\r\n1.1 Sample Selection 17\r\n1.2 Sample Period Selection 17\r\n1.3 Population Classification 18\r\n2. Measurement of Variables 21\r\n3. Empirical Model Setting 22\r\nIV. Empirical Results 24\r\n1. Part 1—the enforcement date of new CSR regulations 24\r\n2. Part 2—the filing date of CSR report of each company 34\r\nV. Conclusion 45\r\nReferences 49\r\nAppendix 52zh_TW
dc.format.extent903765 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104266006en_US
dc.subject企業社會責任報告書zh_TW
dc.subject法規zh_TW
dc.subject接露zh_TW
dc.subject股價報酬zh_TW
dc.subject自願zh_TW
dc.subjectCSR reporten_US
dc.subjectRegulationsen_US
dc.subjectDisclosureen_US
dc.subjectStock returnen_US
dc.subjectVoluntaryen_US
dc.titleCSR法規對企業股價表現之影響 : 以台灣股市為例zh_TW
dc.titleDoes CSR regulation affect company`s stock performance? Evidence from Taiwanen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.referenceAtiase, R. W. (1985). Predisclosure information, firm capitalization, and security price behavior around earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 21-36.\r\nBarnett, M. L. & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1304-1320.\r\nDemirguz-Kunt, A. & Maksimovic, V. (1998). Law, finance, and firm growth. Journal of Finance, 53, 2107-2139.\r\nDhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Accounting Review, 87, 723-759.\r\nEl Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 2388-2406.\r\nFama, Eugene F. (1969). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25, 383-417.\r\nFrancis, J. R., Khurana, I. K., & Pereira, R. (2005). Disclosure incentives and effects on cost of capital around the world. The Accounting Review, 80, 1125-1162.\r\nFreeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.\r\nGlosten, L. R. & Harris, L. E. (1988). Estimating the components of bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics, 21, 123-142.\r\nGodfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J.M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 425-445.\r\nGrossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1980). Disclosure laws and takeover bids. Journal of Finance, 35, 323-334.\r\nHermalin, B. E. and Weisbach, M. S. (2012). Information disclosure and corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 67, 195-233.\r\nHillman, A. J. & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What`s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125-139.\r\nHope, O. -K. (2003). Disclosure practices, enforcement of accounting standards, and analysts` forecast accuracy: an international study. Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 235-272.\r\nHorton, J., Serafeim, G., & Serafeim, I. (2010). Does mandatory IFRS adoption improve the information environment? Working Paper 11-029. Harvard Business School.\r\nHuang, C. Y., Wang, K. Y., & Chang, F. G. (2013). The relationship between CSR announcements and abnormal stock returns. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 14, 175-204.\r\nHull, C. E. & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: the interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 781-789.\r\nJizi, M., Nehme, R., & Salama, A. (2016). Do social responsibility disclosures show improvements on stock price? Journal of Developing Areas, 50, 77-95.\r\nKagan, R. A. & Thornton, D. (2003). Explaining corporate environmental performance: How does regulation matter? Law and Society Review, 37, 51–90.\r\nKhanna, M., Quimio, W. R. H., & Bojilova, D. (1998). Toxics release information: a policy tool for environmental protection. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36, 243-266.\r\nKim, Y., Li, H. & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking and Finance 43, 1-13.\r\nKyle, Albert S. (1985). Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53, 1315-1335.\r\nLa Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. (2006). What Works in Securities Laws? Journal of Finance, 61, 1-32.\r\nLa Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silances, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance, 57, 1147-1170.\r\nLa Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52, 1131-1150.\r\nLa Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113-1155.\r\nLa Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. Journal of Finance, 55, 1-33.\r\nLee, D. D. & Faff, R. W. (2009). Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: a global perspective. Financial Review, 44, 213-237.\r\nLundholm, R. & Myers, L. (2002). Bringing the Future Forward: The effect of disclosure on the returns-earnings relation. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 809-839.\r\nLuo, X. & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The debate over doing good: corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing, 73, 198-213.\r\nMackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32, 817-835.\r\nMartin, R. L. (2002). The virtue matrix: calculating the return on corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review 80(3), 68-75.\r\nMclean, R. D., Zhang, T., & Zhao, M. (2012). Why does law matter? Investor protection and its effect on investment, finance, and growth. Journal of Finance, 67, 313-350\r\nMishra, S. & Modi, S. B. (2012). Positive and negative corporate social responsibility, financial leverage, and idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 431-448.\r\nRajgopal, S. & Venkatachalam, M. (2011). Financial reporting quality and idiosyncratic return volatility. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51, 1-20.\r\nServaes, H. & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: the role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59, 1045-1061.\r\nShleifer, A. & Wolfenzon, D. (2002). Investor protection and equity markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 66, 3-27.\r\nSimpson, W. & Kohers, T. (2002). The link between social and financial performance: evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 97-109.\r\nWaddock, S. A. & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303-319.\r\nWang, M. Z., Chuang, J. J., & Xu, P. J. (2016). The impact of transparency alteration of voluntary information disclosure on the firm’s equity valuation-evidence from Taiwan. Chaoyang Business and Management Review, 15, 29-41.zh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
600601a.pdf882.85 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.