Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/11587
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creator趙國材zh_TW
dc.date2005-12en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-12-01T06:58:11Z-
dc.date.available2008-12-01T06:58:11Z-
dc.date.issued2008-12-01T06:58:11Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/11587-
dc.description.abstract本文從國際法觀點分析「美國對賓拉登」(United States v. Bin Laden)案,藉以闡明國家引渡法與國際法間產生之互動關係,指出在當代國際法中,引渡法、人權法及廢除死刑發展之新趨勢。當現行國際法尚未完全廢除死刑制度之際,國際人權法應優於國家引渡法。美國理應依照國際人權法廢除死刑之逐漸發展修訂其刑法,否則除非美國法庭保證不處以極刑,廢除死刑之國家因恐「喀爾費斯比主義」(the Ker-Frisbie Doctrine)將與其本國法相抵觸,而拒絕引渡死刑犯至美國。-
dc.formatapplication/en_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.languageen-USen_US
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.relation臺灣海洋法學報, 4(2), 61-99en_US
dc.titleExtradition & the Death Penalty Dilemma: Legal Analysis of the Interaction of Extradition Laws and Contemporary International Law in United States v. Bin Ladenen_US
dc.typearticleen
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.