Mental Elements of Patent Infringement Compensation: Empirical Survey of Taiwan Judicial Decisions and Its Comparative Implications

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116393

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor	法學院	zh_Tw
dc.creator	王立達	zh_TW
dc.creator	Wang, Richard Li-dar	en_US
dc.creator	Hong, Shao-ting	en_US
dc.date	2016-06	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2018-03-21T09:31:34Z	-
dc.date.available	2018-03-21T09:31:34Z	-
dc.date.issued	2018-03-21T09:31:34Z	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116393	-
dc.description.abstract	During 2000 to 2007, Taiwan courts gradually settled on negligence liability for damages from patent infringement, and required plaintiffs to bear the burden of proof. The Intellectual Property Court since 2008 ruled defendants with low duty of care of no fault and unliable for damages. This experience may be of help for strict-liability countries that suffer from abusive patent assertions.	en_US
dc.format.extent	97 bytes	-
dc.format.mimetype	text/html	-
dc.relation	Journal of The Intellectual Property: Intellectual Property Forum, No.105, pp.60-64
dc.subject	Patent Infringement; Negligence; Intent; Willfulness; Duty of Care	en_US
dc.title	Mental Elements of Patent Infringement Compensation: Empirical Survey of Taiwan Judicial Decisions and Its Comparative Implications	zh_TW
dc.type	article
item.grantfulltext	restricted	-
item.cerifentitytype	Publications	-
item.fulltext	With Fulltext	-
item.openairetype	article	-
item.openairecristype	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf	-
Appears in Collections:	期刊論文

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		97 B	HTML2	View/Open

Check